Larry Sanders is on Joe Rogan (LIVE)

youtube.com/watch?v=2O-iLk1G_ng

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-08-07 at 00.45.39.png (642x360, 431K)

Other urls found in this thread:

hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Sowell_TrickleDown_FINAL.pdf
fee.org/articles/there-is-no-such-thing-as-trickle-down-economics/
m.youtube.com/watch?v=LibRNYJmZ-I&t=625s
youtube.com/watch?v=2O-iLk1G_ng&t=1h4m30s
youtube.com/watch?v=99-Zryevepw
ancreport.com/report/bernie-sanders-a-warmonger-and-economically-illiterate-2/
youtu.be/ryJteQTPBlU
youtube.com/watch?v=ExgxwKnH8y4&
fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-poor-get-poorer-when-the-rich-get-richer/?utm_source=zapier&fbclid=IwAR2_g5dJ5JZvAN4wx-AGnWIDk1XzXC-WOwbaaEgGaiMnYFjQHcb3edoTTZU
politico.com/story/2019/04/08/bernie-sanders-open-borders-1261392
cato.org/publications/commentary/why-europe-axed-its-wealth-taxes
youtube.com/watch?v=lm-FqtAOSB8
fee.org/articles/the-depression-youve-never-heard-of-1920-1921/
newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409
youtube.com/watch?v=wj2cD8Q5hS8
wnd.com/2009/12/119168/
web.archive.org/web/20180914015026/https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-obama-recovery-took-so-long-1536619545
sys.4channel.org/derefer?url=https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-poor-get-poorer-when-the-rich-get-richer/?utm_source=zapier&fbclid=IwAR2_g5dJ5JZvAN4wx-AGnWIDk1XzXC-WOwbaaEgGaiMnYFjQHcb3edoTTZU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I like to eat ass

Holy shit its real.

Lol Rogan's retard fans aren't gonna handle this one well

>live

They rarely attack the guest unless the guest makes some argument with really shallow logic. I think Bernie came through well in this one.

it's not live

>is live

literally pre recorded

let me guess no questions about hillary fucking him over at the 2016 dnc?

he's had other leftist on
they arent unique as you might think

Look at the like/dislike ratio on literally any video that has a black guest.

Larry Sanders is dead dumbass. And its Gary Shandling.

okay this is epic

Joe CIA niggger rogan

Attached: dont talk about that joe.png (1431x759, 1.23M)

I don't watch Rogan's show much, you're probably right.

Rogan has a lot of Berniebros listening too

Rogan is a meathead simpleton, and Sanders is a noodlebrained kike. No thanks.

Yeah, I'll be skipping this one. There's nothing Bernie has to say, that I need to hear.

>Muh free college
>Muh globalism
>Muh tax and spend
>Muh diversity

Fuck politicians. I listen to Rogan for entertainment, not propaganda. Fuck you, Joe.

Bernie is anti globalism, get laid.

I can’t stand this stupid fucking “responsible conservative” boomer. Rogan needs to go back to exclusively just having scientists, YouTube weirdos and athletes on his podcast.

>only libtards get laid

My question exactly, if they don't talk about this what's the point.

>So Barry, Jaime yeah pull it up, so Barry how do you feel about this hairless chimp?

>See how fucking ripped this fucking thing is Barry?

>Like Jesus Christ IMAGINE THIS THING RUNNING AT YOU BARRY? *Laughs*

bernie is going to be your president

Bernie's stupidity is pretty astounding. The guy thinks everyone is an illiterate jackass without access to a calculator.

is this guy Rogans CIA handler?

Cope

Average Americans are fucking retarded

what in the GODDAMN FUCK?

>Larry Sanders
oh man fuckin owned how will leftoids ever recover?

>joe rogan starts of by attacking tulsi gabbard for pointing out kamala harris' bullshit

damn really makes me (((think)))

I was excited for Larry Sanders and even more excited when I saw Bernie.

Joe Rogan is such a dishonest faggot. He is funny to meme on but really, the fact that his show is no longer broadcast live is such an obvious sign that he got turned by jews. They edit shows now, can't have a huge platform accidentally spill unadulterated redpills.

He also got all nervous when Joey said he heard he was in the CIA.

He's an asset.

Attached: 1564470859553.jpg (640x689, 104K)

this

Ask joe how much bernie paid him to get on his show?

Ask joe if hed consider bringing the actual socialust communist green party and constitutionalist party on his show
for free.

>corporations get to make laws in america

is he wrong? can /pol/ explain to me why this is a good thing?

Bernie Sanders is an enemy of the rich and therefore he is an enemy of mine.

>Democrats will unironically pick Biden over Bernie because "muh centrism"

It's gonna be four more years of trump isn't it?

Can we get a Nick Mullen and Eddie Bravo pedowood episode now?

What is going to happen to america when the generation that has had it easy dies? No one is gonna go along with obvious establishment if people if they can't remember a time when it mattered

Not sure if crazy or just stupid. Firstly, his show being live didn't matter as they haven't interacted with the chat in more than a decade. Second, fuck off, Joe is more honest than you or anyone else. He shows all of his dumb beliefs infront of everyone. Asks stupid questions does stupid things etc for your entertainment. This man is so honest he actually believes supporting someone like Tulsi is the best person to vote for. You're just some jizzthought idiot who gets upset if everyone doesn't agree with you.

Joe is the DEFINITION of honest.

>/pol/ votes against their interests
nothing new.

>Firstly, his show being live didn't matter
He's crazy about everything else, but it being live does matter.

Well there have been some odd instances here and there, Joe has golden handcuffs and a family

>only an hour long
What is this, a female comedian he gave a pity invite to?

>no completely irrelevant, sensationalist questions
Oh no.

OOF, roasties btfo

>Bernie wants to give the US the same benefits of European countries

HOW FUCKING DARE THIS FUCKING COMMIE PIECE OF SHIT LIBTARD DO THIS

FREE HIGHER EDUCATION?
TAXING THE RICHEST RICH INSTEAD OF NEXT TO NOTHING?

