Do you think there will be any films made that address the incel shooter epidemic we’ve seen these past few years?

When people refer to mass shooters I think they mean people who shoot up random civilians for ideological reasons rather than gangland shootings.

might get a b movie about some immigrant hero killing an incel before he could commit one.

Attached: 1566763976634.gif (288x136, 669K)

Fucking COPE, you goddamned failures

Agreed, urban lives don't matter. It only matters if I could have been a victim of it and I'm not poor.

this, it's nothing new, they just have the internet now

Excuse me sir you must have made a mistake.
Why are so many of the fellows in that pic persons of color?
We all know that mass shooters are white cis men.
Please correct this.

200 IQ right there

Attached: head.png (229x324, 117K)

And blacks murder random whites, for ideological reasons, all the time, and in far greater numbers. They shoot up "random civilians", even while attempting to conduct gang-related violence, all the time.

And the distinction is asinine. When your little girl is hit by a stray bullet, do you think she'll be more dead, or less, if the bullet was fired by whitey for "ideological" reasons? It's a false distinction, used to push a false narrative. We absolutely have a problem with gun violence in this country, but it sure as shit doesn't come from a tiny handful of violent white people.

>urban lives don't matter.
criminal lives don't matter.

You also recognize Cho (Virginia Tech) I'm sure

Yes. Top Right are DC Sniper killers

>doesn't remember the owner of the high score

*shoots up a wal-mart*

>epidemic
You mispelled "mass media hypefest." Doctors kill far more people more regularly.

This, also some are false flags
El Paso kid was a patsy, black ops agents did most of the shooting and killing, multuple witnesses saw multiple shooters, but it was memory holed

Attached: 200_s.gif (490x200, 57K)

The overwhelming majority of mass shooters are black. Why don't we see more white shooters?

Most of these guys look like incels

I mean the main difference is that my daughter wouldn't be hanging about in ghetto urban areas so gang shootings in those places don't have any reason to concern me. White mass shooters targeting random people is much more likely to result in my hypothetical daughter being murdered.

>And blacks murder random whites, for ideological reasons, all the time, and in far greater numbers.
Can you think of some recent examples? Genuinely curious

>And the distinction is asinine. When your little girl is hit by a stray bullet, do you think she'll be more dead, or less, if the bullet was fired by whitey for "ideological" reasons?
I agree with you that the end result can often be the same but we should recognize the difference in motives behind such shootings. There is a difference between someone purposefully shooting up a civilian center with the intention to murder innocent vs a stray bullet accidentally hitting a bystander in a drive by. Recognizing the difference in motives is critical in being able to address the problem of each respective sort of shooting. What solves gangland violence won't necessarily solve the issue of ideological mass shooters.

This is the look of someone being told and forced to do this. This was not an active shooter

Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. Or literal thousands of others. If you think you need to be "in ghetto urban areas" for the violence to touch you, you aren't paying attention.

Attached: murdered.jpg (3200x1680, 253K)

...

>All mass shooters kill people because they don't have sex
>Not because they are mentally ill, racists or simply evil.

you'll rationalize away literally anything won't you

Takes one to know one.

Attached: 1566254689445.jpg (716x724, 32K)

>damage controlling this hard
cringe

I don't think it's damage control it's just recognizing there is a very big difference behind the motives of gangland shootings and ideologically driven shootings. The solution to solving these problems isn't the same so I think it's worth making a distinction. Would you not agree?

>this one specific incident of an active shooter seems very strange and doesn't match the rest
>"no no no, you dont ask questions, don't think!, he was incel just like the rest, dont think about it!"

Absolutely based worldview not shaped by the mainstream media poster

>seems very strange and doesn't match the rest
how so?

Your problem is that, based on zero data, you're assuming an ideological motive behind the majority of white shootings, and a non-ideological/ganglang motive behind the majority of non-white shootings, despite a very well documented series of "kill whitey" shootings in this country.

There's a distinction - it isn't a worthwhile distinction to the victims, but it's there. But you're assigning that distinction to cases on the basis of zero evidence, other than your preconceived and racist idea that all white shooters are ideological and "incel", and all black shooters are crips shooting at bloods.

Ever hear of the Zebra Killings? How about the Washington snipers? Dorner? Omar Thornton? Colin Ferguson?

Did he even fire off a single shot? Did he immediately put himself in the vicinity of an armed security guard that would shoot him? Hmmmm.....

They already made one, 500 Days of Summer

>you're assuming an ideological motive behind the majority of white shootings
I never once said that or even implied it. I was talking about ideological shooters which can be any race never once did I say that majority of them are white

>and a non-ideological/ganglang motive behind the majority of non-white shootings
Again did not say this. I was talking about gangland shootings not non-whites.

