This was actually kino as fuck
Did lefties and mainstream media types hate it because it honoured the cops instead of glamourizing the spree killers?
This was actually kino as fuck
Did lefties and mainstream media types hate it because it honoured the cops instead of glamourizing the spree killers?
I liked it and am leftist. Although I generally love violence against criminals
It was ok, elevated by the actors but nothing special. The things you like not always being popular isnt some conspiracy
I'm talking about the scathing reviews in NY times and the guardian calling it "reactionary" and "a celebration of police brutality" and "politically terrifying"
theguardian.com
nytimes.com
I'm half surprised these reviews didn't say DRUMPF.
lmao motor bandits deserved the rope
Yeah of course, they only made it worse for working people during the great depression.
>NY Times and The Guardian
>Lefties
Just because people don't agree with reactionairy politics or just with you doesn't make them leftiets. Especially NY Times lmao
Fucking retard.
It was ok but nothing that special.
>muh leftists hate muh kino about stereotypical white cops
Seethe harder commie
Dilate
It really was kino. I Should watch it again.
Honestly I can't believe netflix made it.
>tie too short
>pulling your pants halfway to your armpits
What aesthetic is this?
Old man core
It is a solid movie, one that will age very well. A lot of it has to do with the performances and the script as well as showing the Bonnie and Clyde story from another perspective, which is rare.
Just read their eulogies to the soviets. Nary a criticism to be seen.
nytimes.com
Why do conservatives have such shit pedestrian taste in shows and movies
>uhhhhh yeah im thinking Death Wish is movie of the year
Dilate
Retarded nigger detected
Was quite boring. I fell asleep watching it.
Why do leftoids lick bull cum out of their girlfriends' cunts and become """women"""
well that question really answers itself
t. Death Wish fans
lol imagine posting on this board after 2012 the great reckoning
at least there wasnt laughably bad acting like in Lawless
>the guardian calling it "reactionary"
It is reactionary. Kids these days like the bandits with rebellious public image more then honest red-blooded 60 years old retired paramilitary mercenaries, the horror.
>a celebration of police brutality
Not really in my opinion, but you can see it that way.
>politically terrifying
What the fuck was politically terrifying about that? It was a fucking 1950s western shot in 2019 for some reason. There was a lot to like and to dislike but "politically terrifying"? Bullshit.
They will by the time your milkrace gets done, OP.
You want to see lefties, read some of the comments on any given NY Times story. If that rag isn't written by liberals, it sure has been adopted by them.
nigga I'm practically a film twitter regular at this point and I can tell you that no one cared about this movie. there was no "controversy"
I saw reviews for Once Upon a Time in Hollywood that criticized it for the most bizarre reasons (not even referring to the ending or the story itself) and the only thing I can think of is because it portrayed hippies accurately as the dirty unwashed leeches they were instead of romanticizing them
This was one of the most boring and pointless movies I've ever seen. Calling this kino as fuck is retarded lmao. And that has nothing to do with politics.