Would you a Baker, Hannah?

Nah man; it's in her name.

Attached: suicidalmilkies.jpg (500x250, 12K)

BASTE!

Attached: inetltjbxhq21.jpg (1080x1350, 122K)

>aaaaaaah I can't do anything but think about her taking 5 dicks at once
fuck off

based suicidalmilkies.jpg poster

But that's not what I said. I just saying she's a human. Girls aren't perfect angels *or* irredeemable whores. They're people, and people are a mix of good and bad.

>*or* irredeemable whores
she is if she had sex before marriage

AHHHHHHHH

Attached: 4Vv0fgN.jpg (1096x1435, 135K)

>muh bible-based morals
Cringe

>muh wife with 30 previous sexual partners

Nothing wrong with sex. I don't care about what she did before she marries me and I don't see why I should.
I also assume you didn't have any premarital sex either.

This is what peak performance gf looks like. Beatiful in natty way, full lips, some thiccness - ideal handholding and sleeping on top of you on a cold winter night

Attached: 5B3FC8D4-12D7-4284-872D-3E1FE684AE0C.png (454x520, 13K)

Attached: 1D82BB7C-DB21-4308-BFF9-A0DE41A989B7.png (703x800, 37K)

>Nothing wrong with sex. I don't care about what she did before she marries me and I don't see why I should.
oh how naive

Attached: 1562122518317.png (853x855, 100K)

>alright user I've taken all the dicks I could now I want to settle down :)

>Nothing wrong with sex. I don't care about what she did before she marries me and I don't see why I should.

Attached: A3BA6E1A-C761-4F9A-83D5-80B017511788.png (231x218, 9K)

Based

Attached: fuj940l6eym21.jpg (1536x2048, 784K)

>Nothing wrong with sex. I don't care about what she did before she marries me and I don't see why I should.

Attached: E9B093BE-39C6-43ED-96DE-9C560E8D6D2F.png (323x570, 214K)

>I don't care about what she did before she marries me
Spoken like a true redditor cuck, kys

Attached: premarital-sex-and-divorce-revised.jpg (1049x648, 311K)

you're only jealous because you can't get all the pussy you want so you don't want her to get all the dick she wants

Attached: 1562879543485.png (200x300, 28K)

>Nothing wrong with sex. I don't care about what she did before she marries me and I don't see why I should

Attached: 1459AD9F-A44E-4586-AF37-F6390A4AAA6F.png (785x1000, 254K)

I wonder if the rumors about Knives Out are true.

Attached: 003-3.jpg (2912x4368, 2.2M)

I am? okay, thanks for clearing that up

>Nothing wrong with sex. I don't care about what she did before she marries me and I don't see why I should

Attached: BB381DB7-05C8-4209-A301-0EA36833893D.png (785x788, 284K)

POV BJ scene when?

>those divorce rates
What the chart's missing is data showing how happy the couples that remained married or got divorced were. More traditional couples, i.e. couples ideologically opposed to premarital sex, are also likely that be ideologically opposed to divorce, so traditional couples are more likely to remain married even if they're unhappy. Also, pic related

Attached: 1562879362071.jpg (480x439, 39K)

Attached: B211A2AE-2CD6-442A-B04D-03FB3DF262FA.png (221x228, 8K)

Attached: E692115C-FE04-407E-8814-ADEFF966F63E.jpg (785x773, 134K)

I'm out of retard faces, but just in case pic related isn't clear, I'm calling you a retard

Attached: 1562879083383.jpg (235x188, 7K)

>be incel
>shitpost a bit about this woman I've never heard of before being a whore
>user correctly points out that having sex is natural and it's naive to think a woman of her age would be a virgin
>am about to lose the argument
>the entirety of Yea Forums starts shitposting at him
well that worked out great

Looks like Lana Rhoades

Doesn't change the fact that women who aren't whores have lower divorce rates

Attached: 014ABC9E-F5B2-400B-8094-EB11123A5A06.png (454x520, 10K)

...and those women likely have less happy marriages. Seethe harder.

I would anyone at this point
t.Blade Runner fan

A lovely KatLang thread ruined by whiteknight and basedwojaks :(

Attached: 13 reasons cringe.webm (853x480, 2.52M)

where's your data for that again? I must've missed it

literally who
seriously who she cute, who is she

Source?

Those women have happier marriges because they aren't whores, cope harder

>all the samefagging soi wojak replies
cringe desu

My argument is , which explains a missing set of data from , making its conclusions unreliable. Set aside your retarded ideology, this is just bad statistics/science.

I don't know what your rationale for believing that would be. Why would they be happier? Can you actually explain that to me?

no source

My point is that the conclusions made in are flawed because the cited study is incomplete. There's no "data" required to back that up.

Your argument is flawed and not supported by any data
>The surprisingly large number of Americans reporting one lifetime sex partner have the happiest marriages.
>Psychologists Galena K. Rhoades and Scott M. Stanley found that the study respondents who had sex with other people prior to marriage reported lower-quality unions compared to couples who slept just with each other. Multiple sex partners prior to marriage reduced marital quality for women, but not men. Along similar lines, sociologist Jay Teachman showed that premarital sex between future spouses didn’t make divorce more likely, but sex with other people did. A study from the 1980s reported similar findings.
ifstudies.org/blog/does-sexual-history-affect-marital-happiness
Its not my fault you married a whore bro

no source, false claims.

>study presented by christian website
Very unbiased.

>still no data from studies to support your claims
Very good argument

yeah
when I wanna look for nonbiased information, I ask some desperate user who is badly losing an argument to give me his best guess on why existing data might be wrong

based dubs of level-headedness
here's a non-seething (You)

Based redditor

>5'5

The perfect gf height, smol enough to completely manhandle, but not womanlet and like 5'9 in heels.

Attached: 1a31b2fd53504db05a3886118a1dd8c4.jpg (1920x1280, 191K)

>4 inch heels
sorry you had to learn it like that but every woman you know is a disgusting bimbo, apparently

Chicks like wearing high heels, it makes them feel sexy and shit. Maybe 4 is a bit much though, you right.

Attached: 14722970_320373325003019_5360415246093647872_n.jpg (640x640, 69K)

A little smol but not dealbreaking.

stop bumping this the mods are gunna see my soijack spam and i don’t want another 3 day

this bitch looks just like lana rhoades

Dubs and my crush becomes my girlfriend so I don't become a cuck like Clay.

