Rank em

Based Pitt.

Attached: EAU-wRWW4AEwyPZ.jpg (1200x801, 72K)

>>looks in their prime and current
Pitt, he takes good care of himself
Leo, best in youth
Cruise
Depp, degenerate aids baby
>>acting ability
DiCaprio
Cruise
Pitt
Depp
>>filmography
Pitt, love Fight Club and Seven
Cruise, Eyes Wide Shut
DiCaprio, consistent quality but not my favorites
Depp, shit on all accounts

Actually Depp is not that bad of an actor, he'll go to 2

You already did

I don't undertand the obsession with DiCaprio, he looked like a twink faggot then and turned into grown up Stewie Griffin, Cruise and Pitt mogs him so hard it's not even funny
also how can you say he's best actor while he can't act at all (he played some good roles tough)

Too hard to rank. I will do this instead:

>action movie
Cruise

>Adventure movie
Depp

>Comedy/action movie
Pitt

>Drama movie
Di Caprio

Hopefully Depp actually tries in Waiting for the Barbarians. It's playing in Venice and Ciro Guerra is a very good director.

Attached: wftb_first_look.jpg (928x523, 96K)

>looks
Pitt > Leo > Cruise > Depp only because of all the drugs
>acting
Cruise > Depp > Leo > Pitt
>filmography
Cruise > Leo > Depp > Pitt

Where does this "DiCaprio is a bad actor" meme come from? Dude has served straight-up kino with Django, Wolf of Wall Street, and Once Upon a Time. Are people still bitter about the Revenant thing? You can hardly blame the man himself for exaggerated Oscars hype, that was the Academy's fault

Because normies think Di Caprio is one of the best ever some contrarians on Yea Forums can't agree with them so they are memeing that. Sad really.

>prime looks
Depp, Brad, Leo, Tom
>now
Brad, Tom, Depp, Leo
>acting
Leo, Brad, Tom, Depp
>films
Leo, Brad, Depp, Tom

He has too many makeup+silly hat+silly acting roles. And they're all the same

I will give you Wolf of Wall Street but essentially he plays le screaming man in most of his films. He is not very convincing in Django and in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood he is serviceable but nothing more. He just added stutter.

He's overrated, like he's some sort of dramatic genius or whatever while he does his job fine but doesn't bring something to the movies he's in. For instance, Cruise brought M.I to the same levels as James Bond, even surpassing them.

I don't even think Cruise would consider himself a particularly good actor but he's a very charismatic guy and he generally makes great flicks.

Are there better streak than Leo's one?

>2002: Gangs of New York
>2002: Catch me if you can
>2004: The Aviator
>2006: The Departed
>2006: Blood Diamond
>2008: Web of Lies
>2008: Revolutionary Road
>2010: Shutter Island
>2010: Inception

no other movies between those.

That's 3 movies, 2 if you don't include OUaTiH, which wasn't a thing few weeks back, that's hardly worth the mania around the guy, especially compared to Cruise and Pitt, who had great memorable roles from 90's to today.
He was legit great in Django though, gotta give credit where it's due.

>looks
1. Pitt
2. Cruise
3. Depp
4. Caprio

>acting
1.Caprio
2.Pitt
3.Cruise
4.Depp

>filmography
1.Pitt
2.Cruise
3.Caprio
4.Depp

>rating looks
Fags

those are good moviesbut I don't really recall any memorable performance by Leo

>not appreciating male looks from strictly aesthetic point
you sure it ain't you who isn't sure about his sexuality?

Well he's no DDL but in every role Leo is believable which is more than you can say for about 90% of hollywood actors.

Inject in pit
Inject in knee cap
Testosterone depp-o
Blast and Cruise

Mmmm ya i’m thinkin blast and CRUISE

Cruise is the only one worth a damn, the rest make shit movies and people only think they can act because jews keep telling us they can

Looks in Prime:

1) Depp
2) Pitt
3) DiCaprio = Cruise

Looks today:

1) Bradu Pittu
2) Tom Cruise
3) Leo
4) Depp - seriously what the fuck happened to this guy? He was on the VMAs less than 10 years ago and looked like a stud

Filmography:

1) TC
2) BP = JD
3) LDC

Pussy track record:

1) Leo
2) Depp = Pitt
3) Cruise control

Most bro looking:

1) Brad
2) Tom
3) Johnny
4) Leonardo

Like if you agree.

>Depp - seriously what the fuck happened to this guy? He was on the VMAs less than 10 years ago and looked like a stud
dude's an alcoholic and also succubi in your life won't help

Is this the closet homo thread?

>looks in their prime and current
Peak/prime however short it may be I actually would say Johnny Depp but Pitt overall, then Cruise and Leo last by a mile even prime pretty boy Leo wasn't really anything special
>acting ability
They are all decent but overcasted actors, at this point they might as well just start using their real names in movies
Depp and then Cruise I think actually had the most natural talent for acting but Pitt and Leo got more out of theirs in the end
Cruise has just been doing stuntman actionshit and scientology since forever and idk Depp just kept drinking rum or something since pirates he's been jack sparrow a meme basically
>filmography
Pitt, Leo, powergap, the other two

Cruise is the only one who's still making good movies, does his own stunts, and is the richest.

