Rhedosaurus is relentlessly handsome. I want to kiss him relentlessly.
Rhedosaurus is relentlessly handsome. I want to kiss him relentlessly
Zachary Price
Other urls found in this thread:
Michael Taylor
Dino kino coming through
Isaac Watson
WAKE UP PEOPLE! DINOSAURS ARE NOT AND NEVER HAVE BEEN REAL! ALL "EVIDENCE" WAS FABRICATED BY THE SATANIC ORDER TO BREAK OUR FAITH IN THE ALMIGHTY!
Jeremiah Taylor
Based relentless poster. Also based Rhedosaurus
James Rodriguez
Why is Darth Maul there
Jack Hill
>Jew pretending to be an atheist pretending to be a christian pretending to be retarded
Caleb Reed
This is a fun movie. I keep meaning to rewatch it.
Holy shit, are the Sith evil?
Juan Nguyen
Jack Jenkins
Valley of Gwangi is good stuff.
Blake Rodriguez
Should I watch this? I'm into stop-mo schlock but I haven't seen this one yet.
Isaiah Sanders
Evan Diaz
Henry Nelson
Based Rhedosaurus poster.
Charles Rodriguez
You are relentlessly based.
Elijah Clark
Honestly, the movie is mostly pretty eh. The Rhedosaurus is barely in it and his rampage is like 50 minutes into the movie.
Watch Gojira 54 instead, it had the same basic idea as Beast From 20.000 Fathoms but did it way better.
Though if you don't like the serious tone of Gojira: Godzilla 98 is basically a remake of The Beast From 20.000 Fathoms: It takes place in New York, the monster's first attack is on a boat, the monster came from nuclear radiation, etc. I'm pretty sure Roland Emmerich was atleast inspired by it considering Independence Day was also a bit of a remake of the 50s film Earth vs The Flying Saucers.
Nathaniel Campbell
Checked and T-Rex’d.
Jeremiah Jones
Does this movie have alot of screentime for the dinos or are they only in it for a couple minutes?
Josiah Morgan
The creatures here move more lifelike than CGI mocapped monsters in today's movies, how did Ray do it?
Adrian White
He was a fucking wizard.
Bentley Morgan
It's because mocap sucks and will never look as good as animation done by hand. Mocap is done by lazy cunts who don't want to put in actual effort, the only movies where mocap has any actual benefit are the Planet of the Apes and Godzilla movies, as those were franchises that started with people in suits/makeup. For anything else it sucks and looks like shit
Manual animation allows you to recreate a creature's movements way better than simply having an actor pretend he's a dinosaur. It's also why Jurassic Park still looks fucking great
Nicholas Wood
oh my god
ZILLAAAAAA
Hunter Sanders
Does anyone else here prefer the remake?
James Davis
>King Kong 2005
>Not beautifully done mocap
It's more because Andy Serkis knows how to do mocap properly, and he was the one who mentored TJ Storm for Godzilla.
William Carter
>The creatures here move more lifelike than CGI mocapped monsters in today's movies, how did Ray do it?
He used actual, real-world lights instead of CG lighting that our brains immediately interpret as fake.
Luis Wright
I guess but a gorilla resembles a human alot more than say a dinosaur so mocapping an animal like that can look pretty great. Though a lizard or almost anything that walks on 4 legs is best done manually
Nathaniel Long
Takes a good while for Gwangi to show up but once he's in it he's in it.
Carson Green
Harryhausen put a ridiculous amount of work into everything. In Valley of Gwangi the lassoing scene he had to go frame by frame to make sure everything lined up as he did his stop motion. As seen at about 44 minutes into this.
youtu.be
James Ortiz
Is this restored or were they always that purple?
Eli Butler
Even 78 looked better than 2005
Brody White
Mr Lucas was aware of the true Chitauri form and incorporated it into the Star Wars
Jace Kelly
Of Lourié's monster works, Gorgo > Beast > Behemoth.