Not knowing if you had a shot hurts more than being rejected - for real.

Attached: 13 reasons walk.webm (853x480, 2.79M)

Would love to see her taking some BBC like Lana

>She's a 23 year old girl, expecting her to be "pure" is naive.
Fuck, I'm the same age and I hate being a loser. Spending high school homeschooled was the biggest mistake in my whole life. Then, I wasted every opportunity I had with hot college girls because I didn't even feel alive.

Scenes that women will never understand

Attached: 1563104416747.webm (852x480, 2.1M)

oh shut the fuck up normalfag
I am so sick and tired of "I had 5 girls interested in me throughout high school and I never made a move I'm so lonely" posts
you're the second biggest faggots right after """lonely and horny""" posters complaining about not having sex for 3 months

>Spending high school homeschooled was the biggest mistake in my whole life
speaking as a white sissy, i wish i had been homeschooled

i was constantly beat up by black guys, white chads, and hispanic guys

they were always fucking all the hot chicks while i was a miserable virgin

mate, im in the same boat. after 5th grade I chickened out and took the opportunity of homeschool. and one of the reasons was because I couldn’t figure out combination locks on the lockers. now I’m fucked

Bryceposters are the most powerful race in the world!

Attached: 0CFDB3C4-B1B2-46DF-A971-532EB9BED653.jpg (320x330, 21K)

Just the other day I saw an episode of SVU from a few years back where he played a high school student who was seduced by his Betty Gilpin teacher and then slits her throat.

He suffers well onscreen.

i got so angry when he raped hannah. that scene makes me so angry every fucking time.

i just wanna kick the shit out of incels who think that was hot

Based
Seething claycel detected

Attached: brycepilled.webm (960x540, 1.37M)

I had many shots and I wasted them all.
She became my crush when we had eye contact at the college library. The day after, she moved from her sit to sit next to me without her bag, she was all here just for me but I did nothing. She tried two other times and I still didn't talk.
A year later, I talked about her to my only college friend and he repeated everything to her. He told me that she wanted to spend Valentine's Day with me but I had so much shit to hide in my life at that time, living with a crazy schizophrenic mom and stuff that I hit on her friend just to make everybody disgusted and go back to indifference.
My autism is killing me a bit more every day.

F

Based and thankspilled

The nature of poking a logical hole in a conclusion is generally such that you don't need data to support your hole-poking. Do I demand statistical proof when someone claims that 2+2=4? No, because asking for "a source" is nonsensical in that context. You're retarded.

You don't have to trust me. Just consider my argument and reason out why or why it doesn't make sense.

It's never too late to learn from the past and stop being a faggot, user

I’m not feeling the power of your posting race. You must be an Alex poster.

Attached: 58B20DAA-12C9-40BE-BBF6-9D4AB7D142F5.jpg (1280x720, 49K)

no source

A real woman in a world of mtf looking monsters.

that's a tiny penis he's got there.

although hannah was traumatized by the psychological aspects of rape, at least the physical pain wasn't as bad knowing that Bryce's peepee is so small

>retards unironically talking about 13 reasons why instead of langfordposting

Epic trol

Attached: 3s7v1rfcck731.jpg (1080x1350, 188K)

My reason is that I had a late puberty, I spent all my early childhood being the tallest guy and at 15 years old, I was one of the smallest, I also had a child voice, a complete babyface and everything you could expect from a prepubertal kid. I would've had trouble to get my dick wet but it was still a bad call.
Now, I'm a 6"4' social retard, that's all.

langford and lana rhoades are the same person

I'm stucked on her while she probably went back to fucking other guys without thinking about me. I don't even care about what she's as a person, I just feel like I need to repear that huge mistake to make peace with myself and move on.
If she ever found me attractive, maybe there's still a chance for me to make things right and date her this time. I need a good excuse to restart everything without letting her know that I'm a huge sperg which I am.

you are a virgin if you think that scene is funny or arousing

she looks like she smells bad

He's a big guy

you must be a virgin

she looks like that one porn star, but she actually succeeded at becoming an actress

and didn't get bogged

haha yeah I bet it would smell terrible if she sat on my face haha

Except smaller tits and Lana's face somehow already looked like she had plastic surgery done before she actually got any

imagine she poops right in your mouth it would be so gross wouldn't it? haha

SEETHINGALEXPOSTER

Oh yeah

yeah whatever seething virgin

She looks far better than pre-surgery Lana, despite her caracter being a cunt, her looks alone make it work. You just know everybody would want to fuck that bitch.

can she take big black cocks like Lana?

It needs to be scientifically tested.

Why did he start twisting it WTF

Thing is her character really isn't a cunt, at least no more so than other normal adolescent girls who make occasional bad decisions

Though she sometimes seems like a cunt from Clay's perspective because she doesn't really reciprocate his feelings until it's too late, which is the point, the audience feels somewhat conflicted about her

Langford has been blacked? Where?

>conservative think tank shows women should close their legs
No way, I'm definitely sure this is a scientifically sound study that reflects genuine research into actual quantitative analyses with similar additional peer-reviewed studies and isn't a political cherry pick for Jesus points.

>it's a "total plebian who doesn't actually understand the limited significance of a single study tries to use their version of 'science' to prove their worldview correct" episode
So predictable.

>Langford shot a scene for Endgame in which Tony snaps and goes to the soul world, where she talks to him as the adult version of Morgan Stark
>test audiences found it confusing, so it was removed
>they didn't even put the unfinished version of the scene on the Blu-ray, so we'll probably never see it

Son of a cuck.

Attached: Gamora-in-Soul-World-herohyper.jpg (1400x700, 41K)

>Though she sometimes seems like a cunt from Clay's perspective because she doesn't really reciprocate his feelings until it's too late, which is the point, the audience feels somewhat conflicted about her
Didn't see the second season but it seems like she boiled the rice while she was also flirting with Clay. What a whore.

>>Langford shot a scene for Endgame in which Tony snaps and goes to the soul world, where she talks to him as the adult version of Morgan Stark
that sounds retarded, shouldn't it have been black widow? i thought we seen gamora because she was sacrificed

>you're not allowed to have ambiguous emotional attachments as a dumb teenager to more than one person at a time reeeeeeeee
I'm sorry nobody loves you user.

