Do you read film theory, Yea Forums?

I do not love Jesus, I do not know him. But He is everywhere as is God. Showing my knowledge of Him anywhere is not weird, as He is everywhere.
>Is it a sin to judge
No, but it is foolish. Your judgement means nothing. We are but men, our kingdom is made of dust and will return to it. So to will your judgement. Gods Kingdom is eternal and so is his judgement. Do you feel you can compare to that? If you do, that is sin.

I read literary theory, that has quite a overlap with film one.

Why didn't you save her, user?

No they are not. Not even in theory. Read more.

Attached: 563e19c2-7ab4-4198-a3d7-7605b6e1632a-screen-shot-2018-10-12-at-112819-am.png (970x546, 540K)

Only God can save someone.

>I read literary theory
Who are your favourite literary theorists?

Why didn't he save her though?

Christ did, when he died for her.

I didnt go read film theory. I went to read films

All of them?

>I'm kinda mad at you actually
>Why, what's the problem?
>Why the fuck did you not have me in the Cum Filled Asshole Overload movie?
>Oh shit, I didn't think you'd be willing to do it. You're a little bit prissy, kind of a princess.

Who was in the wrong here?

Attached: 1504696058881.png (640x480, 270K)

>Go crazy on me
>And THAT's how you do an anal creampie gangbang
>that smile at the end
Clearly the director was in the wrong

No one was in the wrong.

How come porn has better dialogue than capeshit?

I like the work of Zdenko Lesic, and want to get in depth with Russian formalists. You?

It does not.
He was joking.

You can't tell me you enjoy capeshit. How much soi do you eat each day?

It is ok from what I have seen when family wants to go and watch the tent poles. Not worse than pornography which is sick and anti-human.

yes. is awful.

Based

Attached: 1564318545073.jpg (1212x1558, 603K)

>Zdenko Lesic
Never heard of him unfortunately.

Mine are probably Terry Eagleton and Fredric Jameson.

Yes, Donald Richie is my nigga

Who is this slut?

That's Keri Sable, user.

All are Gods creatures. You are misguided.

>colonise Africa
>complain about niggers
What did the French mean by this?

maybe in another life where i'm a faggot

Even niggers?

Are they men?

Men and women

All are children in the eyes of God.

Being an adoptive parent doesn't make him an actual one.

Why not?

But you are already one in this

OP were you the person who asked how film theory could be applied to the Keri scene? And how contemporary porn studies would read it?

I remember having a conversation on Yea Forums about that a few months ago using Mulvey, Sianne Ngai, and Massumi (I think...).

Attached: der.png (743x539, 744K)

Weird flex but okay

to add onto this I didn't see these responses:

Richie is great. I don't know enough about Jap cinema to talk about it in depth though

Jameson is the best: his writing style repels posers. Eagleton is excellent too, though he's at his best when he's commenting on others. Both are based

Based Derrida lol
>OP were you the person who asked how film theory could be applied to the Keri scene? And how contemporary porn studies would read it?
kek, yes that was me. Hello again!
>And how contemporary porn studies would read it?
Where did we settle on that? I can't remember unfortunately.

>I remember having a conversation on Yea Forums about that a few months ago using Mulvey
Yes, I remember talking about Mulvey.

>
>Jameson is the best: his writing style repels posers
Indeed. But I'm quite a brainlet so his writing style is certainly not for easy reading.
>Eagleton is excellent too, though he's at his best when he's commenting on others
I reckon I'll soon read something by him on Marx or Christianity.

Attached: allsmiles.jpg (412x440, 90K)

I do
there's a few genuinely good and insightful books
and a ton of highschool tier bullshit overanalysis

i hate movies, television and hollywood. all subversive evil trash for hypnotizing the public

My impression upon you is not me. It is God.
Men writing on ash, about ash.
You respond to nothing, about nothing.
Expound.
Expound.

There is only one God, and his name is Sneed.

You jest to me, a man. When you meet God, you will not feel so bold. Joke on, stranger for you have free will.

That's great! Nice to talk to you again

>Where did we settle on that? I can't remember unfortunately.
Yeah neither can I. I was actually reading the Porn Studies journal earlier this week, you should check it out. Some of the articles are garbage but there's some gems in there. Although some grounding in film theory - feminist included - would be good, they're all fairly accessible. "Grey, gonzo and the grotesque" would be a good place to start (and relevant to Keri)

>Indeed. But I'm quite a brainlet so his writing style is certainly not for easy reading.
lol don't beat yourself up too much, Jameson is notoriously difficult. Not so much because of his ideas: but his writing style.

>I reckon I'll soon read something by him on Marx or Christianity.
Good idea!

What kind of film theory are you interested in? I'm fairly familiar with "porn studies," if you can call it that, though I'm no expert. Its so new!

