>Go to yule ball
>See this
What do?
Go to yule ball
why didnt the students at hogwarts have sex?
>not posting bestgirl of film
>What do?
Laugh at her pathetic attempt to look sexy.
they did, harry and ron were just incels
Think about based Merula the whole time
Based best girl
>harry
He tapped her in the tent, notice she was wearing his clothes after that.
hermione fucked Krum, Harry, Dumbledore, Snape, and Ron
Because in the 90s civilized countries wasn't full of sluts and man whores like today's America.
I dunno. I mean, if I knew her and there was some chemistry between us, I would think it was hot as fuck. If I'd never met her, I'd think she was a slut.
what happens if you tell taissa to smile?
>why is this 30 year old woman at a school ball?
t. zoomer
act
Turn 360 degrees and walk away from one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
watch kids zoomer
if you turn 360 degrees you would face deh same direction you fucking retard
based
> underage and new fag
Gtfo
traps are gay
What retard put Tolkien in shit tier?
>Snape
Proofs?
report to Umbridge
>he fell for it
Now who's the newfag?
>fell for it
(You)
Who has the edit of OP gif spliced with bbc porn?