Cruise>Dicaprio>Pitt>Depp

>Based
Pitt

Attached: 1566908445620.jpg (680x453, 42K)

fuck
marry
kill
double kill

Actually agree with all of this.

Christian Bale. On all metrics.

You shouldn't find men attractive unless you're a woman, in which case your opinion doesn't matter anyway.

what about Blood DIamond, I liked his performance there

>Looks
Pitt>Cruise>Depp>DiCaprio
>Acting ability
Cruise>>POWERGAP>>Depp>Pitt>DiCaprio
>Filmography
Cruise>DiCaprio>Pitt>Depp

This is objective. Any other answer is wrong

Pitt > Cruise >> Di Caprio > huge power gap >>>>>>> Depp

How does Cruise have better filmography than Brad fucking Pitt? Cruise is a great actor and can really excel at times, but he can't beat Pitt when it comes to the quality of the movies he was in, outside of few exceptions like Eyes Wide Shut.

Look, prime:
Pitt
Depp
Leo
Cruise

Look, now:
Pitt
Leo
Cruise
Depp

Acting:
Depp
Pitt
Leo
Cruise

Filmography:
Pitt
Leo
Depp
Cruise
but that's really hard

100% agree with this.

>Prime Looks
Brad>Depp>Cruise>DiCaprio
>Current Looks
Brad>Cruise>DiCaprio>Depp
>Acting Ability
Depp>DiCaprio>Cruise>Brad
>Filmography
Cruise>Depp>Brad>DiCaprio

You can close the thread now I have successfully answered the question.

Lol this guy was spot on and undisputable. Time to move on

>looks in their prime and current
Pitt
Cruise
Leo
Depp
>acting ability
Pitt
Leo
Cruise Depp
>filmography
Pitt
Leo
Cruise
Depp
Damn Brad is based

Attached: achilles vs TD.jpg (320x210, 20K)

Cruise
Cruise
Cruise
Cruise

He was fucking beautiful on the inside and outside, and a good actor too, when he started in the biggest movie of all time. Avatar and Endgame aren't close to the cultural behemoth Titanic was.

CAN'T
BRUISE
THE
CRUISE

>brad
1/10
leo
1/10
pirateguy
1/10
cruise
10/10

Underage opinion. Watch some of his older films with god-tier acting like Rainman

Why do his abs look so different? As in, they are asymmetrical on the left and symmetrical on the right.

Good posts.

based scientom wins all three

Eyes Wide Shut, Collateral and Minority Report are great movies in which Cruise truly shines.

Pitt >cruise depp >leo
Leo depp>>≥ cruise >pitt
Cruise >pitt leo >depp

Leo hasn’t been attractive since titanic. Pitt was at his best in fight club, I can’t really decide what movies the other two looked their best in though

cruise is the man
pitt is the can't do no wrong
depp hit the wall
leo is boring

>Pitt was at his best in fight club
Either that one or Troy.

>Top Gun
>Eyes Wide Shut
>Magnolia
>Rainman
>Jerry Maguire
>Tropic Thunder
>MI 1
>MI 4
>MI 5
>MI 6
>Vanilla Sky
>Edge Of Tomorrow
>Collateral
>The Last Samurai
>Minority Report
>Interview With A Vampire
>A Few Good Men
>Born On The Forth Of July
>The Color Of Money
Vs
>Troy
>Fight Club
>Assassination Of Jessie James
>Snatch
>Inglorious Basterds
>12 Monkeys
>Benjamin Button
>Once Upon A Time In Hollywood
>Fury
>Seven
>Interview With a vampire
>Legends Of The Fall
>Ocean's 11
>Moneyball
>Burn After Reading
>The counselor
>Babel
>Megamind
>Killing Them Softly
Cruise has the bigger absolute classics and unlike Pitt, Cruise is the main character in the majority of these. Both top tier, Cruise edges him out.

>Putting Pitt over Cruise in looks

Attached: Tom-Cruise-gave-sexy-glance-Magnolia-premiere-LA.jpg (730x1024, 53K)

1. DiCaprio
2. Pitt
3. Depp
4. Cruise

Muscles aren’t painted on. While being anchored to the same places on both sides making them structurally symmetrical, they’ll flex and stretch different depending on the pose

>Looks
Keanu
>Acting Ability
Keanu
>Filmography
Keanu

are you serious?

>Cruise has the bigger absolute classics and unlike Pitt,
Most of the movies you've listed don't fall into the category of a "classic", and as much as I love Cruise, Pitt was both in better movies and is a superior actor. Cruise will never top Pitt's Jesse James.

based

No, I was merely joking.

Blessed

Men don't know how to rate other men.
They put Pitt above Cruise because he looks more manlier, not more attractive.

thank god

Pitt also has The Tree of Life.

