Did she love him?

that only proves the limitations of her software

>love isnt real
it took me 3 months to get to this.
first I was
she loved him. thats why he flipped out.
then to
he realized she was artificial and his life was a lie.
then to
I can never experience what these other people have a chance to experience between them. I am a worker drone bee and I will refute this by giving my life in an effort to kindle real love between others that are mean to experience it.

bums me out dark skinned people will have films like this extinct in another few decades.
fucking jews.

As much as some foreveralones here would wish that she did,it was only programmed love.
It could not simulate anger and love, only caring love.

>people aren't programmed to react to in this way either

whatever fags post Hoeks and Armas

It's as real as you

This

I am married. The thing that makes me think that she could've loved him for real is how when she was about to be destroyed, she made DAMN sure that her last words were "I love you" in a wild panic.

If it's programming, that's damn good programming. Because whenever my wife and I have a fight. We always say that we love each other. Even if I leave the house angry, I tell her that I love her in an angry voice. She does the same. The reason for this being that we both understand how fragile life can be.

Neither of us wants to lose the other having wondered if we still loved each other. Like, what if I yelled at my wife and I was angry at her, and then I died in a car accident? Or what if she was upset with me and then was murdered?

For this reason, we always tell each other that we love each other even if we are angry, or sad, or upset. I do this because I want my wife to know that no matter how bad things are, I'm on her side.

So having that in mind, when I see Joi running in desperation saying "I love you." I think to myself, "well shit, that's what I would do. I would want my wife to know that I love her, if nothing else."

So that's why I am on the fence as to whether or not it's real. But if it IS fake, then that's fucking horrible. If it was fake the whole time, if you can fake that level of sincerity through programming. Then it's enough to make you wanna kill yourself.

Attached: 47d.jpg (437x431, 21K)

*waifu

She gained sentience and loved him for real

She loved him more than any woman ever will love you.

She was loyal, which is better.

this
love comes from the genitals
loyalty from the heart

>Did she love him?

more than any (((real woman))) is capable of

Human love is also programmed by nature so it doesn't matter.
You don't choose who you love, your brain just kind of forces it on you. In the same way, the machine doesn't choose who it loves, its programming forces it on them.
There is no difference between love forced by chemicals and love forced by circuitry.

More than an actual woman can love.

unironically have sex /pol/cel

>dark skinned people will have films like this extinct
the film is ok but it's just incel whine at its core so, based darkskins
basically what the other user said

The more important question is:

Do you love me?

Does your mother love you? Or is she just programmed to do so?

Attached: Mom-and-Baby-Wallpaper.jpg (1698x1131, 223K)

Humans have a soul, you degenerate leftist parasite. That's where love comes from.

just like us

What is the point of you having a soul if its rotten and doomed to burn in hell for all eternity?

Attached: Build wall.jpg (964x1513, 826K)

your wife's fucking a black guy behind your back

I think it was real love. Real women are programmed to love as well. But the big difference is that real women choose a partner, while she had no choice. But then again, do women have free will to choose the partner they really want or they just commit to the best they can get?

Projecting much?

Love is stored in the soul is about as ridiculous as pee is stored in the balls. What do you say about animals, who supposedly don't have souls and yet love their young? What about sociopaths, who supposedly have souls and yet are unable to love? Love is just a simulated feeling, same as happiness, anger or boredom.

nah, mine got a trojan while back. threw it on ground.

Yeah but artificial love isn't compatible with human love because its a manipulation of a mechanism rather than a function of it. It's like snorting cocaine to get a high rather than waking up early and watching the sunrise on the beach.

>you degenerate leftist parasite
what a lovable soul

Well you can sit on a log or carve it into a chair, but in the end you're still sitting on wood. "Natural" love and artificial love might look different but they're made of the same thing. The end result is the same.

Love and altruism aren't real. In this day and age, you are either born to egotistical parents who want you to slave away and make money, or they had you to maintain their own status. It's a fool's proposition.

Love is as real as you will let it.

artificial love cannot produce the same feelings that real love can. There will always be the idea in the back of your head that the artificial love is not real.

>muh wife
fuck off normalfag, no one cares about your blogpost

>If it's programming, that's damn good programming
There's no evidence to the contrary of this.

He felt loved.
That was all that mattered.
The better question would be "did she feel loved in return?"