Are you a woman?

is this the rise of the poop eyed actress? along with her blonde counterpart

>while also flirting with Clay

No, she fucks Zach, the Asian guy, during a summer break when Clay was on vacation with his family. Hannah and Zach take each other's v cards. Things get sorta confusing chronologically but this is supposed to take place before most other events of the show, before Hannah and Clay became close friends or attempted anything romantic.

When Clay finds out, he's furious, thinking it could have been him instead if he had just been home that summer.

i think you talking about Kiki my dude. Langford has gorgeous eyes.

When did you realize all women are whores even that quiet innocent girl who sits in the back of your uni class and barely says a word is most definitely a whore.

Attached: 1526659231938.jpg (1000x1504, 412K)

don’t talk shit about Kiki
when I learned women have more sexual thoughts than men

Attached: ADF367C0-EFAA-476E-AFDB-1344F7225831.jpg (750x732, 624K)

her milkies are nice but I thought they were bigger

If they do it for free they're not whores.

A deepfake of her over lana rhoades would be top tier

what rumors

she has literal butthole eyes

omg hell yeah i would beat it up and eat her booty

My guess is the Soul World shows you whoever matters most to you, regardless of whether they were sacrificed for the stone or not.
And since the snap includes the Time Stone, it can show you something from the past or the future.

Maybe for Tony it was something like the roughly 20 year old Morgan telling him "yes, the world is still here 15 years later, thanks to your sacrifice".
Which would be similar to Pepper's line "we're gonna be ok, you can rest now", so maybe that's another reason it was cut, it felt redundant that way

thewrap.com/avengers-endgame-katherine-langford/

Attached: enab.jpg (569x802, 43K)

I bet she fucks black dogs.

she sacrifices small animals and drugs herself while getting gang banged

Attached: 1A5F14A3-3E68-4960-A697-9A3E113B252B.jpg (750x209, 232K)

Well, I rather not being loved than being a puppet, roastie.

>When Clay finds out, he's furious, thinking it could have been him instead if he had just been home that summer.
Yeah sure. Girls like her would never let a beta be their first. Clay is only good once everybody sees her as a whore except her emotional tampon.

The way it's written, Zach is sort of a beta too during those flashback scenes, though it doesn't work because the role is so horribly miscast

There is no way this 27 year old ripped model can be the 15/16 year old high school sophomore he's supposed to be playing

Attached: ross-butler_0637.jpg (752x1128, 69K)

What rumors?

I remember plenty of Chads who looked like this when I was in high school.

Ok, I see the point. Teenage shows always have an awful casting, maybe because actual teenagers are terrible actors.
The MTV Scream show had the same problems, all the male actors were at least 25 years old.

Thing is the character is not supposed to be a chad, when he starts hanging out with Hannah during that summer, he's an awkward virgin.

Maybe his brief relationship with Hannah helps turn the character into a chad, though

Chinks with a twisted jaw?
He's tall and ripped and that's it. He's a Brad at best.

For the show he’s one of the Chads, tall, would have gotten a basketball scholarship without hannahs bs, good grades.

Isn’t that like the non fats on /fit/

based

Attached: aitaaa.png (1709x1223, 264K)

your point?
I want someone who had a life similar to mine how is that wrong

12 guys a year since she's 14 years old ahahah.
God, I love living in this era when all these worthless roasties will find a retard to marry them. She had bad luck with that one but no doubt she'll find a more athletic guy with a better job ready to settle. As long as men don't put their shit together, they deserve all of that.

>lose cute girl who likes you because she had sex with people before she met you
What a retard

I hate women.

>guy has sex: wow good job!
>girl has sex: what a whore!

>dump a whore cause she had sex with 96 other dudes
Yeah, I'm thinking he's based. Whores are nothing cute.

even more based

Attached: friend.jpg (746x479, 25K)

She should've played Jean Grey in X-Men instead of Sophie Turner.

Let's hope Kevin Feige fixes this one.

Attached: 5003352_press03.jpg (667x1000, 353K)

>kills herself because her instagram was deleted

Are women really this vapid?

Attached: DjreNuyXcAET64F.jpg (734x944, 86K)

Sexual promiscuity isn't healthy for society as the whole but guys have it so bad these days that I can understand how they need to find pride in that.

I'm sure there's a suitably traumatic reason for having a number that high, but there's every chance she's a perfectly well-adjusted adult and as long as she didn't contract anything permanent STD-wise and she didn't get pregnant there's literally nothing wrong with it. Prove me wrong.

Number of past sexual partners proportionally increases rates of infidelity and divorce. Chick who's hitting triple-digits at 22 has a near-100% chance of cheating, making you raise a bastard or two before you grow wise, and then taking half your shit in the divorce.

This but unironically

a) What's the rationale? b) Would you say the same about a girl who turns down a guy for having sex with 96 girls?

Most guys don't have it bad. The brainlets on this website have it bad. I don't see how sexual promiscuity is bad other than "muh christian doctrine", and I don't see how girls being able to get sex more easily means they shouldn't have it.

You would be surprised.
I dated med students, law students women and they were all this vapid, even the ones with a decent IQ have no moral compass.

Having sex is for procreation purposes only. If you have sex because it makes your genitals feel good, you're a pleasure seeking whore that needs to reconsider your life choices.

Attached: 1565653324050.png (684x828, 106K)

>a) What's the rationale?
past behaviour predicts future behaviour
>b) Would you say the same about a girl who turns down a guy for having sex with 96 girls?
instantly. if my sister or female friend told me she was partnering up with a dude who admitted that, I'd tell her to bail immediately.

That's a cool non-sequitur bro. Does that mean I need to show you my dick?

her view on sex could have changed at anytime over the course of that entire timeline. Sex can mean next to nothing until you find someone that makes you think of it differently. I still don’t think that’s a valid excuse to judge her as the partner she is right now.

Having sex can be used to procreate, but there's no law that says that has to be its only purpose. You're basically appealing to the naturalistic fallacy, i.e. that because sex is naturally only for procreation, using it for pleasure is inappropriate.
>you're a pleasure seeking whore
There's literally nothing wrong with seeking out pleasure in life. In fact, I'd argue that seeking happiness and pleasure are in many ways the 'purpose' of life.

