>movie made in 2019 with lots of diversity
>Yea Forums hates it
>movie made in 1995 with lots of diversity
>Yea Forums absolutely adores it
???
>movie made in 2019 with lots of diversity
>Yea Forums hates it
>movie made in 1995 with lots of diversity
>Yea Forums absolutely adores it
???
I make it an event to watch this every year.
I don't bitch about diversity but yeah Hackers great movie even if it quickly outdated itself tech wise. The atmosphere, the music, all just great.
It almost like Yea Forums is all pre-teens full of shit or something
Maybe your ideological opponents aren't all some strawman you've invented?
I write "Hack the Planet" in bar bathrooms.
Except people literally get furious every time a major blockbuster film has a black or female main character and call it white genocide. No one's straw manning you, you really are just that fucking insufferable.
>you really are just that fucking insufferable.
This.
Its has nothing to do with diversity and everything to do with Angelina's fun bags, same goes for Gia (1998)
There were only one or two black people what are you even talking about ignoranus
It's not outdated at all. It's transcended time.
Oh yes I'm sure that's true and not just people like you being silly on the internet, tricking other retards like you to get upset.
Well I'm reffering to them getting excited about shit like a 28.8 bps modem, when we have places with gigabit internet.
Yes, I'm sure the entirety of /pol/ is just trolling, surely no one actually believes diversity in film is a Jewish plot to destroy the white race
You are fucking delusional.
It's also white male wish fulfillment, he's a magic super genius hacker who immediately gets a cool funny group of friends and then scores the hot cyberpunk girl in the end
Oh and ontop of that just dialup speaking the 56k modems were created in 96.
Kek how upset are you by things you don't understand?
Life is more complex than brainlets like you can understand.
You don't get excited by a million psychadelic colours and a 28.8 bps modem AND a killer refresh rate with a PCI bus?
That shit is bombastic fantastic.
>movie comes out in 2019
>several months of virtue signalling about the movie's progressive, feminist stance and how it spits in the face of the rise of literal nazis and incels
>is considered divisive, needlessly aggressive and defended to hell and back while having little actual artistic merit
>diversity hires can't act for shit
>movie comes out in the 90s
>has a diverse cast hired because people think they're cool or the actors are actual competent
Also, no one cared that Blade was a black guy.
He was just a cool vampire hunter.
Snipes was also awesome in Demolition man.
He was great in New Jack City as well
Now hes a muslim who chops off people heads. Bravo Disney
Spawn was a different case in that, likewise, it didn't matter the lead was black; it mattered that the movie sucked hamster balls.
Blade and Blade 2 were kino though.
Does Steel count too ?
Leguizamo as Violater made it watchable
Snipes was also a highly charismatic actor with screen presence, one of the now sadly extinct 'movie stars'. John Boyega, Idris Elba and whatever other forced black actor they're using now are not, and never will be, movie stars.
NO
NO STEEL DOES NOT COUNT
YOU GO TO HELL
YOU GO TO HELL AND YOU DIE
Boyega I agree, but Idris Elba is absolutely kino, what are you on about?
I'm literally having like 20 people over tomorrow to watch this. This and Street Fighter
B A S E D
The diversity in Hackers doesn't insist upon itself. It's organic. Like when they knock on the nigs door and he acts all gangsta for 5 secs but then reveals his tru nature.
diversity of the 2010s insists upon itself
No one gave a shit about diversity in 1995, which is why it wasn't virtue signalling bullshit.
You should throw Johnny Mnemonic in the mix
1995 boomer diversity is not 2019 wokeshit diversity. one is strictly passive and profit-motivated which is why it still leaves room for both fallibility and coolness. the other is about the convergence of all art toward a scatological diaristic style in which transcendent beauty is impossible.
I've found him to be very very one dimensional and just doesn't have the presence of older Hollywood actors.
Most of Yea Forums weren't in their mid twenties in 1995
Zoomer retard.
>these darn SJWs started around the same time I began paying attention to it
When did Minor Threat release 'Guilty of Being White'?
How did Kaczysnki have such an apt analysis of leftism and concepts you think are brand new in his notes published 1995?
What was the period of time for the escapades of the author of Rules for Radicals?
Well I mean the movie sucked balls too
In 1995 only extreme cases of diversity were perceived as forced, nowadays as a result of the current social climate, any piece of media that includes a woman, a black or a gay in a starring role is immediately seen as forced pandering inclusion regardless of whether it is or not.
A lot of the time it is, sure, but that has been going on for decades.
Now trannies though, 100% of tranny roles are forced.
The SJWs of today were silent as churchmice in 1995. You'd know tht if you weren't, you know, not even born until 2008.
They were never silent. You just never paid attention and believe the grass used to be greener.
>This
Jolie in this made my dick diamonds
There's a difference between an interesting character who happens to be black and a character who was made black just to replace the writing process with virtue signalling. It offends me because its lazy, not because of the political agenda that may or may not be involved. Hack the planet.
Elba is a good character actor but he sucks as a superhero. He's our generation's Ernie Hudson.
Now, I'll go to watch anything Hudson is in, because the man is awesome. But Hudson isn't a superhero.
Elba (rather, his agent) should understand this, and he (/she) should quit proposing Elba for roles like fucking Roland in Dark Tower movies. That's not him.
>just people like you being silly on the internet
Sometimes I wish this was true, but it's not.
I'm sure posts squealing about the existence of a single black in a movie being white genocide is honest.
Are you attracted to leftism because you're an autist and you feel as if they're more accepting of worthless retards?
a puerto rican. and Joey looks like lanita Hot a trans.
Because it's not forced, whereas in the current year and social media if you don't have muh brown people then you're some kind of fucking white supremacist.
yep im thinking based
not to mention back then leftist politics were still somewhat anti-establishment
these days it comes across as annoying because the left is the establishment, so them acting self righteous is no longer punching up, but punching down
Absolutely based.
Kino as fuck, senpai.
I've never seen that, but I'm assuming that each character is equal. Whereas now the woman is always the most powerful, and the men are weak bigots.
I've not heard a single soul say a film is bad because it has no niggos, which only makes it even more pointless.
That's because it was made in a time before we were being force fed a daily diet of pure FUCK WYPIPO and WAHMEN STRONG.