Just saw it on Netflix for the first time and loved it. It was amazing. Absolute Sci-fi masterpiece.
>B-BUT IT'S TOO LONG AND NOTHING HAPPENS!
2 hours 40 minutes wasn't enough. I could have happily watched 4 hours of this. Luv is best girl. Joi is literally soulless.
It was the movie of a decade and maybe even a century
It's on Netflix? I know what I'm going tonight, haven't seen it yet
wow what a total patrician and such a discerning viewer!!
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.
Amen desu.
Not only was it possibly the best science fiction movie, it certainly is the best sequel ever made.
It took all the interesting things from the first movie (replicant - human jealousy / identity crisis), and then took them in a totally interesting new direction.
No it isn't, retard. Stop repeating whatever you read.
It's dragged down by its forced ties to the mediocre original.
You're dragged down by your immense faggotry, cunt.
How new are you? That has been a saying here for YEARS.
I saw it yesterday and it was total shit. It was so slow because they had to spend minutes showing K walking around and "muh beautiful kinotography".
Plot was shit too. So basically he thought he was special but then he found out he actually wasn't and then died. Woah so based. Also Leto trying to play the ebin god complex man talking about angels was just cringey. Literally only reddit likes that
>Trips confirm other user's faggotry.
Noice
It's decent bait because it's convincing. 8/10 enjoy your (You)s.
No really I thought it was boring. It's brainlet tier too. Literally only reddit enjoys that movie.
>OHMYGOSH LIKE IF YOU'RE NOT SPECIAL YOU CAN JUST KEK YOURSELF AND DIE FOR SOME OLD BOOMER AND A ROASTIE
>(You)ing your own shitpost
whew lad
Fuck you dumb faggot CUNTS. This is kino of the absolute highest quality.
Shit nigga BR2049 was a mere appetizer at La restaurante du Villeneuve. Prepare for him to reach inside your anus and tickle you pink in 2020.
BLADERUNNER 2049!!!? OF COURSE I FRICKEN LOVE IT I LOVE BRIGHT CONTRASTING COLOURS!!!
I liked the first one more
Shut up, retard. Stop replying to me.
You first
You're weak and full of cheap attempts at baiting. It's pathetic man. At least get creative with your craft.
>DUDE WALLACE IS SO DEEP MAN. HE KILLS HIS OWN ANGEL (GET IT BECAUSE IT'S LIKE CHRISTIANITY EVEN THOUGH I HATE RELIGION) BECAUSE HE THINKS HE'S LIKE GOD DUDE SO DEEP. DUDE I FUCKING LOVE THE CINEMATOGRAPHY
>DUDE IT'S SO DEEP BECAUSE K THINKS HE'S SPECIAL BUT HE"S LIKE ACTUALLY NOT SO HE KEKS HIMSELF FOR SOME OLD BOOMER. BASED!
edit: thanks for the reddit gold kind stranger
the point is that you can only become special by your own actions as K does in the end, not by the nature of your creation you literal mental midget
I just thought it was a really recent and expensive Drive rehash. What makes it better than that film?
The absolute state of Yea Forums
Woah so the moral of the story is...be yourself and try your best
WOAH MINDBLOWING
BONE
CHILLING
You can edit on here?
>on Netflix
Don't do that.
With a crappy Netflix encode the ad giant JOI just looks like a whatever holo projection, while in 4K she looks like a literal moving mesh of lit up diodes.
Well if it wasn't in this state then you'd still be on Yea Forums or whatever board you crawled out of some time after 2013
No, no it's not. Read again.
I like it because hes just like me
if K just went with the "be yourself" meme he would only forever remain a corporate emotionless slave
you literally can't comprehend even the most simple narrative possible my dear soiphoneposting tranny friend
It insists upon itself
Read some C.S Lewis and Kierkegaard instead of watching some reddit movie
To add on this it recycles concepts from Her, Ex Machina, Snowpiercer etc... why take from such recent popular stuff?
>projection
Never been to Yea Forums, or /vg/, or /vr/, but you seem to know a lot about them, hmmmm.
Looked pretty good on my TV.
50" 4K HDR
Yeah yeah, I know it streaming in native 4k, but I sit like 5ft away from my TV. It looked incredible even in 1080p.
To be fair Yea Forums is the best board on this fucking site.
>Her
It's funny how BR2049 made a ten times more genuinely emotionally investing romantic story in just a side story of the film compared to Her where that's the entire film.
For most people the actual physical "love" part falls apart completely in Her, especially in any scene where the love part wants to be materialised (the prostitute sex scene, that sex scene where Joaquin just lays and talks to her) which come off as extremely cheesy and "quirky" which in result end up falling completely flat. Funny how there is the exact same concept of the threesome between an AI, a prostitute and a man in Her and literally no one ever talks about it because the execution of the scene is like any standard rom com flick, the AI part is completely secondary. Not to mention that in Her the prostitute is entirely meaningless in the act itself, while in BR2049 all it's a very character involving scene for all three characters, not just literally but in narrative terms also.
It's a physical manifestation of K's character development.