>past behaviour predicts future behaviour
But in the past, they weren't in a relationship, so there was no reason for them not to have sex. This is in contrast to when they *are* in a relationship and fidelity toward their partner motivates them to not to have sex. It just seems like you're boiling human behavior down to the point that you can twist it to fit your beliefs. Also kill yourself britbong.

yikes post

>Having sex is for procreation purposes only.
THIS THIS THIS, OUTLAW BLOWJOBS, CRIMINALIZE MASTURBATION, SEXUAL PLEASURE IS STRICTLY FOR CHRISTIAN COUPLES IN THE BONDS OF MARRIAGE TO MAKE MORE CHILDREN SO YOU'RE ALSO NOT ALLOWED TO FUCK YOUR PREGNANT WIFE OR ANY WOMAN AFTER MENOPAUSE REEEEEEEEEEE

>a) What's the rationale?
There's no need for a rationale. Cuteness is instinctive, once a girl comes out as a whore, she loses it all for me. That solves the deal.
She can do anything she wants with other guys who don't see a problem with this, I just don't care.

yikes

>people are incapable of change
This is why no one likes you.

>THIS THIS THIS, OUTLAW BLOWJOBS, CRIMINALIZE MASTURBATION, SEXUAL PLEASURE IS STRICTLY FOR CHRISTIAN COUPLES IN THE BONDS OF MARRIAGE TO MAKE MORE CHILDREN SO YOU'RE ALSO NOT ALLOWED TO FUCK YOUR PREGNANT WIFE OR ANY WOMAN AFTER MENOPAUSE REEEEEEEEEEE
This but unironically.

oof

yikes

>The brainlets on this website have it bad.
Having standards or not being attractive has nothing to do with IQ, retard.

And that gets down to the entire point of this conversation. I'm arguing that your "she loses it all for me" attitude is ridiculous. Unlike you, I still find women who aren't >le epic pure virgins cute.

You're a retard.

>her view on sex could have changed at anytime over the course of that entire timeline
The monkey brain doesn't change its mind.
>I still don’t think that’s a valid excuse to judge her as the partner she is right now.
It's not an "excuse" it's a reason, and statistics are a better reason than any other reasons. You can desperately cling to your preferred lie all you want, nothing I can do to force you to stop being wrong. It's still a lie. And always will be.

>Having sex can be used to procreate, but there's no law that says that has to be its only purpose.
So just because you "can" you "should"? Great, because I can wring your neck until its a lifeless corpse, should I?

>torturing the woman who's carrying your child by denying her sexual release when the hormones demand it most
Cruel and unusual.

yikes dude have sex

Neither does being a brainlet ;^*

unironically have sex and go b2r

>and statistics are a better reason
But that's factually wrong.

Monogamous life long relationships are the only exception. Then it is okay.

You misunderstand. I say that "the brainlets on this website have it bad" because the guys here are awkward weirdos who most women are understandably not attracted to.

No, my point is essentially that there's no reason not to have sex for non-reproductive purposes. Since sex feels really good, it's understandable why people have it outside of procreation.
I'm curious, are you just naturally this stupid?

Cringe.

>censors suicide scene
>leaves in the scene of the scrawny dude literally getting a broom pole shoved up his ass
Also, what were the writers trying to convey with that scene? That the difference between a nice well adjusted kid and a school shooter was a broom pole up the shitter? Highly doubt any of the burger shooters endured anything close to that

>Cringe.
lol yikes buddy

are you that guy I saw posting earlier on Yea Forums about how 50% chance to hit should mean you hit more than half the time and if you only hit half the time with 50% hit that's wrong?

>recreational sex is literally murder
Conservatives everyone!

yikes

I have more sex than you do and don't even have a reddit account, come at me bro!

yike

>there's no reason not to have sex for non-reproductive purposes
It devalues the act of sex itself and makes it no longer sacred. It also corrupts the meaning of the act which is to procreate. Sex is meant to be had between two people in a monogamous relationship for procreation purposes.
>Since sex feels really good, it's understandable why people have it outside of procreation.
Yes, pleasure seeking is the opiate of the brainlet masses. Although it has nothing when compared to the merits of meaning and fulfillment which are counter to meaningless pursuit of base pleasure.
>I'm curious, are you just naturally this stupid?
As yes, the cry of someone who knows they cannot back up their position without personal attacks.

Attached: 1565289603298.jpg (1000x1211, 189K)

>crossboarding
kys

>the guys here are awkward weirdos who most women are understandably not attracted to
Awkwardness comes from a lack of paternal figure, lack of paternal figure comes from sexual promiscuity and liberal divorce.
Most of these guys could've been decent fathers if they had one themselves.
Will you ever see the whole picture or do you really love whores too much to stop being blind?

No, but anyone who's ever taken basic statistics knows that statistics are about as accurate as the people presenting them want them to be.

Hey Liberal, admit that abortion is killing a baby. I know you all know it is deep down, but don't admit it in public since you know it makes you look like murderous psychopaths.

>statistics like aren’t true because like they aren’t! like

Attached: 25ABE156-A7B1-478A-95DF-6A2C08E5446E.png (201x250, 18K)

Honestly I wouldn't be against killing a baby post birth if it was destined to a shitty life
it's not even conscious anyway

>Sex is meant to be had between two people in a monogamous relationship for procreation purposes.
Only in your make-believe world with the tree and the snake that made everyone evil and also perpetual victims of incest descended from the first man and the woman a bearded sky-wizard made from his rib.

>devalues
>no longer sacred
You're essentially talking like a religious person. In tangible terms, what does "devaluing" it mean? What's the measurable effect? When you use words like "devalue" and "sacred", it basically sounds like you're citing Christian doctrine and not making an argument rooted in logic.
>Sex is meant to be had between two people in a monogamous relationship
Sex isn't "meant" to be anything. Evolution has no intent, and while sex is the means by which we reproduce, I see nothing wrong with having it for non-reproductive purposes. Please, if you can, explain to me what's wrong with it *without* citing Biblical ideas.
>pleasure seeking is the opiate of the brainlet masses
There's not really an argument here. When I'm old, I'd rather have lived a life of pleasure and happiness than the bizarre austere, religious coldness you're advocating for.

So you're positing that 4channers are awkward... because they were all raised by single mothers? Do you have the data to back that up?

