Refuse to review Alita

They don't review cartoons like alita or pikachu

Because they don't do movies for children i.e pokemon, toy story, angry birds etc

Alita is Japanese, based on a manga, a thing they steer clear of widely since always due to, as stated many times, only having surface level knowledge of. Same with pokemon. Only very rarely do they touch something vidya related.

Chernobyl is just a show dude, it's weird enough they started doi g those at all.

Gave up after the Jurassic World review
Even Jay couldn't believe Mike's shit taste

REY IS NOT A MARY SUE

star wars and marvel movies are for children

They only have surface level knowledge of Pokemon? We're they born yesterday?

Ah yes, they only do intellectual films like Bird Box and BasedWars. Not kiddie shit like like The Lego Movie.

>dude lol we don't care about our fans that makes us cool right?
>yeah we totally don't care how many subscribers or patreons we have. we're just that badass heh
>no we won't review your popular requested movie, we do what we want and don't care about you

this schtick is getting old. No, it doesn't make you a badass to shit all over your fanbase and not give them what they want. It just makes you retarded

PG-13 and PG are two whole different categories my dude.

>review Pokemon
why would you even want this

Lost a lot of respect after they shilled Force Awakens. Even sweet little Jay for saying " She ain't no Mary Sue in this one"

>only having surface level knowledge of
Yet they reviewed Ready Player One.
>chernobyl is just a show
they reviewed that shitty Hill House movie with interracial lesbians and ghosts and praised it while refusing to review other shows in the same episode.

Mike “If your cock is black I want it in my crack” Stoklasa

Same. But then it turns out to be an e-celeb guest cancer episode every time recently.

Attached: Lao.jpg (807x659, 42K)

>shitty Hill House movie
I meant series

Mad. They don’t owe you anything.

You can watch the video of Rich clearing the entire Pokemon Red using only his charmander spamming Strength, that doesn't mean he knows shit about it.

Jack knows a little, but that's not enough to support a discussion with any sort of depth.

Only TFA and RotS were PG13.

They have reviewed The Haunting of Hill House, Star Trek Discovery and Stranger Things.

PG doesn't mean "immature/juvenile" it means "all ages". PG-13 means "we included some juvenile violence or a boob"

that's because Ready Player One is so incredibly overloaded with pandering to uncle culture that there was something to comment for even on them. They didn't go 'wow I can't belive they put in Amuro's gundam even though nobody in the cinema is going to recognize it' because you can't expect them to know what that is

80's boomers make it a point to hate on pokemon because they want to distance themselves away from millenials and establish their boomerism. Remember when they were growing up pokemon was exclusively a little kid fad and you'd get beat up at your high school for liking it.

at least they're honest enough to not review things that they know they have a disposition against

>Elitism
LMAO these chumps are the biggest manchildren plebs imaginable. The only awards films they’ve discussed in the last two years were Get Out and Black Panther lmaooo
>Because they don't do movies for children
They have literally reviewed 20+ Marvelflicks and recommended all of them. Movies for children are their bread and butter. One could much more accurately argue that they don’t do movies for adults

Attached: AFB5AF2F-9B58-4B3C-9684-85629F3A495F.jpg (458x960, 38K)

>iphoneposting
get the fuck out you underage twitter nigger

That seems to me like you only watch their opinions on those and miss out on jay talks about latest weird artkino and mike compares it to TNG #36326

Why are you so hungry for people's opinons on marvel? Do you like those movies?

>paid Disney shills start raiding Yea Forums to hype up the trailer
>we have our first anti-RLM thread in weeks
is it... a conspiracy?

Attached: 1536036569822.jpg (1908x1776, 508K)

Why did Rich Evans and Bald stop doing Previously Recorded?

>RLM
>elitists because they don't review absolutely all the Hollywood garbage that opens in cinema nowadays, even if they are mostly plebs and talk about Star Wars and Marvel all the fucking time.
They review what they want. You are one less retard suscribed to their channel. What a loss.

Yet they review every marvel childrens movie that comes out

Imagine making a series making fun of nerd culture consumerist shills, while simultaneously giving THOUSANDS to the mouse for video props, and also recommending every single disney movie ever. LMAO @ Reddit Leddit Meddit

man Rich was such an ahole in the VTM Bloodlines video

Rich Evans is dead, and Jack's son died and he's going through a divorce.

their whole detached irony schtick is soooo 2013 at this point

They were an asshole about any game that wasn't indie steam shit. No wonder PreRec failed.

>>refuse to review Pokemon
The movie that shouldn't have worked but it did.

to become a partner on twitch you had to stream on a schedule, it was to much to keep up with and they got bored doing the same shit over and over.

RLM doesnt really run on a specific time frame for stuff so it didnt work for them

Only in burger land.

'weren't feeling it anymore'

But more accurately, people were calling them out for only having very basic and not often well informed opinions on vidya, like when reviewing the fifth title without having actually played the four before - they could judge it on its merits as one videogame, but the larger picture escaped them every other time.

Also, it doesn't help that Jack is antiphotogenic. Too many awkard-on-purpose starts betray the fact that they didn't actually know how to frame the show naturally.