HOW FUCKING DARE HE

>no completely irrelevant

Who are you to decide what is irrelevant? what is the mission statement of a podcast? How can a topic even be irrelevant in a podcast? Lets get back to discussing chimps ripping dicks off? Fuck off shill

Who does this guy think he is?

If the Democrats really wanted to win, they would pick Yang. Everyone would vote for a thousand dollars per month except the staunchest boomers.

>TAXING THE RICHEST RICH INSTEAD OF NEXT TO NOTHING?

They don't either, they tried for decades and they just leave

why is the political corruption within his own party that screwed him out of his candidacy irrelevant? are you actually retarded?

>Yang

Attached: prophecy.jpg (795x573, 39K)

Nobody gives a fuck about Hillary anymore expect for you Clinton-Derangement-Syndrome infected fucktards. Welcome to the current year.

This nigga would barely be considered left of center in any non-American Western country. This is the American right's big bad booogey man? Why specifically?

Attached: 6534866949.png (500x375, 192K)

>not wanting a Psyker President

>sensationalist questions

Why the hell would you be against this honestly? for what purpose? it doesn't make any sense. Oh no he might lose credibility by saying something unfiltered! the horror

Hillary has been retired since 2012. The current year is 2019 and the current president is the most corrupt in history, but let's keep talking about the fact that Hillary hurt your feelings in 1972.

>non American
You dun goofed

Attached: download (2).jpg (225x225, 9K)

Why won't Norm come on? Does he not like him?

Not a response

Norm was going to after he got in all that trouble to clear the air but his agent thought he would only get himself in more trouble (likely accurate) so he cancelled.

oh is that where you were going with that? no ones cares so the topic is taboo? no one cares about something he was involved and the only guy that might ask him directly can't because "no ones cares except chuds!"

>Why specifically?
rich assholes

Attached: rmcV5I5.jpg (740x493, 49K)

CRINGE

unironically this.

you have zero understanding of economics.

neat

No one cares that you think about Hillary Clinton 23 hours a day.

>gun grabber
Yikes

Well look American socialism basically involves the transfer of wealth to minorities that don't/can't work ever. It's fine in Scandinavia where everyone is invested in the future but americans just know it'll pay for latinos and blacks who hate them anyway.

Literally what the rest of the western world does but ok.

You are the one that brought Hillary up, you don't want your buddy being asked tough questions because you are basically a zealot. Fuck Trump and Fuck hillary

Dems have still not figured out how elections work, it's pretty amazing. Trump won entirely because of his charisma and personality and not actually because of his policy. It doesn't even matter if he builds the wall or not, he got a whole demographic screaming BUILD THAT WALL and it carried him to victory.

Dems would unironically have the best chance at winning an election if they nominated someone like Oprah. Most Americans don't fucking care about substance or policy. Biden will be nominated just based on his association with Obama alone.

This sounds more like Yea Forums reality than reality reality.

mike baker, obviously a fake name

/pol/ isn't Yea Forums, they're a radicalized transplant from stormfront and other neo nazi communities infecting an anime forum

>blaming other races for why things can't be done
Switch black to white and you could earn a blue checkmark on Twitter.

I'll be voting Bernie in the primary. Come at me fags

Maybe in 2016.

>Yikes

Attached: images.png (220x229, 9K)

Well why are they net negative tax payers? they are cost the government money. Asians and White pay the most after Indians

Wish Canada had a Bernie.

I dropped out of high school and make less that 15$ an hour so I'll vote for him.

He only wants to ban semi-auto rifles. Pump shotguns with slugs are higher-T anyway.

>You are the one that brought Hillary up
Wrong.

Who? Bernie is pro 2nd ammendment.

I thought this said Larry David, then I thought it was actually Larry Sanders, then I reread it and don't care

wow could u try any harder

He says in this interview America isn't a gun grabbing country.

I tried getting food stamps in the early 2000s but the social worker basically told me "honey you are white you don't need them" Black people control these offices and any relief you will be entitled to is not practically available to you if you aren't black, not even latino people get approved for ssi or disability as much as blacks

>Bernie is pro 2nd ammendment

Bernie isn't even pro-Bernie most of the time, he'll just cuck to the DNC again you watch

>I tried getting food stamps in the early 2000s but the social worker basically told me "honey you are white you don't need them

Holy shit /pol/ you are going full retard on this fanfic. You don't even need to meet a social worker to get on SNAP.

I voted for Trump in 2016. Would gladly vote for Bernie, Yang or Tulsi this time around. But it won't matter anyway since, somehow, none of the candidates anybody genuinely wants are at the tops of the polls.

I dropped outta high school, still went to community college (2 years) dropped outta that and I make 20 dollars an hour (I've been working various jobs since i was 14, now 28). I have all kinds of friends that went to a 4 year college and they're making less than 15...I just don't get why you all make horrible decisions with money?

Tells Joe he'll announce if aliens exist on his podcast, what a lad.

>none of the candidates anybody genuinely wants are at the tops of the polls
makes you think

Yang is truly based

I'll say one thing, the guy is actually answering every single question completely with no cop outs or side stepping and I can't see that being true for literally any other major presidential candidate of my lifetime.

Attached: Untitled.png (714x210, 16K)

You're not telling half your story, but nice try retard.

Trump was never on top of the polls either, who gives a shit? Political Polls are bullshit for manipulating public perception.

>entire party gets caught colluding against your campaign
>collusion with the media, feeding questions to Hillary and so on
>immediately keks out and endorse the person that represents everything you hate in politics
There's a reason the Bernie train stopped overnight.

It wasn't Snap it was Wic and my child, why would I larp about being a loser? oh yeah that's gonna change minds lol

>muh trump

i dont support trump either dickhead. democrats deserve to know why bernie got screwed out of his candidacy but backdoor politicking

The difference is I don't trust Dem voters to stick with their candidate like Trump voters did. How many Bernie supporters immediately jumped ship and got behind Hillary last time? Same thing will happen next year.

