Imagine watching this 99.9% cgi trash and thinking it's good. Loony tunes was more masterful

old movies still have soul

Attached: jason and the argonauts.jpg (700x400, 99K)

Stay mad.

Attached: thanos dab 2.webm (900x506, 2.87M)

Jurassic Park was released 26 years ago and it has better visual effects than any Marvel flick.

The Thing was released 37 years ago and it has better visual effects than any Marvel flick.

It took a month to film like 3 minutes.

You mispelled Avashit.

And better colors.

Attached: MV5BZTYyOGZkOTktMDI1ZC00ZjI3LTgxNGEtYzMyMDk2NzExM2M4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjUwNzk3NDc_._V1_.jpg (1200x630, 75K)

Is it some kind of corporate mandate that all these movies have to look dull and gray?

>When he turns his head

Attached: cat falling off table.jpg (410x410, 123K)

Why was ScarJo not killed in AoU? She has really over stayed her welcome and his easily the most out of place character in the avengers movies

Come to think of it, is it really that ridiculous to create a rough model for him to stand inside of then cg over that?

They stopped using this filter after it became heavily criticised

Yes because they want to pretend they are mature yet they quip in every single scene. Why not just embrace what the genre is and let show some colour like the source material is know for

she's dead m8
She served roles not suited for the OP avengers

Absolutely nothing in that shot is real other than Chris Evans. The other actors were probably pasted in. Despite having omnipotent control of angles through the use of computers, the composition is flat and uninteresting. And yet people, and even critics, praise this shit. I’ll never understand it.

>DCucks still seething over their complete joke of a cinematic universe
>have no DC movies to watch
>have to spend their free time nitpicking cgi shots in MCU movies
imagine being this much of a loser

Which tv show is this?

sure they did

Attached: 1564849173303.jpg (1280x1100, 415K)

>cgi shots
which is every shot

Top: Fun Times in Philly
Bottom: Half the universe has been dead for 5 years

>which is every shot
which is every superhero movie nowdays
which makes this thread pointless
which makes OP a faggot loser

A fully articulate robot suit would unironically be cheaper than the CGI they made. And better looking.

>Bottom: quips quips quips

>a real raccoon man?
I know just the guy

Attached: koksal-baba.jpg (700x525, 98K)

The only thing that made this movie not age as gracefully, is that the creatures move on a different framerate than the rest of the actors. Like they move at 12, while people move at 24.

I know it would be double the effort, but still.

Do you think the entire MCU is quips?
WELL IT ISNT

lmao Shazam is nothing but quips

I wish every movie had a color filter degrade option, this would surely make me buy Blu-rays more.

Chadzam is one of the few capeshit movies without that crap. No wonder it looked so beautiful.

The only non quippy (maximum of 10 quips total) MCU movies are Incredible Hulk, The First Avenger and Black Panther

>Shazam is fun and has color and quips
>Endgame is "serious" so it's colorless but it's also full of quips which it at odds with the theme
your point?

That shit looked like a Nickelodeon sitcom

Deep

Attached: 1564341244023.jpg (1280x532, 151K)

Go out of your room, you fat piece of shit. The real world have these things called "colors", they are not filled with shitty filters unless you are using dirty glasses.

Reminder he just had time goes through him, why wouldn’t that make you lose control of your urinary system?

>no levity allowed unless I like the colour palette
fuck off DCuck

>You'll never see a Turkish ripoff of GotG starring Baba as Rocket

It may have bad CGI monsters but definitely has better composition. Shazam! is supposed to be a fun character. Bright colors welcome

Good thing movies aren't the real world
If you like real life so much go sit on a park bench and watch that instead, you fucking tard

Yeah man, It’s literally Thor: Ragnarok The Sitcom

>color palette
It's called real lightning, faggot. When your movie have a shitty color filter, is because somebody, some asshole, decided to put that shit over the original image.

Attached: Alita Regrade.jpg (2546x4276, 2.25M)

>why not do things that were easily done in the 80s

Actually, I prefer to take your movies and fix them in Adobe by making a color grading on them.

bottom has too much pink skin. Makes people look sickly.

>Makes people look healthy
Fixed for you. Maybe you are from another race, but in humans, being yellow means you got liver problems.

Imagine living with AIDS, right you don´t have to.

No, they didn't.

Attached: 1565377754217.jpg (1125x1182, 335K)

> time goes through him

>invented immortality
>Cap: nah, this test is a failure

*dabs with sadness*

Attached: images.jpg (739x415, 24K)

>Loony tunes was more masterful.
Why are you hating on Looney Tunes, though? Are you trying to imply that Looney Tunes was not masterful?