>ther than your preconceived and racist idea that all white shooters are ideological and "incel", and all black shooters are crips shooting at bloods.
Can you point to one instance of me doing this? I very purposefully did not specify race in my comments but rather the sort of shootings (ideological vs gangland).

t.

Attached: 70462A66-3B5A-4881-A3FE-66FB6C635183.jpg (721x482, 45K)

i was incel until 29 so happy ive fucked a few different times now

>I very purposefully did not specify race in my comments but rather the sort of shootings
Yes, as an attempted explanation as to why black mass shooters aren't classed as mass shooters, e.g. "mass shooters are ideological, and these black guys are clearly gang shooters, because they're black", don't do that redditor bullshit here, any outside observer with two brain cells to rub together knows exactly what you said, and why you said it. This sort of back peddling is pathetic.

>recent examples
I'm actually familiar with all the shooters you mentioned but I was asking for recent examples. I think Thornton would be the best case you could point to and I do agree it was ideologically driven. Dorner as well. The only reason I ask is because I couldn't remember any recent cases reported in the media even though there has been a history of non-white ideological shooters in this country as well.

>mobile poster
post a timestamp
lets see that brown skin

Don't you put Dorner's name with those fucking niggers.

>golly gee, we didn't do anything!

Attached: nzZ3A7x_d.jpg (487x719, 52K)

Your saying that in an alt right board full. Of incels lmao at your life faggot boy

Bullshit you faggots use the "more mass shootings than days in the year" stat all the time

Actually, this is the El Paso shooter.

Attached: 1546252346773.jpg (940x545, 63K)

whores don't count

White shooters and terrorism is notable, because it is exceptional. Mass murder and violent ideology steaming out of the African American community is just seen as another Monday.

I always feel joy when Amerimutts kill each other.
You are the cancer of this planet.

Attached: 1541070867097.jpg (912x707, 134K)

One of my friends looks exactly like this, should I be worried?

Then all men are virgins.

Your request is predicated on the belief that black mass shooters are as well publicised as white mass shooters, when the mass media is actively suppressing anything that defies the ‘mass shooters are white’ official line.

He literally has incel genes. That doesn't inherently make him dangerous, but definitely keep an eye on him.

Probably, since he is a 20 year old NEET kissless virgin

>Yes, as an attempted explanation as to why black mass shooters aren't classed as mass shooters
I never once specified blacks nor any race for that matter my initial response was to this photo here which appeared to be list mostly gangland shootings.

>mass shooters are ideological, and these black guys are clearly gang shooters, because they're black"
I didn't assume gang affiliation because they're black retard just look at the image. Filled with tatted up mongoloids (both white and black) with some literally throwing up gang signs. If we could get an actual list of names of the people shown in the image I'm pretty positive you'd see most are gang affiliated.

>don't do that redditor bullshit here, any outside observer with two brain cells to rub together knows exactly what you said, and why you said it. This sort of back peddling is pathetic.
Don't sperg out just because your brainlet ass can't read an argument.

Yeah and the doctors are really trying to kill as many people as possible.

>you faggots
based tribal retard assuming everyone who disagrees with him is on bad team.

>120070645
So in other words, it's just going to be pathetic redditor "ha, gotcha, I didn't use those exact words!" shit, and you ignoring any context of the argument, because you're so autistic that you literally can't allow yourself to admit fault, even anonymously.

That an actual human being could be so pathetic strains credulity, so I'm pretty sure you're a troll, go farm (You)'s somewhere else, thanks.

your pathetic cherry-picked image macros don't change the facts of the world
whites are the main threat to the US and western civilization as a whole
here is the director of the fbi stating it directly
youtu.be/4EvtGCKkYQk?t=360
>"i will say that a majority of the domestic terrorism cases that we've investigated are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacist violence"

Attached: right_wing_white_terrorists.png (835x1020, 75K)

just like every other shooting, only the lowest forms of IQ buy into the conspiracies made up on a basket weaving forum

>my numbers, using cherry-picked politically correct definitions to manipulate the outcome, which disagree with my own crime stats, clearly show that you're wrong!

Attached: autism.jpg (707x536, 154K)

>"ha, gotcha, I didn't use those exact words!" shit
Faggot I told you why I assumed gang affiliation and it wasn't due to race. I even explained the specific reasons why (tats, literal gang signs being thrown up) but you just ignored it.

>and you ignoring any context of the argument
You have no argument to make. You're condemning everything I'm saying as being racial despite the fact I very carefully explained to you my reasoning for my assumption.

>That an actual human being could be so pathetic strains credulity, so I'm pretty sure you're a troll, go farm (You)'s somewhere else, thanks.
Cry some more faggot. You argue like a woman.