Will there ever be another Fantasy Kino on the level of Lord of the Rings?

Will there ever be another Fantasy Kino on the level of Lord of the Rings?

Attached: 268x0w.jpg (268x402, 45K)

no. everything for the rest of our lives will be about niggers and trannies

No, everything will be a derivative of it, and will ultimately disappoint, eg GoT.

The remake which sticks closer to the books

No because everyone one involved genuinely loved the source material. People even stood up to Peter when he wanted to do stupid shit. You wouldn’t see that in NUwars.

Attached: AC9FF716-EC9E-4837-98EA-1B4C71454317.jpg (225x225, 11K)

Already completly surpassed, in every field.

Attached: mad4.png (1147x971, 597K)

No

Lord of the Rings is mediocre

Wrong

No but Over the Garden Wall was up there

Attached: 654884.png (1000x559, 857K)

After you see an actual masterpiece, you understand that it's true. Sad, but true.

Attached: burnthem.jpg (4500x2995, 2.5M)

No, everything has to be woke now. With Amazon's show we're gonna find out that there were gays, trannies and blacks in Middle Earth all along

Yes

".....And Morgoth came."

Attached: Feanor_threatening_Fingolfin.jpg (1122x742, 301K)

They're not comparable. High-Fantasy Films vs. Low-Fantasy Series.

You literally just described both of them as fantasy in a thread about fantasy you pedantic tryhard fucking retard

>nearly Fall and time for my annual rewatch
Is there a comfier feeling?

Different formats and different genres of fantasy. Take a chill pill.

But both of them are high-fantasy.

You're trying too hard.

False.
Not an argument.

Now I'm no master of the blade (merely a student...) but that looks like some ass sword-handling to me.
Anyway "fantasy" is overrated, I'd much rather see movies like Braveheart that have some basis in reality. Also, if you make movies based on real history, you get to cast a lot of white people (if you're not FUCKING LYING) so that's a plus.
I guess they should keep making orc-related projects so the niggers have roles to fill though.

>False
How is GoT not high fantasy?

There's nothing to argue. You are trying to show everyone you know what high and low fantasy are when it's not relevant.

The early 21st century is seeing an increase in prominence of the work of authors such as George R. R. Martin and Joe Abercrombie, whose high fantasy novels (works set entirely in fantasy worlds) have been referred to as "low fantasy" because they de-emphasize magic and non-human intelligent races in favor of a more cynical portrayal of human conflict. Fantasy writer David Chandler considered this "rise of 'Low Fantasy'" to reflect the contemporary reality of the War on Terror—characterized by "secret deals", "vicious reprisals" and "sudden acts of terrifying carnage"—much as the horror genre reacted to the Vietnam War a generation earlier.
How is it not relevant? They're obviously going for very different things. It's kinda like comparing Star Trek to Star Wars.

I do not believe

Still waiting for the Sci Fi masterpiece of this century

Attached: pu_The_Stars_My_Destination_015.jpg (763x373, 82K)

Attached: 1534561412258.jpg (480x270, 46K)

Attached: E22E7BD8-FEFC-4E8A-8E63-E5B9A92117F8.jpg (1440x1080, 214K)