What's the verdict anons?

ive heard it doesnt have plot and only weirdos think its good because of 'cinemaographic' or some such incel freak shit.

I don't know how that's a bad thing

Based chad retard

youtu.be/0Wy_XeNFLfk
I just saw it for a third time last night and yes. Loved that it didn't go off the rails until the last scene. If you have any interest in the 60s, the murders or moviemaking in general it's a fun flick.

>doesn't have a plot
It's literally 90% non-fiction with a handful of characters sprinkled and a fictitious ending. Not just you but the general reaction from people in theaters was embarrassing, enjoy your capeshit folks.

When is this going to be on torrent?

I get that the Manson murders were symbolic and shit in real life and in the film, but I feel like maybe the film could have had a normal (or at least less Tarantino-violence styled) wrap up and still been great.

I actually felt like most of the violence at the end hit really fucking hard for some reason, the scene with the dog and the canned food was just fucking brutal, and the screaming was blood curdling. Until the Asian chick started waving her arms like one of those airtube puppets outside of car dealerships it felt really savage and real, and even that wasn't funny to me. The dialogue and interactions between characters were funny but the violence itself wasn't until the flame thrower came out. I know I'm in the minority because my theatre was howling hysterically but it just didn't seem stylised enough to be fun. It felt like revenge-violence-porn against people we'd been given very little reason to hate in the actual film.

I guess this is where you call me a pleb

It was good liked the little twist at the end. Shame we didn't get to see Uma juniors feet tho.

>People drive around and listen to the radio for 2 and a half hours

Yeah, real kino you guys got there lol

I'm not saying this movie can't be criticized but everytime I see someone attempting to criticize it, it's the most brain dead pleb shit I've ever seen.

>hurr hurr le so much driving
you fucks had me so worried about all the driving but i barely noticed it when i finally saw the movie

Are you talking about Pulp Fiction?

People are just fucking savage man. I went to see it with my friends and the only part they liked was the end which is a shame
t. someone who laughed throughout the ending

>I blame the world for my own complete lack of an attention span

Hate shitbulls but I would pet that dog

It’s just fuckin beautiful

The actual dialogue and gags were hilarious at the end and I liked how jarring I found the violence alongside the actual comedic stuff but other people were laughing at the girl screaming in pain with her face smashed by a tin can, for one example, where I found that pretty shocking and brutal. The arm waving as she ran around was the only thing that felt like it was meant to be humour that didn't actually work for me, it just looked silly.

Just felt like the audience misread the intended impact of certain things, but maybe it was just me.

Audiences are retarded. The whole scene was meant to be shocking until the girl landed in the pool and the flamethrower came out. My theater surprisingly was going “OOOOH” and audibly getting shocked at the violence, and everyone broke out in raucous applause when the flamethrower happened
>based boomers and millennials

It is the first movie of Tarantino that is an old man now.
Also, the movie is shit, but the atmosphere is top tier.

>ive heard it doesnt have plot
It does have plot, but VERY little amount of it.

honestly I don't think terantino makes BAD films perse, but they're so predictable at this point I can't stand em

it's always shock violence with people screaming really intensely, distorted storylines and title cards/jump cuts set to sixties music, cool one-liners from black guys and at least one scene of a foot

I got it in high school, I got it in college, I got it the last five fucking movies, and I would be damned if this movie didn't have those four things

I save movies like this for when I'm bedridden in my nineties and have a lot of free time

>black guys
actually zero niggers whatsoever in this movie and the story didn't get distorted until the last scene

>it felt really savage and real
yeah I agree
>It felt like revenge-violence-porn against people we'd been given very little reason to hate in the actual film
this too, he tried to do the same thing with the Manson family that he did with Hitler in Inglorious but the Manson girls and Tex hadn't actually done anything that I felt justified a Tarantino style massacre also the asian girl a qt

with several changes made to the film, such as improvements to the acting of various minor characters, it could easily be reservoir dogs tier. however it has moments that are perhaps even pulp fiction tier, such as the ranch sequence

going to see it tomorrow :)

enjoy lad it's great

>bruce lee scene
>brad pitt western in spahn's range scene
>pumpkinpuss
yeah that's gonna be 10/10 from me

Attached: 1564248200867.png (876x1068, 729K)

>watching it in the kinoplex
>10 other people in the theater
>dead silence during all of the funny scenes
>people start leaving about halfway through
>by the end I'm afraid to laugh at the girl getting torched
>last few people walk out before the credits even start rolling
what the fuck is wrong with normoids?

