Scorsese

not him, but it would be complete shit without ddl.

Better than Harry Potter, which was his only goal imo

Wolf of Wall Street was a terrible movie

>i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover i don't have talent for visuals so voiceover

His only mediocre film

why are you posting the same thing 50 times?

why are is his movies basically audiobooks with action sequences sprinkled in

>voiceovers
>bad
say that to my face not online see what happens

Attached: 1559115195558.jpg (680x680, 70K)

>his first 2 movies have combined 5 minutes of dialogue

This. Not every Scorsese flick with DiCaprio is bad, but his presence in them does make it worse.

He's great for Hollywood standards, but no one takes him seriously in the auteur world. He's shallow and unoriginal. Taxi Driver is the closest he got to making an honest artistic confession. Everything else is just high quality entertainment for the masses.

>the auteur world

Attached: 1553568705620.gif (300x290, 3.13M)