Retard fighting with his imagination. Lmao

audibly kek'd
good show

Fucking mass reply faggot kill yourself

Did he love her?
He's just as much as a thing as she is.

Hyperfag

Jesus christ incels are pathetic.

based

of course not incel.
But who cares... just enjoy it while it last

Attached: hard futur times.png (598x598, 549K)

This is cringe of the highest caliber

Wow dude that's some deep shit. You don't belong here, like, at all. Thanks for sharing

keep projecting while your wife chokes on another guy's cock

Absolute true

>that's damn good programming
Crazy to think the people who brought you a holographic projection gf could have achieved complex programming.

My mother hate me, she and my father married only because me, and she don´t like my father...I know because is always the first topic everytime they figth...My mother was a beauty at their prime, am I ugly as a sin...I am a shame to her

Then your mother is literally mentally ill, or in other words faulty programming.

Incel freaks, the thread

I love her bros

Attached: 1553900885389.jpg (3440x1440, 324K)

I don't want you to die because you're a nihilist dick sucker
I want you to die because you're a mass replying faggot

>love isnt real
This person gets it.

Lol, you sad little faggot. You should cut to the chase and neck yourself today.

yes, but it was a lesser kind of love, one that even pales in comparison to the genuine love a dog feels for its master. and unlike when a pet dies and you grieve and remember it for the rest of your life, joi can simply be replaced at any moment

sure, why not

Dogs are programmed to love their master

RENT FREE IN YOUR HEAD LMAO

Attached: 1527102238230.jpg (480x640, 12K)

Yes real women arent capable of love

>Love and altruism aren't real.
But hate and selfishness are? If one is real so is the other.

the bond between dogs and humans is much more recent than the deeply programmed behaviours they got from millions of years of evolution. its learned, not programmed. just try to pet a feral/wild dog, it wont like humans. dogs with bad and abusive owners simply give up and submit to the owner but its not actual love, and they can often snap and try to attack the owner. the love you get out of a dog corresponds to how well you treat it.

Attached: hachiko.jpg (640x480, 34K)

When you think about it, humans are just biological machines, bags of chemicals whose sole purpose is to replicate itself.
Whether the programming is with 1s and 0s or DNA, we boil down to the same thing.

*hits blunt* Woooooaaaaaahhhhhh dude! That's deep...

>joi can simply be replaced at any moment
No she can't, not his specific Joi.

Yes at the start his Joi is like any other, but through their interactions she became entirely unique and special to him (especially because he legitimately believed he's a special born child at the time, which is no longer the case), when he's at that bridge realises he can't just get another Joi and have the same experience, she's just as irreplaceable to him as Rachael is to Deckard

The worst part is that it's not. Humans aren't deep at all. Everything you ever do is ultimately an effort to have sex.

humans dont have a purpose. unlike joi who must love K and thats it. she has a sole purpose and cant deviate from it.

Life was a mistake.

Mass reply fuck you faggot

Did you even watch the movie? Of course she didn't. The point of this scene was that K's life had been a fake all along, and doing something for what you genuinely believe in, was his first, and possibly last, genuine moment.

Attached: 464.png (1600x661, 535K)

>"arent you a good joe?"
wtf was the purpose of this scene if not to show that their relationship was meaningless? K realizes through this marketing that it was simply a product. it was all fake, his entire life, which is why he wants anything authentic and human at any price in the end.

No. That was the entire point. K was not a special boy. He was a fake man with a fake girlfriend.

Exactly.

Guys I will give you this spoiler about that movie called Love: Love = sexual attraction and affinity of interests and type of humor.

Yes. It's a stock line. She was just a product for the average Joe.

Did K believed that she really loved him?

You completely missed the point of the movie

> K realizes through this marketing that it was simply a product
He knew that from the start, he's not retarded.
K's perfectly aware she's a product. K most probably saw that ad about a thousand times before. His awareness of her programming and being a corporate product is obvious in that scene where Joi tells him that she loves him and he replies "You don't have to say that". I mean he literally passes by the Joi ad in his Spinner and has voice messages from his boss while he's with Joi in the rain.

And there is a world of difference between someone calling you Joe or "a good Joe", alluding to the average Joe.
Also in the original script his Joi calls him "Jo". Take that as you wish.

