Lolita 1962

>Lolita 1962
>Director: Stanley Kubrick
>Writer: Vladimir Nabokov
>Actress playing main heroine was 16 at the time

>Lolita 1997
>Director: Adrian Lyne
>Writer: Stephen Schiff
>Actress playing main heroine was 17 at the time

Why was this allowed? Why didn't anyone think of the children?

Attached: TRZk9lLaHR0cDovL29jZG4uZXUvaW1hZ2VzL3B1bHNjbXMvTkRJN01EQV8vNGJhYWFhNjRkYTk1MmRhMmU1MDI0ODI0YWMwMDMzM (1200x924, 196K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qqi793k9M0o&t=19s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

The 97 version is better. Dont even @ me.

I thought Dominique would be a bigger star. Shame her career ended around 2000.

@119344471
faggot

Well, nothing actually happened though. All the scenes are just suggestive. Besides, she was 12 in the book which is worse imo.

>Why was this allowed
>"Oh no murica considered 17yo girls illegal, it's probably the case everywhere else..."
There's nothing wrong to have sex with a 16 or 17yo girl, you puritan fuck.

Way to kill a thread

>no nude scenes

I was surprised when I was able to fap to it when I was like 9

God bless the French

>boo hoo girl is ten months before her 18th birthday that makes it ILLEGAL!!!!
Grow up americans

There is arguably something wrong with it if you are way older than her, but most places it's not illegal. But clearly something being legal doesn't mean it is morally good.

Good luck arguing with janny

>implying
dynamic IP mein nigger

The thread is not dynamic, dummy

She had boobs, so how did they disappeare later in life?

What is morality?

morallity is a spook

>Besides, she was 12 in the book which is worse imo
In whose opinion wouldn't it be worse if she was 12 instead of 16-17?

>Actress playing main heroine was 16 at the time
and guess what she did after that?

this is the biracial child Sue Lyon had with a football player Roland Harrison (m. 1971; div. 1972).

Attached: lmao.jpg (1488x948, 264K)

>hollywood selling starlets as escorts to sports stars
imagine my shlock!

When they change it from a scabby kneed little kid like the book to a hot fully developed teen, does it completely change the story? The protagonist has done nothing wrong then, in some states they could even legally marry.

>Why didn't anyone think of the children?
Yeah, what's the deal with old hags playing Lolita?

>16
>17
>children

Attached: 1561005825089.png (900x676, 410K)

t. roastie

Why do commiefornians think there's something wrong with banging 16 year olds?

>Lolita 1962
Utter trash.

>Lolita 1997
Hot.

Let me tell you: I've thought about those particular children a whole bunch

There’s nothing wrong with mating with a woman of breeding age. Modern societal morality is a joke.

you're right, that's bullshit
they should have cast a legit 12 year old

We need a remake!

>heroine

get the fuck out of here

Reminder
90s version >>> dogshit >>> 60s version

>16
>17
>children
imagine living in the usa

Attached: age-of-consent-europe.jpg (1800x1800, 742K)

You're right. The first act was probably the most amazing ~30 minutes of film ever made.

The Russian version is best, they show the pusy and sex

Attached: ruskie.jpg (650x491, 74K)

A reminder that lolita wanted it

so you're fine with me murdering you then?

I agree, I think Melanie Griffith was a better Dolores than Sue Lyons

Are you retard? A lot of young teen girls preferer them older.

lol, is the guy in the middle Humbert? Isn't he supposed to be a distinguished upper class guy?
dat tummy tho

No we don't

I think there will never be another film adaptation of Lolita, at least not produced in Hollywood or western Europe

Sure murder me daddy!

Daily reminder that both Swain and Iron were both actually in a scene naked

It’s a porno
They don’t really try

>doesn't mean it is morally good.
you're retarded

have sex with your own age group gramps

actually 97 lolita was 15 when they began shooting. she looked way cuter than 62 one too

Alright my girlfriend is away with her family for a couple days. I can finally watch this film by myself without her looking at me if we were to watch it together.

Which one should I watch based kubricks, or the 97 one. The girl in either has to be at least similar to Silverstone in the crush.

youtube.com/watch?v=qqi793k9M0o&t=19s

the older you get, the more you get attracted to cute 12 year old girls. it's like nature's cruel joke aginst straight men

>the 97 one

this one, kubrick´s version is boring, the story structure doesn´t make any sense and is shit
the 97 version lolita acts like someone of her age

Name?

>eurotard tries to make a point
>trips and falls flat on his face immediately
every single time lol

Attached: h1imcmk7unxz.png (620x393, 126K)

>go porno site
>russian lolita

Attached: cumbrain.jpg (460x366, 23K)

Ma negro, that flashing scene though.

Nice excuse for an incel who couldn't get a woman whose brain is fully delevoped and knows better

Wrong. Healthy adult straight males stay attracted to 20 year olds. Degenerate losers like you though should kill themselves

>qt underage grill wants to look sexy
>puts on makeup
this fucking meme needs to stop