His best film since Pulp Fiction

His best film since Pulp Fiction.

Attached: Once-Upon-A-Time-In-Hollywood-Review-2.jpg (798x420, 36K)

True

How?
And don't use the phrase "visually illiterate"

.. was Inglorious Basterds.

Attached: 1560945344451.jpg (680x577, 39K)

this. to me, it's clear as dad that IB is his second best movie, but i guess diff'rent strokes for diff'rent niggers.

The synchronicity of Tate's and Rick's stories was beautiful. It's a humble tale of an age forgotten with phenomenal acting.

Anyone else think that the gratuitous feet shots were put in to fuck with the audience now that Tarantino's foot fetish is normie-level common knowledge?

How does that make it his best film though?
The excellent performances are hindered by redundant and meandering imagery with no real plot, conflict, or obstacle to overcome and ends up feeling like a naive fever dream about a supposed golden age of hollywood history that would have done better as a short film.

I'd believe it.

>he needs plot

Wrong.

>shots
it literally always has been

Stefan molyneux said it was bad

Romance

he will never, NEVER, top kill bill

The plot was a vehicle for the visuals. The innocence and brilliance of youthful perception. A love letter to the world and what is in it

How much did Champion pay to slap their logo on Brad Pitt's chest?

Both are shit movies. His only good movie is Reservoir Dogs, which he ripped off a chink flick

lol. what was his reasons?
watching this film beat the shit out of hippies is enough.

>Zionist revenge porn
>good

Hi Shlomo

Just got out of it. Loved it. Top tier QT. Loved it from start to finish.

Boring as fuck.
Wish fulfillment for Tarantino, "my heroes Brad pitt and Leo killed the big bad Charlie Manson family!"

I love this film for killing hippies. that's all