Is there scientific evidence that the power of love could allow communication from the center of a black hole?

Is there scientific evidence that the power of love could allow communication from the center of a black hole?

Attached: Interstellar primary1.jpg (1800x1012, 104K)

no. gravity near the event horizon of a black gole is going towards the infinity and if would simply tear everything apart

No, but there's no science to deny that possibility as well. It's stupid but so is our knowledge of the universe.

No evidence it can't.

Attached: beans.png (750x1334, 674K)

>through God all things are possible
Jesus literally said this so yes. the black hole is the eye of the needle, love is the camel.

just turn off your brain lmao

no, the power of love cant even keep 50% of marriages from ending in divorce , gravity is much much more powerful.

I'll try spinning that's a good trick.

To this day I don't know if this is just shitposting or if people genuinly believe the movie tried to say love caused it to happen.

Attached: 1528845636832.jpg (426x566, 17K)

you didn't understand the movie. the point was that the characters are too primitive to understand the mechanisms by which future humans constructed the chamber inside of the black hole, so they rationalize it through a meaningless emotional mechanism (as humans do constantly)
you have to be a real moron to not understand the simple idea behind this movie.

the idea was that he knew she would take the watch because they loved each other.

It really pisses me off that we will never, EVER be able to observe a singularity. Not now and not in a million years. It's like Godel's uncertainty principle that shows certain math problems will never be solved. It's so annoying

>u jus dun geddit
>bravo nolan

Why did future humans build a supercomputer inside a black hole to help a guy twitch the handles on a watch instead of simply producing the equation we needed

the movie made it pretty obvious that TARS created the chamber after losing his friend on the ice planet, dumbass

Hurr, it's "Godel's incompleteness theorems"

Why? Because TARS sounded like it understood the black hole machine better than Cooper? That was just lazy ass writing to explain to the audience wtf is going on. "His friend"? Gimme a break

No but there isn't evidence against it

IS THERE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT INTERSTELLAR WAS ONE OF THE GREATEST THEATER EXPERIENCES OF ALL TIME IN 70MM IMAX AND ANY PLOT NITPICKS ARE AUTISTIC AND IRRELEVANT

>this movie is good because 70mm IMAX
How about you talk about the actual movie and not the projectors though

Movie sucked, should've been more straightforward about locating a new home for humanity instead of all that black hole shit.

if you can't understand the love between two robo bros, then I can't help you. what did you think the whole "love" speech was about? fuck, I wish I was a robot all the time, and now the reCAPTCHA is reminding me that I never will be.

I mean, the movie literally did say it was the power of love.

How come NASA could make a super ship capable of zipping around from planet to planet, but couldn't make corn? And how did information about the interior of black holes help them make corn?

THE ACTUAL MOVIE AS IN ALL THE PRACTICAL SETS INSTEAD OF CGI AND THE RARELY USED 70MM IMAX FILM CAMERAS IT WAS SHOT WITH

HOW ABOUT THE MOST SCIENTIFICALLY ACCURATE MODEL OF A BLACK HOLE EVER PUT IN A MOVIE

TARS SET SHITPOSTING TO 100%

Attached: 635505429981593257-INTERSTELLAR-02.jpg (1920x1440, 395K)

It wasn't about the corn, the equation helped them make spacecraft to leave Earth. But I agree, if the entire planet is working on one thing, making fungus-resistant corn should be way easier than magic space drives and way higher in the priority list

Why did the future humans need a past human to go into the black hole? Why send the data through a watch? Couldn't they just have a future human manipulate a fax machine or something?

>Scientifically accurate black hole
Science needs to be verified. There are no pictures of a black hole, so none of it is verified. Its philosophy until then.

because they can only manipulate gravity, since it's the only force that moves through time

Yes, it's all explained in the 2014 documentary "Interstellar".

Literally is a single picture of a fucking black hole you dunce

>no pictures of a black hole
Get a load of this brainlet

How did leaving earth solve their corn problem? It isn't like they found corn on Saturn.

why didnt they just use the lovemagic to cure the corn cancer

But that doesn't why they need past humans to do it.

Lol no. That is a visualization using a machine learning alogirthm to display some data. Its not an actual picture in any sense.

They were looking for the interstellar wheat farmers' planet.

Attached: wheaties.jpg (1920x1080, 196K)

They were able to make colonies around Jupiter or something. I guess they had clean seeds of various plants but the fungus on Earth kept infecting and killing them.

Why not grow corn in a colony around the moon? This shit makes no sense.

They couldn't grow it in a secret hyper-isolated facility on earth? Seems easier than making satalites around Jupiter to grow enough food for everyone on earth and shipping it around the solar system

Look I'm not defending this gay ass movie I'm just remembering what I saw

Movie was shit, grow up pused

PSEUDS ARE THE ONES NITPICKING THE PLOT

NOLAN HATERS ARE ABSOLUTE BRAINLETS

EVERY F I L M HE PUTS ON IMAX IS A GIFT TO THE WORLD

It's just a picture of the radio spectrum converted to visible you goddamn imbecile. It's absolutely an actual picture. If someone takes an infrared image of something do you not think it's "an actual picture"?