>I'm arguing that your "she loses it all for me" attitude is ridiculous.
I'm just like girls, I don't argue about attraction, emotions are everything, my friend. Girls feel like they need to fuck every decently attractive they meet, I feel like I don't want to fuck those girls. I have many other things to do with my time like persuing a good career and shitposting on 4channel.

Thanks for admitting it. It's a breath of fresh air to hear the murderous nature behind leftist thought.

yikes sweetheart, awww have sex and maybe you’ll understand

>literally no fun allowed
I unironically bet you're fun at parties sarcastically.

Cringe.

>Girls feel like they need to fuck every decently attractive they meet
I take it you've never interacted with human beings, because guys are actually significantly more interested in having sex.
>I feel like I don't want to fuck those girls
And I'm saying that that's retarded. Your rationale for not finding them cute is retarded.

yikes

>EVERY TIME YOU HAVE SEX YOU GET A WOMAN PREGNANT
Wait, what were we talking about?

>Cringe.
yikes sweetie.
also you’re retarded for arguing that his subjective tastes aren’t to your liking. sign of autism, just saying

>You're essentially talking like a religious person.
>it basically sounds like you're citing Christian doctrine and not making an argument rooted in logic.
You're an Atheist? Well that is where your problem begins and ends my friend. I hope you change your ways and find yourself back on the path sooner than later. You'll overcome your Atheism either after high school or college.

>because they were all raised by single mothers? Do you have the data to back that up?
They all got raised out of traditional structure and in many cases raised by single moms, yes. I spent enough time here to know who I'm talking to, I don't make data on chinese image boards, incel. You sound like you should try to have sex.

Birth control is not the same as abortion.

>nobody actually admitted anything
>pretend you win the argument
Conservatives everybody!

In some arenas, "subjective taste" should be based on some chain of reasoning. When you like something or dislike something, it's always good to question why you like or dislike that thing.

My religious views aren't the point. I just want to have an argument rooted in actual ethics rather than you just citing the Bible in every reply.

So where's your source?

>blatantly overlooks posts in the thread that don't fit his narrative
How very Liberal of you.

>should be
Yikes. that’s subjective. Thank u next

>the Bible's views on sex are right because... the Bible!

Can we get back on topic pls?

Attached: 5BDF7D8D-E035-4831-85B2-F0151A461C37.jpg (437x501, 47K)

And sex is not the same as murder, what's your point?

nope, there are “”””people”””” who enjoy arguing and will never care about anything else than getting someone to argue with them

>doesn't actually know who he's replying to
That's so reddit.

>Your rationale for not finding them cute is retarded.
I don't find a dirty poop cute, I don't find a used up whore cute. There's no rationale, you have reading comprehension problems, cuteness is a hormonal reaction, if a girl tells me something that kills it, it's over. I'm not religious, I'm just a male with balanced oxytocin levels. I'm not attracted to whores and since they like to try different males, they'll find someone with low standards to satisfy them. Everybody is happy, at least until many more guys become like me, then things will become interesting.

If an adult person's brain activity has flatlined, you would consider them dead, wouldn't you?
Or at least brain-dead, so you are not "murdering" them if you take their body off of life support.

If a fetus in the early stages of pregnancy has no measurable brain activity, is it really alive yet? Is it really a person that can be "murdered"?
Just something to think about.

Attached: 1487824524248.jpg (566x392, 48K)

Let's get down to the fundamentals here. When a girl has sex for the first time, what changes about her? Her hymen breaks. Outside of your internalized world of ""purity"", her hymen breaking is the only measurable, tangible, *real* change. In what way does that make her used up? Is she unable to have sex after that? Does it change her appearance? Does it change her attitude? In my experience, the answer is 'no'. Do you see what I'm getting at?

>So where's your source?
Your posts are all I need to source your incel condition.

dude, he doesn’t want to fuck whores, get over it holy shit

>ctrl + f
>"abortion is"
>1 match
Remind me again who actually conceded your bullshit propaganda point?

You're very close to the right attack, but using the phrase "is it alive yet" is just asking for a snarky reply from the /pol/tards. The fetus *is* alive, but the real point is that it's not a person yet.

>I DONT LIKE KETCHUP
>YOUR PREFERENCE IS IRRATIONAL STOP HAVING IT

yikes, get over it incel.

Seething brainlet.

Actually, I have a mother and father in my life, so why am I here?

If I thought someone was killing a baby I would stop them as would any normally person.

Not really a response to any of the content in , is it?

>continues justifying the murder of babies
You're playing a game of semantics. You and I both know that abortion is taking the life of a human being. Stop trying to hide behind justifications meant meant to make you feel better about taking the life of a baby. If you get an abortion you are a baby killer, and not just any baby killer. As a woman you literally kill your own son or daughter. You let a doctor decapitate your baby and pull it out of your vagina piece by piece. It is horrific and to deny that or to attempt to normalize it is just a coping mechanism to deal with the guilt of murdering your own child.

>a virgin
For you

See

It's not a semantic. I wish you people would stop strawmanning and actually read and respond to the posts you're replying to. 's point is that a first/second trimester fetus doesn't think or feel and hence isn't a person. Yes, it's a human, but it lacks personhood until higher brain activity starts to occur.

>cringe
>yikes
>sweetie
>virgin
>have sex

Attached: 1562904686771.gif (200x160, 2.41M)

>every abortion is a late stage one involving ripping a body apart

Late-stage abortions are a different debate, and something that I and most other lefties agree should be avoided.
Early-stage abortions, when it's just a clump of cells, are far less objectionable.

Attached: 1425347366710.jpg (739x742, 36K)

Based, thanks for being a voice of reason in here

There are hundreds of scientifical studies which show that sex has big cognitive impacts, expecially on the woman's brain. It's well documented that all their life women tend to be attracted to the same type of man who took their viriginity. I'm only picking an example because you're exposing yourself as a ignorant a bit more every post you make. Read a fucking evolutionary psychology book.
Regarding me, I don't even care about that, I just trust my gut, like any girl who wants her sexual freedom, I don't persue things or people I'm not attracted to. I'm no longer attracted to a girl once she tells she has had a promiscuous sexual lifestyle. That's it, end of the story, I won't take revenge, just ignoring her for the rest of my life because I don't make any effort for things that I don't like. As I said, I'm curious about would happen if a majority of men acted like me, would women become lesbians or change to please us?

