We are not removing Spider-Man from the MCU, but Kevin Fiegi will not direct anymore films

Pretty smart move by Sony. They benefited from letting people believe Venom was part of the MCU, when it wasn't, so the same tactic should work with Spider-Man

It was never about rebooting Spider-Man, you guys don't like reading for shit

Kevin Feige has not directed a single MCU movie. Sony are being deliberately obscure.

I’m confused. If he’s still going to be in the MCU, why is Kevin leaving and who’s decision was that? I’d prefer that Spider Man leaves all together but getting Kevin Fiege away from him is still a small victory.

Yea, Sony likely wants to play ball and leave things open. They're not gonna reboot, they want to make a 3rd and they'll do so and hope to rejoin later.

So is f.lux a meme placebo or what? what's going on?

Kevin Feige was producer, not director.
Jon Watts is the Director

Simple
> 1. Sony is allowing Spider-Man to stay in the MCU
> 2. This entire controversy was simply related to Kevin Fiegi not being credited for some Spider-Man movies
> 3. They are continuing to have MCU Spider-Man movies without his input

look at all you capeshitters

>they actually think marvel lets directors direct the marvel movies

LMAO holy fuck how much gullible can you be?

You seriously think Kev directed every single MCU film himself? WOW

so is this all just a calculated move to have like 10 different spidermans for a real life spiderverse movie?

Attached: 1486939815521.gif (202x360, 1.84M)

KEVIN FEIGE BTFO
DISNEY THROWING HIM UNDER THE BUS
GET FUCKED CREEPO LIZARDMAN

Marvel is still directing the movies, but Kevin Fiegi isn't the Producer of them anymore & Disney doesn't get 50 % cut. That's literally all this fallout was about, it had nothing to do with removing Spider-Man from the MCU

Yes mang, that's why Gunn didn't come back the second they rehired him.

>all this drama over which multibillion dollar conglomerate gets to further destroy a beloved comic book character

Couldn't possibly give less of a shit.

Wait so i'm confused, what the fuck even happened & what does this mean for the MCU? Is Spider-Man still in or did they lose him?

Literally not what the article says at all

I just want to know flat out if Holland is still Spidey and still gonna be within the MCU. Cause if Sony pulls any retarded shit I am going to be pissed. It doesn't seem like there's any solid answer one way or the other or did I miss something?

>Marvel is still directing the movies, but Kevin Fiegi isn't the Producer of them anymore
That's bad

nice piss filter bro

>In a statement obtained exclusively by The Hollywood Reporter, the studio says it is “disappointed” that Marvel president Kevin Feige will no longer act as lead producer on the film franchise, squarely laying the decision at Disney’s feet.
>“Much of today’s news about Spider-Man has mischaracterized recent discussions about Kevin Feige’s involvement in the franchise,” says a Sony spokesperson. “We are disappointed, but respect Disney’s decision not to have him continue as a lead producer of our next live action Spider-Man film.”

capeshit is not cinema

flux does help your eyes but I've never seen it get that yellow

He was never fired, you retard. They just pretended he got canned so they could pretend they cared about pedophilia

> no more iron man wank
Thank christ.

He’s still in the MCU but Kevin Feige won’t be involved with the spider man films anymore. Why that is I’m still not sure.

All of you basedboys in this thread need to grow up and stop watching superhero movies, or fuck off back to r/marvel you underage kids.

> “Much of today’s news about Spider-Man has mischaracterized recent discussions about Kevin Feige’s involvement in the franchise,” Sony said in statement sent to ComicBook.com. “We are disappointed, but respect Disney’s decision not to have him continue as a lead producer of the next live action Spider-Man film.”
> “We hope this might change in the future, but understand that the many new responsibilities that Disney has given him – including all their newly added Marvel properties – do not allow time for him to work on IP they do not own,” the statement reads. “Kevin is terrific and we are grateful for his help and guidance and appreciate the path he has helped put us on, which we will continue.”
Disney threw Kevin Fiegi under the buss, Sony sounds like they are still keeping Spidey in the MCU

VENOM CHADS IN THE HOUSE TONIGHT!
youtube.com/watch?v=8CdcCD5V-d8

Attached: venomchads.jpg (682x497, 115K)

flux shouldn't even affect your screenshots so i don't know why the fuck op's image is evne yellow

Based, but why though

Where does that say that Spider-Man will continue to be part of the MCU? All that says is 'It's Disney's fault'

Even if that was true Gunn still got away with putting loads of crude humor, and Ryan Coogler who got free pass to include all that political crap.

