Why didn't Voldemort just hide his horcruxes on the moon?

you really think he cared about anything but muh pureblood lmaoo

____deh____

dude didn't even really care about purebloods he wasn't even a pureblood himself he just used that to motivate the retarded purebloods who surrounded him who could be manipulated in to doing what he wanted.
He cared more about Hogwarts than any pureblood who supported him.

This desu
The horcruxes are entirely dependent on the vessel that stores them. He should have went full Samson option and ensured that if he goes, the rest of the world goes with him

you know what
Who cares give a fuck about harry potter

what was his motivation? he just wanted to own the school? why?

Because he was an incel who wanted to ban school relationships.

>make an ice cube your horcrux
>melt it to water
>heat the water so it boils and evaporates into the atmosphere
your move Potter

doesnt sound healthy to evaporate part of your soul

Why didnt he use a neutron bomb during the summer break to irradiate the faculty without damaging the structural integrity of the castle.

why didn't he just keep one in his pocket?

because although the structural integrity would be fine the figurative integrity would be compromised

He cared a lot about blood purity. He was obsessed with being Slytherin's direct inbred to shit blood descendant on one side but eternally butthurt that his father was a handsome Chad of a muggle, to the point that he murdered him and his entire family for no other reason.
Him thinking he was the best despite thinking blood purity = magical potency while being a mutt never occurred to him, probably because he was a deranged schizo with a shattered soul. or because he was a one-dimensional cartoon villain on account of J K Rowling being a hack womanchild

why dint voldermort just make his soul a horcrux?
then according to religions he would live forever

Maybe because something that's true in a fantasy world isn't true in real life. If Harry Potter was merely conceptual but otherwise completely consistent with real life, heritability would have a direct influence on magical potency

Why didn't JK Rowling just hide her books on the moon to save us from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: No!.jpg (168x300, 15K)

because horcruxes are respawn points you idiot imainge him dying and respawning on moon wouldn't be really fun there would it

Attached: 1513801228438.png (645x773, 188K)

How did the wizard world take the moon landing? Do they have a spell to breathe in space?

Did Voldemort know Harry was a Horcrux? If so, why did he try to kill Harry? Is there another Horcrux out there?

Why did Voldemort turn a living animal into horcrux when the others were all objects? The ideas of Horcruxes in general is fucking retarded

>him dying and respawning on moon wouldn't be really fun there would it
I mean knows magic so he could literally teleport off it.

Attached: 1544964044604.webm (640x264, 941K)

nigga that must be the smallest picture I've ever seen with text

Meh, this is the first time ive done it in a few months and the thred is ded anyway. (you) do you

you must be new here.

Voldemort was an egomaniac obsessed with being a god and with being slytherin's heir. The whole point is that each of the objects have meaning for him, that's why they're all these oddly specific things located in weird places. If he was smart and/or sane he would just keep them all in some secret vault in some swiss bank.

>doesnt sound healthy to evaporate part of your soul
Why? The atoms are still intact.

it's a soul, there's no atoms