In short, Spike Jonze didn't know how to approach the concept of a man falling in love with a computer in a serious way so he had to make it extremely quirky to have an excuse for most scenes, while in BR2049 it's executed completely direct and tasteful with zero pretense at all.
Also the core script of BR2049 and the "concepts" with it were already made far before any of those flicks were even released.
The relationship between K and Joi is garbage. It's even worse when the film reveals to you just how artificial Joi really is. At the end of the scene depicted in your image you're taken through the cityscape to reveal an ad for Joi which says "Anything you want to see. Anything you want to hear". You're being outright TOLD the relationship between them is utter nonsense. Joi isn't real. She's a bunch of 1s and 0s, which she herself says.
She didn't love him because she didn't feel anything. It's said, multiple times throughout the film. The A.I isn't capable of it.
>In short, Spike Jonze didn't know how to approach the concept of a man falling in love with a computer in a serious way so he had to make it extremely quirky to have an excuse for most scenes
That was a smart way to handle it, yes. When K stares at the hologram he just comes across like a dumbass because he should know it's a fake hologram.
>She didn't love him because she didn't feel anything. It's said, multiple times throughout the film. The A.I isn't capable of it.
All factually wrong. She is programmed to do what the owner wants her to do, and K wants to be genuinely loved.
Joi was a physical extension of K's character development. What K yearned for, she expressed.
Yes at the start his Joi was a blank slate just like that giant ad, but through all their interactions and K's genuine "I'm special" beliefs (which he doesn't have anymore at the bridge scene) his Joi became special, unique and "real" to him specifically, seeing that entire scene as a mirror of Deckard meeting the fake Rachael, which is most evident by the completely black eyes of the giant Joi, where K could've easily had the same exact "I know what's real" line like Deckard did with the fake Rachael there.
K wanted her to become like a real girl that really loves him and she slowly did so (as she is programmed to do), so where is the difference once she becomes the thing he desires?
>The A.I isn't capable of it.
Or is it? The film isn't telling you anything, it's asking the question.
>it's a fake hologram.
What? What is then a real hologram?
Agree, still great though
Joi specifically says she's made of two digits (1s and 0s). She's an A.I.
>What is then a real hologram?
It's what's in your pants.
Yes, and?
Are you still in highschool? Take your time, think about it again and you might see what you missed, if you're lucky.
>She is programmed to do what the owner wants her to do, and K wants to be genuinely loved.
Wasn't this done in Ex Machina also? The main white knight beta character gets fucked over by a robot except it's written in a more convincing way.
Denis is rolling in his grave hearing people speculate about whether the AI was alive or not. BTFO waifus is the only original thing he brought to this film.
Are you fucking stupid? 1 and 0 is a binary language. Everything you look at on your COMPUTAH is in binary.
In what way does Joi "fuck over" K? The very last words as she dies in panic is claiming how she loves him, the polar opposite of what happens in Ex Machina.
I said for you to take your time, you obviously didn't. If you don't take your studies seriously you're in grave danger of failing this class and then you can kiss goodbye to getting into a "good" college.
>wojak
le troll xdxdxd kys
>Wasn't this done in Ex Machina also?
No. Ava was never programmed to love Caleb, Caleb was chosen precisely because Ava was his "type". You should stick to Chinese cartoons.
Get a 65 inch OLED and sit 9-10 feet away and enjoy 4k bluray the way it was meant to by enjoyed.
I have a large house but my TV room is a small room just big enough for 5 people.
keep coping brainlet
woman detected
Virgin zoomer who hopes to god that he is going to have sex before he's 30 and is scared of finding anything meaningful in this movie
She's an artificial intelligence. She's no different from what you're looking at right now. Broken down into binary form everything you're seeing here, from the words you're reading now, to the images in the catalog; is all just a series of two numbers.
Do you you understand this? Because you sound fucking stupid.
>She's an artificial intelligence. She's no different from what you're looking at right now. Broken down into binary form everything you're seeing here, from the words you're reading now, to the images in the catalog; is all just a series of two numbers.
Yes, and what is your point? Maybe I'm also just an AI bot writing this reply to you right now aswell, what then?
See me after class, Jenkins. I'm not wasting any more time on you.
I meant the part where he falls in love with the A.I. is more convincing
>more convincing
I disagree, I think it's exactly what you highlighted, white knighting. More to the point, what we're discussing is an AI genuinely feeling love, not a beta meatbag. Showing beta meatbags feeling love is easy to do, not so with an AI.
Read a book nigger. Your reddit film is not deep or particularly interesting. Also, as a film it's boring and not even fun to watch. I much rather sit down to some Bay kino like Transformers 3 or maybe watch an episode of Spartacus or maybe watch the new baywatch film
In what universe is it on Netflix?
Why are you fighting me on this? You know I'm right.
I am asking what is your point.
*In what country is it on Netflix?
just switch tabs to the capeshit thread already
Did anyone else think the voice overs reminding the audience of plot points were unnecessary? Its trying to be a smart and thougtful movie but it wont even stop holding the audiences hand. Just like Arrival too actually. But yeah it was a nice movie
>what we're discussing is an AI genuinely feeling love
Can you give me an example of 2049 showing this convincingly? I don't even think that kind of thing is realistically possible.
