No female characters

>no female characters

What did Carpenter mean by this?

Attached: s5fh3gqfchbi2f0nsbsh4krntc0_0.png (325x487, 302K)

>One female crew member, who leaves production do to pregnancy and was replaced by a man
He knew he was making a movie women couldn't understand.

because then it'd be obvious the female was getting gang banged regularly by the entire crew and he didn't want that in his movie because he's based

He wanted to make a good movie.

Girls don't have things.

Having a girl on base in an isolated place is a bad idea.

>not carrying on while pregnant
No dedication.

truly based

Attached: 1506652604067.gif (245x245, 1.75M)

>no female characters

What did Tarantino mean by this?

Attached: MV5BZmExNmEwYWItYmQzOS00YjA5LTk2MjktZjEyZDE1Y2QxNjA1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQxNzMzNDI@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182 (182x268, 14K)

The same reason why The Shawshank Redemption is a great film

She bowed out because she realized that pure kino was being recorded on the screen and her presence would have ruined it.

It was a science fiction body horror thriller about how isolation can mess with a man's mind filling it with distrust and paranoia. The surest way to come across this is making sure there was no hint of romance for the general audience.

>inb4 gay shipping
fags are not people nor the target demographic

you are full of shit OP, it is clear that, from how it destroys men from the inside, the thing is female

the original story was written by John Campbell, and the current shitstorm in the SF world shows he was a fascist.

explain

It's possible the outpost was semi-connected to the US military, but really one woman in a sparsely populated research center seems like a bad idea.

Actually the Thing is female, Carpenter warned us

>The Thing corrupts the hearts of men
redpilled as fuck

Macready or Child's, who was it?

Attached: Schrodinger.jpg (960x304, 18K)

neither

Both

Childs.

...