I only watched 2 (episodes? shows?) and the only thing that bothered me is that Rich was overbearing and uhh... jack? (aids moby) was very very passive and deferred on everything. It pretty much eliminated any meaningful conversation and Rich isn't exactly an authority on videogames so sucked.

don't "watch it" just find the "jay on pre rec" on youtube and listen to those. jay talks about movies

I'll try that

>bit about white people ruining everything
Never happened.

What a sensitive faggot you are.

Why?
Why?
Ok maybe.

Why are there suddenly anti RLM trolls?

>Why are there suddenly anti RLM trolls?
>in a tv/ thread
Hello newfag

It was in that ninja episode with the long haired martial arts guy

They were never gonna review that weebshit or pokemans. I haven't unsubbed but I haven't watched anything since they snubbed Gilliamkino for Endgame.
Why they haven't talked about Chernobyl but did a special little featurette for The Boys is a good question tho.

Attached: 3E9D1DB1-EC83-47A0-ADE2-4158DB090CF3.jpg (2155x3192, 3.59M)

They don’t subscribe to HBO, that’s why.

They reviewed RPO because Mike actually read the book for that one.

Attached: 1522687863904.jpg (800x631, 203K)

Me! I only watch people that have the exact same opinions as mine.

they need two people to talk about a tv show. i think jay watches all tv shows, rich only watches superheroes, mike might watch some horror

someone edited them into compilations so you don't even have to be bothered with their terrible gameplay
youtube.com/watch?v=kIMyX9-bHRU
youtube.com/watch?v=sVfLqYEFIO8

Mike doesn’t care unless 1. It guarantees views (like Endgame) 2. Makes them look smart (indie film) or 3. Is Star Trek or Ghost movie/show

The Alita one is weird because Mike made TWO Plinkett reviews on James Cameron. You would think Alita would be a topic he would want to talk about, even if it was to shit or praise it.

They couldn’t even review Venom. I wanted them to tear apart that movie so badly.

>RLM
>elitist
>liked once upon a time in pedowood

has RLM always been this fucking pleb? these fuckers lost all credibility i thought they had with that review

Your logic is dumb. They reviewed Godzilla and Power Rangers, both with Japanese origins.

When they review sony movies they don't like, such as ghostbusters they namedrop sony over and over to get viewers to see sony = bad. When they review sony movies they like, such as Spiderman, Baby Driver, or Hollywood they will make absolute sure to not even utter sony. Why do they do this?

>review every shitty horror movie that comes out
>elitism
They just have shit taste.

Mike hates Mexicans almost as much as Spoonys brother

Their entire "brand" is build on reviewing movies for children

They have gotten lazy. The realize they can do anything they want and their retarded loyal fanbase will give them 50K on Patreon for doing nothing.

All they care about doing is Best of the Worst because it is cheap and easy to film.
And even that is lazy since they pick the same B-movies and Eldery exercise videos (seriously, what is their obsession with Eldery exercise videos).

Patreon ruins another channel.

do they have day jobs? seems like they don't release content frequently enough to provide income for 2-3 people.

Attached: DrW9J5eWoAM8LbD.jpg (788x654, 64K)

Mike was the one that shilled TFA and cried and said it was amazing.

And when RotS comes out he will suck JJ’s dick hard there too and shill the movie.

Mike only watches Star Trek, Rick and Morty, and Ghost Adventures.

>refuse to
Please direct me to them saying they “refuse” to review any of those. They’ve never reviewed every movie that comes out.

i just want them to give anime a try

why cant they review steins;gate or attack on titan?

Attached: 1564631804720.jpg (1200x1122, 197K)

>Alita
>Pokemon
Are you a child, retarded, or both?

Are you?
They can shill every Marvel movie but can’t review Alita Battle Angel? A movie written by THE JAMES CAMERON and a decent movie?

Yeah I hate when a joke gets played out, that’s why I post on Yea Forums

in your mind not reviewing anime-related stuff and stuff for actual children is elitism?
>hurr but marvel is for children
not anymore, I hear more 'adults' talking about marvel comics than I do children.

yeah they have shit opinions, at this point i'm just watching because jay is cute

Attached: 1567729887227.gif (400x366, 1022K)

But there are always retards who complain because their "favourite" reviewers are offensively ignoring such masterworks as Pokemon or things that are not really their cup of tea, like Chernobyl.

They’ve skipped several Marvel movies

For you

>REVIEW THE THINGS I WANT TO SEE
eat shit kid

They don’t care about video games and they stay away from anime-related shit like the plague. Chernobyl is up in the air though.

They probably skipped it because it looked lame and they didn’t care. Just a thought.

Golden Axe

I mean have they really?

pretty pathetic how triggered this board gets over a simple factual statement. cartoon fags are mentally ill

>Alita is Japanese, based on a manga, a thing they steer clear of widely since always due to, as stated many times, only having surface level knowledge of.
Oh that's just bullshit. I knew nothing about the manga and I still watched the damn movie. You don't have to know shit about it to judge whether or not it's a good movie on its own.