>you have zero understanding of economics
>believes on trickle down
>hasn't read an econ textbook since 1994
bro this is a bad look for you

This.
Absolutely based. I could see it happen

Based

The other half is quite mundane, worked myself up through the muck, I mean working gas stations, pop stores, and no pun intended, Walmart promoted me, and ever since then, I have always been hired on in a manager capacity; currently in security, nothing to it!

And that's exactly why he'll never be able to win.

Honesty doesn't sell, and every candidate is selling a product to the people.

Why don't leftists understand basic economics? Not only does overtaxing the rich reduce tax revenue, a disproportionate amount of the revenue ends up being subsidized by the middle and lower class.

hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Sowell_TrickleDown_FINAL.pdf

>taking an obvious joke seriously
Are you guys fucking retarded?

>Honesty doesn't sell

I know I'll get modb& for this but what an extremely Jewish thing to say

no he's prolly being honest, I'm in the same boat. dropped out of cc without a 2 yr, now make $21 doing gay manual labor in a warehouse while most people i know make less, regardless of college. a few lucked out here and there, one makes bank at GM, another makes a lot as a chemical engineer but most get absolutely cucked by the college scam

You think it'll get better when the boomers die off or forced to retire?

? Trump has charisma? He's a retard and could be replaced by anyone saying his retard lines.

Also, are you trying to say Yang has charisma? Asian ching chong fuck is boring as shit.

Who pays you shills to make up these retard memes?

Trickle down is pejorative used by leftists who don't understand supply side economics. There's no such thing as trickle down theory, and no economist worth his salt has ever called it that.

fee.org/articles/there-is-no-such-thing-as-trickle-down-economics/

Damn I actually was a little excited because I thought it was Larry David.

Fuck this retarded old pussy.

I have no reason to lie to abunch of mucks; just hoping they snap into reality and stop spending money. Only thing I allow myself to buy (for myself) are books, and even that is useless once I've read the words ha

He does have charisma and he's quick witted in debates. Leftists don't stand a chance, just like 2016.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=LibRNYJmZ-I&t=625s

wont matter, automation and AI are going to obliterate the current system in ways most people cant even imagine. we're talking at least 50% of jobs gone in 10 years, probably 90% in 20 or less. who knows what's gonna happen, either the elites find their humanity and we build an inclusive, basic-income based system of sustainable growth or (more likely) they continue hoarding and offshoring at exponential rates and it leads to civil war once everyone is broke and destitute

heritage foundation pls go away

>shouting one liners and interrupting everyone

>debate
>quick witted

>No u
What quick wit.

The Democrats problem isn't that they don't have charisma. It's that retards think memes are charisma. No one actually likes or respects Trump. THey like his memes because they think it will piss off liberals and they're retards. That's not charisma. He's completely replaceable. Same morons who voted for him voted for Bush and Mittens and McCain.

it's fine dude, things are fucked now but "money" like we think about it today won't even exist in 20 yrs

>lalallalala I can't hear you!
Lol pathetic

Do they pay you? You post this shit all the time.

I know you hate the term but it's literally what it is

I see you guys purposefully ignored that video analysis. Should have expected as much from liberals.

Gold and silver, fren, and of course, actual resources, sustainable food stuff, ammo, the whole bit, feels good to be your own man.

We watched it, we're just not already going to imagine anyone who climbs to the head of the tribe has charisma. You don't know what charisma is. Winning isn't charisma.

They pay everyone before they even see a return on investment. A business man could invest in a company for years and never see a profit margin and go out of business, but you know who did get payed? The workers. Nothing is trickling down, since it was never their money to begin with.

How could anyone listen to a rambling old jew for an hour.

>automation and AI

I don't think this will work out like you think, it's just meme AI not real artificial intelligence.

>Charisma - compelling attractiveness or charm that can inspire devotion in others
Is that not how he won? How else did he get the votes with less than half the funding of Hillary?

America is a giant block of minorities. Minorities pay taxes and are invested in the future too, you racist.

youtube.com/watch?v=2O-iLk1G_ng&t=1h4m30s

>we fought china in ww2
>joe doesn't correct him

fucking low iq retards

Minorities have a net deficit when it comes to investing in the country

it's actually kind of funny how bernie was super progressive left just a few years ago and now he isn't left enough. i dunno why they think going extreme left is the key to beat trump

>you post this shit all the time
And yet I've never seen a solid rebuttal. Really makes you think.

Whites $553.52 billion

White Per Capita $2,795

Blacks -$389.71 billion

Black Per Capita -$10,016

Hispanics -$411.95 billion

Hispanic Per Capita -$7,298

It's just how it is man, like I have any racial animus at all just because I acknowledge that they are a net drain?

Charisma is all there fucking is to winning elections. If you think most Americans voted for Trump because they cared about his policies on tariffs and the intricacies on foreign policy then you’re a retard. Moments like spewing insults during debates and making up multiple chants and slogans all throughout his run is how he won. He’s an icon, for fucks sake he was already a celebrity

Yeah /pol/ is always weeping about femoid degeneracy because they're just drowning in pussy, right?

It literally is trickle down. You just don't like the wording. It's like saying tax planning instead of tax avoidance.

>femoid degeneracy

Oh come on, it's getting a bit much don't you think? Women are just trolling them at this point

>all nationalist conservatives are on /pol/
When you look at white birth rates declining, it's mostly liberals.

Gonna taste good, hog

guess we don't need more migrants then

Should Joe Rogan ask people about their last fight on his MMA podcast?

No one not even Trump advocates for less legal immigration. Boomers don't like it when the price of their house they bought in 1973 is less than a million dollars

ouch

It's not like he would be asking him about his dead mother or something. It was one of the biggest news stories ever. Like not asking Nixon about Watergate. Or not asking OJ if he killed his wife

Average *people are fucking retarded. Yea Forums is no different.

See
As I said, no economist worth his salt has ever used that term seriously. It's literally a buzzword for jealous lefties. Labor demand (and subsequently wages) increase when the wealthy retain enough earnings to invest in free market competition.

Wasn't china our ally against the japanese?

Funny that you continue to not only fail to put up a response, but ignore the other person that further explained his position.