HAHAHA FUCK YOU DISNEY

Attached: 2542459.jpg (419x429, 130K)

>fine, i'll do it myself

Attached: 1412_v9_ba.jpg (1080x1440, 179K)

No idea, Sony clearly had nothing to do with him being sacked. That was a Mouse situation.

If Feige is the one pushing for more money, cutting him out works for both parties. It doesn't matter though, because Spider-Man will not appear in the MCU if Feige isn't allowed creative control. Sad but true.

>not to have him continue as a lead producer of our next live action Spider-Man film.
Which is the next live action Spider-Man film, user? And don't say Morbius.

Probably deadpool, because he hates spiderman so much, get it? HEUEUEUHHEHEHEUHE

OH NO NO NO...

Mouse couldn't win this round.

Hey Quartering. Kevin Feige is the producer, not the director, of Marvel Studios' films. You made this same mistake in your video on this topic.

>Much of today’s news about Spider-Man has mischaracterized recent discussions about Kevin Feige’s involvement in the franchise,” says a Sony spokesperson. “We are disappointed, but respect Disney’s decision not to have him continue as a lead producer of our next live-action Spider-Man film.”

>“We hope this might change in the future, but understand that the many new responsibilities that Disney has given him – including all their newly added Marvel properties – do not allow time for him to work on IP they do not own,” says the statement. “Kevin is terrific and we are grateful for his help and guidance and appreciate the path he has helped put us on, which we will continue.”

Disney is being Jewish again.

We don't fucking know. It doesn't say if it is Spider-Man 3, or a reboot.

Because you're a paraplegic transexual jewish nigger.

It literally is the MCU Spider-Man films, they are just removing Feigi because he was probably pushing for too much money. Sony never intended to remove Spider-Man, which is what the mischaracterization line was referring too. It was simply about a dispute with the Producer

No I mean bad for the MCU. It will be the first time Feige isn't involved

They can just use the Russo Brothers.

How does that work then? Feige is the chief creative force behind the MCU. If he can't work on Spider-man then they can't really work him into the rest of the universe anymore

I still need to hear Disney's side of the story.

Feige also wasn't involved with any of the Marvel Television series except for Agent Carter and they are still semi-canon (maybe).

No idea, but it's clear that they came to some kind of deal to keep him in the MCU without Feigi producing the films

This entire story is being caused by Amy Pascal fucking around behind the scenes. She and Feige hate each others' guts.

Peggy Carter is but it really has no bearing on anything. None of the Netflix shows are canon

Literally what does a producer even do?

Agent Carter is at the very least semi-canon (since it's by Marvel Television and not Marvel Studios but Kevin Feige was still involved with the production, and there's also the Jarvis cameo in Endgame) and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. is semi-canon at most since the movies never really reference Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. that much.

The Netflix shows and the other shows are either non-canon or are only slightly canon.

So no Tom Holland vs Tom Hardy vs Woody Harrelson?

not clicking that shit, give quick rd pls

Is this stated anywhere plainly though? I don't care about Disney and don't want them to own all the goddamn things in existence, but I enjoy the MCU and Spidey is my favorite hero with Venom being my favorite anti-hero. I don't care about which company is the in the wrong. I just want my favorite heroes to still be within the MCU, officially.

You can't be "slightly" canon. The Netflix shows couldn't even say Hulk. They were never canon but they sure tried to act like they were

So let me get this right
>Disney wanted more money
>Sony didn’t like that deal
>Disney says fuck off and drags Kevin/MCU with them
>Sony will still make the 2 sequels to Holland Spider Man but without MCU references.
From reading other articles that’s what it sounds like at the moment along with the statement from Sony.

They are the MCU equivalent of the Star Wars Legends EU stuff.

They said Captain America in Jessica Jones and referenced the attack on NY. Hulk is a Universal property I think. Netflix shows are cannon.