And Demon House didn’t?

Ant Man and the Wasp, Venom, Spider-Man Far From Home

Mike has a personal interest in that type of thing. It’s almost like they discuss movies they have an interest in or think would be interesting to discuss and skip stuff they don’t care about. This isn’t hard to understand. Are you fucking stupid?

>they don't do movies for children

Attached: faggot.jpg (600x737, 68K)

Spider-Man Homecoming and Shazam are the deepest adult movies.

Don’t you faggots ever get tired of pretending you hate RLM? You literally have every opinion they’ve ever said memorized and post about them constantly. I’m sorry they will never be your friend in real life, but acting like you hate them and pretending you don’t use them as a friend simulator isn’t going to change that.

Europeans don't watch this childish shit. Only Amerimutts watch faggot manchildren.

Has Mike killer himself over being anally destroyed by William Shatner yet?

If they review classic Yea Forums
cccccc

.
Ppppppp

I'll resub

>STOP CRITICIZING MY FRIEND SIMULATOR
Go outside.
Talk to actual people.
Have sex.
Live.

they did cover venom in another video but it didn't get a full length review

I'm eagerly awaiting for the next 'Catch-up' episode.
Only chance we got to see if they have any input on some of those skipped/missed movies.

I wanted to see a look at Spider-verse.

No they didn’t.

This a capeshit only channel, kiddo.

The only movie I wanted them to review is Crawl but I am not sure if it even played where they live. The movie flew under the radar pretty quick. Maybe it will be in the Catch up.

patreon always makes everyone complacent, I want them starving

Capeshit AND Star Trek AND Ghosts-Adventures channel.

i want his protein so bad

Attached: protein.gif (292x243, 1.16M)

Is there a more kino trifecta?

>use to love Cr1tikal
>now he is a patreon whore who only does drama/reaction videos and a terrible podcast

I didn’t realize Us, Paddleton, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Under the Silver Lake, Midsommar, and Bone Tomahawk were capeshit

Hollywood capeshit but without the capes.

those don't count

I'm pretty sure they briefly covered it in the latter half of one of their episodes. I tried finding it but couldn't so here's this

youtube.com/watch?v=bfSnk0OgRas

>everything is capeshit even when it isn’t because I said so
Sure thing, autist

Why not?

nice thanks.

>subscribing to anything

Attached: 7dbffb772e1729f5049b8a1e7d83b7db.jpg (2048x1024, 102K)

They make so many racist jokes like when Rich was speaking fake Chinese and shouted THEY ALL SPEAK LIKE THAT!

This. After trying to beg a celebrity to be on their low quality youtube channel like that, I don’t know how anyone could show their face.

Copulate

jay is not cute

Reasons!

>watching RLM mainly for HITB

People don’t really do this do they? BOTW and Re:View are the main reasons to watch with HITB as a fun extra

No it wasn't.

No

BOTW sucks though. They don’t even watch entertaining bad movies. It is just the same monster movies and elderly excessive videos again and again and again and again and again. They couldn’t even be bothered to watch Ratatoing.

Why are they still reviewing capeshit and Star Wars then?

I only watch for the care boars.

>refuse to review Alita
Based, I'm going to go donate 100 bucks.

based oldfag reference
I never thought I would miss Plinkett Saves Santa

I want Jack to push his penis-like head deep inside my asshole until it comes out my mouth and we fuse into one sapiosexual being

Personally, I would have gone with: I want Jack so far up my ass he wears me like a halloween costume.

>Anyone else unsubbed?
Nope. And I still donate to their patreon. Best channel on youtube still.

No! I want to BE Jack and Jack to be me

>I want to BE Jack
You really think you could pull that off?

He has no discernible personality traits
So yes

i just love RLM so much Yea Forumsros

There's plenty of other people reviewing films that probably covered those. I'd have liked to have seen Jay talk about The House That Jack Built and Climax while Mike tries to make sense of them but it is what it is.

>didn't get paid to review Alita
>didn't get paid to review Chernobyl
>didn't get paid to review Pokemon

Have Mike and Rich reacted to the trailer, yet?

Do you think Jay trims his pubes?

>sNEED HEHEHE

I’m basically a body double of Jay and yes

Please post face pic.

no need he waxes smooth from the neck down

I don't recall them ever doing anything anti-white or even all that lefty. They're largely apolitical.

They're Disney shills. All they review are star wars and marvel movies.

>Chernobyl is just a show dude
(You)

Can you imagine believing this how you run a business?

Yet it works
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>couldn't even get Shatner on there show after begging Maculey to jump in

Attached: tfa.jpg (350x350, 16K)

>youtube movie reviews are a business
what's the term for somebody younger than a zoomer

Never heard of them.

You can clearly see Jay's chest hair in multiple episodes.

The white guy with glasses said that online anonymity is bad because it lets people be racist and that everyone’s identity online should be public

I agree with his sentiment but because I feel I shouldn't have to read opinions voiced by ugly people online as I certainly don't listen to them in real life.

The irony of your post is hilarious.