How the fucking fuck did they put, out of all the fucking takes, that stupid retard laugh on that scene? What were they thinking.
How the fucking fuck did they put, out of all the fucking takes, that stupid retard laugh on that scene...
Anthony Clark
Other urls found in this thread:
Joshua Adams
"Deh!"
Ayden Jones
They knew it was going to make a fuckpile of money regardless of what they did. In this situation, would you do anything other than sneak in as much shitposting as you could?
Dylan Garcia
It's pretty clear they just wanted to get over with it. All the films more or less stink but they didn't even try to stick to the source material in the last ones.
Gavin Allen
As soon as voldemort came back the series took an instant nose dive. Kids didn't like Harry Potter because of the battle against evil aspect: they liked it because they self inserted themselves into one of various houses and day dreamed about their Hogwarts adventures. After book 4 there were no more adventures just long, boring grind to the inevitable conclusion where they kill Voldemort - AGAIN - that everyone knew would happen.
Also Pottermania was coming to a close in 2005 since thats the time when the bad books were being released and the movies had reached book 5, so executives basically gave up and stopped caring and moved on to the Twilight fad, since they knew people were going to see the last 4 movies no matter what so they just let that visionless hack have full control over the last few films.
Christopher Ortiz
they wanted it to be disturbing. the problem is that when you're editing a movie you're watching the same thing over and over and over and things lose their impact on you personally. so maybe they had a better take of him laughing, but after a while it stopped having a disturbing effect on the editor. so he grabbed another, worse take and mistook his gut instinct of "this is a bad take" for "aha, this take is leaving a deeper impression on me!"
Juan Howard
Harry Potter is dehd! Deh-he-he-he!
Aaron Scott
>since thats the time when the bad books were being released
Jacob Torres
5+ are objectively shit
Adam Williams
Why was Smee one of Voldemort's death eaters?
Noah Gray
it's classic.
also
"I DON'T NEED YOUR HELP!"
, is a pretty amazing line..
Dylan Gomez
Jesus what a ratchet ugly looking bunch. I thought Slytherins were supposed to be rich and classy?
Leo Cruz
truly the gift that keeps on giving
Brayden Butler
5+ are the best books in the series you pleb. The last chapters of book 5 is fucking amazing.
Jace Nelson
it's even more goofy in french
youtube.com
the point is that Voldemort is at the happiest he's ever been, because he finally killed Harry.
Lucas Hughes
italian voldemort cries...mamma mia
Dominic Flores
Wyatt Hernandez
ARE YOOOOU JOOOOOKIN
Austin Robinson
They are all inbred purists so it makes sense.
Owen Sanchez
more like
>DEEH-HEH-EHHH
Daniel Roberts
Not in the later movies, that's what that other user was talking about
Angel Hughes
can't be real
Connor King
It's the laugh of a broken man, a man who's realized he's in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
William Nguyen
What an odd collection of books in an odd sorting
Nolan Jones
German one sounds exactly like Homer Simpson
Easton Rivera
this never gets old
Jack Perry
Dehest dehs deh dehe dehy deh dehie dehs. Deh deh dehing deh deh dehard deh deh dehs deh Dehwarts Dehdemy deh dehey deh dehed dehs deh deh indehable deh deh dehs. Deh deh deh dehy dehery, deh dehs’ deh dehency deh deh dehs deh deh dehment deh indehive deh deh dehial dehs, deh deh deh dehic undehical, deh deh dehtion deh indeh.
Dehs deh deh deh deh deh Dehling dehed deh deh deh Dehlberg dehing deh dehs; deh deh deh deh dehs deh deher deh dehen deh deh deh deh deh deh deht dehthing deh dehbody?deh dehusly dehable deh-dehtion deh deh dehs. Deh Dehry Dehher dehs deh deh anti-Dehtian (deh deh), deh deh’s dehly deh anti-Dehes Dehnd dehs deh dehs deh deh deh, dehty deh dehment. Deh deh dehs deh deh deh deh. Deh, dehfully, deh deh deher deh deh.
>d-deh dehst deh dehs deh deh dehough d-deh
"Deh!"
Deh dehing deh dehful; deh deh deh dehble. Deh deh deh, Deh dehed deh dehry deh deh deher deh deh deh deh, deh dehor deh dehtead deh deh deher "dehed deh dehs."
Deh deh dehing deh deh deh deh deh deh dehry deh deh deh deh dehed. Deh dehed deh deh Deh deh dehed deh deh dehal deh dehs. Deh deh dehlous. Dehling's deh dehs deh dehed deh dehes deh deh dehs deh deh deh deh deh deh deh dehing. Deh Deh deh deh dehish, dehing deh deh Dehry Dehher deh deh deh Dehphen Dehng. Deh deh dehthing deh deh dehect deh, "Deh dehse dehs deh dehing Dehry Dehher deh dehdeh deh dehdeh, deh deh deh deh deher deh deh deh deh deh deh Dehphen Dehng." Deh deh deh deh dehght. Deh deh deh dehing dehic. Deh deh deh "Dehry Dehher" deh deh, deh deh, dehed deh deh Dehphen Dehng.
Lucas Scott
>Kids didn't like Harry Potter because of the battle against evil aspect: they liked it because they self inserted themselves into one of various houses and day dreamed about their Hogwarts adventures. After book 4 there were no more adventures just long, boring grind to the inevitable conclusion where they kill Voldemort - AGAIN - that everyone knew would happen.
Most accurate description of Harry Potter ever. The first four were just for fun, but Rowling and Hollywood insisted on turning it into yet another Nazis were bad metaphor
William Campbell
Interesting take.