The problem was the fungus fed on co2, they had to leave because of global warming.
>movie makes no sense
Yes.

Look up the reconstruction algorithm. It is a machine learning thing. Its nowhere near a picture in the same sense that a picture of Jupiter is.

Yeah bo shit theres no light to reflect. But something can reflect or be detected and that info is then manipulated into a display to represented the data. Good lord are u nitpicky.

I'm well aware of the algorithms. You make it sound like if they used different algorithms the image might be radically different instead of having 2 pixels in different places. The entire scientific community has accepted these images as direct, to the point of observing the event horizon to check if it looks like it fits general relativity.
Do you think they'd do that if they didn't think it's an accurate image?

>The entire scientific community
>Muh consensus

Yes, those are some words. Would you like to form an argument with them?

Because they needed to colonize a new planet, as the virus was going to literally eat the air. Around saturn(or Jupitor, can't exactly remmber which planet it was) is the wormhole that leads to the only other habitable planet in the vicinity. By basing themselves around it they could slowly colonize it without having to go from the moon to jupiter.

Its a representation, not a picture. It would be like using your hands to feel something in the dark, then drawing a picture of it after. Sure, its something. But its not the same as if someone snapped a photo of it with their cellphone.

You just know some terrorist brought the fungus to the new planet just to fuck with everyone

No, it would be like having like 10 super powerful telescopes all synced together on one object take a picture in the radio spectrum and then feed the raw data to a well established algorithm to produce a visible image

Thats what was done. Still not the same as flying up to and snapping a shot with your cellphone. And until someone does, that picture isn't verifiable. So its not science.

NOLAN GOT A NOBEL PRIZE WINNING PHYSICIST TO CREATE INTERSTELLARS SCIENCE

ITS AN ABSOLUTE PEAK SCIFI IN EVERY ASPECT THAT MATTERS

IF YOU DIDNT SEE IT ON THE GIANT SCREEN YOU MISSED ONE OF THE GREATEST THEATER EXPERIENCES TO EVER HAPPEN

Attached: 41oLlat3X0L._SX385_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (387x499, 24K)

It just happened this year, and there is already a scientific consensus? Seems suspect. Aren't scientists supposed to be notoriously critical?

Predeterminism.

Oh my god. You actually think that "taking a picture" verifies it... Man you must really struggle with stuff like UV radiation then. Or do you not believe in that?

>hyped for sci fi epic
>ghosts
>interdimensional future humans
>LOVE TARS

i'm still mad

It was futuristic humanity that allowed communication from the center of a black hole. They were the only reason it was there in the first place. That's the how. Cooper's statements about love's quantifiable presence are his explanation as to the potential 'why' of it all. The movie's theme is largely that people with scientific minds and grounded beliefs are still not only capable of faith but need it to survive, particularly in the most dire of circumstances. The movie advocates balance. Men of science must operate with some degree of faith and men of faith must accept certain realities of science. It's beautiful, the only problem is general audiences don't seem to be able to wrap their heads around it. Which is a shame, because it's not even that complicated.

>Cars 2
>1998
I call bullshit

They are, which is why they waited for this picture for decades rather than announcing that they definitely for a fact know what a black hole looks like because they have the math and all the circumstantial data

>having a mental breakdown
user...

There is no evidence that it does, nor does the movie imply it. The construct in the black hole is what allows Cooper to send his message. His love is what informs him on how to send a message to Murph that will actually be read. That is he knows Murph well enough that he can send a message to her, and she'll be able to read it.

Im not saying black holes don't exist. I'm saying we don't know if they visually look like the one in interstellar because no one has ever taken a visual image of one.

There were no ghosts or alternate dimensions, you're just retarded

Attached: 4E9F8864-F65B-4D6F-9FA2-2F99F8735E76.jpg (720x500, 9K)

>>>/LETTERBOXD/

PSEUDS BEGONE

PEARLS BEFORE SWINE

DELETE THIS

So the entire scientific community had this image for decades? This bitch doesn't look that old

Attached: 5caea3da230000a403ea1c05.jpg (1910x997, 143K)

You're really going to hate Solaris

WHATS FUNNY IS THAT YAY SCIENCE GIRL WHO TOOK THE SELFIE WITH IT AND GOT THE CREDIT

WHEN SHE IS ON A BIG TEAM MOSTLY MALE
AND LIFTED THE CODE OFF SOME MIT GUY'S GITHUB LMAO

zero points in reading comprehension

>they waited for it for decades
>so they had it for decades?!
damn son

This. Anyone who says shit about love magic is simply too stupid to follow the movie.

But they have, you've seen the visual image posted already

moron

Attached: 1554989779821.jpg (500x356, 29K)

SHE ALSO DOESNT LOOK THAT SMART, HARDWORKING, OR HONEST

#YAAAASSSSS

Attached: 1554981943540.png (1012x1255, 105K)

This, it came out in '99

THIS NIGGA EATEN BEANS

>too stupid to follow a Nolan movie
Pitiful