Pitt on Troy is pretty much the peak male beauty. Also Pitt is tall and Cruise is not.

>Also Pitt is tall and Cruise is not.
And? Cruise has charisma the size of Saturn.

not with that nose

Attached: 7CB8DA24-0302-4B0C-B771-0E3569653EE5.jpg (949x720, 116K)

Where my Pitt posters?

Attached: source (1).gif (500x225, 497K)

A NEW ACTOR ENTERS THE FRAY

Attached: bale.jpg (696x464, 53K)

>Looks
Pitt
Cruise
Depp
DiCaprio (hit the wall before his 30s and looks like a fat slob of shit)
>acting ability
Cruise
Pitt
Dicaprio
Depp
>Filmography
Cruise
Depp
Pitt
DiCaprio

I don't hate DiCaprio, he's just unlucky in the aging game. Also, looks wise, they get obliterated by Chico Lachowski.

Leo was extremely talented when younger...Gilbert grape, catch me if you can. Honestly he is at LEAST top two out of the four.

What about The Beach (2000)?

>filmography
>Depp second
Depp hasn't made a good film in ages. He usually picks terrible films and he still works with Burton who is a hack.

>Chico Lachowski.
Cruise mogs him

Attached: images (13).jpg (396x600, 23K)

I don't think I've even seen Tom Cruise outside of action movies. How the fuck is he not last place in people's acting ability, and how in the fuck could he possibly be ranked above DiCaprio?

Cruise moggs everyone.
>Pic related, Cruise and The Giga Chad Cavil who moggs Chris Hemsworth so hard he makes him look retarded.
Literally can't Bruise the Cruise.

Attached: Tom+Cruise+CinemaCon+2018+Paramount+Pictures+RBgrizNgZudl.jpg (555x600, 82K)

bad post

Seems like it is Cruise vs Pitt at this point. Interview with the Vampire, who you got? That's the only movie they were in together

>crooked nose
>central tooth
>messy eyebrows
>manlet
gee, I wonder why

>I don't watch movies, how are there people in this thread that do??

In that movie, Pitt in looks and Cruise in acting

Not gay enough to care about looks but

>acting
Cruise
Depp
Pitt
Di Caprio

>Filmography
Cruise
Pitt
Di Caprio
Depp

Maybe watch more films you fucking retard.
Pitt is terrible in that, one of his worst performances. Pitt is a better actor overall. He chooses wide range of roles with interesting directors, Cruise has been doing almost exclusively action film for the past decade. He should really work with someone like PTA again.

Leo was cuter in Catch Me if You Can.

Pitt looked best in Oceans or 12 Monkeys, Troy minus the hair.

Depp looked best in Chocolate, Cruise in Cocktail

>looks in their prime
leo, pitt, depp, cruise

>current
pitt, cruise, leo, depp

>acting ability
leo, pitt, depp, cruise

>filmography
leo, pitt, cruise, depp

Women all over the world constantly call Pitt the most handsome guy alive. He's also cast in roles where being an object of lust for women is a central part of his character.

Meanwhile Cruise has never been cast in a movie where he's listed after, except the beginning of Vanilla Skye. The only women who find him hot are Nicole Kidman and Katie Holmes

>looks (current)
Brad
Tom
Leo
Depp
>Talent
Depp
Brad
Tom
Leo
>Filmography
Leo
Brad
Depp
Tom

1) Dicaprio
2) Pitt
3) Cruise
4) Depp

Forced to have Dicaprio at the #1 spot because of his performances in films such as:
Wolf of Wall Street (excellent film & acting)
Revenant (great film/ excellent acting)
Once Upon A Time In Hollywood (excellent film and acting)...
Shutter Island (great film/ excellent acting)
Django Unchained (great film & excellent acting
Inception (excellent film & acting)
The Departed (great film & acting)
The Aviator (great film & acting)
The Beach (average film/ great acting)
Basketball Diaries (average film/great acting)
What's Eating Gilbert Grape (average film/ amazing acting)

I would've ranked Pitt at #3 if it wasn't for his latest performance in Tarantino's Once Upon a time in Hollywood (his best acting since 12 Monkeys and fight club).

Cruise is an excllent actor (and surprisingly good stuntman) who's filmography is more of a mixed bag. That being said, he's great in all his films. even the mediocre ones.
He's been in excellent ones too.
Edge of Tomorrow ( comes to mind..)
Collateral
Magnolia
Born on the 4rth of July
Interview with a Vampire
Rain man
Minority Report..(Not excellent sci-fi but great overall).
There's be no Mission Impossible franchise without him. And he does all his stunts. He basically is Ethan Hunt at this point.
Eyes Wide Shut (say what you want about this one, not a single actor in this list can say they had the privilege to play in a Kubrick film)
Finally...Depp
Depp's career has been going downhill... That beeing said, in his prime, i can't think of a lot of films that stuck with me. At least no films of the calibre you'd expect from ¨Pitt's, Dicaprio or Cruise's filmography.