Yes, it is very good, but don’t expect the visually illiterate to even have an inkling of a clue of what’s happening on the screen in front of them. The whole movie is wrapped In the sequence which starts with the juxtaposition of Margot Robbie (playing Sharon Tate) watching the actual Sharon Tate on screen in the movie theater. The film is basically about subjectivity, objectivity and the oddness of a creation of a fantasy. Cliff Booth lives in reality, he coasts on it, he rides the waves and nothing can topple him over. Cliff is the loyal supporting squire to Rick Dalton, the famous wealthy knight (or prince). Dalton’s subjective reality is breaking in around him from the objective force of the world. Rick sits in his pool and talks to his tape recorder, he talks to a creation of himself. The film is another loose King Arthurian retelling much like Pulp Fiction was, cowboy stories are already repackaged knights and wizards fantasy tales, so this movie has three layers to comb through. Charles Manson’s family is basically just goblins or mountain bandits that want to destroy Tolkienesq society because they are objectively evil. Every ‘wound’ is the force of the objective world intruding onto your subjective physical body, the gratuitous shots of the hippies ‘wounds’ at the end are clear signs that their subjective creations break way to Cliffs objective force because Cliff submits himself to the objective current of the world unwaveringly, allowing him to actually hold real weight and power in the realm where humans subjective realities co-mingle and clash. The film is actually suprisingly optimistic and I would even say a work of genius, it’s his best film since Pulp Fiction.

...

mac n cheese/dog food scene while watching the tube was so comfy

What did the feet scenes symbolize?

i live in germany and the theather was full at the premiere and nobody left until the credits started to roll and many laughed at the funny scenes but the foot scenes were cringe tho because a normie said " oh no its tarantino there gonna be foot scenes"

I saw it on the first weekend and the theater was roaring with laughter at all the great bits. 2 times since have been EXACTLY like you described.

Surely the twist ending robs the film of any nostalgic thematic weight it had about the end of the golden era of Hollywood? Instead it literally ends with Dalton getting his dream come true and things working out for the best. I get that it's Tarantino but the ending feels like the end of another movie tacked on to a different movie, and not because of the violence. Jackie Brown follows through on its thematics to the end and is my favourite film of his. And I love Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, so it's not just because Jackie Brown is more "grown up".

>2 times since have been EXACTLY like you described
did you go during the week those times?

Pretty much. He's surrounded by too many yes-men, and lost a much-needed editor.

Yes.

>optimism bad

Our feet are the arbiters between our subjective physical bodies and the objective fact of the outer world, they are the bridge-way, the gap, where the ‘veil’ is at its weakest (sole/soul)

Our feet are the arbiters between our subjective physical bodies and the objective fact of the outer world, they are the bridge-way, the gap, where the ‘veil’ is at its weakest (sneed/sneed)

This is the first Tarantino film where I feel the acting was better than the directing.

Jackie Brown has a pretty upbeat ending, albeit bittersweet, iirc nobody totally innocent is hurt or dies in the whole movie and the cops who seem like asshole antagonists to begin with turn out to be decent and reasonable guys who respect the title character by the end.

It's not "optimism bad", it's that it undermines what the rest of the movie is about to the extent it makes the couple of hours or so we've just spent with these characters seem pointless.

Even without the knowledge of the reality, Tex was literally pointing a gun at Brad Pitt and prepared to kill him and everyone else in cold blood. That’s enough to warrant a decently brutal retaliation imo

only if you had prior knowledge of the sharon tate tragedy before watching

What is the next fetish that Hollywood will popularize, after pedophilia, oral sex, group sex, anal, eating pussy, cuckoldry, ass rimming, and feet ?

Attached: 1561576357652.png (500x428, 70K)

piss?

>GEORGE ISN'T BLIND! YOU'RE THE BLIND ONE!
>BABY I' BEEN THINKIN' 'BOUT RUNNIN' AWAYYYY FROM YOUUUHH

here in belgium crowd laughed out loud during torch scene

youtu.be/IZt9LN8wA_0
Idk but hear about star trek here

absolutely retarded. what is a plot? what is story, then? What is plotting?