Unpopular positive opinion challenge: Name a movie that... (1) you genuinely like (not "so bad it's good") (2) came out in your adult life post-2000, and (3) is rated below 50% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Remember that you can also find the RT score listed on Google, Wikipedia, or whatever else you prefer if you refuse to use the RT site.
I don't know, honestly was surprised it was rated so low since I thought it was considered one of Scott/Denzels best movies together I did enjoy day after tomorrow but even when I was younger there was a lot of dumb stuff like the tornadoes forming together, but was still a pretty fun movie
Benjamin Perez
>The Mummy - 52% >Hidalgo - 46% >National Treasure - 46% why do critics hate adventure films so much
Aiden Clark
>National Treasure - 46%
What the fuck is wrong with critics. That's one of the most genuinely enjoyable adventure movies.
Carson Ward
the mummy and national treasure are fun but i remember thinking hidalgo was pretty mediocre. that mcconaughey flick sahara came out around that time too and it was bad. also i don't remember the flight of the phoenix remake being as bad as rt says. anyway yeah it seems like critics weren't having any of it.
Kevin Perry
>spectacular visuals Ironic that the thing they praise it for is the thing it failed at.
Joseph Barnes
Cat in the hat has some good moments
Chase Anderson
Good pick!
Jackson Cooper
I remember the infomercial bit being pretty funny
Brody Hughes
The latest Pirates of the Caribbean movie was fun
Nathaniel Rivera
Denzel is too masculine for soi reviewers
Asher Smith
>Man on Fire You are my nigga
Ryan Wright
>Critics Consensus >Man on Fire starts out well, but goes over the top in the violent second half.
Ah, it was that time when violence was bad and not race/gender issues.
Kayden White
>bright, +80%, >chatrapati, +80% hm I suppose I do like Die Another Day Not a lot, but when I've been n the bond for bondburger I've put it on. After the other 3 though.
Sahara is fun and would have been a success if not for its budget being unnecessarily enormous but either way it's boring to name movies that the audience still liked, what's more interesting is when you find a movie that both the critics AND the audience hated and you still love it.
Bright Godzilla: KotM Man of Steel Batman v Superman The Last Jedi
Aiden Price
Sneed Racer
Jaxon Cox
I have a few. >Has Fallen trilogy - 49% / 26% / 39% >Atlantis The Lost Empire - 49% >Bright - 26% >Pandorum - 28% >The Boondock Saints - 22% To be honest, most of my guilty pleasures are from before the 2000s.
>what's more interesting is when you find a movie that both the critics AND the audience hated and you still love it. OK, so ones with double green?
Prince of Persia - both rotten scores Sahara - same case Da Vinci Code/Inferno/Angels and Demons - cool adventure films set in closer area, not an exotic journey, just something closer and down to earth Clash/Wraith of Titans and Gods of Egypt - capeshit with ancient mythology Exodus gods and kings - more realistic take on story from the bible The Mummy - solid and unique adventure flick panned for "muh universe" - fuck off, marvel does the same in post-credit As Above So Below - best "Tomb Raider" movie we ever got Van Helsing - pre-MCU monster avengers
they are all solid adventure films, not "so bad so good" kind of thing. they have high production quality, acceptable special effects, spectacular stunts(plane stunt in the mummy is one of best plane crash scenes ever!) and really cool sets or locations - moving pyramid from gods of egypt or labyrinth in clash of titans are very cool
I'm surprised As Above, So Below made so much money because what the fuck does that title mean? And then all the poster has is an upside down Eiffel Tower.