Liverbros…

What a sore loser LMAO

How many has City won before 2011? Oh right...

damn

Attached: FSQWnQ3XEAE5k6Z.jpg (930x558, 49.45K)

Cope, the premier league is harder.

City didn't exist before 2011, it was retroactively inserted into our memory by Emirati shamans to promote their new club

City has won more titles than Liverpool has in 30 years

Attached: D709E71D-89C0-4092-B465-ABB0CB5E4142.jpg (236x236, 9.39K)

desilucional

Do you have a problem with us dinobros?

buying success means nothing.
Absolute plastic team.

He mad

Based Pep.1 league title in 30 years it's a joke for a big club.

>literally throwing the CL semi final because you were so scared of losing to Klopp in the CL Final

Poop Guardiolel

Is anyone else feeling extremely comfy at the thought of seeing real Madrid dab all over them again?

I'd say Liverpool were hoping for man city in the final. Now they are going to get bullied by Madrid. Remember Liverpool fans, it's not Tottenham this time, which is literally a by in a final

Liverpool still would have more if they didn't win any in the next 10.

The fuck does the advent of the PL have to do with the fact that Liverpool only have one title in 30 years?

It's especially hard to win when you can only spend unlimited money on player transfers and salaries

>"winning is... le bad!"
>"d-doesn't count!"
cope, seethe and dial 8

>City conceded 21!!! goals in 35 games
>4:0, 5:0 every week
>teams don't even try against City anymore
Thank god they have Liverpool with Klopp who he edged out almost every season since 2014

>they've won one
Generous way of looking at it. Liverpool fans should be sucking his dick for this plaudit.

Based. Maybe this will put a rocket up the faggots from Egypt who think champions league is the pinnacle. It means nothing if your arent champions of your league you fucking pieces of shit

>can get way with breaking FFP
>have unlimited money
>can field two starting squads
>only beat Liverpool(a team with a shoestring budget) by the 1-3 points
Is this supposed to be impressive?

Embarrassing that Liverpool FC have one won one, under controversial circumstances, in 30 years. Why can't your rabble accept this without deflecting?

a $600m team is not a team on a shoestring budget, hermano

>under controversial circumstances
Only morons on Yea Forums think this. Liverpool were 20 points clear before the break. They were always going to win the league, don’t be delusional

*

Mate, covid

>(a team with a shoestring budget)
good bait made me (you)

cry more bitch lmao

The bald fraud is so consumed by Klopp he has him on his mind 24/7.

based Twain

its harder in a sense that you need more consistency, but cl is harder in a sense that you need more luck

whoa liverpool doesn't pay their players? that's crazy

PL > CL. Having a few lucky nights is far easier than staying consistent across 38 games.

>staying consistent
LOL if you fuck up ONE GAME in the CL knockout stage, YOU'RE OUT OF THE COMPETITION

He's won though?

>NOOOO THAT'S NOT HISTORY, IT ISN'T RECENT ENOUGH

lel, he's absolutely seething isn't he

>second most winners don't have a great history

No you're not. Two legs means you only need to win half of the matches. Liverpool are in the final despite bottling the second legs against both Inter and Benfica.

>0 (zero) dollars
>2 CLs (should have been 3 but UEFA rigged one for Poonaldo so that they could sell more FIFA games to muslim kids in England)

getting into damage control mode in order to try to keep his job fuck you bald fraud

man city won the league in 68

lmao seething

Reading some football histories and success has always been bought
Even in the amateur era the richest teams bought up the best players

yeah because thats definitely the same as a country buying a bench player for 100 million pounds

Wipe your tears away and tell us which part of what he said was incorrect.

Kek finally someone said it

hes totally correct
doesnt mean he will ever win the cl

this, you can go all the way back to preston north end to see them buying all these scottish players. The hate for new money clubs seems a little strange to me, especially when man u and lpool get a slide but have spent millions dating back to the 80s

yeah city definitely dont have any advantage totally organic success

Attached: file.png (720x900, 1.02M)

My favorite thing is when they use Manure as an excuse as to why they have 0 CLs

>most expensive team in the continent
>all he can do is win the league
So this is the power of Oil money

Net spend isn't real

sell to buy mate
not that complicated

>the city state of manchester united