Somebody call Hollywood, we got a future award winning Adobe user over here

This webm just made me burst out laughing. Was this supposed to be an emotional moment? I cannot fathom anyone over the age of 14 taking this shit seriously, look at it

Daily reminder these movies are mostly shot on greenscreen not because of artistic choice, but so that Feige and the Disney suits can decide the backgrounds or make changes without the need of reshoots.

These movies are souless, and have no real artistic vision.

Joker comes out in 6 weeks
Marvel isn’t putting out a movie for 10 months and it’s a post-wall Black Widow flick. Lmao
3 of the next 4 superhero films are DC
Looking forward to your LGBTQ+ hero flick next pride month?All you get is diversity pandering now. Enjoy

This is the mind of a capeshitter. Literally a child.

Yes, it’s literally meant to be the emotional climax of the entire film LMAO
>Levity
By which you mean turning your characters into walking punchlines in literal fatsuits like a piss-poor MadTV sketch? Pants peeing and anus jokes? Dabbing and Fortnite? I bet you like NuWars too. Lmao

>Wonder Woman 84
>Birds of Prey (And the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn)
>The Suicide Squad
>not diversity pandering on steroids
LMAO

And Joker isn't even canon to anything, just pretentious oscar bait.

>not canon!
like the best thing the MCU ever did

Attached: images (1).jpg (620x408, 31K)

How are literally any of those diversity pandering? You understand the difference between making a film for an A List hero who happens to be female and “queering” your straight characters for diversity points / making identity politics the raison d’etre for your film right down to the release date, right? C’mon, I KNOW you aren’t this stupid

Attached: A21BD34F-EBCE-4E1C-A7E7-2555561C464C.jpg (1125x2192, 1.05M)

Having Banner's head sticking out of the Hulkbuster was pretty retarded.
All the other CGI looks great though.

When was your last optometry check-up?

>'Wonder Woman 1984' to Tackle The Gay Rights Movement and AIDS Crisis
jg-review.blogspot.com/2018/06/wonder-woman-1984-to-tackle-gay-rights.html

>DC Universe gets first gay villain in ‘Birds of Prey’
washingtonblade.com/2019/07/12/dc-universe-gets-first-gay-villain-in-birds-of-prey/

>Suicide Squad: Jared Leto's same-sex kiss cut from the final movie
independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/suicide-squad-jared-leto-joker-gay-kiss-a7726616.html

two can play at this game friend

youve got to be legitimately retarded to think the mighty thor storyline is anything but diversity pandering

If you're just going to CGI over it, yes, it's ridiculous.

Fair, hadn’t seen those. Let’s see how that Wondy one plays out, it looks a bit like they wrote that article based off an AIDS poster in the background which is part of the 1980’s worldbuilding. But if there’s a lecture about it or it starts coming up in the marketing I’ll absolutely concede the point
The Black Mask one doesn’t bother me, he’s a punching bag villain that they’re playing as a joke, so making him a lisping closet-case is actually pretty based. Plus he wears a gimp mask in the comics, it’s not exactly a stretch. Def doesn’t seem to be going for woke points
The Jared Leto one is ridiculous, thanks for sharing. Dying at:
>”He’s like [panting and moaning] ‘You’re a big guy’.”

Attached: 8E3301BC-AA04-4D39-8EB2-8F376BB97460.jpg (236x551, 33K)

>shitting on looney tunes

fuck you man

terrible, cgi should be banned

No, it wouldn't at all.
To do the Hulkbuster armor in the 1980s, you'd either
1) make a suit that wasn't articulate (this suit would be mostly animatronic) and the limited movement it was capable would look like shit
2) employ models and do composite shots, but these never ever mesh well
3) make a full sized prop but then it's only useful for scenes where it stands around and doesn't move (which would look weird to have it just standing there lifeless in the background even though someone is supposed to be in it)
4) claymation/animation which really doesn't work with a non-animated film
or some kind of mix. You look back at something like ED-209 in Robocop, where they did a combination of 2 and 3, and whenever it's moving, it doesn't match with the rest of the film. Then they substitute it with the real live size prop for some shots (like where it shoots missiles, but it just stands still and doesn't even get pushed back by literally launching a missile). Huge nitpick as well: when it's falling down the stairs, they use the real prop, and it flails about like a dummy (because essentially that's what it is) and bounces off the handrail, but a robot of that size and weight is basically a car, and it wouldn't bounce off the handrail. It'd fuck that handrail off.
And before you say it, no, I like Robocop. I watch it all the time. But the effects in that movie weren't perfect, you have to constantly say "well they did the best with what they had at the time." So why can't you say that of End Game or any other modern movie? "Well, it's only 2019, they're making good effects given the limited resources." It's because you think a computer is a genie that can just fabricate perfect reality.