Attached: Haram.jpg (500x563, 32K)

lel based Memri TV :^)
>Nice to talk to you again
Right back at ya. I'm suprised the thread is still up. I wish the threads would be left alive more often so you could have semi-serious discussion more often.
>Yeah neither can I.
I guess we should start and make a collab essay on it then :^)
>"Grey, gonzo and the grotesque" would be a good place to start (and relevant to Keri)
Thanks for the rec
>I was actually reading the Porn Studies journal earlier this week, you should check it out.
Any link for it?
>Jameson is notoriously difficult. Not so much because of his ideas: but his writing style.
lel yeah. I started to read the Routledge Critical Thinkers book on him and they managed his writing style immediately.
>What kind of film theory are you interested in? I'm fairly familiar with "porn studies," if you can call it that, though I'm no expert. Its so new!
I've never really read any porn film studies so I should definitely check it out. Apart from that, I'm very much centered on political / cultural analysis of films.

>semi-serious discussion more often
yeah it sucks. I enjoy the bants on Yea Forums threads though
>collab essay on it then :^)
Could be fun! I'm fairly busy but drop a discord tag or something. I've emailed a few people working in this area and, to their credit, they're always nice: but there is a limit to how much you can do.
>Thanks for the rec
np. Most of the "porn theory" out there is either simplistic reactionary garbage, from both the right and the left, or propoganda for the industry. Its always one of those two extremes. Generally when you know reputable-ish journals you can seperate the wheat from the chaff
>Any link for it?
sure, tandfonline.com/loi/rprn20. If you need any help getting articles use sci-hub. ez pz
>I'm very much centered on political / cultural analysis of films
Awesome! I'm the same way. Its good you're reading Jameson in that case. His essay on the shining in Signatures of the Visable, and his essay on Jaws (Reification and mass culture?) are classics

Deh!

Based Deh! poster

Attached: gocrazy6.jpg (412x440, 55K)

>I enjoy the bants on Yea Forums threads though
Of course. Once the threads get going, they're awesome.
>Could be fun! I'm fairly busy but drop a discord tag or something. I've emailed a few people working in this area and, to their credit, they're always nice: but there is a limit to how much you can do.
Like I said, I'm pretty much a brainlet who still needs to read more but working on it would be fun. I just have no idea how to approach the scene - which kind of topic should we focus on and the methodology ghettotekz#8833
>Most of the "porn theory" out there is either simplistic reactionary garbage, from both the right and the left, or propoganda for the industry. Its always one of those two extremes.
Which sucks since it's an actual culturally relevant part of modern life (including female viewers) and hugely interesting from a film theory point of view.
>sure, tandfonline.com/loi/rprn20. If you need any help getting articles use sci-hub. ez pz
Based, thanks!
>Awesome! I'm the same way. Its good you're reading Jameson in that case. His essay on the shining in Signatures of the Visable, and his essay on Jaws (Reification and mass culture?) are classics
Hell yeah, I'll get to reading those. Have you read any of Zizek's work?

>I just have no idea how to approach the scene
I think it would be useful to historically situate it, before anything, within early 2000s gonzo. That way you'd have a huge amount of literature to draw upon. I haven't seen the scene in months but you could use lots of methodologies; at any rate, psychoanalysis would be especially useful.
>culturally relevant part of modern life
absolutely! Porn is the red-headed stepchild of the film industry: completely ignored by everyone. Though pornography has always been treated that way (generally), depending on who you read
>Zizek
I've read lots of Slavoj, he's a legend, and I'm making my way through Lacan (and the endless secondary lit on him) rn. I'm incredibly interested in this area, Though I cringe a little when I see the shamelessly hagiographic comments about Lacan. He was an absolute mad lad though: he would run red lights all the time

>she was 18 in this scene

>hitting the wall at 18
pass

gocrazy6

Nice trips
>I think it would be useful to historically situate it, before anything, within early 2000s gonzo.
That'd be a good start. I'd also be interested to analyse (although an essay format would probably be too short) how we arrived from simple nude pictures as porn to seeing cuties do anal creampie gangbangs.
>I haven't seen the scene in months
Time for a rewatch then :^)
>at any rate, psychoanalysis would be especially useful
I guess we arrive at Mulvey's work then again
>absolutely! Porn is the red-headed stepchild of the film industry: completely ignored by everyone. Though pornography has always been treated that way (generally), depending on who you read
lel, yes. Which then opens up another discussion and analysis on why that is. Although I'm sure there are people who have written on this topic.
>I've read lots of Slavoj, he's a legend
Indeed. He might have turned into too much of a meme in the last years since so many discovered him but some of his film analysis work is amazing (and hilarious of course).
>and I'm making my way through Lacan
I've ONCE tried to read Lacan's work. NEVER again - makes me feel like an absolute brainlet. I'll stick to Bruce Fink and Zizek for now.

Makes it even hotter, doesn't it?

Attached: maha.jpg (412x440, 86K)

Keri Sable shill>Miss Alice shill