Why is Citizen Kane so highly rated? I enjoyed Casablanca and 12 Angry Men, but I just couldn't stand this one...

Why is Citizen Kane so highly rated? I enjoyed Casablanca and 12 Angry Men, but I just couldn't stand this one. Does anyone feel the same way? Am I just crazy?

Attached: 635879.png (846x1048, 325K)

If its black and white its automatically shit

Because you can watch it today and it actually comes off as a movie, using the same styles and direction we would use today, but it came out so long ago. Compare it to any of its contemporaries and its night and day how ahead of its time it was.

Its not the greatest movie ever, but really special

This is true. It is a land mark film in the history of cinema and a cornerstone of any kind of education in film criticism or film making.
However it does not change the fact that the movie is incredibly boring, the main character is horribly unlikeable, the pacing is slow as fuck, and the ending has been spoiled to everyone since birth about what Rosebud is that there is zero mystery left to the movie. I can't stand Citizen Kane, and I know there are others like me who rolled their eyes when they had to watch it for the sixth time in school.

>Compare it to any of its contemporaries and its night and day how ahead of its time it was
How many films from the 30s and 40s have you seen?

>the main character is horribly unlikeable
The fact that you think this is a valid criticism is how I know you're a faggot

it’s one of those movies that are supremely boring but because it was innovative for its time it is considered “important”.

>it was innovative for its time
It wasn't very innovative. The only real innovative part about it is that a Hollywood studio gave the director complete creative control. Didn't really do anything new besides that

At least six

I'm not familiar enough with film history to comment on the "innovation" aspects, but there was something jarring about this film I can't quite put my finger on. Perhaps the bombastic noises and transitions? It seemed like a set of scenes strung together without real narrative momentum or flow.

I worked at a small media company that would take public domain movies, upscale them, then post on their app.
Theres way more crap from the 30’s and 40’s than the Criterion Collection would lead you to believe

If you watched more, you'd see how wrong you are. Stylistically, Kane isn't that different than a lot of films that came before it

Cringe
Cringe
Based
Cringe
Based
Based
Cringe
Cringe
Cringe

Dont respond to my (you)’s

Cringe
Based
Cringe
Based

Cringe

>based!
>cringe!
Why don't you say something substantive you retarded faggot.

Attached: 687592.png (210x240, 6K)

>public domain movies
No shit, you're watching garbage public domain movies no one gives a shit about

there are good pd films, but most of them are there because they're shit and no one cares about them

Vertigo beat it out for #1 on the BFI top 100 movies list, and rightfully so- Citizen Kane is the pleb's choice.

Attached: MV5BMTUxMzcwMDU4N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjUxNzU0NzE@._V1_CR0 60 640 360_AL_UX477_CR0 0 477 268_AL_.jpg (477x268, 13K)

Based
Based
Cringe
Based
Cringe

I really really enjoyed it. I dunno, man. Just scratches an itch, y'know?

no idea what you're talking about

Based
Based
Cringe

Because it's a real movie unlike movies today and adaptations of stageshit.

Based
Based

Surprisingly, a lot had stars and recognizable names. We put up one called need for speed, and it turns out the movie studio got the name from it.

Often with these old movies, studios dont care or forget to renew them, and they fall into public domain.

Still, point is there was a lot of crap, and citizen kane really does come off as more modern than the vast majority of them

smells like virgin in here

Attached: laughing at virgins.jpg (1300x956, 91K)

Based
Cringe

yeah i felt that way when i first saw it. then i saw it again and i really liked it. maybe it's the hype, maybe it's whatever, but it's a really solid filim. Try it again in a couple years when one of your friends says "i've never seen it"

Cringe

The Wizard of Oz feels more modern than Kane, and that came out two years earlier

No one ever wants to admit it, but all these black and white movies suck cock.

Based
Cringe

Cringe
Based

Adam fuck off

Based
Cringe

At least they don't suck dog cock

And it is often put on top 10 lists with citizen kane. kane just lacks musical numbers so has a bit more of a mature dramatic feel. Both fantastic tho

Citizen Kane does not exist. It was filmed in the 90s and made to be intentionally shit but appear kino so people could oust pseuds

>does not exist
>It was filmed in the 90s

burn

no it does not wtf

>using the same styles and direction we would use today
I'd say it even uses styles that would be great today even if they're not used. It's a great film all around, OP is just a fag as usual

vertigo is overrated as fuck. It popularized the worst tropes in cinema

This. Citizen Kane is just a kike by the jew nigger the planet and eliminate the white race.

TRIVAGO

Citizen Kane is not innovative. It's really good, but it didn't do anything newother than the fact that a Hollywood studio gave the director complete creative control

A bold claim since a saw it in the 80s.

The movie was made to insult a major newspaper magnet.

99.99% guarantee you wouldn’t think that if Wizard of Oz was b&w

it doesn't exist as commonly known
glownegro

It’s just picking over a dead man’s belongings and talking to his “friends” to try and make some sense of his life.

Wells was admittedly ignorant of film making and that’s why it’s a good watch.

All the $$$Hollywood$$$ (((bigwigs)))has it out for him, (((they))) hated him.
Even tried to frame him as a pedo.

Attached: 036CE565-3F79-44AC-B35E-3457902B5E0C.jpg (670x767, 122K)

ceilings, "impossible" camera movements, and some interesting splicing. it was also incredibly well shot.

>ceilings
Watch Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, or James Whale's Frankenstein
>"impossible" camera movements
I guess it may have been the first to have the camera go through something(not saying it was the first, just that I can't recall any film that did it before), but people often act like Kane was the first film to use the camera in an interesting way, which isn't true
>interesting splicing
I don't really know what you mean by this. If you're talking about the editing, it is interesting, but many films before had had interesting editing as well
>incredibly well shot
True, but it wasn't the first film to be incredibly well shot

The plot of 12 Angry Men makes suspension of disbelief impossible. The amount of evidence against the kid is
so staggering that a lawyer would have to argue that there was a conspiracy to frame him, like the OJ Simpson defense team. The "logic" the protagonist uses to dismiss the evidence is also deeply flawed.