The best ones that come to mind. (most memorable in terms of perfromance and film quality) are:
Ed Wood
Fear And Loathing in Las Vegas
Blow
Black Mass (ok film but great acting)
Edward Scissorhands
What's eating Gilbert's grape (but Dicaprio stole the show even though Depp was supposed to be the lead)

Attached: LeoInceptionOtherRoles.jpg (1200x680, 124K)

> Cruise more charismatic than Pitt

t. has never had a social interaction or met women

Some of the films that you called great and excellent are good at best and even that would be being generous to some of them.

His recent filmography is dreadful but he used to have peak fucking films at one point.Even the most unlikely, like A Nightmare On Elm Street prior to his prime.

Cruise
Pitt
Depp
Leo

That being said...If we're just talking about pure acting... Gary Oldman is the most amazing one i've ever seen. Dicaprio is super solid too. But Oldman is scary good. even in objectively mediocre films. Prime Gary Oldman is in a league of his own. Christian Bale also comes to mind. And of course Daniel Day Lewis.

But Oldman takes the cake. Dicaprio is not as much of a chameleon as Oldman was in his prime but still amazing.

Attached: gary oldman NDk2ODc@._V1_.jpg (1200x792, 144K)

>Some of the films that you called great and excellent are good at best and even that would be being generous to some of them.

Such as...You mean in Dicaprio's career ? Cruise's ? or in general ?

>Old Cruise is BTFOing a man half his age and that is way taller him
Based

In their primes:
Johnny=Brad>Leo>Tom
Today's attractiveness:
Brad>Tom>power gap>Leo>the most renound Grotesque artworks>Johnny
Acting:
Leo>Johnny when he gives a shit>Tom=Brad>power gap>popular actors from streaming service original series>Johnny when he doesn't give a shit
Filmography:
Leo>Tom>Brad>Johnny

>looks in their prime
2, 1, 3, 4
>Current look
1, 2, 3, 4
>acting ability
2, 1, 4, 3
>filmography
2, 3, 1, 4

6'0 isnt tall hes pretty close to being manlet too

Edge of Tomorrow is not that great, the last third is pretty bad.
Inception is decent at best.
Django is exploitation spaghetti western schlock. It's garbage.
The Departed is one of the weakest Scorsese films.
Revenant is undermined by the pseudo intellectual, spiritual nonsense by Inarritu who is a complete and utter hack.
Shutter Island is a stupid B thriller, decent i guess.

>Pittfags coming out of the woodworks
Is It really because of that meme?

For a white guy but for any other race it's tall.

No, it's because he had the most recent movie. As I'm typing this I realize Leo was in it too but the fact that I'm saying Once Upon a Time in Hollywood was Brad's not Leo's or both proves how I received the the movie I guess.

Chad Pitt>DiCaprio >cruise>depp

He is a great actor. He was in Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and The Tree of Life which is more than enough for one actor. He is also good in comedy and drama alike although sometimes he is miscast like in 12 Years a Slave

Was it really alcoholism or did he do more hard drugs for longer than he admits?

Attached: young-johnny-depp-6.jpg (640x799, 50K)

>looks in their prime and current
what kind of stupid question is this? the whole point of prime is that you peak and go downhill

Nah, that Mennonite part was perfect for him and I wish more of that part of the book made it on screen

His best role is OUATIH by far, and he doesn't do his usual yelling scthick. Depp looks like a literal vampire now.

how steep is the hill

i respectfully disagree..
I think Inception is one of the best sci-fi film ever made. I wouldn't rank it as high as the original Blade Runner but defo amazing.

Edge of tomorrow wasn't just excellent sci-fi, it was fun, had solid acting & even though you can argue and say that the film's concept was stolen from Groundhog Day, it worked brilliantly.
Django is not perfect, but calling it "garbage" is nonsense. No Tarantino film is "garbage". Even the ones i personally hate (such as Inglorious Basterds) have memorable and amazingly written scenes.
Departed maybe not be on par with GoodFellas but calling it Scorsese's weakest is absurd. (you're telling me it's worse than "Bringing Out the Dead" ? or "Silence" ? "Hugo" ? ..)

Revenant's cinematogeaphy is to die for. a masterpiece in directing. the film's main flaw (imo is how they modified bit of Hugh Glass' real life story, such as his motivation for revenge etc..)
Shutter Island is one of Scorsese's best.
Not on par with Casino, Goodfellas, Taxi Driver..But it's up there. at least top 5

>prime
johnny > leo > brad > tom
>current
brad > tom > leo > johnny

brad and tom took care of themselves as they aged and it shows, nobody touches prime johnny depp though

Nolan couldn't direct his way out of paperbag. He is not a good director, Inception is 80 % of blatant exposition explaining the plot.
I would call most of Tarantino's films since Jackie Brown garbage, exploitation schlocks ripping off other films. Masturbatory dialogue and overtly long runtimes. OUATIH was good.
Bringing Out the Dead and Silence are both very good. Definitely better than both Shutter Island and The Departed. Shutter Island has quite a predictable twist, rest of the film is nice B schlocky thriller elevated by Scorsese's direction.