How much more should they be taxed?

Attached: tax burden.jpg (720x384, 54K)

Where does the thousand dollars a month come from?

Attached: A.png (184x172, 3K)

The trillion dollar tax cut was in large part used for stock buybacks. Nice meme.

How come that don't add up to 100? this is a stupid pie chart. The 1% doesnt earn wages its all from capital gains. They make themselves a corporate entity and suddenly they are no longer taxed that high

So wait, you're telling me when 50% of restaurants go bankrupt within 5 years, the employees end up making more than the business owner?
But he's a fat cat.

This kills the bernout
youtube.com/watch?v=99-Zryevepw

You realize the top 1% are a part of the top 10%, right?

bill gates, buffett and bezos' pockets

The same place aid for Israel, welfare for niggers and the military budget come from.

What is the purpose of stocks?
Why do businesses issue stocks?
Why do they buy them back?

Yes.
Bernie did an oopsie.

Yes. The US sent a few military advisors to help the GMD's against the japanese (and later the communist) before they dropped them in 1949. I'd suggest you read Forgotten Ally. It's an excellent book.

I don't know how I feel about the majority of these issues but I do think the minimum wage should be a living wage regardless of what job you do. I just can't be convinced otherwise, it all reads as business owners making excuses.

Then why use a pie chart?

Did you see how much of the budget is spent on foreign aid?
It's a rounding error.

Attached: Budget.png (1003x915, 146K)

Why are the Dems pushing so much left, there are so many salty trump supports that they could easily win with a more center candidate.

Fuck you it's a rounding error.

what is a living wage

every bernie fan should read this
ancreport.com/report/bernie-sanders-a-warmonger-and-economically-illiterate-2/

It's not a single pie chart.
If it was, it would be broken into different groups.
Instead it's breaking down the percentage paid by each group.
How else would I represent 97.1% of the tax being paid by the top 50%?
A bar graph?

That doesn't change the fact that over time it still results in more investment in business development and innovation, which increases labor demand and wages. Not to mention that it was the wealthy persons choice to take a risk on the investment in his business, whereas the workers had no risk/loss, only gains from the increase in labor demand.

If he made the initial investment and took the risk with his money, its his earnings. Even if he doesn't make money, the workers still get paid the first year and thereafter. It was never their money to begin with.

when's the Carmack eppy?

One bedroom apartment, food without subsidies and heating with the ability to travel for funerals. That is about it

The only salty Trump supporters are the ones that fell for the "Trump is the next Hitler" meme and are disappointed that he isn't, which is a very small group.

Enough to be able to support yourself and not have to work more than one job.

ok
Now what?

Attached: 1542152616694.png (1282x813, 1.92M)

>and it has to be in the heart of New York
Move somewhere cheaper.

How does price controls on labour make their work more valuable.
As in, if you put a for sale sign in your car saying "for sale, 1 million dollars", it doesn't mean you're a millionaire.
How does government saying that sweeping floors is worth 15$, make sweeping floors worth 15$?
How have those sweepers gotten more efficient in the past 30 years?

Attached: adam.jpg (648x278, 37K)

I can't think of a job that wouldn't pay for this

With how many room mates?

So the vast majority of people? Especially those who are smart enough to find housing outside of Manhattan?

Dems aren't going to pick a white male like Biden and Bernie had his chance in 2016. Democrats see Bernie as the reason Hilldog lost.

What would happen to the prices of apartments, if everyone in the city with a room mate, decided to get their own apartment instead?
What would happen with the supply and demand curve?
How high would you have to raise wages in order to support this?

Attached: chin.gif (200x293, 1.75M)

>How have those sweepers gotten more efficient in the past 30 years?
They became Mexican and are willing to do it for next to nothing to undercut Burger sweepers.

oh ok go ahead and make it ridiculous, that'll prove your point implying I said something like that. I couldn't even afford a shitty trailer at 600 a month when I was working 45 hours a week at McDonald's

None.
What is this New York meme? I'm not coming from a leftist position here, I just don't understand how gigantic companies that make billions of dollars and pay no taxes can justify paying their workforce so little.

No, he's legitimately a shitty president, I think you forgot that we got him elected as a joke, as a fuck you to the system. You aren't supposed to genuinely like him

Time to look for a roommate.

So then how do we raise wages?
Price control?
Or changing the supply and demand of low skill labour?

>Veteran's benefit
What exactly is this? Because it seems comically huge. It's bigger than education.

based bernie

You know about the heart beat rule right? you can't live 30 to a house it's illegal. What you think I'm greedy just because I think living in a shoe box indecently should be the minimum?
I bet you want retards to just take wellfare all their lives

Why?
At what point in human history, were the poorest working low skill jobs, able to afford single room apartments?
Unless you mean one without running water or electricity.

>he's legitimately a shitty president
not really
>as a fuck you to the system
Why wouldn't I genuinely like that?

They pay their worth. It's supply and demand. If you raise minimum wages, people stop getting paid altogether due a decrease in labor demand resulting in increased unemployment. And They're tax exempt investments are into the business itself, which can often result in increase labor demand (and subsequently higher wages).

>? Trump has charisma?

Holy hell I know it's hard to see him the same way his supporters do, but to be completely oblivious to his charisma? Are you serious?

Watch any of his rallies. It's an unscripted, two hour long stand-up and he has the crowd wrapped around his finger.

Attached: 8f04f55d6d1f3fb3e7bc59082c80c0315e7057f5f72b5a1603b91f94b126e075.jpg (2048x1152, 269K)

He won because those in power wanted him there. For all her faults, Hillary was going to shake things up too much for the establishment to allow her to take the wheel. Instead they installed a puppet they already conditioned Americans to like through reality tv.

As far as I understand it, there's various veteran's benefits.
So it includes Medical benefits, and Veteran's Affairs run hospitals.
There's educational benefits.
I know there's some benefits when it comes to veteran's and getting housing if they're homeless. But I don't know if that's federal, state or municipal

>Labor demand (and subsequently wages) increase when the wealthy retain enough earnings to invest in free market competition.
It doesn't work that way in a globalized economy. Capitalism is unable to deal with the wealthy betraying their own nation to invest in foreign markets.

he's pretty good at diplomacy too. he just goes full retard on twitter to bait the press.