>a first/second trimester fetus doesn't think or feel and hence isn't a person
Liberals are so fucking retarded. I mean there isn't any complex thought happening in the brains of Liberals either, but it's illegal to kill them? Talk about double standards.

why are people here so insecure and unable to cope with the fact that they have missed out on sex as a teen/young adult? what is preventing them from moving past it instead of trying to recreate such formative, bonding social experiences when the window of opprotunity is so late?

you will never find a cute gf who is as socially inept as you are that has a low sex count. it is impossible. accept modern women as the whores they are and stop coping.

Attached: 1546178126586.png (429x610, 320K)

>t. lefties attempting to justify murdering their own children
I feel pity for you.

THAT'S RIGHT WHEN ARE YOU GONNA MAN UP AND RAISE THIS OTHER MAN'S CHILD

stop coping.

please, have sex.

>t. brainlet attempting to justify forcing his garbage religious or spiritual beliefs on others
I feel pity for you.

>dude, just accept to take the loser price instead of creating your own path, it's ok

I too love having the choice of single mothers and used goods

you have been taking the losers path your whole life by not having sex and browsing Yea Forums so i fail to see how you would be able to change now

When I was growing up, I knew girls all the way from 7th grade through college and after they presumably (((had sex))), they didn't really change. There aren't hundreds of "scientifical" studies. Stop making things up.
>It's well documented that all their life women tend to be attracted to the same type of man who took their virginity
So? I'm not even sure that's true, I'd love to see a source on that too.
>I just trust my gut
Trusting your gut is generally a brainlet move. You're basically going through life acting on instinct. Literally an NPC.

Insults, no argument. I don't know what I expected.

What if you browse Yea Forums after having sex?

>what is preventing them from moving past it
probably the PERMANENT SEVERE PSYCHOLOGICAL damage that shit does you retarded normie

>creating your own path
It's hilarious how Yea Forums has come to unironically believe that being a basement dweller without a life or relationships is a legitimate, respectable way to live.

You're such a retard. It's so sad. I wonder what people like you will be like when you're in your 70s.

but i did

married girl i met when i was 26 and she was 18, 7 years ago
im her first and only
the idea that you cant meet one when the internet exists is stupid

>I knew girls all the way from 7th grade through college and after they presumably (((had sex))), they didn't really change.
Nice blogspot dude. You can keep talking about the whores you were orbiting as an incel kid or read Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind by David Buss but given your reading skills, it may be too much to ask. This book gives the results of dozens of legit studies.
>You're basically going through life acting on instinct. Literally an NPC.
Just like women but women are always right since you feel the need to defend every moves they make, so I'm always right too.
I feel my instinct to avoid falling from height, I feel my instinct to avoid falling for a whore.

27 year old inexperienced guy attending college right now, any tips on approaching younger girls like that when you're in your late 20s?

Attached: planecrasher the guys are the biggest at night.jpg (1026x1600, 800K)

>You're such a retard. It's so sad. I wonder what people like you will be like when you're in your 70s.
Did I hit a nerve?

Attached: 1526317245576856.jpg (263x317, 8K)

>It's well documented
>cite zero sources
Cool.

obviously not on college retard
internet, i met my wife on omegle (Text only)

>It's hilarious how Yea Forums has come to unironically believe that being a basement dweller without a life or relationships is a legitimate, respectable way to live.
I'm an engineer for Air France and you, what are you? Does devoting all your time to women pay well?

>the PERMANENT SEVERE PSYCHOLOGICAL DAMAGE of literally nothing happening
Christ you're stupid.

Attached: 4D9BBE44-A9F6-4C63-A863-94D76319B668.jpg (1242x722, 682K)

Can you actually cite any one of them? What page are they on? Any direct quotes?
>Just like women but women are always right...
That's just a whataboutism - you're failing to dispute that you're an instinct-obeying NPC.
>I feel my instinct to avoid falling from height
Some instincts are justified and worth listening to. Some aren't. Figuring out the difference takes thought, something you seem to be unwilling to do.

No, I'm just saying it's pathetic that Yea Forums has convinced itself that having a job and having relationships is bad. Everyone here is that deep in denial.

I'm an engineer at Ball Aerospace.

fucking PWNED

A five year age gap is only weird when one or both of you are still in high school

Literally no one thinks it's weird for a 20 year old to date a 25 year old, even if yes there might still be some difference in maturity

What about single mothers expecting that men should date them?

That's a different case because you're also taking on the responsibility of a kid you don't know. I won't make any assertions about whether or not dating single moms is a good idea. I'm just saying that refusing to date women because they aren't virgins is a sign of retardation.

25 and 20 can be the difference between teacher and student

If people have a preference what are you gonna do, cry about it?

No. If you've been reading this thread for the past 30 minutes or so, you've seen my argument.

Actually more like the last hour. We've been at this for a while.

She should play Spider-Woman.

Attached: spider-woman.jpg (474x719, 87K)

>Can you actually cite any one of them? What page are they on? Any direct quotes?
I need some time to do that since it's a 600 pages book (that I have), if the thread stays up one more hour, everything will be quoted.
Also, stop talking about NPC, it's not a scientific concept, it makes no sense at all. What are your sources about the existence of NPC?
>Figuring out the difference takes thought, something you seem to be unwilling to do.
I figured out my tastes, you like pink, I like blue, you like whores, I like devoted women. I don't need a psychoanalysis to like death instead of life or men instead women. Sometimes, things are right the way they're and being a contrarian by instinct doesn't make of you a subtle mind.

She's a shit character.

If The MCU can't even make an interesting Carol Danvers, then why should Spider-Woman be in The MCU?

Plus, Spider Gwen is already a "superior" Spider Woman.

Give me the cliffnotes. If someone wants a virgin, who cares? How does that impact your life at all?

i feel sorry for the ppl in here glorifying the rape scene. gotta wonder how pathetic their virgin lives must be

He knows he'll never be able to get one, so he has been mad and larping for hours now. One way to cope I suppose.

You mean the fictional one?

