just saw excalibur
did she really just break the bond between arthur and lancelot for some dick?
Just saw excalibur
Other urls found in this thread:
Welcome to women.
Came here to post this.
Yes. she does in every version of the story.
Lol yeah.
Yes. In original arthurian stories there's a lot more to it. Basically, Arthur started spending less and less time with her, while Lancelot, who was essentially her guardian, became the object of her affections. It was customary in medieval romance stories for courtly love, which was basically a cucked knight liking a woman he can't have, to be seen as the true ideal of chivalry. The story of lancelot is a massive subversion of that medieval trope, and it is why it's so memorable to this day. But all of that is lost because of Excalibur's run time. there simply isn't time to show and establish that. So in the end, she betrays her husband for Lancecock's jousting pole.
So, did he lance her a lot?
reminder that the majority of early Lancelot-cycle Arthurian stories were openly satirical of 13th and 14th century rulers and not pure fantasy in their own right
Chretien de Troyes wrote the OG Lancelot Knight of the Cart which was basically just a 200 page takedown of the lady who paid him to write it
Honestly the worst part of Excalibur was the golden age of Camelot scenes. It looked like a fishtank.
The Grail Quest act is one of my favorite sequences in film.
At first she didn't like him that much, though she was flattered by his honesty. Then Arthur sentenced her to death, Lancelot was wounded defended her honor. I think Excalibur does a MUCH better job of portraying Guenevere sympathetically than most Arthurian stuff. Arthur seriously wronged her, even though he loved her.
God damn this movie is good.
>tfw reading Morte d'Arthur
>gets to the Lancelot chapters
>suddenly gets very personal feeling
Malory was a sad dude.
Boorman's original cut was 3+ hours and apparently featured a lot more scenes with Lancelot and Guinevere.
>did she really just break the bond between arthur and lancelot for some dick?
All she broke was her marital vows, Lancelot's the one who fucked his best friend's wife.
>implying any of that is an excuse to fuck your husband's best friend
She wanted to fuck Lancelot even before that. She was a whore. She plunged the kingdom into years of turmoil because she couldn't control herself.
>the VIRGIN Vulgate Cycle vs the CHAD Carolingian Cycle
How come books and songs written in the middle ages and early renaissance feel more primitive and alien than either the Iliad or Odyssey? Is it just the translations?
save the moralizing for someone who gives a fuck. Her moral degradation and slavery before her passion are (1/2 of) the essence of the work, and it's part of Boorman's greatness in conceiving the story that he doesn't shy away from that in anyway. The psychology of characters is the root of drama.
Pic related
>Her moral degradation and slavery before her passion
>boo hoo i want to fuck lancelot and not my husband woe is me
will we ever get Arthurian kino again?
Why are you putting all of the blame on her and not Lancelot?
Why would anyone even bother when Excalibur exists?
those feet, made by a true artiste
I'm not. They're both to blame but the post I was replying to was about Guinevere.
Based foot appriciator