The Revenant was supposed to be a survival epic but he completely dragged the film down by his shitty additions. The wife, why? The son, why? The high school tier level, half baked symbolism and mysticism, just fucking why? Some shots directly ripped from Tarkovsky. The whole spiritual part of the film was bad and should have been cut out. He suffers from trying to be self important all the time. I would say that he is a pseudo intellectual. It kind of worked in Birdman but The Revenant really suffered because of this. In no way is The Revenant masterpiece of directing. The long takes were done better and more organically by other directors, the whole film felt like Malick lite. Without the thematic depth.

>Pitt is a better actor overall. He chooses wide range of roles with interesting directors,
Nah, Cruise is better. Pitts choice of roles or directors might be wider but he sucks outside his range. I can only stand him in action movies. Drama? Thats for my girlfriend to schlick while I nod off. Cruise in drama? I watch it fine. There is no genre Cruise can’t pull off. Depp has almost the same effect but his Jack Sparrow act sucked his talent for the last decade. Leo is closer to Pitt as schlickbait but I cant stand his streak of oscar-bait, even if he was great in some of them

No, Pitt is good and can do comedy like in Burn After Reading but also drama like in The Tree of Life. He is sometimes miscast but he is never overwhelmingly bad.

this is it

>100char vs 10char

>in their prime
pitt, cruise, dicaprio, depp
>now
cruise, dicaprio, pitt, depp
>acting ability
dicaprio, cruise, pitt, depp
>filmography
pitt, dicaprio, cruise, depp

Imma agree with you on all counts there brosef.

>Nolan couldn't direct his way out of paperbag. He is not a good director, Inception is 80 % of blatant exposition explaining the plot.

He's one of the most succesful & talented film directors in Hollywood. His filmography speaks for itself.
imdb.com/name/nm0634240/#director

Your subjective opinion on the guy doesn't change reality. Someone who can't "direct his way out of a paperbag", can't direct films such as Prestige, Inception, Batman trilogy, Memento etc..

Can't produce scenes like this:
youtube.com/watch?v=gZY1mB9m9b0
or this:
youtube.com/watch?v=8fm-KFPs_o4
Or this:
youtube.com/watch?v=E679XJellLs
Or:
youtube.com/watch?v=Pj5laLK4itI

etc... You're not being objective. I am.
How so ? His box office results, his overall success, other film directors looking up to him.
When was the last time a sci-fi had a rating like this on imdb ?
imdb.com/title/tt1375666/?ref_=nm_flmg_dr_6

Nominated several times at the oscars..
How many film directors can say several of their films are part of imdb's top rated films ever ?
imdb.com/chart/top?ref_=tt_awd

Filmography isnt really a good metric. Depp picks offbeat shit, but he mogs the rest with Sbarro.

>popular=good
This is where you are wrong. He can't direct action and has very bad editing during action sequences. Also his retarded fanbase gives every one of his films 10.
Box office is nothing, most good films don't make money. His filmography is not that great, ranges from decent films to bad and embarrassing films.
Imdb is full of braindead morons and like i said it's mostly his fanbase that artificially inflates the ratings.
Imdb is garbage and that top 250 is an embarrassment.

>looks in their prime
brad, depp, tom, leo
>looks currently
brad, tom, leo, depp
>acting ability
brad, tom, leo, depp
>filmography
leo, brad, tom, depp

>This is where you are wrong. He can't direct action and has very bad editing during action sequences. Also his retarded fanbase gives every one of his films 10.

This isn't just about being "popular" If that was the case, i would've mentioned the Russo brothers or J.J. Abrams to name a few... You are lying to yourself. Then again, you're entitled to your opinion. But anyone who claims that Nolan (love him or hate him) can't direct his "way out of a paperbag" doesn't know a thing about directing or what constitutes a quality film.

How can you objectively look at a film such as Memento and tell me it was directed by an incompetent or even overrated film director?
His Batman trilogy is arguably the bets thing to come out of DC, everything else has been shit since Nolan left the Batman franchise.

Inception wasn't just a succesful box office hit.
It's right up there... TOP 13 best film ever on imdb (for a sci-fi no less)..
was nominated several times, won many awards.. imdb.com/chart/top?ref_=tt_awd

You may not like the guy's style, but you're not being rational here.

They're all mediocre actors. I guess Depp is the best from the group, despite he wasted 15 years playing Johnny Depp in a hat

Cruise is an unironically good actor.

Depp doesnt belong in the pic at all. He made a meme out of himself.

