Bob Iger should step down.
FUCK DISNEY
Should be called Bob niggerfaggot
Jews always put their tribe over ethics, it's why they shouldn't be allowed to consolidate power.
Paz's whole schtic is that she has amazing boobs. If you sell yourself as an amazing pair of tits, they are going to get fondled.
How nice are we talking?
Shes shown them in mexican movies. I remember googling it back when she was in that sandler movie. Im sure you can find them.
If itz good enough for a old man to love, it obviously is not worth it
>"Nobody knew Harvey Weinstein was a rapist"
Why do all the celebrities tell this lie? Years ago, Elijah Wood was on the verge of blowing the lid off of the whole thing but he pussied out and backpedalled. Do they threaten them?
shes absolutely fucking disgusting
Somehow every normie that knew of harvey was aware he was a creeper but yet all the famous celeb insiders just didnt know
>Why do all the celebrities tell this lie?
Why do you think you know better than all these people?
he did nothing wrong
literally who
Yeah, lick those boots, incel.
If the Amazon Original Series The Boys™ taught me anything it's that celebrities only care about their image.
>this is worth 60 million dollars
I hope this trends more than that Spiderman thing. MCucks needs a rude awakening.
I guess she Entered The Void
You guys realize how big this is since Bob Iger and Michael Eisner's now involved?
t.
not to defend disney jews but she's crazy and her claims are retarded. basically "Weinstein produced a film financed by Disney once so it's their fault I was raped a decade later"
>The new lawsuit, filed in state court in Los Angeles, seeks to establish that the Disney executives and Miramax can be held liable for Weinstein’s conduct in 2010, even though Weinstein left Miramax, which was then a Disney subsidiary, in 2005.
>De la Huerta appeared as a 14-year-old actor in “The Cider House Rules,” a 1999 Miramax film. The suit alleges that Weinstein developed an unhealthy fixation on her during the filming.
>“She experienced disturbing and sexual interest from him commencing at that time in 1999 and continuing through at least 2011,” the suit alleges.
>The suit alleges that Eisner and Iger “made a series of decisions that allowed a range of actions by Harvey Weinstein” that harmed Miramax employees.
>In a statement, a Disney spokesperson said that Weinstein operated independently when he ran Miramax.
>“The Weinsteins operated and managed their business with virtual autonomy,” the spokesperson said. “There is absolutely no legal basis for claims against the company and we will defend against them vigorously.”