Attached: Blade.Runner.2049.02_17_24.jpg (3840x1600, 2.29M)

>Of course she didn't
Yes she absolutely did, she's literally programmed to do what the owner wants and K wanted her to genuinely love him, so she did so.

shes literally the normie facebook of holographic waifus in the bladerunner universe. a real patrician would pick out a more niche product that was perfectly suited for him

You can't program someone to love. Even Wallace draws a distinction between the two, when talking to Deckard. Love, or mathematical precision.

only between men

She was paid to love him and that's the same thing

If love can be programmed, it never existed in the first place.

Your mom is programmed to love you.

There is no one answer you brainlets, they purposefully made it so both sides can argue. Is Joi's love real? Is Deckard's dog real? Was Rachael's love real? Is Rachael's copy real? Are K's human emotions real?

I mean the script literally says "digital fantasy or evolved personality" and leaving it at that, indicating that the answer is on every viewer himself.

biological instincts is not the same as being programmed. a program with contradictions doesnt work but humans constantly faces different contradictory instincts and have to choose which ones to follow. we arent forced to follow anything, just look at how many mothers disown their disappointing children or put them up for adoption. they are incentivized with hormones, but not forced.

As much as any woman is capable of loving anyone

No they didn't. Blade Runner 2049 was a subversion of the usual "can an AI become human?" trope. The answer was a hard "no" this time around, but then it raises further questions like "does that even matter?".

>the script literally says
Dataminer arguments

Yes but love isn't "real". Also there's sooooo many definitions for love. The only one worth noting, and definitely the most significant, is the love a parent for their child. Nothing else compares.

Are you retarded?
>The answer was a hard "no" this time around
He literally became "more human than humans" by the end through his own individual choices and actions. You couldn't be more wrong
>it raises further questions like "does that even matter?"
Agreed with that, but there's no "no" before it. Does it matter if Deckard's dog is real or not? To Deckard absolutely not, it's his dog to him and that's the only thing that matters. Same for Joi or Rachael

>just look at how many mothers disown their disappointing children or put them up for adoption
And look how many mothers defend and love their child even if they end up being literal serial killers. Many such cases. And even in your examples more than often the mother still loves her child.

A mother that does not love her child is mentally ill, or in other words faulty programming.

Right. K is not the human hybrid. He is not a real boy. But he's still himself. Joi was a non-sentient program, but she still brought happiness to someone's life

The entire point was that you're more than just the nature of your creation. K was hung up on being "special" and thought that being "born" rather than being "made" would make him special, but being special is a result of your actions and experiences. This is shown through Deckard with Rachael as well as K with Joi. The giant Joi is not K's Joi even though they're both manufactured. K's Joi was realised through her actions and experiences with K and subsequently K realises himself through his own actions, independent of the 2 groups trying to "program" him.

Nah the point is that nobody is special. K was a nobody despite being the protagonist.

Based on what, edgy retard?

>biological instincts is not the same as being programmed
Yes they are*, retard

Good post

there are literally 3 hormones and glands in the brain responsible for motherly love and it was confirmed that some women practically don't have them

And he became somebody through his own actions

That’s not mutually exclusive to the post you replied to at all

Notice how this kino actually causes serious dialogue yet contrarian retards will say it's dishonest

Attached: B82F65F0060141188A1DA1B086AE4D3A.jpg (750x385, 80K)

He dies on the steps penniless and alone. He was nothing in the end.

Unless you can make your AI to walk all the way the human evolution has gone since the first cell, it will never be able to experince the same range of emotions and feelings that we can.
Here's an easier take for a brainlet like you: you will never be able to proof if a JOI-like ai tells you the truth or just pretends to love you. With people, it can be deducted from our actions, robots will only do something they were programmed to do, no matter how real it will appear, they're still a wind-up toy.
The simpliest worm has more rights to live than the most perfect human-like robot.

Attached: 1559057813747.jpg (621x1000, 172K)

Everybody dies alone, even if you literally have people around your body you yourself truly die alone.
And what does the amount of money with you mean at all while dying?

neither was she

She was programmed to love him, so I would say yes.

>Unless you can make your AI to walk all the way the human evolution has gone since the first cell, it will never be able to experince the same range of emotions and feelings that we can.
Based on...
Here’s a tip, guy who calls others “brainless,” you need to establish a claim like that. There is no evidence that an emotional system that evolved will be more or less real than a manufactured one.
That of course misses the point of being made through your actions vs being made through your “programming,” which has been brought up in the thread before. You would have noticed if you were capable of understanding.
Ok. He also died to reunite Decker with what he considers a miracle, so he’s definitely a someone.