>hurr durr popular and critically acclaimed actors mediocre

He just does one shot of everything, look at some of the action scenes in his films it's embarrassing, look at the death scenes in TDKR, embarrassing too. I mean if you are defending Nolan i would say you don't know what constitutes a quality film or filmmaking.
Memento was decent.
Capeshit is garbage so it's not a big accomplishment.
Like i said imdb rating are unreliable especially with Nolan and Tarantino. Inception better than 2001, Andrei Rublev, Mirror, The Leopard, Stalker, Dead Man's Letters, Lawrence of Arabia, Ben Hur, The Apartment, The Searchers, La Dolce Vita, The Wild Bunch etc. Yes sure. What a great list. Awards are mostly bullshit.
I'm being perfectly rational.

He's a Hollywood pretty boy that got too old for playing pretty boys. He's not a bad actor but he isn't a really good one

>critically acclaimed
If I listened to (((critics))), I would believe TLJ is a cinematic masterpiece and Avengers Endgame is the new Citizen Kane

>Can do comedy

Sure, but Cruise is better at it (Tropic Thunder, even Jerry Maguire)

The only time they shared the screen, Tom out-acted Brad so hard people forget he was in the movie.

Name one bad Tom Cruise movie

I wouldn't say that he is better at it.

Agreed.
Rock of Ages, The Mummy

Okay name three bad Tom Cruise movies

>look at the death scenes in TDKR, embarrassing too

This ?
youtube.com/watch?v=T7kK6vvxQrs
Agreed.

But you'll find plenty of film mistakes or embarrassing stuff in many films. Even Blade runner or Gladiator etc.. But again, you're focusing on specifics, on the exceptions to prove your point while dismissing everything else.

Same goes with Tarantino btw. Especially him. Like i said in a previous comment, even i (trying my best to look past my own biases) am forced to admit Tarantino is a fucking genius. I hated Inglorious Basterds, thought Jackie Brown was average at best. But even these films have strokes of genius and brilliantly written scenes.
Awards are mostly bullshit, maybe so... (especially when films are being rewarded for their ideologies, political agendas)...
And yes, "capeshit" films are more often than not, garbage. But you can't say that about Dark knight with a straight face. Nolan may not be a solid "action" film director, but he's top quality in about 90% of the rest. (sure, he doesn't know how to film action scenes for the most part, i'll give you that).
The imdb list isn't based on film snob/critics opinions... But actual film viewers. Not just from America, but around the world. You just have a hard time admitting that your opinion is clouded by bias. "Everybody else is wrong, everybody else is clueless and dumb, and i, i only have seen the light. i'm right, i know what makes a good or bad film." That's your mentality in a nutshell.

I can't stand Spielberg's films, yet i'm also forced to admit he's a very talented director. Look past your own biases.

>>looks in their prime and current
Tom>Brad>>>DiCaprio>>>>Depp

>>acting ability
Tom=Brad>Leo>Depp

>>filmography
Tom>>Brad>Depp=Leo

Tom wins on pretty much everything. Brad Pitt always looked kind of dopey to me, whereas Cruise had a clean, classically handsome face. Leo is now fat and Depp is a meth junkie, and neither really looked exceptionally handsome even in their prime. I would say that Tom and Brad are roughly equal in acting ability, but Tom blows all of them out of the water for filmography.

You’re all actual faggots

Pitt and Cruise are both based tho

Tom Cruise wins all of them.

Knight and Day

looks like cruises pleb filter is still working.

yes i also watch redlettermedia

Yes.

His films are not well directed especially after Memento.

>forced to admit Tarantino is a fucking genius
I can't imagine how someone with a certain knowledge of film can claim this. He just rips off exploitation films from the 70s etc. Everything ends in le bloody violence because it's so cool, exploitation and violence is so cool haha and quips and violence and exploitation, so cool. He is like 15 year old. He can write a good scene but he can't construct a well flowing narrative. Exceptions are his first 3 films and OUATIH. So many references and ripping off. Exploitation films that he is aping have 90 minutes not 3 hours. Also he can't act and all of his films have this wannabe cool feel, they end up being embarrassing.

Like i said imdb is garbage and will rather have some film snobs or people who have actual knowledge rating films of films instead of bunch college kids who think Interstellar is the best film ever made. Audiences are retarded. Lot of mainstream audiences didn't even get Mother! which is one of the most unsubtle films i have ever seen.

Everybody's opinion is subjective. I like Nolan as a person i admire his work ethic, his use of film instead of digital etc. But he is a bad director. Tarantino is funny because he is a like 50 year old man at a party for 16 year olds. Wannabe cool old guy, it's funny.

> "Everybody else is wrong, everybody else is clueless and dumb, and i, i only have seen the light. i'm right, i know what makes a good or bad film."
True. Also most people who defend Tarantino and Nolan have very surface level knowledge of cinema.

Kek that's not a pleb filter. But if you disagree with that then Losing it is pretty bad.

He’s a much better actor than Depp.

I don't understand WHY he can't do good action.
With the budgets he has available, its fucking easy to get average to good action scenes, i mean its not like he is filming this stuff or choreographing it himself.
I don't understand why he hasn't learned that in the past decade.
I personally think it is embarrassing for an director to not get good action-scenes done.
Action is the essence of cinema.