Tell me about the piss image. How does it happen

>Netflix shows are cannon.
No

Wrong song faggot.
youtube.com/watch?v=seEjFQ0lNhY

Correct. Sony can make the movies on their own. The director/actor contracts are for two more movies. Getting Tony Stark or Nick Fury in the movies is out of the picture for sony. They get all the profit. They do still share some with Marvel as per the original pre-MCU agreement. Every spider-man movie from 2002 gave money to marvel.

We do not know how this affects spider-man in non-spider-man marvel movies. Like Avengers 5 for example. None of this clarifies that.

Disney trying to get 50% is dumb. It pushed Sony away. As if the boycott will work? Venom pulled 800m on their own. Now they can work on a Venom/Spider-man movie. Disney is fucking this up and Sony has nothing to lose.

Feige has been involved for a long time back to the Maguire films.
Pulling him from future Spiderman films looks like an acting of seethe from disney desu

Kinda sad too because out of all modern marvel properties, the Netflix stuff was the better half of it.

>sony thinks now that disney/marvel resuscitated the spidey brand that they can fuck off and carry it from here on out
they will guaranteed fuck it up and i can't wait to watch it implode

Attached: shinebox.jpg (640x460, 64K)

>spiderman movies will flop
delusional

Attached: 1563673441662.jpg (274x272, 22K)

FEIGE BTFO

>nuh Fiegi is the only director in my retarded mind that is good

sony:
>stop niggrafying spiderman you stupid motherfuckers
raimi is back on the menu boys!

>Live action SpiderVerse movies with Raimi directing Logan Style Tobey Spider-Man meeting his younger replacements, fighting and BTFOing the pair of them.
"that's a cute outfit. Did your sugar daddy make that for you?"

So basically what happened is one of these right?
> Best Case Scenario: Spider-Man is still in the MCU but Feigi is no longer involved
> Worst Case Scenario: Spider-Man is no longer in the MCU & this won't change unless Disney buys Sony pictures

As long as we get Tom Holland Spider-Man with the same calibre villains he's received so far but with less/no iron man wank fest, we'll be golden.

disney getting greedy and want 50% ownership when a deal is still existing. Disney coping hard by stopping Feige involvement

they should stick to what they have and make all parties happy

>yfw they nuke Queens in episode 1 of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, vaporizing the MCU versions of the Spider-cast

They have double duties. They make sure they don't go overbudget, they're involved with amassing the finances needed to fund films, and they make sure the director sticks to their intended vision unless convinced otherwise. Think of them as directors but in a different ball game of film making.

so wont really matter since same director
I imagine Feige's main input was connections to MCU

If Feige isn’t producing it’s not going to be cannon in his eyes since he’s a spiteful little weasel

He’s actively working on scrubbing the Netflix shows out of existence by rehiring Cottonmouths actor for Blade and has openly feuded with the heads of the old tv division.
Expect Spiderman to not appear in any more avengers movies and to no longer have any MCU characters in his films.
It will still technically be in the same universe but it may as well not be.

>what is asm1 and asm2?

>With Feige not producing future “Spider-Man” films, the impasse effectively removes Tom Holland’s Spider-Man from the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Hmmm

AMS 1 wasn’t a flop and Garfield only got let go because on top of AMS2 not cross $1 Billion he pissed off the head of Sonya’s a major event where it was likely they were going to officially announce AMS3

>Far From Home made 1.1 BILLION dollars in the box office
>Tom Holland is the most beloved Spider man actor to date
>Spider man is part of a cultural phenomenon in the making, possibly being at the helm of said phenomenon
>Sony is disappointed by this somehow

Sometimes, I just don't understand how corporations think.

and nothing of value was lost

Pretty much. It would also mean that it'd be consistent with the MCU but then if you analyze the entire franchise, they were already kinda fraying at the seams when Hulk was made (Hulk's ambiguous ending and after credit scene--which they tried to fix with a short film--, the infinity guantlet seen in Thor 1, Adam Warlock in Guardians of the Galaxy, and so on) so if projects with Kevin is like that then projects without him is gonna be a mess probably. I honestly don't mind, I'm just here with my popcorn watching two giants piss on each other's cup.

How will mouseshills COPE with this?

I love how they don't mention how disney gets 100% of the merchandising profit

youtube.com/watch?v=PCsZkNf7NMA
Based

So basically t's Disney's fault because they are being fucking jews again?

