Can this be refuted?

Sloppy job mossad

I think he meant no one who isn't congenitally touched in the head.

Pleb = liking any Star Wars film.
This shit franchise needs to die.

that was very rude

return of the jedi > revenge of the sith > a new hope > clone wars > empire strikes back > phantom menace

Attached: 1548283631173[1].jpg (1080x1266, 85K)

>i'm proof you're wrong

Attached: tips.png (474x432, 331K)

Based

Of course it can be refuted lol

But The Last Jedi is the patrician movie

Do the Freemasons who make these kinds of images/memes think they’re not obvious?

Can anyone unironically stand to watch any of the original trilogy films from start to finish? Yes there are some memorable scenes that have become embedded in popular culture, but the special effects are so shit.

Here's your (You) you crave.

>he’s a fag who has to watch the “latest greatest hollywood special effects” to even be able to enjoy a movie
Can you be anymore of a corporate drone

They're all pleb.

>DUDE only movies is good special effects are good

absolute state of brainlets

Attached: 1527119345680.jpg (540x720, 33K)

All of that is wrong. Contrarian is fucking Jedi, literally one of the worst Star Wars movies. A New Hope is golden, and Empire is okay.

Empire is least pleb though

What the fuck is that bootleg shit at the top? Did you pick that shit up in China or something?

>It's not so easy to appreciate nowadays how strong Star Wars was from an artistic point of view, its runaway popular success and subsequent butchering in the name of remastering it has contributed to a lack of serious attention to it by much of contemporary film culture. But let it be said that even if Star Wars had been a total flop and languished in obscurity, it would still be a film venerated by cineastes because it is a visual masterpiece.

>For Star Wars Lucas looked to the experimental work of three great film artists and combined and applied their ideas in new and interesting ways. The first was the striking mise-en-scène of Leni Riefenstahl, which conveys power relationships in purely (fascistic) visual terms by drawing on religious and mythic imagery. The opening to Star Wars, with a small organically shaped starship being pursued by a giant triangular star destroyer, a mechanical man clothed in black surrounded by the repeating element of uniformed figures, etcetera, demonstrates how this aspect is used to tell the story and explain the relationships and dynamics between characters throughout the film in a purely visual fashion (watch it on mute if you don't believe me). The second is the editing of Arthur Lipsett, who experimented with combining scraps of found footage into a film. This is seen most clearly in Star Wars in the construction of the dog-fight between the Falcon and the Tie-Fighters (which was reshoots of found WWII aerial footage), but Lucas also applied it more broadly to taking disparate elements of classic Hollywood films like John Ford westerns, Casablanca, Flash Gordon serials, etcetera, and creating a cohesion from them in what we would now call a postmodern fashion. Finally Lucas was greatly influenced by Akira Kurosawa, particularly his populist impulses and narrative framing whereby the action is observed from the vantage point of the lowliest characters (in Star Wars this means the droids).

Attached: my-image (26).png (1216x581, 297K)

Why is Return of the jedi considered the weakest of the original movies besides the ewoks

Would you seriously enjoy watching something like this then?
youtube.com/watch?v=Kj5NDLlG2Ys

>Remove the now annoying fanboy elements from the film (the force and the hero's journey and so on) and Star Wars is, in all serious, almost avant-garde cinema.

You moron. Pleb is correct but you need to wap contrarian and patrician. ESB is the good one.

Regardless of it's status as a movie, Star Wars is inherently flawed as a movie. It's just really tonally broken and not fun to watch unless your 4 years old.

ROTJ on the other hand is the most polished of all the Star Wars films. Just for everything in Palpatine's chambers alone ROTJ could be said to be techincally the best movie in the OT.

what are you talking about those are all steelbooks

Of course faggot because all 3 are patrician.

I mean most people actually believe that the Freemasons are good and not a mainstreamed organization that is somehow Christian. Just a bunch of heretics if you ask me.

>Then we come to Jedi, which I feel is better classified with the prequel films than with the two proceeding films. The previous films were made with a view to the craft of filmmaking, meaning that the decisions that were made during their production were decisions mostly made with a view to making a good film. Jedi does not follow this pattern, rather the decisions that went into the making of the film are obviously decisions made without concern for the film itself, but rather with concern for selling merchandise. The film suffers greatly for it.

The most obvious sign of this is that Jedi drops the narrative arch that Empire bequethed it, almost immediately, to become a simple remake of the Star Wars narrative: Tatooine, followed by the discovery of a Death Star, a fatal design flaw is found and exploited to bring it down, the droids get mixed up with the local creatures, and there is a climatic lightsaber fight, etcetera. The construction of these scenes is adequate at best, and represent mediocre filmmaking. The fight between Luke and the pit monster (whose name I cannot recall) to use an example, is (SFX achievements aside) uninspired and completely unmemorable. I've mentioned all this before in my review of Jedi. Very telling is that the specific elements of Jedi that might be considered original are obviously there to find a broader demographic, which is to say to increase sales by bringing in more and new customers. Examples include Leia's metal bikini (thanks) and Ewoks (no thanks). I'm not sure if people realize that the Ewoks got two spin-off movies (now almost completely forgotten) which were obviously planned. Jedi is best called a "toy commercial", not as a term of disparagement, but rather as a literal description of what it is.

Freemasons are the only thing protecting you from the Bavarian Illuminati

yes

Star Wars is tonally perfect & speaks to a sublime simplicity in its mythic style. But sure by all means go off on your mediocre edginess that the next couple entries bring to the table.

Uh, fuck yeah because I love dinosaurs. Also, Harryhausen put some great detail into his models.

0:37 is fucking adorable.

You're implying they don't work hand in hand, there were Freemasons on both sides of the revolutionary war basically manipulating the whole thing.

Wow that HK bootleg shit is next level.

He's right you know.

RotJ is the first Star Wars movie I can remember seeing. Apparently I saw the others before that but I was so young I can't remember. It's my favourite of the original three.

Carrie Fisher in the slave getup helped.

>muh soul! Rotj is soulless capitalism!!!
A movie could be both great and made to sell toys. See: transformers, gi Joe, etc. The designs of Rotj are no more marketable than ESB but no one cares about that

amazon.com/Rogue-One-Limited-Steelbook-Blu-ray/dp/B06Y1KFV77

stop being so fucking dumb

Hilarious

>rogue one
>good