He gave Toy Story 3 a bad review. How can any of you take him seriously

I love Toy Story 3 but I respect his opinion and think some of his hatred for the series makes sense

What's his favorite movies?

anyone who buys funkopops deserve a concrete enema

>He gave Toy Story 3 a bad review.
Based.

Sansho the Bailiff (1954)
The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928)
Nouvelle vague (1990)
Nashville (1975)
The Magnificent Ambersons (1942)
Lola (1961)
Lawrence of Arabia (1962)
Jules and Jim (1962)
Intolerance: Love's Struggle Throughout the Ages (1916)
L'Avventura (1960)

Armond is one of the very few critics who is actually worth reading because he always has something interesting to say, whether you agree with it or not. But that's the point, critics aren't just supposed to reiterate what you already agree with.

Most "critics" aren't even critics, they're just glorified marketers.

god tier taste. Can any other critic compare?

Why would anyone take a nigger seriously?

When I say Armond you say BASED
Armond

Attached: Picture 5.png (456x314, 88K)

Toy Story 3 was bad, MUH FEELS

that's his whole thing, though

if a movie is good, he'll shit on it mercilessly
if a movie is bad, he'll praise it

just read a review by him and you'll know whether a movie's good or bad

Well you see, my lad, Toy Story and the rest of that Disney cancer are for children and the mentally retarded only.

BASED
(shouldn't the words be reversed?)

Yes... fuck too late now.

He's a contrarian. Why would a board of contrarians take him seriously? Beats me.

based, filmlets btfo

People only like it because of the incinerator scene. Leave that and the ending out, and it’s really mediocre.

The only reason I read Armond's reviews is because I never feel like he's trying to get me to see a movie like the marketing shills most movie critics have become. True, I don't always agree with his takes on film but I at least respect the fact he has opinions that aren't just based on his paycheck or trying to appeal to the popular crowd for some street cred. Though his review for Domino made it out to be a much better film than it was, so I'll admit he's not all that different from them when it comes to appealing to politically obsessed viewers

he really isn’t even that contrarian. he just calls out the “acclaimed” shit that gets pumped out today like Get Out and the MCU for what it is: shit.

most renowned critics except for hacks like ebert held opinionated reviews in their day. Andrew Sarris hated the stuff kuckbrick and david lean put out, and Pauline Kael disliked star wars and indiana jones.

Toy Story 2 was the perfect ending. What's something memorable in 3 aside the furnace bit? What was Buzz's character arc aside speaking Spanish for 2/3 of the movie?

Toy Story 3 was an emotionally manipulative cashgrab. It's no coincidence it was one of the first films on the docket when Disney bought Pixar.

all toy story movies were stupid
if you're over 15 and enjoy them, reconsider your life choices

>he didn't like my childhood animated reboot

Attached: d90.png (644x800, 15K)

People are allowed to have differing opinions. Deal with it. Sorry he shit of your favorite movie. Stop being a crybaby.

Toy Movie 3 was trash.

Attached: 8A058A6E-44F8-4486-AF02-ACD28D232737.gif (245x283, 229K)

All solid except L'Avventura, but I must be the only one disliking this film.

t. Cole Smithey

test

Ebert was based was your whore mouth.

go back

How can one gay black conservative contrarion be so based?

You're not cool or interesting for not liking popular films

...

Yes I am, deal with it tranny.

Absolutely based, all I remember from that film is the Spanish Buzz gag

He wasn't the only one...

Attached: 300px-Cole,Barb&Chris.jpg (300x209, 13K)

He hates capeshit. That's all I need to know