This is the least believable thing in the series

>this
Pederasts are all alike.

Abuse and pederasty is indeed no joke but make no mistake, this poorly written character is still dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1566589655758.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

This is the most retarded thing for me, you have a fucking kid in your house that could easily explode your head just by thinking on it, that one time he convert one of your family members into a fucking balloon and you still fuck with him his entire life make him your slave. Seriously fuck Harry Potter

Attached: 1510744734635.png (724x552, 19K)

based

Okay, this is an epic fan theory

He's more of a villian for using him as a pawn for 17 years but yeah. Also it's fine for Hogwarts to let their kids fly around multiple stories off the ground and maybe fall to their deaths. But to go to the local candy store they need parental approval? Wtf is the death rate at this school

You’re getting worse and worse at this. Are you an imposter, perhaps?

This was explained in the book that he was protected by his mother’s magic as long as he stayed with family

His stairs closet looks pretty comfy desu

Harry, in a spiral of depression turns to the escape of the world of miniature equine aficionada. He produces many a "wine out of nowhere" spell, and is drunk every day before noon

Yeah, but this theory is applicable to everything, I've heard the same one for The Walking Dead, it's Rick's dream etc.

Another interesting theory is how Harry Potter is prequel to Trainspotting.

>know you have a wizard kid living in your house
>treat him like shit

Its like they wanted to raise the worlds biggest school shooter.

Harry must stay calm and repress his urges of igniting the house in a demonstrative fireball, ending the lives of these three little pigs. But our wolf remains cool.

Yer right. He's wizard, laddie

is there anything left of england from the time of harry potter? it all seems plastic and nigger af

>No Clifford for president.
Get out of here.

Who says he was sane?

Ironically Harry Potter was white af, with them even retconning Lavender Brown to be white because of Ron.

For a lunatic lefty, Rowling sure made Potter's Great Britain white, traditional, and right-wing.

>right-wing

Rowling confirmed that Harry is an antisemite

They were his only living relatives and his mum's protection spell only worked as long as he's with them.

He would have grown up to be a serial killer for sure. The next Ted Bundy

i wish i was as based as the guy who originally wrote this copypasta

Rowling is pretty far right on pretty much everything aside from race and sexuality.

Harry Potter is fucking gay

>af
You're talking to a zoomer

protect from who exactly?

it can't shed its skin, XX century was a different time, jkr need to stay relevant for the shekels to flow, but she never give a fuck about minorities and womyn until she had to

Dubs of truth. I was just discussing with my gf (big harry potter fan) how Harry probably would have been a Slytherin considering how he was raised. The fact that he could talk to snakes would have made him prefer that house too, after his experience at the zoo. I don't think he would have jumped ship so easily after some strangers in a brand new community told him Slytherin was "evil".

>protect from who exactly?

Voldemort, whom Dumbledore very well knew was still around, and everyone who thought that Voldemort had the right idea.

She's a British boomer. Loves to jill off to the though of a multicultural idea of "Britain" (not England) but doesn't have to live long with the consequences of such a choice.

This. I toured a million+ dollar apartment about a year ago and the last owner had installed a secret 'cave' bedroom hidden in a wall. A secret door opened and revealed a small nook you crawled up onto, a room just big enough for a king size bed. There was a flat screen TV on the wall and little nite stand and that was it. So you were on the bed, with walls immediately around the bed, and the ceiling was like 5ft up. Apparently he had this little room made because he could only sleep comfortably in small enclosed spaces.

you can, though if he was never rescued he would mysteriously find himself addicted to heroin at 23 or something

How can you tell the difference? It's the worst pasta with literally nothing going for it I always laugh at idiots who convinced themselves that it's any good. It's one moron pushing this and he gets really protective sometimes. That's hilarious as well. Compensating for his lack of talent even with something as pathetic as a pasta meme.

what did you expect from low IQ media?

Attached: 1384969232721.jpg (737x642, 227K)

fuck dursleys

>You can't stay sane after such maltreatment and border abuse.
You ain't seen shit.

You also think Harry stayed sane: Harry believes he went to a wizards school and raised a dragon and undied some conspiracy. Harry was abused and made shit up to get by. It's a psychogenic fugue. You just got lynched.

That's because Harry didn't stay sane, Hogwarts, Wizardry, and everything that happened to him after was just a figment of his broken imagination. The Dursley's had him committed after began to threaten them with a stick and after he ran away for over a year.

Even inmates have international laws protecting them from spaces that are too small, but you moron will think children can suffer more than adults.

You are the kind of brainlet waste that ruin children permanently and cause the majority of suicides, cimes, and everything that is wrong with people today.

Consider yourself scum and fuck off.

/thread.

did it died?

Good ones have a seamless transition. Bad ones (like the one ITT) have overly long intros, sometimes multiple sentences before the actual pasta begins. Here's an example of one I really like:
archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/96585002/#96585771

>Dursleys tried to stamp out any magic business he'd do
>the Fantastic Beasts movies show that had they been successful Harry would have ended up a shadow smoke thing of murder
fucking muggles should never raise magical children.

This is it! This is the moment! I must make my move in the masking of a snowstorm... I will take one letter into my room and whisper it to my horsey, see what they think! Oh how the wine speaks!

>Dude what if like that was only his IMAGINATION. Woah that would be a DARK and GRITTY undertone to this totally not children book series

Attached: 1547419141684.gif (413x243, 51K)

Reminder to by British made drills

Attached: Grunnings.jpg (463x313, 57K)

It wasn't even that bad in the movies, in the books it was far worse.

What it boils down to is that someone as rich as her can't be a leftist. It's simply not possible. At some point someone like her needs to ask herself "is the money I've made from my works a fair compensation for the labour I've put into them." And I have no doubt that she put a lot of hours and a lot of work into these books that deserve to be compensated fully. But claiming that the billions she made are in any way equal to the labour she put into her books is absurd and holding onto them rather than giving at least most of them up for redistribution makes her, fundamentally, not a leftist, no matter what her views on social issues might be.

you are underestimating people's ability to rationalize. Expecting people to be logical is fucking stupid, most can't even own up to their hypocrisy, let alone fix it