Got btfo by a baby, then later by a high school teenager.
Is there a more pathetic villain?
Got btfo by a baby, then later by a high school teenager
Liam Wood
Isaiah Foster
harry potter is a dull franchise
Noah Wood
The scene when he returned to life in the Goblet of Fire was villain kino though. But agreed, other than that he was at best a decent villain trapped in a stupid story/setting.
Aaron Cook
Built up for 8 seasons as the biggest threat humanity has ever faced. Got one shotted by a teenage girl.
Isaiah Sanchez
He basically was like a much more drawn out Snoke.
Eli Rodriguez
Why didnt he just shake the entire house and give Potter shaking baby syndrome
Gabriel Adams
Why didn't he just have one of his underlings stab harry with a knife?
Isaac Robinson
>beaten by steak salesman for the job you have a career in
Dominic Wilson
>the power of love saves baby
>Yea Forums goes wild trying to figure out this concept
Joseph Morgan
Why didn't they use machine guns instead of their stupid spells?
Jace Torres
Voldemort was a narcissist . He wanted to kill Harry himself. Also he didn't want to use filthy miggle weapons.
Dominic Collins
*muggle.
Blake Scott
they didn't even have plumbing
having a gun without understanding basic mechanics is suicide
Easton Morales
>Is there a more pathetic villain?
"No!"
Alexander Phillips
>Couldn't even make it past Winterfall
>90% of Westeros probably never knew he existed
Robert Ortiz
>be born a random nobody baby and manage to ascend to be the baddest villain in the world
>suddenly an oddly convenient prophecy of your demise appears and singlehandedly destroys you
Truly the dullest franchise
Justin King
Main villain as pathetic and untheatening and incompent as Voldemort truly is a shit cherry on top of a shit cake that is Harry Potter, one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Sebastian Allen
No.
Michael Hall
Caleb Myers
Voldemort, Night King and Snoke!
Trio of pathetic villains, assemble!
Tyler Moore
>So why does the North get to be an independent kingdom anyway? (Besides nepotism)
>We beat the night's king?
>The who?
Julian Martin
Why did Draco suddenly do a Sheev impression out of nowhere that one time?