Great. I'll be here. I suspect the thread will still be up unless we hit the bump limit, I'm not sure what it is on Yea Forums.
>stop talking about NPC
I'm just using the term to illustrate that you're going through life on instinct instead of conscious, rational thought. If you don't like 'NPC', I could use 'animal' instead, as animals tend to be more driven by instinct than humans.
>I figured out my tastes
And that means that you should never again question your tastes? They should be set in stone for the rest of your life? I'm just asking you to question why you have the tastes you do.
This is a tangent, but if you haven't, I'd actually recommend you read the book Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by Joyce. In fairly large part, the book concerns the protagonist's relationship with women as he grows up, and in the final chapter, he realizes that women aren't either "pure virgins" or "worthless whores" with no middleground - rather, they're just people, like men, neither black or white. There's a large population on Yea Forums, yourself included, who just seem incapable of making that final leap.

Just read the thread, brainlet.
>If someone wants a virgin, who cares?
I don't really "care" per se, I'm just saying that someone who refuses to date women who aren't virgins is a moron. You're putting words in my mouth and it isn't working.

>I'm just saying that someone who refuses to date women who aren't virgins is a moron
But it's their PREFERENCE so how do you have any say in that at all?

The rape scene really is awful and should not be joked about

Though there is a pretty funny edit out there of Bryce sitting there with his erection, thinking about CIA instead of the rape, if anyone cares to post it

Attached: 1490827436952.jpg (824x1096, 195K)

>spiderwoman
ew

>should not be joked about
So we can't joke about things now?

Fine whatever you can joke about it

I had a personal experience with a female friend allegedly being raped and then committing suicide a few days later, so it doesn't feel like joking material to me

>they don't want to see Langford preggo

joking about rape is not funny you stupid incel. you have autism or something?

Did he leave a note on her that said "kys"?

Where did I joke about rape?

maybe reread the post you replied to

You seem to be misunderstanding my intent here, willfully or no. I'm not saying anyone *must* change their preferences. I'm just explaining why their preferences are stupid. You realize people hold certain preferences for a reason, right?
Take an example. Religious people tend to hold more conservative views about relationships. Why do these people *prefer* to marry someone who hasn't had sex before marriage? Because of their religion. Preferences aren't just things that magically appear in people's heads for no reason. Some preferences, like favorite colors, might, but in cases like this, preferences regarding subjects this complex, those preferences come about because of some reasoning that went on in someone's head or because of some event in their past.
My point in explaining that is people in this thread refuse to date women who aren't virgins for reasons - misguided reasons, but reasons nonetheless. They didn't just spontaneously, inexplicably decide to hate women who aren't virgins. And my posts in this thread are intended to explain why their misguided reasoning is fallacious. Can you accept that? Do you still have questions?

If it actually happened, it was the kicker, she had been spiraling down into depression and self-harm and drug abuse for quite a while.

She did provide a name and location that I checked and it all made perfect sense, and, you, know, she actually did kill herself, so clearly something traumatic happened, even if for some reason she lied about the rape

>I'm just explaining why their preferences are stupid
Which is in itself, is pointless and dumb

That's a damn shame

I accept that you think it's pointless and dumb. Most of what happens on this website is pointless and dumb.

When I find myself in times of trouble, Mother Mary speaks to me. Speaking words of wisdom: let it be

I'll let it be if I can't change it, but I'll try to change it first if you don't mind.

By change you mean corrupt right? Corrupt men with standards?

I think it should be clear from the above thread that I'm just frustrated with Yea Forums's irrational attitude toward women. But sure, put all the words in my mouth you want.

Yea Forums isn't one person. I just thought I should let you know that

>standards
This is another word for "preference". despite your desire to put an air of superiority on your preferences, they're still logically stupid.

Last reply I give because if you want the studies I can't spend all my time playing the puppeteer. if the thread hits bump limit, I'll create a new one just for that.
I have no idealization of a perfect woman, in my personal case, my mother has only had one partner, my dad, but put me through a hell of a life only because she developed schizophrenia once I turned 10. I'm more aware than most people about what a woman can be.
You have to understand that humans are animals too and wanting to rewrite everything in their genes, in their tastes is pure constructivism, having an intellect doesn't force you to use it against yourself. I asked myself many questions about women as a teenager, I hated chaste women because I was associating them to my mother's mental illness, then I realized after hanging out with thots and fucking a few that I had no business continuing on that path because I had nothing in common with them and couldn't see myself wasting any more time like that. So, I already tested myself, I tested my tastes just to find out that I hated to be sorrounded my those women.
You're already convinced that fucking those women is the way to go and you distort everybody's perception to force it in your narrative. Did you ever try not being attracted to whores? You don't talk like a man who saw anything else in his life.

I never said they were my preferences. But if a man wants to date a virgin, it is not a barbaric or stupid idea. How is that irrational? The man wants a lasting legacy, not a genetic cumdump

Typical tabula rasa retard. Your modules that operate social relations have evolved to offer better intuitive solutions to them than your shitty effortful-thinking can come up with. At least outside of employing the scientific method to study it, which - when people actually do that - you find that, turns out, these social intuitions people have are usually excellent.

Or to put it in simple terms you might be able to understand, these "stupid" preferences reach better solutions than you sitting down and thinking about the problem does.
But I'm sure you're still partially right. For example, I bet your own history of infidelity has lead you to these rationalizations and rejections of science.

>she boiled the rice

burn the rice

pay the price

Attached: 13 Reasons Why_Zach_1526695065366.png (1280x720, 1.39M)

>it is not a barbaric or stupid idea
Not necessarily, if we're talking simple preference, but in case you weren't following the thread, a lot of people use the notion of "non-virgins" to denigrate women in general.
>how is it irrational?
The year is 2019. Most people have no prejudices against non-virgin women in any capacity because we've accepted that women have sex just like men do. And because those women have sex, the older they are the less likely they are to still be virgins and it literally changes nothing about them as people. That's why insisting that any woman you date is a virgin well into near wizardhood is irrational, because it arbitrarily and unnecessarily limits your potential mate pool.

look how fat she looks on this screenshot, you just know they ate the whole bowl

>MY FEELINGS TRUMP YOUR REASON
Based roastie.