4, 3, 2, 1

>I can't imagine how someone with a certain knowledge of film can claim this. He just rips off exploitation films from the 70s etc

If it's that easy why don't you do it ? If it's that easy, how come nobody has ever been able to rip him off and easily copy his style ?
and speaking of ripping off...
You are deluding yourself if you think other directors are pure originals.
The same goes for music. influences are everywhere, subconscious or not. You can't escape it.
I encourage you to watch "how tarantino steals from other movies"
youtube.com/watch?v=KYM_ZRjPD-A

(and he's brilliant at it, it's basically a compliment in his case),

>looks
pitt
>acting
leo
>filmography
cruise

Attached: 1357627233167.gif (500x200, 964K)

>Audiences are retarded. Lot of mainstream audiences didn't even get Mother! which is one of the most unsubtle films i have ever seen.

Which one ? Aronofsky's or Ho Bong's ?
So, Audiences are retarded..You're part of that audience, so are you also dumb ? Or are you an exception ? (i didn't like Interstellar btw, it's one of Nolan's worst with Dark knight rises & that remake he did with Pacino)

Attached: PdnRdvex5tpe37fZegHg4m-1200-80.jpg (1200x675, 61K)

Film audiences today don't deserve my genius.
You mean ripping off exploitation films? Plenty of people have done it and there are films with similar style as Tarantino.

I didn't say that but what's important is directors own personal spin on the subject matter. Lets say Paolo Sorrentino obviously likes Fellini but still his films feel unique. La Grande Bellezza was accused of ripping off La Dolce Vita. La Dolce Vita is one of my favourite films. What Sorrentino managed to do is tackle similar themes and also wildly different themes in the film, that way it doesn't feel like a copy.

I have seen it and i disagree with the conclusion he is making. It's pretty obvious what films is Tarantino aping and what genres and it's distracting because i don't think he puts his own spin on it, he essentially just copies it and pastes it into his own film. One more example. PTA made Boogie Nights, you watch that one and you see that he is aping Scorsese and it's distracting, it's too much. Later he made Phantom Thread and that was influenced by Rebecca and films of Max Ophuls but when i watched i wasn't thinking about that. It merged those elements and i wasn't thinking that seems like a Max Ophuls film. Tarantino can't do this. He doesn't modify his influences, he just copies them.

pitt looks acting film
tom looks film
leo looks film
johnny film

Mainstream audiences. The ones that have seen Mother only because Lawrence was in it. The ones that watch garbage that tops the box office charts and whose cinematic knowledge is limited to knowing Spielberg, Tarantino, Nolan and Hitchcock by name. These are the people that i'm talking about.

Aronofsky's Mother!

>I didn't say that but what's important is directors own personal spin on the subject matter. Lets say Paolo Sorrentino obviously likes Fellini but still his films feel unique. La Grande Bellezza was accused of ripping off La Dolce Vita. La Dolce Vita is one of my favourite films. What Sorrentino managed to do is tackle similar themes and also wildly different themes in the film, that way it doesn't feel like a copy.

Yet you don't use the same logic for Tarantino.
Some people claim that Reservoir dogs is a rip off of City on Fire.(Ringo Lam's film). Because many parts of the story are similar. Yet you can't really call it a remake because what makes reservoir dogs special (and way superior) is the storytelling.

I agree about Reservoir Dogs.
Like i said he utterly fails at copying in most cases but i don't have problem with Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown and OUATIH. I have problems with all the other films. That's why i called everything after Jackie with exception of OUATIH garbage.

bp, ld, tc, jd
tc, bp, ld, jd
bp, tc, ld, jd

Actually the first guy to be spot on

>Mainstream audiences. The ones that have seen Mother only because Lawrence was in it. The ones that watch garbage that tops the box office charts and whose cinematic knowledge is limited to knowing Spielberg, Tarantino, Nolan and Hitchcock by name. These are the people that i'm talking about.
>Aronofsky's Mother!

Aronofsky's is a one hit wonder. Once managed to fool many of us that he was a quality director after Requiem for a dream, but just like Donnie Darko's director, he never been able to produce/direct something of similar quality since then. "Mother!" had intereting moments here and there but it was heavy handed. Same goes for Dark Swan and Fountain.

Ya'll niggas acting like Cruise and Pitt aren't still in their prime

Why is everyone shitting all over Depp in terms of acting? Granted, it's been a while since he's tried or been in anything good, but in his prime he BTFO the rest of these nerds, idc how many Burton flicks he's been in.
In terms of acting I propose:
Depp Prime>Leo>Brad>Tom>Depp Just

In terms of looks it's:
Depp Prime>Brad>Leo>Tom>Depp Just, whatever else you may say, this one is quite literally indisputable

>Ya'll niggas acting like Cruise and Pitt aren't still in their prime

They aren't. Pitt's prime was during the late 90's Same goes for Cruise. But they've managed to stick around and not be forgotten because they still manage to have a huge audience. They aged well...But they're not in their prime anymore.