>just switch tabs to the capeshit thread already
Do you think you're an artificial intelligence or an organic one?
>I DON'T KNOW LOL
Yes you do. Now fuck off.
How isn't it possible? A mother is also programmed to love her child. It's not some magic untangible voodoo shit
The ending was amazing
The most basic of "what if you're actually living in a simulation" meme already ends your argument.
Because it's an A.I., it doesn't have a consciousness but it could probably fool you it does.
Yeah those two or three audio flashbacks were unnecessary, but luckily they are just about 45 seconds of a nearly 3 hour long film so it didn't hurt it that much.
seriously though it's the most redd.it movie i've watched and this board loves it haha
Where do you live?
And where is the difference once it manages to fool you? Why do you think Deckard doesn't give a fuck about is his dog actually "real" or not?
Are you?
Currently I'm living living in your head rent free.
The whole "K fucking a prostitute" thing. This is something suggested by Joi. If Joi was simply following a program to make K happy she would never follow this risky gambit, the outcome is too incalculable. The whole point of a program to make someone happy is to never fail at doing this, voluntarily rolling the dice with an unknown outcome is a no no. This was an act of love and need, as much her own as K's.
Is this wojack faggot the same as the faggot posting about atmospheric horror? You're a fucking loser with no real friends or a girlfriend to give you hugs and kisses.
No I mean what region does Netflix have BR2049?
>no real friends or a girlfriend to give you hugs and kisses.
Ha ha, imagine having no friends or a gf, haha. What a loser.
Sneed
It just appeared on UK.
ah thanks
Wojak pleb poster. You smell of shit.
>ATOMSPHERIC HORROR
>OMGOMGOMG I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE THE LIGHTHOUSE MOVIE! IT'S TOTES LOVECRAAAAAAAAAAAAAFT
>DIRECTED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE VVITCH WOAH BASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSED
Imagine not seeing this in theaters. Had chills the entire time from the great sound. Not slow burn but slow chill
Read a book
>Not slow burn but slow chill
read Pale Fire
>reading fiction
What the fuck, it's not on Netflix you liar
>I just really like the premise/conceit of the movie so I just handwave all of its blantant flaws and expose myself as someone who can’t form an opinion worth respecting!
Op is cringe
Unironically read these books and watch BR2049 again.
lol
Sucks to be you, amerishart
OH SAY CAN YOU SHART
IN THE MART EARLY DIABETES
>Ayn rand
HBO just took it down too.
Joi did literally nothing
Leto's character did literally nothing
The premise was nonsensical
>read anything by Ayn Rand
>blantant
pajeet pls
Cis Lewis and this movie preach the same themes. Self sacrifice. That's what jesus does.
>Cis Lewis
Was this intentional?
Yes
Just read Branden, then, if it's too difficult.
Ya it was great.
I still feel I missed out not seeing it in theaters but I'm was too much of a social anxiety neet to bother
>I still feel I missed out not seeing it in theaters
Wish I could sugar coat it for you but you missed out big time
Ex Machina was hyped way too much, that's a bs story anyways. With Joi, there's an ambiguity about if the A.I. loves K or not, you don't have that in Ex Machina.
kek notice how just because something is sci-fi netflix recommends you shit like nuwars and cloverfield
pretty much this
Netflix trap a cute.
>mfw i use utorrent, wear a newsboy cap and love werthers
>still in my 20's
2nd half of the movie is garbage
This is dead on and leaves incels r*dditors seething
Imagine defending this soulless rehashed garbage
t. pathetic discordtranny samefag
Both BR films are extremely good and if you think either one of them are bad you're a certified mental midget. Fact.
"No!"
>story comes first
Seriously nothing wrong with that. Doesn’t have to always be the case but there’s nothing wrong with that at all.
>descriptive vs dreams
Dreaming is kind of better, but I don’t think there the change in style of 2049 is a fault.
>derivative and familiar
No. Not enough to be a glaring problem and certainly nothing like most of the shit you see in theaters today.
>kitsch; often tawdry
Not at all. Posturing hard here.
>familiar imagery/boring
Sounds like the complaint of a retarded contrarian child while also being untrue. Anything that looked like the previous Blade Runner, and there were a few things of course, come as an homage.
>narrative dependent
Holy shit stop repeating yourself to make a longer list you retard, this shit doesn’t fly outside of high school and undergrad which is like high school 2.0
>safety/clarity/forced
Moreso than the original Blade Runner. I can understand that. Still nothing was done in an overtly bad way regarding these things in 2049.
>left/right brain
Both right brain
>REPETITIVE SHIT TO FILL SPACE MORON
>REPETIVE SHIT
>Looks like work
No. Not in the slightest.
>Done for money
Holy shit no dude holy fuck, you think the average person even gives a shit about something as commonly regarded as blade runner, wrong. Audiences are literally less receptive than ever to anything like this. The people who made 2049 wanted to.
>understood vs challenging and memorable
Both are very memorable, but yes the original Blade Runner is a little more challenging
>detail
Your whole fucking argument and even the inclusion of it is retarded
>technical argument
Fucking retarded. They really are hardly different here.