Still the only teams that matter.
Still the only teams that matter
Other urls found in this thread:
Badge of honour clubs get in here
milan?
>Serie OAP
>relevant
>counting ECC's and pre 1998 CL's
kek
Milan hardly matters nowadays.
>Milan
Posted from your Nokia 3310
bayern munich are the equivalent of a man who spends his time trapped in a cage swatting flies and wanking himself off and getting a gold star for each year he does it
damn this is old
real have 13 now, and liverpool & bayern 6 each
milan doesn't need updating though.
T. Benficaca
bizarrely specific
>not recognising Portoposter
Yet apt. Good post imo
Forest too. Still bigger than City, PSG, Spurs and Arselel
Where are indeoendiente, boca and peñarol?
My club won the CL in 2004. The real CL, after the 1997 format change that allowed the runner ups to enter, not just the champions from countries that have zero (0) CL.
While I agree with Milan being there, I don't feel like an Italian club will win this ever again.
>Champions League
>only "real" when non-champions are in the league
BIG THINK
Ah so the easier to win version? Pure cope from Portoautists once again. I know your the cunt spamming shitty threads.
>a fucking cherry
Name doesn't matter. It could be called the super league, it's the superior competition. I don't expect you to understand it though, you're an anglo.
Milan will win the next cl
>Name doesn't matter
It literally does. How can it be a Champions' League if it includes non-champions?
More chance of the Costa Concordia sailing again
If it's so easy why only 9 teams have won it? Why haven't Steua, Celtic, Ajax and others won it? Only the best teams have won it and it will always be like that. You won't see any other team win besides >these 9.
Lel we are the only reason Portugal is a country. Show some respect
Because it includes champions, you dimwit.
Your club will never ever win it again.
>t. doesn't watch serie a
Milan has great players in all positions starting from having the best goalkeeper in europe
if you don't like anglos you shouid've fought the spanish
OH WAIT IF YOU DID THAT YOU WOULDN'T EXIST
>here have my respect
>choosing an arbitrary date to make it look like your club is super special
That's fucking sad.
We'll see about that, we have done it once. What is your club? Just so I know how many times you have done it.
In all honesty though. Should these still count?
>arbitrary
It's the date the format changed and allowed for runner ups to enter, the actual best teams, not just 3 or 4.
anything before the 1997/1998 season is irrelevant.
The format changed in 1991.
>trophies expire after my arbitrary amount of time
runner ups were allowed to enter in 1997, that is the relevant format change
they didn't expire, they're just not the same. I know it's hard to accept it but just win one lmao
I think the introduction of a group stage is a far more significant change.
You constantly ignore this though because Porto wouldn't be "super duper special" if we included the winners from 1992-1997.
There are key moments in time where the credability of the sport changes:
>Post VAR
>Pre VAR
>Pele Era
>Pre Pele Era
>pele era
hello pele
You guys are getting so angry at me and my tier why? It's just a tier made by some random user. You getting so angry just shows that you're in denial. If it matters so much to you just win one CL and I'll add you to it. Ok? Hope you guys can find some peace amongst your clubs failures.
pele here, vacation in spain, i was very good
lol, don't talk such shit
we all know what you're doing with that tier chart and convenient choice of format change
no you weren't youtube.com
You’ll have to go to uefa with that complaint, I’m not the one who decided to make the CL a proto Super League and add the runner ups in 1997.
You can drop three and it will be a true statement.
>avoids the point raised
lol you're so fucking sad
You’re the one ignoring the real point. Or do you mean to tell me that somehow when you had only 3 or 4 champions there of real quality it was a superior competition than when you add in the best teams from the best leagues?
Not true. France helped too in the independience.
Dortmund has won the CL.
CL started in 1997/1998
>You’re the one ignoring the real point.
Coming from someone so afraid of their club being associated with Marseille or Ajax that they've gone into full cope, that's laughable. You said the CL starts from this convenient date where the format changed and no country outside of the big three leagues (except one specific one) has actually won it.
>Or do you mean to tell me that somehow when you had only 3 or 4 champions there of real quality it was a superior competition than when you add in the best teams from the best leagues?
That was when it was a genuine Champions' League. You actually had to win something to qualify for it. Not the bullshit pseudo-Super League it's been for the past 25 years where teams that won nothing the season before can win the biggest title in club football.
>Loserpool
>2nd biggest Club in milan
These are the 3 royalties in european football
You seem mad that Porto has won it. What is your club?
Where's United? I was assured it's the biggest team in the world.
I'm not mad that Porto have won it. I'm mad at you trying to push this tier list as something legitimate when we all know the real reason why you're doing it.
I’m doing it because I’m 1997 the runner ups we’re allowed to enter and the competition became much better and harder to win. That’s why Steua, Celtic, Dortmund, Ajax etc will never win it.
Stop lying. I can guarantee that had a different non-EN/DE/IT club won the CL since 1997, you wouldn't be doing this.
seems like madrid are the only ones that deserve honor