Was it really that bad?
Was it really that bad?
first half or so is actually pretty good and I like it better than temple. it all kind of falls apart once they're in the jungle.
Aside from a few really stupid scenes, ancient ayyliums and Ford clearly being too old for the role, it's still kinda enjoyable and comfy.
I like it a lot, the first half is genuinely fantastic, the second half, depending on your ability to deal with stupid shit, isn't that bad.
yes. it's boring as shit compared to the other ones. but people are right saying the first half is much better
The movie died for me after the nuke scene. The series never went full retard until that point.
I hated it
Yeah, it's pretty bad.
And this is coming from a Lucas apologist who thinks the prequels, Willow, and Strange Magic are great.
yes
willow is really good and i hate midges
troll
I always like an Indiana jones adventure, haters gonna hate, film snobs gonna hate.
>Was it really that bad?
No, it was worse.
I thought it was fine. It was entertaining. I wasn’t a massive Indy fan so I wasn’t offended like I was with the Star Wars prequels.
Opposite feeling for me. I was never huge into Star Wars, so I never really cared how badly they fucked that franchise. Indy 4 though? That hurt. It was just awful.
Pretty good... a little over-the-top at the end.
Yes, it's embarrassing and I won't own it. The Indiana Jones trilogy is just fine as it is. Need more Indy? Watch the Young Indiana Jones TV show or play some of the video games.
>And this is coming from a Lucas apologist who thinks the prequels, Willow, and Strange Magic are great.
I agree with you with the exception of Attack of the Clones and Strange Magic, with the latter being one I missed.
Indy 5 is going to be so horrid.
>Turbo-Old Fart Indiana.
>YES!!!!!!
>raisenette Marion
>SOI MOUTH
It's just alright.
>Watch the Young Indiana Jones TV show
My nigga, I loved that show as a kid.
The plot makes no sense (Mack is a human light switch and serves to purpose), the skulls are magnetic...what? Is there more than one skull? The alien's master plan all along was to lose their skulls so that they could have humans collect them, place them back onto the neck stumps so that they could finally kill them. It was an abortion.
worse
>The alien's master plan all along was to lose their skulls so that they could have humans collect them, place them back onto the neck stumps so that they could finally kill them.
Did you even try to watch the movie
It's was like Godfather part 3
A good movie, but nothing compared to the originals. Hope Spielberg has learned from his mistakes with IJ5
1>3>2>4
It was amazingly shit, yes. I wanted to rip my fucking eyes out when the jungle chase sequence happened.
It had some stupid part (Shia and the monkeys) but it's not THAT bad. Still a step above modern Star Wars, for sure. The fridge part wasn't even that bad and the nuclear testing city was a cool idea for a 50s adventure.
>Did you even try to watch the movie
Saw it three times (twice in a theater) and it got worse with each viewing. Stoklasa was entirely correct.
Its better than any star wars film
No, not as much as people give it shit for. I just rewatched all of them recently, and even if I think it was the weakest of the 4, it wasn't terrible. Shia was probably the worst part. He felt out of place in almost every scene except for the maybe the middle of the movie where they're tracking Hurt's character.
It's not terrible, but it's soulless. No one even gets shot on-screen.
aside from ayys and the asinine shit like the fridge and gunpowder being made of iron flechettes they only explained why it worked, not why Indy would think it works, it was aight and a lot better than 2
>ctrl+f
>PART TIME
>zero results
Meh I think 2 is underrated desu