>For all her faults, Hillary was going to shake things up too much for the establishment

Amazing

>imagine unironically typing this

this is bait, do not feed.

>these are democratic socialists
youtu.be/ryJteQTPBlU

Attached: D72DE0FB-42BF-4A13-AC75-ADFA3D0DBA2A.jpg (750x814, 88K)

>this entire post
What in the fuck?

Can you explain to me how this is betrayal?
Okay. Let me explain. Certain industries are labour intensive, and also low skill.
Others are high skill, and require a lot of existing infrastructure, be it education, knowledge, factories and so on to produce.
If we trade 1 computer chip, for 1000 t-shirts from Myanmar, both of us are getting ahead.
How is this a betrayal?

Attached: Comparative-advantage-even-allocation.png (384x341, 18K)

>he thinks Bernie is a globalist

literally wants to close the borders

retard

The richest rich are business owners
Business owners don’t show a profit on their income tax (at least most don’t because they choose to lie)

I don't understand this at all, she was secretary of state and a senator from New York. She was the establishment.

Okay.
So, why not increase the supply of housing?
youtube.com/watch?v=ExgxwKnH8y4&

This.

>they actually raise their hands and wiggle their wrists instead of clapping
Wish I could have seen what that beast on the mic at the end looked like.

Attached: 1540143544390.png (500x913, 470K)

And pay for the healthcare of illegals

Yea Forums
Television & Film

lol

Allow the wealthy enough earnings to increase labor demand through free market competition, restrict illegal immigration.
Who said anything about 30 ppl? Just get a residence with 1 or 2.
>shitty president
>economy is booming
>unemployment at an all time low
>libbys seething
Checked all my boxes.
Which is why I'm glad trump created tariffs to incentivize labor demand in the states.

Can I have a link to him saying what he wants to do about the border? I find it really hard to believe he would verbalize a similar endgame to Trump on the border.

>semi auto rifles
Great so now I am forced to use a bolt action rifle to hunt because we are now banning 90% of long rifles in America today?
Good thing a faggot who doesn’t go hunting gets to decide that I can’t fire two rounds without reloading in between as I have sat in a stand for 9 hours waiting for something

...

>quick witted
Lemme just scream catchphrases over this guy
I'm such a quick witted genius

>Who said anything about 30 ppl? Just get a residence with 1 or 2.

You can't have a white couple with a baby share the same room it's illegal. How can she work when she is pregnant? Poor whites that are too stupid for better jobs should lose out to smart but lazy blacks who get it for free?

Lol joe no one likes you

>people voted for this guy
lmao I knew he was a fucking hack

what a brainlet, socialists really don't know anything but LETS GIVE FREE STUFF AND IT'LL WORK

I'm glad this jew is getting BTFO

>I'm glad this jew is getting BTFO

snake with two heads, the rightwing jews are in israel

>"you'd be in jail"
Yes he's quick witted. Also, his catch phrases help in the debate because they're memorable. Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Creepy Joe, Pocahauntus. There's a method to his madness and he's well aware of how to market it.

Imagine calling trump more corrupt than hillary

Neither should get it for free. Also, the family can get roommates too.

I feel like OP said live when he meant to say "this was just uploaded, brand new".

When did norm “get in trouble”?

you don't have to be a trump fan to admit he's charismatic, denying so is just being deranged

How long should we wait for it to trickle down (increased demand and wages)? Balooning defecits and accumulations of wealth at the top are the result no matter how much you quote Sowell.

Intelligent enough to do a lot of jobs.

OY VEY! TAX THE RICH MORE AND YOU"LL LIVE IN LUXURY GOOD GOYS!

Trust me and my pals.

**hand rubbing intensifies**

>the family can get roommates too.

No they fucking can't retard, they actually enforce this shit when it comes to white people.

>Neither should get it for free.

You know they fucking will and yet you would like to see poor whites die off out of some misguided principle.Boomer cuck

>bro this is a bad look for you
>a bad look
You fucking faggots are so fucking obvious.

Yeah sorry that's the old Bernie and he disappeared sometime in late 2015
The new Bernie wants to abolish ice and give free health care to every Central American who shows up

To build a house from scratch costs about 240k.

Capitalism isn't a zero sum game, you're thinking of socialism. Everyone benefits through increased demand for labor, wage increases, and purchasing power. And at least I did quote an economist. You've provided nothing besides your own brain farts.

fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-poor-get-poorer-when-the-rich-get-richer/?utm_source=zapier&fbclid=IwAR2_g5dJ5JZvAN4wx-AGnWIDk1XzXC-WOwbaaEgGaiMnYFjQHcb3edoTTZU

As if that means anything, who are these people that you are supposed to look bad to? is this fucking high school? fucking faggots getting shamed out of having opinions that aren't mainstream

To be fair he said "assault weapons" he may just mean AR-15s when he says that. Maybe all rifles with scary plastic furniture to appease retards.

>Muh gdp!

Yes everyone benefits from emergency rooms full of people that never invested in the infrastructure

Why are they having children if they can't afford them? I know people who move in with their parents all the time in these situations, don't tell me it's not possible to split the cost of of living with someone else when it is. There's even entire programs set up to help single mothers with children find others to bunk up with.

You’re a faggot

>Capitalism isn't a zero sum game

This is the stupidest of the jewish talking points that people fall for.

>le creating wealth meme

Leopards dont change their spots

politico.com/story/2019/04/08/bernie-sanders-open-borders-1261392

April 2019.

Hi Jamie

>Why are they having children if they can't afford them?

So they don't get replaced by a demographic genocide you fucking libertarian faggot.
You would rather had everything away because of misplaced ideas about the past.
I would agree with you if there wasn't more at stake here

GDP per capita is literally the economic equivalent of standard of living, so yes that is the correct metric. It's the reason americas poor population makes more than the global median. Not sure why you brought up emergency rooms out of nowhere, but at least we have waiting rooms in our hospitals unlike socialist countries.

AhahahahahahahahaahHAHAHAhahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAhahahahahhAHHahahHAHHAHAhahahHAHAHAhahahahahaHAhAAHAH
(deep breath)
AJHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>GDP per capita is literally the economic equivalent of standard of living

Not when the PPP goes way down, GDP per capita is irrelevant when it amounts to arbitrary numbers

Okay.
How much did an iPhone cost 50 years ago?

I hope he does want to close the borders, but this just says that he doesn't support open borders.

If this is your best argument I have nothing to respond to. I've provided several articles on the topic throughout the thread, and this is the quality of response I get from Economic illiterates. There's a reason the wealthiest economies also have the wealthiest people.

I admire your idealism, but the economy would stagnate under your standards.

Attached: t_c76ce577f4ce1e127898a4b271cb2973-imagejpeg.jpg (200x143, 11K)

Yeah lets bankrupt the middle class sounds like a great plan

He literally edited the second Alex Jones episode you faggot.

How long did it take for smartphones to being something only the rich could afford, to everyone having one?

Capitalism increases PPP. The literal point is to provide the consumer with the best product at the lowest price. The only reason our PPP have gone up for lower and middle classes is because socialist programs cause inflation for services such as education, healthcare, and food stamps.

>I admire your idealism

Fuck your dead mother, you think the economy is gonna save you when you are old? Nursing homes are terrible even the ones for wealthy people.

No because they have higher taxes on everyone compared to the US, not just the rich.

How much of that is because of housing regulation

*gone down

Try reading something other than libertarian think tanks. Reagonomics, trickle down or supply side economics or whatever the fuck you would like to call it is a big meme.

Both parties are made better off through the process of Capitalism. That's the foundation of capitalism. When I get a cup of coffee, the cafe isn't being exploited, nor am I. That's why I say thank you, and the Barista says thank you. I want the coffee more than the change in my pocket, and the business would rather have the change in my pocket than the coffee in their pot. Voluntary transactions only happen when both parties are made better off.

No need to get catty. My children are going to take care of me when I get old because I made sure I had a decent wage before having them.

>bernie's gong to bankrupt the middle class by making billionaires pull their own weight
truly the peak of facts and logic right here

No, it's not.
What's the point of having a market economy, if not for having people make their own decisions on what they value, and want to spend their money on?
It's not as though giving your money to the poor through government makes it more efficient

Attached: economic freedom.jpg (627x479, 119K)

>My children are going to take care of me when I get old

Here is a reality check for you, 90% of the time the incontinence hits they chuck you in a nursing home. You want some person with racial animus to leave you in your own shit? or perhaps a nice white girl that cries when you die because you called her your daughters name all the time on accident?

If we were in a barter economy I would agree. But since modern economies use (((standard currencies))) it is absolutely zero-sum unless you print more money and inflate it.

it's because the wealth disparity has gotten completely out of whack, and we're not longer buying the best product at the lowest price (when those companies have lobbying groups making sure they get special welfare with public losses but privatized gains, and they can use paid off politicians to strong arm other people out of real competition).

We haven't had real capitalism in awhile. Not when they're buying their way to prevent a free market.

Like I said, trickle down is a pejorative for leftists who don't understand economics. And your lack of a rebuttal besides ad hominems have supported that.

i really wish it were possible to kill anyone that replies to more than 3 posts at a time.

>If government was everywhere and had full autonomy you'd have serious fucking problem
>It would be chaos you wouldn't be able to leave your house
>If there was as much government as people you wouldn't be able to even drive a car, they will tax you and fuck your arse
>If you don't think the government will steal babies and eat them you haven't been paying attention to china
>Crazy 800 pound communist government storming through the street
>Eastern European hackers that can type fast they're the ones going to survive

Attached: Screen_Shot_2019_08_07_at_11.48.34_AM.0.jpg (1200x800, 129K)

gene therapy will be cheap and affordable by then so I won't get old

How much more should they pay?
cato.org/publications/commentary/why-europe-axed-its-wealth-taxes
Why did a majority of countries with wealth taxes, repeal them?

These ancap guys are inverse commies, it's all fantasy and idealism.

Somebody has a case of the suppose ta's

Yes. Build your own road.

>Cato Institute

Attached: 1538879026494.jpg (1024x768, 100K)

A clever way to split "Military" to make it seem less comically gigantic even though it's still comically gigantic when you remove a giant piece of it and call it "Veterans' Benefits"

> giving your money to the poor through government makes it more efficient
the purpose of a government is to help and protect the people, not run as efficiently as possible. The most "efficient" thing to do would be kill the elderly, the disabled, repeat criminal offenders.

Would you consider that ethical? That is what the private sector does by running healthcare and prisons as businesses. It allows people to die for the sake of maximum profit and efficiency

Look.
I really don't think that it's that big of a problem
Inflation is what, 2%?
That means it's basically a 2% annual flat tax on liquid assets.
It's not great, it's not terrible

Attached: Chernobyl.jpg (1242x1102, 967K)

billionaires don't have that much monies

Imagine banking on meme science, star trek really ruined you dorks. The only thing they will do with gene editing is make more easily molested children for Neo Epstien City

What does the birth rate have anything to do with casual sex?

>Why did a majority of countries with wealth taxes, repeal them?
because their governments were corrupted by the rich. Did you not notice the Yellow Vest protest? It was because the government decided to cancel their wealth tax and corporate regulation and replace it with high gas taxes that effected working people

If they're going to leave you in your own shit anyways then what's your point? Why are you so upset? Is it because socialism has historically resulted in stagnant or declining economies? Is it because central planning and price controls like you mentioned always result in resource scarcity and inflation? Where on the doll did the supply side economist touch you user?

Prices are always getting cheaper what are you talking about? Unless it's tied to a socialist program that causes inflation through. I'm not for lobbyism or cronyism anymore than you are. But the fact of the matter is that the wealthy drive the economy. You can have an economy full of workers and salary caps - that's called communism. And it played out reeeeaaaallll well in the past let me tell you.