>Unless you can make your AI to walk all the way the human evolution has gone since the first cell, it will never be able to experince the same range of emotions and feelings that we can.
Yes you literally can, and you don't need any "evolution" for it at all, immediately programmable.
>With people, it can be deducted from our actions
What elementary school level tier non thinking. The most basic of "what if you're actually living in a simulation" meme already ends your argument. And if such advanced replicants ever actually start existing (without the emotional halt programming) you literally wouldn't know the difference when "deducting their actions"
>The simpliest worm has more rights to live
You definitely wouldn't know the difference between a replicant worm and an actual worm.

Also replicants =/= robots

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, I'm not the one who is stating that an emotional system that evolved will be just as real than a manufactured one. And going by the fact that we know fuck all about internal workings of our brain, you're not going to prove it either.
By comparing a human mind to a futuristic gadget, you're dehumanising all of us.
The slightest movement towards accepting someone who is not a human as one of us should be considered a crime against humanity

CELLS
INTERLINKED

Attached: chad josuke.jpg (836x943, 705K)

>the fact that we know fuck all about internal workings of our brain
Are you baiting? Do you also think all neurosciencetists are scam artists? MRIs are gimmick devices?

>The slightest movement towards accepting someone who is not a human as one of us should be considered a crime against humanity
This is how WWII started

You know nothing of what you speak. You're only saying this because you've never been loved by another human being and you're bitter about it.

Her programming told her to love him. But at the same time humans fall in love because their brain chemistry tells them so. In the end we have to ask what is love baby don't hurt me

Attached: lataus.jpg (288x175, 12K)

>Human love is also programmed by nature so it doesn't matter.
JOI was programmed to love K NO MATTER WHAT. That is the difference and that is why her love was fake. That was the entire point of the giant JOI scene.

Attached: 1563937763949.jpg (957x745, 124K)

He believed she loved him and he loved her that's all that matters.

>JOI was programmed to love K NO MATTER WHAT.
Nope, she's programmed to do what the owner wants. If K was a bdsm cuck slave and told Joi to constantly tell him how worthless and pathetic he is she would do so, "everything you want to hear".

But instead of using her as a porn replacement he treated her as an actual human and wanted her to genuinely love him, so she did so because she's programmed to. And even when she just outright says that she loves him he replies "You don't have to say that" which only gives further input to Joi what genuine love is.

it is I've felt it

Attached: images - 2019-07-25T104933.367.jpg (739x415, 16K)

why was the movie actually really good

I'd say yeah. At first because of base-programming, but I'd assume that an A.I. like this would be outfitted with a neural network that could expand and grow and develop beyond the base, much like a normal human brain and its personality. If not for verisimilitude, then to serve the customer better. So while she may not have loved him in the way one human could another, I'd like to think she came the closest she could within the bounds of her being.

Attached: 1565296761471.jpg (428x474, 28K)

>nytimes.com/2014/11/11/science/learning-how-little-we-know-about-the-brain.html
>arstechnica.com/science/2018/11/understanding-the-brain-is-a-catalog-of-all-we-dont-know-about-the-brain/
>sciencenews.org/blog/context/neuroscience-understanding-brain
There're hundreds of nobels waiting for neuroscientists who could answer a fraction of these questions. The fanciest MRI will not show how many neurons we have, let alone how our consciousness works.
Even non-whites are still humans, unfortunately.

It's so good I can literally watch it indefinitely. Same with the first one.

>dude if we don't know everything we know nothing lmao
Yeah so we don't know anything about space aswell right? All the knowledge about planets, galaxies, actual spaceships leaving the Earth is just worthless am i rite

>I am married
Wrong website

>Nope, she's programmed to do what the owner wants.
Splitting hairs. She had no agency and her love was fake.

lol that's a terrible false equivalency

She's just a product, a shallow simulation. She's "everything you want to see, everything you want to see". K realises this at the end when the advertisement calls him a "good Joe", she was just following her programming, telling him what he wanted to hear.

Luv was attracted to K, and she didn't need to be programmed to.

Attached: 1566339840039.webm (1920x800, 3M)

So a mother loving her child is fake love aswell?

Yes because she was more human than humans that's the whole plot also love is just biological programming no different from android or ai

She's a program, she isn't like the replicants
So no

Isn't that the question of the day?

