What the fuck was her problem? You could clearly hear Ron was pronouncing the spell correctly
What the fuck was her problem? You could clearly hear Ron was pronouncing the spell correctly
Landon Wilson
Other urls found in this thread:
Colton Nguyen
Always bothered me. They pronounced it exactly the same. He did do the wrong wand motion though.
Samuel Ward
anal sex deficiency
Hudson Jackson
oh I'm sure she got plenty of that behind the scenes
Jacob Garcia
He emphasized on the 'SAH' instead of the 'O'
James Brown
Girls thrive on correcting boys
Wyatt Morris
that's what she claims but if you listen to the scene he's saying it right
Malfoy is the one putting emphasis on the 'SAH'
Matthew Campbell
She didn't have sex
Brody Kelly
>harry doesn't preform any magic in the first movie
Landon Diaz
She wanted an excuse to talk to Ron.
Xavier Morgan
If he had the spell would work
Alexander Hill
>Girls thrive on correcting boys
Stupid girls do. Read a quote in A Song of Ice and Fire fanfic recently that gave me the chills:
//At this, Roose did nothing but smile. A clever woman did not show herself to be clever so easily// - Mercy by Quilljoy
archiveofourown.org
Hudson Perez
who cares
Aaron Barnes
She was racist/classist and wanted to bust his balls for having a poor people accent.
Jose Morris
Her problem was she couldnt wingardium leviosa out of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Nathan Carter
The fuck are you talking about
Eli Torres
He's right watch it again
Daniel White
He makes the glass at the zoo disappear
Jackson Lewis
That wasn't him, the snake (Nagini, one of the horcruxes) did it
Colton Morris
So why did the snake say thanks?
Jason Williams
Nigger are you stupid. If that were true then it could have escaped at any time, it's also why the snake thanks him.
Ian White
that was just a random snake
Robert Cruz
The snake is trying to get on Harry's good side to turn him into a baddie later