>Depp Prime>Leo>Brad>Tom>Depp Just

Name at least 3 films in which you think Depp is better than Dicaprio.

Go ahead, i'll wait.

Yes i agree. My point was that lot of people didn't even get what Mother was about despite it being so unsubtle.

Finally, the only reasonable response.

Christ, you're boring

Prime Depp = prime Pitt >Tom>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DiShittio

Attached: tenor.gif (498x372, 821K)

Prime - Cruise or DiCaprio - toss up
Now - Cruise
Acting - Cruise
Filmography - Brad

Not him but Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Ed Wood and Dead Man are all better than le screaming intense man.

His Jack Sparrow gimmick at the time there was only the first film it was way above anything DiCaprio ever did. It's a shame on Depp for doing nothing but that gimmick ever since

Dicaprio has 2 actually good performances, Gilbert Grape and Aviator. he's a solid actor who can go ham if needed (Django), but none of the other performances are nowhere near as inspired as some of Depp's
i was actually gonna say those 3 lol, but you can add the 1st PotC, however shit it got later, the first one was inspired

shit negro, are we hive-minding?

Overall career filmography: Cruise
Looks: Pitt
Acting: Leo
Fell off: Depp

I think we might

Attached: winchester.jpg (650x612, 55K)

also I'd like to add Sweeney Todd, Donnie Brasco and Black Mass to the list of great Depp performances

>His Jack Sparrow gimmick at the time there was only the first film it was way above anything DiCaprio ever did

NOW HERE'S YOUR REALITY CHECK

Django Unchained
youtube.com/watch?v=hglyRJXCNCM

Shutter Island
youtube.com/watch?v=YQFm5l2J48M

Wolf of Wall street
youtube.com/watch?v=Dftp-1qVkW4

(also excellent in Once Upon a time in Hollywood but i don't have any footage of that one )

Attached: wolf._V1_.jpg (1382x2048, 3.01M)

dude, like i said, Dicaprio knows how to go BIG HAM but it's rarely as inspired as some of the stuff Deppp used to do. granted, the Django performance was great (just like i said in the post above). OUATIH actually surprised me because it was the first Dicaprio performance in a while that touched me

>Dicaprio knows how to go BIG HAM but it's rarely as inspired as some of the stuff Deppp used to do
I mean that the rest of his performance is rarely as inspired as what Depp used to do, his BIG HAM moments are top-notch usually

better question, who is most likely to go full brando mode at some point and just lock themselves on a private island eating hamburgers non stop while watching kino all day because you've literally achieved, you've been a famous actor, you've traveled the world, you've dicked every starlet, you've taken all the best pills, you've met everyone of importance, you've visited the boggs and talked to the ayyy lmaos and seen everything there is too see and will be remembered for thousands of years and all thats left is hamburgers, nothing but endless hamburgers

I vote for leo

Are you trying to prove something here?

This. No one in that list comes close to Cruise in his prime when it comes to facial aesthetics
Pitt is taller and has better body though

>This. No one in that list comes close to Cruise in his prime when it comes to facial aesthetics
>Pitt is taller and has better body though

Christian Bale
youtube.com/watch?v=hSbBf4REAA8

Pitt and DiCaprio are above Depp and Cruise in everything, it's not even fair.

Who can even argue against Pitt?

Attached: D069F582-D075-4E52-BF75-90722137D5AF.jpg (1663x1080, 545K)

>Brad
Looks more handsome and masculine now than in his youth - was too pretty in his 20s and 30s. Solid actor more deserving of an Oscar than many who've won in last 30 years. Good filmography.
>Tom
Basically no difference at all. Hasn't got better with age like Brad though, so maybe slightly better looking when younger. Solid actor more deserving of an Oscar than many who've won in last 30 years. Great filmography.
>Leo
Was a very pretty boy but aging into a schlubby middle aged guy who resembles Jack Nicholson without ever having been handsome the way young Jack was. Good actor but very overrated. Outstanding filmography.
>Jonny
Very pretty when young, progressed to handsome, now beginning to age v. badly (drugs etc?) and taking on a bit of a Mickey Rourke resemblance. Good actor but very poor taste in movies. OK filmography.

boom there it is

Anybody here looking forward to Ad Astra? New James Gray kino starring Brad.

Attached: D_r1glEW4AECpJv.jpg (1382x2048, 495K)

No, it's not. Brad Pitt is the center of the film. I have the script. It premieres soon in Venice, i'm curious to see the reactions.

>looks
Pitt>Cruise>Leo>Depp
>acting
Pitt>Leo>Depp>Cruise
>filmography
Leo>>Pitt>Cruise>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Depp

>prime looks
Pitt
Cruise
DiCaprio

>current looks
Cruise
Pitt
DiCaprio
Depp

>Acting
DiCaprio
Pitt
Cruise
Depp

>Filmography
DiCaprio
Cruise
Pitt
Depp