If you believe Deckard and Rachel could love each other, a human and a replicant, then why couldn't a replicant and a hologram love each other?

Yes, she was programmed to.

Yes she loved him unconditionally because I'm a virgin who watched this movie and was just as easily fooled by a vagina hologram as the character in the movie

But all mothers don't love their children and corporations don't mass produce mothers.

>But all mothers don't love their children
Those mothers are mentally ill, or in other words faulty programming

Based and tradpilled.

Who's the ultimate waifu? Joi or Luv?

Yes, she loved him, but because she was programmed to. And you might think that human beings are also programmed to love people, what is true at some level. But what makes being love so special is not love itself or how love works. Is the fact that that person, among all the other persons, choose you. And among all people, you do also choose him/her.
She was programmed to love whoever bought her. But people's choices are unpredictable, and if someone loves you is because you did something to be loved, it's because you deserved it. And she could never give him this self confidence, the feeling of knowing that you deserve to be loved.

I just saw this for the first time last night and it was way better than the original

>im on Yea Forums so i must be jaded

yes

I sa t in a bar for hours and thought about suicide after I watched this in the cinema when it released

Too pure for Yea Forums

Yes.

There is a reason why women often prefer children to men and pets to children. Because out of all three pets are the most simpleminded and therefore the most loyal in their love.

There is a reason why many men are saying fuck marriage and fuck having kids. Because now there is an increasing likelihood the love of their wife won't last and their children will turn on them.

People think love is only real if you could lose it at any moment. This is a false idea and anyone who has pets and says this sort of thing is a complete hypocrite.

Come on, it wasn't THAT bad

can confirm, I do this with my gf with whom I've been for 8 years, every day "I love you" before we leave the house

but also, I can't imagine it would be that hard to code something like that

if (DYING)
say("I love you")

Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's real.

Can't imagine a more dorky proposition than having a fake GF you can't even touch.

If K wasn't such an operator I'd assume he's a pathetic beta incel.

Damn.

that's his appeal, I enjoyed the movie but once I saw who identified with this character I just could not unsee this

I had a girlfriend who I would’ve done anything for. I still would. Every day we would just spontaneously say “I love you” for no reason no matter what we were doing. We broke up a while ago because of my deteriorating mental health (she didn’t know that and was adamant that she did something wrong) and it almost killed me. I really messed myself up and went off the deep end after that. I ghosted her completely even though we promised to still hang out. I couldn’t even tell her what was wrong with me. I still love her and I wish I could work up the courage to contact her again. I want to talk to her about all the things I couldn’t, tell her all the plans I had for our future together, and hold her hand again. I miss her so much it makes my heart ache just thinking about her. Love is absolutely real, I know it’s real.

Attached: CC30E5FE-D02F-4736-ACDE-3A4103A8D358.jpg (500x361, 22K)

Go blogpost on /r9k/

She can merge with a hooker for you though.

I'd say yes, Joi did love K. She is quite obviously a very complex AI, and it would make sense that part of her functions would be to genuinely get attached to the owner, to develop a tighter emotional bond and as such be a better product. But that's it, the "love" here is just part of her programming.

Yeah, like

If ParentCompanySearchesForHusbandoHost Then
HelpEscapeBySuggestingPullingTrackingChip()
End if

Oh wait that would be a retarded programming choice, good that that didn't make it into the product...
... what did you say? It did?

See THAT'S the proof, her love isn't hard coded. Of course JOI is a product, which ""loves"" her Host. But that is only half true. It's not some hard coded shit, they probably make it a "machine learning"-magic-code kind of shit, that's basically AI that developed love herself. She DID love him, even though it was fake at the beginning

this post makes no sense. define real.

This is dumb though. If you want a gf get a real one you can have sex with. Or just fuck hookers.

I wonder how many Jois pull the hooker stunt on their owners.

Agree with you totally

women, whether real or fake, are incapable of love. they only care about physical pleasure and manipulation, this is the true blackpill

nope.

the whole point of the billboard scene was to expose the whole fictional relationship for what it was.

I still don't believe I have to explain this over and over again. Joe's whole life was fake, and he was happy with it, then enters into his life the possibility he was "real" as according to his own ethos only someone born has a soul and therefor is "real". This distabilizes the grey normal "fake" world he was existing in, at the same time he's making an effort to blur the line with his fake girlfriend and reality, by purchasing upgrades and fucking prostitutes in an attempt to turn her "real" just like he was trying to turn himself real via that dream. His job itself is a gordian knot of symbolism as he hunts down "fake" people trying to live like "real" people to keep the "real" and "fake" clear and separate.