Lol all commies read is just propaganda and if the understood economics the wouldn't be commies.

Let's look at the numbers
If we kept public goods, things like roads, and cut all the redistributionary programs, food stamps, unemployment, social security, I would be fine with the compromise.

Lol libertarians hate Reaganomics which is just Keynesian

I'm not impressed by banging fat feminists. I am impressed when someone mans up and has a family.

companies and billionaires are literally keeping billions away from being taxed through legal loopholes, that politicians don't actually want to close and have them pay their fair share.

Fucking Activision Blizzard has billions that are avoiding taxes. The problem isn't that the rich isn't being taxed enough, it's that they are bypassing shit.

Sure. I agree. The job of the government is to protect people. That's why there's the police, military. And why they both operate through the courts. Because the state has a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence.
I don't think it's the job of a department with tanks or APCs to distribute food stamps.
It just doesn't make sense to me
It has no relation to their job of protection

Attached: adam smith.jpg (460x288, 151K)

You dumb fuck, you are never going to get your libertarian Utopia. They will always vote for more gibbs. Why not give it to young white people to maybe crank out some kids before we get swallowed in the detritus from the third world?

it protects them from poverty, which is a death sentence in modern capitalism

I'm the dumb fuck? You have the Economic understanding of a lunch box and you live in world of idealistic fairy tales.

They were corrupted by the rich?
In the 1920s, the tax rate on the highest incomes was reduced from 73 percent to 24 percent– and the income tax revenue rose substantially — especially tax revenues received from people in the highest income brackets.

Was this corruption by the rich?

In terms of words on paper, the official tax rate was cut from 73 percent to 24 percent. But in terms of events in the real world, the tax rate actually paid — on staggering sums of money previously hidden in tax shelters — rose from zero percent to 24 percent. This produced huge increases in tax revenues received from high-income people, both absolutely and as a percentage of all income taxes collected. That is because 24 percent of something is larger than 73% of nothing.

But none of these facts has made the slightest difference to those who continue to call tax rate reductions “tax cuts for the rich,” even when high-income people end up paying more tax revenue than before. The very possibility that tax rates and tax revenues can move in opposite directions has seldom been mentioned in the media — a crucial error of omission.

What is your goal?
Is it to punish the rich? Or to fund your pet programs?

Attached: Sowell.jpg (600x500, 97K)

The wealthy drive the economy, and only the wealthy see any benefits of it nowadays. Again, because they line the pockets of our government and preventing what should naturally happen.

Free market isn't going to work when it's stacked in the favor of companies who don't want to play by the rules.

fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-poor-get-poorer-when-the-rich-get-richer/?utm_source=zapier&fbclid=IwAR2_g5dJ5JZvAN4wx-AGnWIDk1XzXC-WOwbaaEgGaiMnYFjQHcb3edoTTZU

>fee.org
user...

Based Sowell. The eternal kryptonite of the everyday socialist.

Not if you look at the effects of the programs.
youtube.com/watch?v=lm-FqtAOSB8
Those programs have resulted in the destruction of black families entirely
The legacy of 30 years of welfare programs has been worse than 100 years after the end of slavery

Attached: thomas sowell.jpg (998x730, 65K)

FEE is a right wing think thank just saying bruh

How's that for a NO u! Yes go on continue importing millions of ignorant savages just to bring down the price of avocados below 50 cents. T shirts really cost 80 dollars when they were made in the US in the seventies didn't they? Cars cost a hundred thousand because obviously Americans get paid too much right?
Fucking insane boomer lies you've been fed

Reality has a right wing bias

Attached: poverty.jpg (1200x800, 123K)

Poverty is literally the opposite of a death sentence in "modern capitalism." If you go to California all you need is a tent and you can set up anywhere you like. They'll even give you a free phone.

You're way better off being poor now than poor 50 years ago in whatever commie shithole you think America should model itself after.

who the fuck are this boomers

>just cut taxes bro and the rich will pay for it instead of using tax havens

Attached: 1538441264054.jpg (450x600, 48K)

I thought we were having a serious conversation, too

All of those things would be more expensive (or unavailable) in a socialist economy.

Ah yes, attack the author instead of the argument. I'm a socialist now, your work here is done.

>Reality is whatever aligns with my political views

Attached: 1563045084910.gif (314x314, 319K)

sure, let me just go link move.org or whatever other clinton think tank and pretend it's worthwhile

>dude the bigger picture!
worse than commies

They're more likely to use tax havens when you increase taxes.

yes 1920s america is famous for its responsible fiscal policy and its very generous rich people lmao you fucking goober

they're more likely to use tax havens when you make it legal and have no consequences
they will always use it while it's available, increase or decrease. which is why simply increasing it is retarded. gotta actually make them pay their fair share to begin with, not just increase a number that they'll bypass anyway.

>dude let me just lie for shits and giggles

I'm not advocating for a socialist economy you pig headed neo-con slut.

I'd be surprised if they even had any credible economic literature. Here's a simple explanation even you can follow. If you allow the wealthy to retain their earnings, they are more likely to invest in companies than without it because there's less risk. When you invest in a business you drive up the demand of labor. When the demand of any service goes up, so the does price value (wages). This is what economists call the Law of Demand. You seem like a smart lad, I'll let you figure out the rest.

> If you go to California all you need is a tent and you can set up anywhere you like
I mean that's been true for basically all of human history (assuming you could get along with the native americans there pre-1700s)

All Bernie is really going to do is a NSH ripoff and maybe raise the minimum wage. Everything else will remain as it is. If the deep state is blocking Trump wait until Bernie gets in the white house.