>He’s actively working on scrubbing the Netflix shows out of existence by rehiring Cottonmouths actor for Blade and has openly feuded with the heads of the old tv division.
I always thought it was funny how they let Daredevil's popularity go about out of convenience and it's only when the Netflix shows shat the bed with Iron Fist and Defenders that they started distancing themselves from it. Really shows how quickly things can shift when there's people behind the scenes that are butting heads.

>Expect Spiderman to not appear in any more avengers movies and to no longer have any MCU characters in his films.
Eh, let Spider-Man be Spider-Man on his own. It's not as if he didn't already have huge involvement with the Avengers through Infinity War/Endgame. The worst case scenario here is if Sony execs decide to meddle with the creative process of the new films when by all accounts, they're actually the ones who got a better deal out of this fallout.

Sony is disappointed because Disney literally wanted more money of the deal and declined when Sony proposed to keep the same deal.

uhhhh it was mainly due to disney/marvel's efforts that the nu spiderman movies were so successful. why shouldnt they get a bigger piece when it was their franchise sony leeched off of

both of those made more than a handful of MCU movies, so being in the MCU helped spidey a little, but didn't absolutely need it before.

5% to 50% is a big leap

They didn't flop, brainlet. They made plenty of money, the issue was that they were really bad. Just like every bayformer movie.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Disney said they were fine with 5% and then said they wanted 50% like greedy little faggots. They didn't buy Spiderman rights and thought they didn't need him, and were wrong

Yes. Anyone saying otherwise is a mouse shill.

>he doesn't know
half of those movies are done before there is even a directer attached. every CGI shot is already done or planned in previs.

> Over $700 million minimum
> Flop

Jesus christ MCU manchilds are fucking retarded.

Reminder Sony said that Venom was still in the MCU right up to release day

It’s over Sony fucked Disney in the ass by outjewing them

Can’t Disney just overpay & spend 50 billion to purchase Sony Pictures which is only worth like 30 Billion?

Apparently what I get Sony statement is that the wanted to fast track the next Spidey movie (as FFH just got the studio 1.1B$) but Kevin is right now dealing with the MCU newly adquired prooperties, so Disney must have offered a deal (50-50), Sony said no way fag, and Disney pretty much left them hanging. But yeah it’s unknown how much Sony can actually get away with no ties to the MCU, also they reported a disputed over Keving producing but not getting credit on a Sony movie (Venom or Spider-Verse), which is one of the reason Kevin is reluctant to work with them on their stand alone spidey projects

just saying, by sonys standards, the movies flopped esp factoring what they spent to make and market them. sony expected those movies to gross $1b each

How the fuck are they going to continue the Far from Home story

Disney being greedy fucks asked for 50% of the profits. Meanwhile Venom made 800mln on it's own. It's pretty obvious that 100% 0f 800mln is better than 50% of 1.1bln

What Sony standarts? Far from home made 1.1b making it the highest grossing Sony movie ever. What makes you think they were expecting to reach 1b each on ASM movie, you absolute retard?

They cannot, our only hope is that Disney just purchases Sony Pictures. Because there’s no way they allow Sony to kill the MCU, they are fucked without Spider-Man

>sony made Spider-Man
the last good spider man sony did alone was before most you zoomers were alive.
at least nuspider man are watchable

This is amazing because I fucking hate that they made Peter into some foster child

Cope harder mousecuck
Venomchads and Into the Kinoverse out did your shitty monopoly

>Disney purchases Sony Pictures
This won't happen. They're backed by the parent Sony Company.

> Being a contrarian makes me smart
Subhuman tranny

They can’t, hell, sony wont be able to use ANY of the characters that appear in any of the past movies, specially the villains EVER as that was in the original contract with Disney. Which leads Sony to rebooting the whole thing but keeping only Tom Holland as Spidey which make no sense.

> Making up fake rules
There is no law preventing US companies from purchasing Japanese ones

Lots of people dislike the direction Disney took with the character.

Him being a tony stark dick rider is something people seem to either love or hate and the ending of Far From Home has had a mixed reaction as well

So basically we should expect to hear news about Disney trying to buy Sony within the next week?

Nope cause Sony’s got the spider verse baby
Face it mousecucks you’ve been outplayed

Provide a source faggot

>into the cuckverse
b8

Cope, mouse shill. Sony isn't getting bought out.

