Absolute dogshit

Suffered from too much Ness and not enough Capone.

It's what I was going for. I'd be happy to clarify it for you though. What particular part are you struggling with?

What is it about Kevin Costner that keeps him from clearing that B-grade hurdle? I always felt that somewhere in there was a legendary actor but he's so 'dry.'

This movie isn't dogshit btw. Connery was worth watching. Not bad for De Palma considering he usually did Hitchcock imitations his whole career.

It's so fucking bad

I don't dig the morricone score thats the only complaint I have he should've went with pino instead

Costner has always had this delusion that he’s a competent writer and director and insists on screwing around with production. He’s great when he does what he’s told but most directors cave to his childish demands.

There is no point to Costner. Dude made a Robin Hood movie in which he didn't even attempt a British accent. You can rest assured that anyone who would do that is not just a shit actor, but a retard as well. He's a shit director too. Waterworld is unironically his best movie.

It's not a masterpiece but it's a very comfy, epic, dramatic and fun movie. And the Morricone soundtrack is awesome. Its 10/10. Fuck Zommers.

>sympathy vote

Attached: t1.jpg (1280x720, 95K)

>Not picking up a challenge towards genuine movie discussion and leaving the opportunity of being called a faggot
It's ok. I understand.

Attached: download.jpg (228x221, 9K)

Sean Connery is a terrible actor.

I'll bite. Explain more how this is a meshing of styles and how it's Da Palmas failed experiment.

It would have been lulcowzy if they had MC Hammer come in and be like, "Can't touch this!"

Considering how it's early light and the birds are waking up, I'm going to have to take a raincheck on btfo Yea Forums yet again with another brilliant movie analysis. I've got a bottle of champagne sitting in the freezer and I intend to drink it. I was bluffing though: I just have a gut instinct that this movie is a junk with no identity of it's own. I think it switches styles 3 to 4 times without cause. It's great because I've never heard anyone complain about it, but it rustled my jimmies. If it was done intentionally, which I think it was, all for the better. But the switching from one style to another was just so brute, and without intent. This movie was lost. If Tarantino does it, it's great. But you know what you're going in for. This movie is all over the place. Perhaps I could've worded it better if it was earlier in the evening. Going to crack that bottle.

I've been grooming a hedgehog for the lasth month. It's in the garden and I've found it's nest. Apparently (googled it) they are grumpy during daytime. He always comes out in the evening and makes noise when I'm shitposting. I put food out and let him get used to my proximity. I could be violent and pick him up right now, but that would be stupid. I reckon It'll be another 3 months before he's somewhat used to my being. The trick is to be patient and respect their personal space.

De Palma is the ultimate pleb filter.

He's in the car.

Frank Nitto's actual death was kino, but it wasn't until the 40s iirc.

Outta my way faggots
Just De Palma's best movie comin through

Attached: phantom-of-the-paradise-poster.jpg (1296x1939, 368K)

I actually like Depalma, and Scarface I watch quite a bit. But I know what Scarface is. Its a highly quotable, modern gangster meme movie that every nigger alive has in their collection. Its not a "great film", but it I'd what it is, and it knows what it is.

But now this fucking thing. This was trying to take itself so seriously, with the same director, that it just ends up being comically bad. Like Connery's character gets a damn Tommy gun emptied into him, then the scene after he's crawling across the house hamming up a death scene like I've never seen before.

That weird excruciatingly long train station scene with the baby carriage, him throwing that dude off the building, I could go on. Its like its supposed to be a comedy but isn't funny.

Attached: The-Untouchables-1987-Union-Station (1).jpg (1920x799, 181K)

>That weird excruciatingly long train station scene with the baby carriage
>too pleb to recognize Battleship Potemkin

My father was a rabid Untouchables fan, make of that what you will.

>Its like its supposed to be a comedy but isn't funny
Wut

I understood that perfectly. This movie doesn't communicate very well in what it wants to be.

Carrie was legit a great film too. There's something very sincere & sweet about it, which makes the prom scene have much more weight to it.

He clearly peaked at Scarface though, had a bit of a bounce back with Casualties of War, then fell off hard. Mission to Mars? Fuck me.

Attached: carrie bath.png (570x522, 296K)

fun fact : Eliot Ness' stock fell off hard when the Cleveland Torso Murderer run rampage, even killed a person and drop off his body outside of Ness' office view

>mission to mars
>not kino

Attached: armondwhite090223_250.jpg (250x375, 13K)

Capone looked like a dude playing Capone in like a play or something. I mean, that chanced run in at the hotel lobby where they're shit talking each other? Just so bad. This movie's weird man.

Get a little older and you'll find that Carries really a tragic comedy. Mission Impossible is probably his last decent movie.

Blow Out is pretty kino.

I liked Black Dahlia for the most part and Femme Fatale was breddy kino

It's what keeps me awake at night. Do animals like me, or are they just there for the food?

I've read about cats trying to wake their owner up, during a fire. And animals saving other animals. I've also read about cats being stuck in an appartment and eating the catlady because they needed food.

I love cats and dogs. But do they genuinenly love you back, or are the there just for the food?

I used to torture cats when I was a kid. I could own their entire being. Same with women. I could own their entire existence.

I'd like to think that that part of me isn't in me anymore. I try to build and be constructive. And it is from the heart, most definitely. As it always was. Bu the part of me that was destructive and had instant gratification is still in me. What can I say? You want to own a soul. Gradually, you learn, building is more satisfactory than destroying. So how sincere am I? 'These thoughts put into me'. That's what I think. I don't get to choose anymore when I am cruel and when I am kind. I have feelings of kindness, but when are they my own and when are they nurtured? I make an effort, to be a decent human being, but in how far are they my own efforts? There is no one other for me. Perhaps I could make myself sympathetic by killing others like myself.

You know these are just thoughts.

>That weird excruciatingly long train station scene with the baby carriage
plz be bait

That’s pretty harsh and not very nice but ok

Attached: 344350A9-1CD1-4308-BB37-10988EAAD80D.png (542x450, 56K)

That's pretty much how I view it now & hate it gets limped into the horror genre. It isn't that at all.

The Tommy character hammers it all home I think. Was he supposed to really start liking her towards the end?

Attached: ae8617f31436745cd67d77e1c2dd604a378f19a9_hq.jpg (960x540, 42K)

yes

DePalna would have made a masterpiece if he set The Untouchables in early Miami and basically made it the cop version of Scarface. It's truly a weird movie. My dad loves it, showed me it, I was 8 and I thought it was so corny. Hurt my dad's feelings. First time I was aware of a generation gap.