>I have no idealization of a perfect woman...
This paragraph is meaningless.
>You have to understand that humans are animals too
We're animals with self-awareness. We can actively, consciously choose what to think and feel. Billions of people every day override their baser, animal instincts and interact with society in a civilized, rational way. All I can call your surrender to obeying your instincts is: pathetic.
>having an intellect doesn't force you to use it against yourself
What is "yourself"? You're positing that "yourself" is your instinctual self, who you are naturally. "Yourself" is really your mind, and you're only helping yourself by overriding your instincts and making conscious choices that lead to better outcomes than you'd have arrived at if you followed your instincts.
>then I realized after hanging out with thots and fucking a few that I had no business continuing on that path because I had nothing in common with them
You had nothing in common with them because their personalities weren't like yours, not because they weren't virgins. I'd recommend you spend some time with girls who aren't virgins... and aren't thots. They exist, believe it or not. I've known some. I want to emphasize my point here, which is that you had bad experiences with those girls because of some interpersonal difference between you, the details of which I don't know, and not intrinsically because "they'd had sex".
>Did you ever try not being attracted to whores
I've never observed a quantifiable difference in the personalities of girls who have had sex and girls who haven't, so I *have* considered the question you're implicitly asking, and I concluded that there wasn't a good reason not to be attracted to girls who aren't virgins.

Instincts are generalized and aren't capable of responding to the specifics of individual, unique situations. They may provide general guidance and may be correct in some situations, but they inherently won't always be right.

>That's why insisting that any woman you date is a virgin well into near wizardhood is irrational, because it arbitrarily and unnecessarily limits your potential mate pool.
I think that's the point. More limited, more refined.
>it literally changes nothing about them as people
Just the condition of their vagina
>The year is 2019
Truly, a compelling reason
>but in case you weren't following the thread
I'm not going to read your thesis

>More limited, more refined.
Oh, that's why. I'm sure you'll find a sweet Christian girl who's at least an 8/10 and has never had sex. I wish you all the best with that.
>Just the condition of their vagina
Their hymen breaks, and whether or not you're the one to break it, every subsequent time you have sex with them will be with a vagina with a broken hymen. The larger point is that sex with a non-virgin girl is just as physically pleasant as sex with a virgin. It's just your "muh virgins, muh purity" perception that makes it more enjoyable for you personally.

>muh purity
You mean like not having life altering STDs?

>More limited, more refined
But what's the point? Quality is not intrinsically linked to partner count no matter how many infographics you read on a Paraguayan rutabaga harvesting forum. It's literally limiting yourself for the sake of limiting yourself, or maybe for religious purposes which amounts to the same thing.
>the condition of their vagina
Oh, you're actually a clueless woman-hater. Guess I shouldn't try rationality then.

I'm not a woman-hater, but are you a woman? You are certainly as touchy as a crazy ass btich

>EVERY TIME YOU HAVE SEX YOU LITERALLY GET AIDS!
Dishonest and dumbpilled.

>girls who aren't virgins all have STDs
>this is what /pol/tards believe

>I don't hate women, but they're perpetually my strawman for everything I dislike
K

Are you serious? STDs are at an all time high. Herpes, warts those ring any bells? You fucking retards? Most women have HPV, how is that a good thing? And don't give that "it's normal" shit to justify societal decay

Now who's putting words in my mouth lel I think I got my answer

>STDs are at an all time high.
[Citation Needed]
>*continues to strawman to soothe his ego*
K

He's probably right. That doesn't mean you can't just, you know, be careful.

Fucking kid.
>All I can call your surrender to obeying your instincts is: pathetic.
Just tell me you're a marxist and everything will be okay. The new man won't happen tomorrow. Society can only operate because it contains people's instincts, nobody overrides it, you dumb bell. Society is crafted to contain the animality, not to create something else. Add Hobbes to your reading list.
>What is "yourself"?
All the things that makes a little boy likes cars rather than barbies and warriors rather than princess. It's genetics and that means something, these innate abilities built through evolution made the human specie able to survive. If you destroy all of that, you get useless weak bodies submitted to technic. Heidegger would also be a good reading for you once you become an adult mind.
>You had nothing in common with them because their personalities weren't like yours
Their sex life is the basis of their personality and every guy who actually spent time with women knows how much meaning a woman's partner selection has. Their main hobby is fucking. I'm not getting obsessed with the girls who've had 2 or 3 partners, failure exists I can accept that, I'm talking about the ones who consciously made the choice to have many partners from the start but once again, except if you're a thot yourself, I don't know see your endgame. Yes, I don't care at all about women who made the choice to have multiple partners and that's my choice, so where is the problem? Is a woman's choice more legitimate than mine? They made the choice to adopt a certain attitude that pleases some men and not others.
>I've never observed a quantifiable difference in the personalities of girls who have had sex and girls who haven't
Put glasses. Your conclusion coming out of blind eyes means shit and my studies will go against it.

He might be right about numbers (I doubt it) but that doesn't mean you'll catch an STD from literally everybody or that there's no way to avoid contracting them other than "hide in your basement and jerk off to your loathing of all the sex everyone else is having".

>little boys can't like dolls
This is called a "gender stereotype" and has literally nothing to do with instincts and genetics you mongoloid.

Dilate.
Fuck, I was debating with a discord tranny all along. That's sad.

>Society can only operate because it contains people's instincts
The Enlightenment was a fairly explicit rejection of instinct and embrace of reason. Modern democracy only exists because of that revolution.
If instincts are so strong and immutable, then why are I and a hundred million other American men willing to have relationships with women and aren't virgins? Why is just weirdos on Yea Forums who think non-virgins are worthless? Is it just a coincidence that that's the exact demographic that girls don't like - men who are weird and awkward?
>Add Hobbes to your reading list.
We're four centuries removed from Hobbes. Ideas on the human condition have evolved since him, and citing him does you few favors.
>All the things that makes a little boy likes cars rather than barbies
So you *are* referring to your instinctual, natural self, like I said. You, yourself, who you are, is your mind. Your mind is influenced by instincts, but you're self-aware and hence capable of recognizing those influences and deciding whether or not to act on them. The larger point in the context of our conversation is that denying our instincts doesn't make us miserable.
>Their sex life is the basis of their personality
That's what you believe about women? All they are is their sex life? They're not people, not like you and me, without personalities that exist independent of whatever sex they do or don't have?
>I'm not getting obsessed with the girls who've had 2 or 3 partners
You should have said that sooner. Others in this thread were getting upset about that. It's understandable that you wouldn't want to date a little hooker. Anyway, like I said, it's your own fault for deciding to have sex with those kind of women, and your fault for basing your opinions on women on those ones. They're a minority. Most women aren't like that. It sounds to me like this is all boiling down to you hating women based on your experiences with a few extreme, fringe examples.

*literal hooker