I retrospect, trying to make Spider-Man the new face of the MCU when they don't even fully own him was probably a bad idea. I wonder what they're gonna do now. Probably put Dr. Strange in that position and introduce the X-Men sooner. Black Panther would also be an option but they aren't gonna go for a character who's not based in America. Captain Marvel would also be an option but Endgame made it pretty clear that they aren't confident enough in her to give her a more prominent role.

Attached: The_Bimbo_Bomb_Girls_Cover_Edited_Version.png (1700x2200, 3.52M)

> Liking the most iconic brand in the world makes you a shill
> Liking one of the most hated companies in the world doesn’t because it hurts Sony
How does this make any sense?

> Liking Disney makes someone a shill
> Liking Sony doesn’t make someone a shill
Nice contrarianism

Not sony as a whole but Disney might actually try to purchase the right for spidey this time or exchange it for some of their Fox properties (Avatar)

from a book written abt sonys struggle to keep up w marvel using the asm franchise, faggot
The Big Picture: The Fight for the Future of Movies by Ben Fritz

>Liking Disney makes someone a shill
Yes.

MCU is sure in trouble, huh? Spider-Man is Marvel's most popular character. Holland was going to be the face of their franchise after RDJ left. They literally made him latex Iron Man, had him appear in five movies, etc. And now he's gone. Literally how is Disney going to explain his absence?

Attached: jjj.jpg (480x360, 10K)

>no more söyderman from MCU cuckold Factory
That's a good thing

As bad as Spider Twink was, I have the feeling Sony's third solo take on the character will be far worse

>bitchmade
What?

I think he meant bitchmode.

>Sometimes, I just don't understand how corporations think.
With big summer blockbusters at least someone is wondering how many people wouldn't have bothered seeing Far From Home if it wasn't connected to Disney's Marvel films, and how many of those people would have decided to go see Toy Story or The Lion King instead.

I honestly just want Venom and Spidey in the same movie because I bet the sexual chemistry between Holland and Hardy will be off the hook.

Isn't this Sony calling Disney's bluff? They know Disney MCU will be fucked up without Spider-Man. Aren't they doing this so the Mouse caves and agrees to their demands?

Uh... yes there literally is
It’s very difficult for American companies to buy jap ones
It’s a big reason Nintendo survived.
Go look it up.
However it’s possible Sony could spin off the licensing rights Sony pictures owns and sell that. Not sure why they would, Sony pictures makes shitbox movies but they make a profit

>sony wont be able to use ANY of the characters that appear in any of the past movies, specially the villains EVER
this is backwards logic. all characters belonged to Sony.
Youre only argument is they cant use Jon Favreau character and the guy that got yelled by Jeff Bridges in Ironman 1

honestly its disney who should be shitting themselves here

Every Marvel film is made via committee through previz before anyone gets signed on.

>>Tom Holland is the most beloved Spider man actor to date

Attached: 1565757479868.jpg (960x960, 43K)

>Isn't this Sony calling Disney's bluff?
probably. Other sources have said negotiations still ongoing
the disney expo is this weekend and Id imagine the crowd will be screaming for spiderman back when feige appears on stage

Wouldn't doubt it. Disney blew it when they didn't lock down a better deal when they first negotiated. Spider-man was in a spiral and the MCU deal saved it. Now it's back to printing Sony money and they don't want to give any of it up. This is also a post Endgame world where the MCU is in flux and no longer has its biggest draw.

Sony holds all the cards with the IP and they know it. Provided they don't fuck it up again with another Amazing Spider-man 2.

Their third take was Spiderverse and it was kino.

unfortunately he's not wrong, I recently met some drones who were drooling over his twink cock

Based well-rested bluelight filter user

No, you can buy as long as they still get revenue (doesn't affect their local economy) and doesn't present a threat to national security.

japanese dont like selling user

>Two sided sword

Marvel made Spidey integral to their universe for a reason. All his movies and characterizations do not work without the MCU. On THAT everyone agrees on.

Was it a bold move? For sure. They never expected Sony to be autistic enough to rip Spidey out of the MCU and then go on record saying they'll continue to keep the actor and characterization (with no mention of the MCU).

Both companies had big balls. Who's the loser? Spiderman. And unironically, fans.