Yes. It was
fee.org/articles/the-depression-youve-never-heard-of-1920-1921/
Limited government and stability was able to stop depressions from getting worse.
newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409
FDR's big government policies extended the great depression

youtube.com/watch?v=wj2cD8Q5hS8
Clash For Clunkers destroyed old cars and gave out tax rebates for new cars, it was a retread on the FDR plan of taking fields full of grain and razing them to the ground to prop up the grain industry.
wnd.com/2009/12/119168/
I saw the electronic vehicles that were glorified golf carts, that broke down within months, and cost $6500, but because the subsidies and costs lined up they were "free". Only problem being, the $6500 had to come from somewhere, and it turned out to be from the tax payer.
web.archive.org/web/20180914015026/https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-obama-recovery-took-so-long-1536619545
The great recession was in part as bad as it was, because bureaucrats and central planners tried to "fix" the economy by fiat, and the American people suffered. The Great recession only got that title, and not something like "The 1973–74 stock market crash", because it had the worst recovery since the great depression, because central planning does not work.

Attached: constitution.jpg (940x540, 132K)

What's their fair share? Don't they already pay the majority?

Educate yourself.
hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/Sowell_TrickleDown_FINAL.pdf

I don't think you even know what you're advocating for because you have no knowledge on the subject.

>could get along with the native americans there pre-1700s

implying that you wouldn't need to gib dat boi pussi up on the reg to chief running-faggot

why rely on all these complicated theories about wealth transfer over an unclear amount of time against a million other market factors that effect investment, when you could transfer wealth directly through the government? Stop pretending the market is an efficient way to help the poor, when altruism is fundamentally opposed to the goals of capitalism

That doesn't work when the demand of service is being replaced with automation or outsourced overseas, and when Indians are being brought in with H1-B visas (again, due to lining the pockets of politicians and making it easier for the companies, and worse for the middle class and below).
I thought you were a smart lad until you started linking a shit site, so I'll leave this here for everyone else who might actually be smart.

Congrats. You just explained trickle down economics!

>fee.org
kek

You couldn't use a 20 dollar bill to consume enough calories to last a winter in those days.

Are you complaining about those right wingers at UCLA, talking about FDR extending the great depression too?

America got saved by WW2, with everyone other place getting crushed economically, and America still being completely intact.

>you have no knowledge on the subject.

You equate knowledge with agreement owing to your massive ego. Minimal concessions to increase white birth rates are anathema to the boomer

Which is why I would support tariffs to drive up demand in the states.

It's always less efficient through the government, and it causes inflation by creating hot pockets of short run demand. Here's some food for thought.

sys.4channel.org/derefer?url=https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-that-the-poor-get-poorer-when-the-rich-get-richer/?utm_source=zapier&fbclid=IwAR2_g5dJ5JZvAN4wx-AGnWIDk1XzXC-WOwbaaEgGaiMnYFjQHcb3edoTTZU

dilate

I equate it to you offering nothing but a depressing cry for national socialism.

No. You're missing the point.
Let me put it another way.
Why didn't a socialist country make the iPhone?
Why didn't a socialist country make Microsoft?
Why didn't a socialist country make Amazon?
>Jeff Bezos creates company, starts by selling books out of his garage, he's raised by a single Mom, puts out a service people use and allows hundreds of thousands if not millions of people to have jobs that wouldn't otherwise exist
>People like it, it becomes popular
>Goes public, groups like Pensions, banks, private citizens, all want a piece of Amazon, there's a limited supply of stocks so they drive up the price and let all kinds of people get a little piece of something they consider to have a big future.
>Since Bezos owned the company he created, his shares are valuable and he is the richest man on Earth
The previous richest man, Bill Gates, only reached that point by making billions more in value. Through standardizing operating systems globally, he allowed Japanese developers to sell software to Americans, for Germans to collaborate with Italy and South Korea, and this standardization allowed many businesses to become more productive, and survive where they otherwise would have died.

How many things that have shaped the modern world have come from Europe?
Computers have increased my quality of life, and the standardization of a quality operating system through Windows has increased it. Didn't come out of Europe.
Having a smartphone in my pocket, and being able to instantly access any form of media, information, or tutorial on how to do something in my pocket. What national government made that? None, it was American free enterprise, same with the website hosting all the tutorials and media.
How about the entire classification of Unicorn companies, startups that are shaping the world we live in, by turning resources people had like cars and houses into something they can make money with, The Ubers and Airbnbs of the world. How many of those came out of Europe?
One, Spotify.
Seems like all the quality of life increases are coming out of the united states, with a less redistributionist policy. And that will result in more innovation, because if you tax something less, people do more of it. And if you tax people less for providing goods and services, they will provide more goods and services.

See
Trickle down is a pejorative for the economically illiterate.

It's always all or nothing with you ideologues isn't it. As if the country should be in service to capitalism not the other way round. Or by some super natural force the free market won't be subverted because.... But yeah go ahead and die on your hill and act like the gilded age would have benefited you personally

I shouldn't brag about this, but I'm single handedly fending off an army of economically illiterate socialists in this thread who have offered nothing of substance besides hunches that get btfo in the next reply. Might print it out and hang it up on my fridge. My thumbs are getting tired lol.

>It's always less efficient through the government
the point is to run the country ethically and represent people's interest, not the most efficient. I have already said this and you agreed you are going in circles because you can't admit you're wrong and/or because you're lonely and your only human contact is shilling on off-topic threads

Thanks for playing user. You gave it your best I can tell.

>the point is to run the country ethically and represent people's interest, not the most efficient. I have already said this and you agreed
You might be talking about a different person. I have no problem with limited government intervention. But too much of it results in central planning and price controls, which inevitabley result in stagnant or declining economies - which spells trouble for everyone.

What's your story pal? another "I've got mine so fuck everyone else"? don't you care what happens to the country after you are gone? you know the thing you care about only white people care about.

To be honest I'm just having a bit of fun talking shit and practicing my arguments for a free market economy. Can't take this place to seriously user.

you didnt make a point, you just ignored what i said because of the words i used, ((((supply side economics)))) is nonsense and you are a stupid douche

It's not the job of the government to run the country. It's the job of the people.
The job of government is to set and enforce the rules
Governments suck at innovating and providing goods and services. When's the last time you saw innovation come from the DMV?
Compare the level of quality of Uber and taxis, the government enforced monopoly. Compare government run auto companies from the Soviet Union, and their products vs private companies.
Private charities run better too.