WHY IS IT SO SLOW, i enjoyed the movie but 2 hours and 45 minutes felt like 5 hours. what did it mean?
WHY IS IT SO SLOW, i enjoyed the movie but 2 hours and 45 minutes felt like 5 hours. what did it mean?
Ian Roberts
Jaxson King
It's meditative
Jordan Young
Means you got pleb filtered
Tyler Butler
You got trolled.
Zachary Sanders
It's Tarkovsky's style. Slow cinema helps the audience contemplate, relate, and interpret their own meaning. Maybe you just need to watch more.
Angel Hall
socialist kino
Cameron Nelson
>The film [Stalker] needs to be slower and duller at the start so that the viewers who walked into the wrong theatre have time to leave before the main action starts.
Tarkovsky wanted to filter plebs and ADHD retards.
Andrew Myers
>before the main action starts
Was he talking about the glass scene?
Landon Jones
no he means the part where Stalker is trying to get the bomb from Professor but Writer is pushing him. Literally the only scene where anything remotely actiony happens. If the movie is slower and duller at the start (they're dodging bullets in a car and sneaking into a heavily guarded barren mysterious wasteland) then why are the most boring parts at the ending, like the woman's monologue, the poetry and monologues and the phone call and the resting scenes, the bird anomaly. What action, i ask you? The most exciting parts, not including the philosophical intelligent brainiac parts, are in the very beginning.
Benjamin Lopez
>they're dodging bullets in a car and sneaking into a heavily guarded barren mysterious wasteland
Good God, that sequence was so terrible, I literally cannot stop thinking that the whole movie was just about 3 men LARPing.