They were already in some water from the fox takeover. You really want them to consolidate the movie industry even further?

user I think they'd rather had their fingers cut off before selling anything to gaijins

>Marvel made Spidey integral to their universe for a reason. All his movies and characterizations do not work without the MCU. On THAT everyone agrees on.
you'd have a point if shattered universe wasn't a hit. instead it proves that spiderman is strong enough to stand on his own
and don't forget venom

Sony is based.

so based

Attached: images (22).jpg (630x487, 29K)

not him, but tricking fags into thinking sony actually gives a shit about them to sell them their products? I think this is pretty based indeed, user

you are correct

spiderman should have been the center of marvel going forward, but marvel doesnt own him
black panther isnt american and Cpt America (falcon) is regulated to Disney+
Hulk is fucked up character wise

cpt marvel sucks

So hopefully XMEN will introduce Wolverine properly, while Deadpool becomes the new marvel cash cow.
Who knows, maybe fantastic Four will knock it out of the park?

Attached: 1520271840147.png (1500x750, 1.22M)

Is there any chance they'll come to an agreement? I'm not on either companies side. I just want Spidey/Venom interacting with the MCU.

>shattered universe is a hit

Holy fuck. Are we being invaded by Yea Forumsfags? Why can't you fucking niggers stay in your containment boards?

Alright, let's pretend you're not a co-faggot. Explain to us what a "shattered universe" is and how it relates to tv/film.

Also, what's it like being a virgin?

Attached: DC being fags AGAIN.gif (540x303, 1.82M)

sony has huge balls for this.
They know that marvel spent the last few years building the story line arc with tony stark and spiderman, killing tony stark and passing his legacy off to spiderman ...and at ZERO hour sony decides to walk away with the character

lol fuck you pay me situation in the business room

Very difficult, not impossible. Read

a breath of fresh air in a sea of diarrhea

according to tv, wanting spidey to stay in the mcu is being pro disney and pro monopoly, i guess marvel is the only real capeshit out there, at least on that everyone here agrees

THIS NIGGA FINNA PEED ON HIS SCREEN

>yfw sony dabs on the mouse's plan to make iron man jr to be the lead of the mcu

user, are you fucking mentally impaired? did your father push your brain with his cock stuck in your hear? what in my post triggered you so much?
The only thing wrong in my post is that I called into the spiderverse "shattered universe", which was actually some old ass game on the xbox. if anything this shows how much of a shit I give about all this.
point is into the spiderverse made 4 times its budget in total gross and was overall received very well. And venom made almost one billion, so the brand still has potential to stand on its own feet, this is all I was saying and these are objective facts. I personally don't give the slightest shit if tomorrow capeshit dies forever. now go drink a glass of water, take a deep breath, and fuck yourself

>that gif

So that's how you get aids.

i thought the spat is about money and not about Feige?

Ya seethe?

Based.

Will this help end capeshit?

ur right, something smells fishy and I'm not talking about ur mom's pussy

It is. Sony is trying to use Fiege as a scrapegoat dor whu the negotiations failed

I like this drama. I hope it kills the MCU.

Endgame was a fine ending. Just let it die and do capeshit in 30 years or something. We're done.

It really fucking will if Sony goes through with this. Disney was sitting up Spiderman to be the next iron man and face of the avengers, if disney can't use Spiderman for their future movies, they're fucked and have to find a new face.
The question is, who could even be the new face of the MCU? Cap and Iron man are gone, black panther and captain marvel are charisma blackholes, and no one gives a shit about Hawkeye.

Didn't Sony move the headquarters to california wouldn't that make them a American company

Dr. Strange is their best bet. Also the only one of their new faces who has a confirmed sequel. The Guardians of the Galaxy are popular but their movie got delayed after they tried to fire Gunn for criticizing the government. Thor is still around. And they have the X-Men and Fantastic 4 up their sleeves.

ALL CAPESHITTERS MUST FUCKING HANG

I'm fucking confused. Every article is still reporting Spiderman is still out - so which is it? Is Spidey in the MCU and Feige out or are they both gone?

>Disney is fucking this up and Sony has nothing to lose.
Go to bed, Pascal.

Its capeshit, no one cares go to bed.

