Thoughts?

is this true?

Attached: r3WzT4S_1_1.jpg (1080x1052, 192K)

>twitter screencap thread from a literally who

didn't read

Attached: 1560218433892.jpg (700x700, 99K)

And people still wonder how or why Trump won...

But user, they have a checkmark. They must be important, right?

What is progressive?

nigga they're fucking lions lmao

Have any of you watched an episode from a cartoon i think it was South Park, where everyone is being sarcastic and couldnt stop. Sometimes i feel like thats what the internet is, because i never meet or hear people like that irl

Attached: 1530821306359.gif (500x439, 644K)

So are progressives for or against meritocracy?

Twitter is a different planet. Nothing there matters unless you're a celeb alien under threat of blacklist.

Stop using Twitter.

Nala should have become a lion queen or lioness king
or rather lioness queen

Attached: 1547227024358.jpg (400x400, 17K)

The opposite of progress

Damn Hamlet for not being more progressive.

That's an awesome mask

if I pulled that off would he die?

ikr

Seria demasiadamente doloroso

Against. Because meritocracy creates hierarchys.

Even if it's a hierarchy based on merit, it's still a hierarchy. Monarchys are hierarchys, but not based on merit.

I want her to bear my children.

Attached: Nala.webm (1920x1080, 587K)

>Those fuck-me eyes...

para voce

Attached: 1492647253111.jpg (569x802, 250K)

imagine how many furries that one moment caused

Attached: jokah.jpg (338x377, 45K)

so much faggotry

> Nala, the tigress
>classic 'american education'
She is a lioness.

If everyone who has used Twitter in the past 7 working days was round up and executed, the world would be a far better place.

you seem like a progressive judging from your ability to spell

Attached: 1548670162146.jpg (1486x833, 101K)

>implying she's wrong

based and almost checked

Attached: 1556457477133.jpg (416x416, 23K)

Technically yes, as all she is doing is reciting plot points. The bigger question is whether she thinks that is a bad thing.

Attached: Let me be good to you.webm (720x404, 2.96M)

Glorifying heriditary monarchy is a bad thing.
>retards will unironically argue with me over this

wait how was everything scar's fault again? I know he was a bad guy and murdered his brother and made a child think it was their fault in order to seize power, but also it's not like he caused the drought or whatever so?

the system had worked for centuries
how old is 'democracy'?

>he doesn't know about the weather machine

exactly
honestly which one of us hasn't done atleast one of those things

Attached: 1547942894884.jpg (400x386, 105K)

Not the drought, but he and his hyennas did recklessly eat all the food and treat everyone badly.

The implicatiom is that he didn't deserve to be king, because he was selfish and shortsighted, on top of being a murdering scumbag. By anyone's measure, he would make a bad ruler (well, maybe not to femenists, but to any sane person)

I haven't seen the remake, so IDK if it's as obvious as it was in the original. But that's the gist, anyway.

It didn't work very well. Constant wars over issues that didn't affect the populace (the most recent and the most prominent example being WWI), rulers being incompetent and not working in the interests of the people, a lack of guaranteed freedoms, the inability of monarchy to evolve and improve on its own, huge sums of money wasted on the crown at great cost and little benefit to the people, the oppression of feudalism on the people, etc. Democracy isn't perfect, but it's better than monarchy.

Imagine processing everything through this filter of progressive nonsense, even down to a children's film about big cats. Don't drink the kool aid kids.