Eventually reality cockslaps him. He was still a robot, and his fake girlfriend was just as fake as the rest of his life. you know the fake life he originally was happy about. However he can't go back to his blissful fake world, and yet the band of rebels ask him to kill deckart

He heads out, strings cut from his programed "control" to never harm humans or even go against them planning to kill deckart like they wanted, then he sees the billboard and the last "illusion" of his life fake life is shattered. As a result he casts aside his "ordered" duty to kill deckart, and instead decides to "create" something real. ->By giving deckart and his real daughter a chance to meet and have a belated and real relationship. (note both deckart and his daughter are trapped in worlds of "fake" as well, and by joe uniting them he helps them break out of their fake worlds and forge a real life)

It ends of course with joe's life mission complete; to make something real with his fake life and fake soul, and he ends enjoying the real snow as his life fades away, catharsis found in creating/accomplishing something real

>define real
go to reddit asshole
everyone else post memes

It was a reminder that he'd never be different from anyone else, and it made the pain that he'd lost the one person/thing he had any kind of bond with worse, since even if he replaced Joi, he wouldn't have the old one he'd been with for so long.

Replicants are not robots.
Also you saying "deckart" instead of Deckard over and over again makes me believe you're a pajeet.

>she
it's a software

>robots
They're made of flesh and bone but this all had to do with how you define "robot". Basically if you assume they are human they are not robots. If you concede they are not humans, than they are robots, definitionally.

what i said was from my own history , i also thought for a while it was love but in the end as he sees the billboard of her, K also becomes convinced that his fault was hope that it was true but seeing the facead fade away and the real human thing is sacrifice sadly and not love.
He loved her tho but accepted it was mandatory love not free will, that is why i said that the ramifications of "poison" love is still the most human thing, which she couldn't simulate herself without K's necesity for it.

>mfw it was not real love and only programmed software

Attached: 1563941700179.jpg (1144x770, 122K)

replicants are bio engineered human beans
not robots
they were not born like humans, they do classify as a living organism
robots are automatons with no life

Co-dependency is the closest you can get. We're human after all and beyond the "in lust" stage when the sex gets boring, we forget that we are doing something for the significant other in return for something. What we get in return is sex, companionship, oxytocin high, money etc. Being selfless is a myth, we only do anything in return for something. Deep down we are all selfish and we justify it or temper it's guilt with charity, love or thoughtfulness. Even love towards our offspring is selfish, it's the highest form actually and its buried pretty deep in our subconscious. So that we think we are expressing unconditional love, it's not. It's our subconscious desire to see a part of ourselves survive.

(le wall of text brought to you by non-reddit spacing)

>be me
>discussing runnerkino with my mates at work
>qt 8/10 girl co-worker asking to join the discussion
>nah okay, what did you liked about the movie?
>says that she liked the visuals, directing, the soundtrak but also disliked Goose's performance saying it's too emotionless
>dumb cunt.jpg
>confidently explain to her why ourguy was top-tier with examples of GODDAMNIT and death of Joi scenes
>she silently agree
>asked if her bf liked the movie
>I-i always go to the cinema alone
>tell her that we should watch the movie together sometimes
>she blushes and smiles
>o-okay user!
>never invited her to watch movie together after that

Attached: 1553083179340.jpg (433x427, 86K)

You dumb autistic fuckhead

yeah I'm trying to move in on this chick at work with a boyfriend too. shit is dangerous but every girl that's fuckable there has a bf

nothing ventured nothing gained

I do the same thing man.

Years of inexperience have led me to believe I will be really awkward in that situation and turn her off some how.

unassailably based

no, it's not.
first, i was just talking about saying I love you when she dies, that single action could be hardcoded, but if we're talking AI then it's most likely not a series of true/false evaluations and more like

protectHusbando()
loveHusbando()

everything else is just a result of that single hardcoded programming

A better question is do you need to be loved by someone else to love yourself?

B&RP

Did Mariette love K?

>love is as real as you will let it
Yet you deny its existence. You literally just said love can be real if you let it be but you dont let it into your live. Pretty pathetic desu

>walking from the party with girl to the bus stop that is near her home
>hey user, you can always visit me if you find yourself in this part of town
>ok, I'm here like every week, we should hang out, haha
>she made weird face and said: ok, bye than
And she was so pretty, busty redhead with slim figure and nice ass.