They still have to fulfill their prior contract obligations whatever they may be, if I have read them correctly there is one more Spider-Man movie left under that contract even though Spider-Man was only supposed to appear in 5 movies which has already been done which is also where the confusion is coming from.

I liked the game, if Sony and Marvel stop playing nice, there's no sequel.

So is he out of the MCU or not?

>less than 100 posters
>more than 200 comments

I don't get you dude. Does your life suck so bad that you spend hours in a thread spamming that you hate capeshit? If you ever had sex, whatever your name is, I'll call you "IP 48.123.119.36" cause I don't know your real name, but what you are doing in this thread (and all Marvel related threads) is both sad and pathetic.

Please dude, we beg of you... please get a life. And don't make me expose you again, cause I see you have a long history... go outside. Let me be your Dad here, cause obviously you never had one Brian.

Attached: kurt-russell-in-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-first-look.jpg (1600x800, 110K)

Spider man made a Deal with Mefisto,
or everyone is a Clone that have a limited lifespan

can someone translate the corporate language?

so feige isn't producing shit. what does that matter? couldn't disney get another exec to handle it or is the implication that no disney producer can be involved at all?
even then, they still have some sort of partnership deal standing right? the MCU and Sonyverse can reference each other but not have crossover appearances i would imagine.
we are are in the era of trump, why don't these fucks just come out and say what they really mean.

When did Twitter add yellow mode?

BASED

Partnership still exists for 2 more movies.
I’d imagine they’d agree a new deal by then

Disney need to accept Spider-Man IP will not be bought in the near future. Sony just purchased the game studio that produced the game last year, so a sequel will be treated as priority now (and further releases)

Literally nothing will happen, Sony is out politicting Disney. Disney knows they are fucked without Spider-Man & Sony made it clear they are happy to have Spider-Man in the MCU. Disney will cave in & accept Sony’s original counter-offer because they have no other choice and Sony can’t be bought

They're being deliberately opaque because they want to damage control and work out some sort of deal that keeps Spiderman in the MCU with the only change being Feige isn't involved

Ok.... now THIS is epic

I hope you're right. I just want Spidey to stay in the MCU.

lmao

Based hacker

Enjoy your ban

Pretty sure this guy knows how to turn his router on and off seething janny apologist

Raimi

F**k you, how do you like them apples, janitors keep this place tolerable, and outting commenters is against the rules

im surprised marvel got into bed with sony if it wasn't a lock that they couldn't pull their usual dumb bs

t.Jannie

Attached: 1550970151549.webm (800x800, 2.46M)

That's actually based

>F**k you, how do you like them apples, janitors keep this place tolerable, and outting commenters is against the rules

Attached: 1563529936877.png (454x520, 7K)

why are they so aggressive about not having Feige involved? he quietly helped with the spiderman animated movie from last year also

Disney severely booty blasted. Feign has worked with Sony for almost 20 years

FUCK THIS SHIT WHO CARES

Billions..

BIGGER THINGS GOING ON IN THE FUCKIN WORLD MOTHER FUCK SPIDER MAN

NWO COMING WORLD IS ENDING YALL TALKING ABOUT SOME GOD DAMN SPIDER MAN

bring on harley keener aka iron lad

Nope, only Daredevil was any good.

You literally use reddit you nigger

Why no one bought Nintendo yet is because they can't, literally, only time motherfuckers didn't make money was in 2013 and even then they made Wii U make money with upswing that continued with Switch, which is their second best seller after Wii right now.

Babbies first redpill?

SAM HEIL UND FETTE BEUTE!

>he thinks Far From Home is bigger than Spider-Man 2002
>He thinks Tom Holland is the best Spider-Man
>He thinks Spider-Man "is becoming a phenomenon" when he has been for decades
MCUfags are this delusional

These children are bitchmade.

based

Only the comics are canon.

Fiege is head of the studio retard. Nowhere in that statement is it said he will remain in the mcu. If fiege isnt involved, he wont be in the mcu how stupid are you not to get this?

Microsoft & Disney both have more than enough cash flow to buy out Nintendo. Nobody has bought them out, because there are slanteye laws in place which prevent Non-Japanese from buying out the entire country.

Fiji doesn't direct, though
is this the thread for 40-something housewives who don't know the difference between directors, producers, cinematographers, DOPs, and lighting technicians?

Nowhere in that statement is it implied he is staying in the mcu you fucking retard. In fact the opposite is clearly implied. How do you lack reading comprehension this hard? The deal is broken off. Its really fucking simple.

Only the comics are canon.

based and redpilled

If they remove fiege, that means the next spidey film they do wont be in the mcu you dumbass. It really isnt that complicated. It will simply be standalone. It is nowhere implied in the article otherwise

“Journalists” just regurgitate rumors they hear on social media.

Attached: BDD71D2D-FED7-4F6D-BC97-358970C15997.jpg (781x522, 74K)

Or Disney could just keep the original deal a stop being Jews.

>Feige
>creative

100% of 800m is better than 50% of 1billion.

Are you a genuine fucking retard or what? Two characters you listed have their own billion dollar films. And you brought up hawkeye who is a side character for no apparent reason other than a random slight. You may as well suggested drax be the face of the franchise. Jesus youre an idiot

Read the article you dumbass

Fiege is the head of the studio smooth brain. He is either involved or he officially wont be part of the mcu. Get your shit together moron

Attached: 1562116434688-tv.jpg (455x520, 41K)

>chief creative force
You make it sound like he came up with all this from scratch. The material is sourced, it doesnt take a genius. Feige worship as some mastermind is a meme. The films are loosely connected and the threads are not that complex. Im sure he thinks hes some hot shit and got all jewy.

*ahem*
SNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED

not an argument

No Feige is = no MCU, Tony cap thor hulk, etc are gone, Sony has the entire Spidey universe, including Mysterio, Vulture, Scorpion, Black Cat, etc

Uh, no I dont

La creatura

K I N O
I
N
O

>>sony thinks now that disney/marvel resuscitated the spidey brand that they can fuck off and carry it from here on out
>they will guaranteed fuck it up and i can't wait to watch it implode
Is Yea Forums really that fucking ignorant? It doesn't matter if they were "good" movies or not you retards, Amazing Spider-Man 1&2 each grossed upwards of $700M, and Venom pulled in around $850M. And while Spider-Verse wasn’t as big of a commercial success as it deserved, it took away Disney/Pixar’s Oscar.

Like, that's the cold hard numbers. However much modern marvel is viewed as "resuscitating" the Spiderman brand, fact is the "bad old ones" still made boatloads of cash. Enough that Disney saying to go from 5% first day + merch to 50/50 + merch was utterly fucking ludicrous. Like, "lol no", particularly since Sony would still be responsible for most marketing costs (teaser in post-credits isn't without value but not enough at all).

Attached: 1264000030083.jpg (182x195, 8K)

if disney offered marketing costs in the spidey mcu related stuff that would be a hella good deal in exchange for 50% profit

>hella

Fuck off retard

hella no faggot

So its basically just "FUCK FEIGI!"

True Detective season 4
PI searching for a killer and his victim turned sidekick fuckboi.

jesus christ what kind of bluelight filter are you using

He hasn't directed a single film. What kind of stupid shit is this?

Based Sony shitting all over the Mouse and his woke bullshit. Jews fear the Samurai!

why the "Feigi" spam? his name is Feige
Is it a single pajeet or multiple pajeets?

>>Tom Holland is the most beloved Spider man actor to date

not even fucking close, are you kidding

>piss filter

Who cares about spelling the kike's name correctly.

Feige is really in charge.
Of everything.

>No no no it says that Bummer #7 directed the movie! Bummer #7 was the director! It says so!
Everything goes through Feige.

Yes.

you don't think that it does but it do though

>Tom Holland is the most beloved Spider man actor to date
Sure thing faggot shill.

He was a skrull.

Heck of a blue light filter you've got there, OP.

they making a true detective season 4

The way I see it, Sony is telling Disney to go fuck themselves, which is always a positive
Even if we won't see the consequences of this for a few years, it's amazing schadenfreude

What if Sony has decided to make a Spider Man with Japanese origins. I mean a completely new one. Here's my idea.
Spidey's uncle gets killed by Yakuza. Norman Osborn is the head of a conglomerate. Doc Ock is a professor at Spidey's university. Lizard is a human kaiju .Venom is an ancient Japanese treasure that was locked away for years and was used to give the ancient Emperors super strength due to which the Japan was able to defend itself against the Mongol Invasions.