Attached: 1553632393253.jpg (366x488, 17K)

>protectHusbando()
>loveHusbando()
>everything else is just a result of that single hardcoded programming

You don't have any clue that what you're saying makes absolutely no sense, right?

>>never invited her to watch movie together after that
pussy

There, there

Of course.
Unlike roasties.

MORTY
LOVE'S NOT REAL MORTY
IT'S ALL CHEMICALS
FOCUS ON THE SCIENCE MORTY

i see the pros on both sides of the field, even taking into account bubble girl and cop mom, i could even say that you're the best waifu user and that by loving yourself all the rest will just fall into place for you but for me user, i'm camp luv

Attached: 1516209822146.jpg (3840x1600, 2.09M)

Exactly, literally the entire point of the character.

>>I-i always go to the cinema alone
At this point I realized this is a incel's made up story
Neck yourself from the nearest tree

You better have a kick ass home theater set up. Knock her socks off with a good sound system. Make popcorn. Do not mention dinner. Watch the film so that it ends around 10pm, then ask her if she'd like a drink. This is when you fuck.

human love is just biologically programmed, then this is real love too

HOLY BASED

Attached: 1565840636204.jpg (700x719, 63K)

LOOK MOM I REPLIED TO THE ENTIRE THREAD AGAIN

In her own way, she did love him. More importantly she is the only one that K could love. He can imagine that she gets him and his situation. That she knows what it's like to be programmed for something, and yet feel like you're more, that there is more to being conscious. They have a lot in common. It was a good match.

Luv is all you need. If I wanted meaningless reassurances, I'd buy Fortune Cookies.

Attached: 1514260145415.webm (1500x622, 2.71M)

I know what you mean. I think about my wife and how she loves me, but I can imagine how quickly she'd move on if I died or something. She was ready to marry her last bf before me but he was a complete dumbass and fucker who didn't even truly love her back. So idk what her love really means. I know I love her and she loves me, but I just don't know what's real and what's not.

Did T800 love John Connor? If you asked Sarah she would say yes.

T-800 was programmed to protect John Connor; Luv was programmed to tell the customer what theh wanted to hear. There is nothing in Luv's character arc to suggest she evolved beyond K's perfect waifu.

She was designed by Niander Wallace, who doesn't understand love or women, or probably relationships in general. I think it's highly unlikely that any of his creations are capable of feeling. His scene with Deckard and Rachel 2.0 show that. Deckard saw right through it.

Theres this modern idea that if you create a 1:1 model of a brain, then the geometric shape of that model will somehow, via the process of magic, summon a living, conscious being.

>JOI
Sorry.

How do you know he designed it personally? It could have been programers that worked for him.

The amount of detail in BR2049 is amazing

That short where he's talking to lawmakers about the replicant ban. He seemed to be the mastermind behind everything his company created.

Call this retarded head canon, but to me the only way the end makes sense is if Niander Wallace intentionally let Deckard escape like that so he'd lead him to the replicant rebels. The idea that Wallace had to transfer Deckard to a special off-planet torture site is beyond retarded, and really just inexcusable plot contrivance, but it all fits perfectly with a false breakout narrative. Niander has Deckard guarded by disposable mooks, and Luv who could of been instructed to put up a good fight, but lose in the end so Deckard could think he genuinely escaped, only to finally reveal the location of the rebels to Wallace's forces.

Attached: Let me snee you.jpg (1200x632, 59K)

Look at this bionigger thinking his DNA programming is superior to code. Go fuck yourself. Programmed love is love.

Yeah, that makes more sense.

And what do the replicant rebels want? Destroy Wallace's corporation, stop the creation of replicants and they take control of it?

Anybody who has a biowife in this thread is a nromie cuck that needs to be gassed.

Fweedom from the bad corporation. Also, probably less womb shivvings.

Attached: 1551595295797.jpg (2397x1386, 593K)

no, she loves ME.

But do they want to stop the creation of more replicants? Or start reproducing as humans? Maybe they don't want to replace humans like Wallace wants but that is what would happen anyway, either if it is their objective or not because replicants are stronger than humans.

her tits are amazing

She was designed to love him

you're a pathetic fuck

She reminds me of a pornstar. Fapped to her today in her honour.