Is it the best film of the 60's?
Is it the best film of the 60's?
It's either that or 8½ or Lawrence of Arabia.
God no. Leave it to Kubrick to make a film so devoid of life and feeling that the most sympathetic character is a fucking computer.
That was the intent you fucking mongoloid
no, because kubrick was a fat hack that ripped off foreign films
40s: Citizen Kane
50s: Vertigo
60s: 2001: A Space Odyssey
70s: The Godfather
80s: Raging Bull
90s: Pulp Fiction
00s: In the Mood for Love
10s: The Tree of Life
There is way too much kino from that decade to pick a single best one.
Was failing to tell a coherent story and using images to try and transcend his vague, inconsistent ideas also his intent?
just kill yourself you fucking underage cück
What was incoherent about the story?
Yeah, the 2010's film should be Avengers: Endgame.
lemme correct you
40's: it's a wonderful life
50's; Ikiru or rear window
60's; still 2001
70's:Clockwork Orange
80's: Das boot
90's: The Thin Red Line
00's American psycho, the assassination of jesse james and TWBB
10's: The Tree of life (stayed the same)
40s: The Third Man
50s: The Bridge on the River Kwai
60s: La Dolce Vita
70s: Chinatown
80s: Blade Runner
90s: Pulp Fiction
00s: No Country for Old Men
10s: The Tree of Life
Watch the film jackass
It’s like a kid playing around with expensive toys without realizing what he was actually gonna do with them.
We go from planet of the apes to le ambiguous monolith to HAL
"everything i dont like is onions"
its sequel is better in every way
zoomers should stay the fuck away from Yea Forums
>using images
it's a film you fucking retard
2001 is a shitty ripoff of a better film
It’s definitely the most influential movie of the 60s. Best? Not for me. That honor is reserved for Psycho (1960) or They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? (1969)
Art for art’s sake is heretical. A useless film is not good because it has pretty images you absolute child.
Based
40's: Double Indemnity
50's; Rear Window
60's; The Graduate
70's: Chinatown
80's: Raiders of the Lost Ark
90's: LA Confidential
00's Children of Men
10's: Blade Runner 2049
>Art for art's sake is heretical
Good thing Kubrick used his images to portray a spiritual experience then, while you sit on your ass whining about it on Yea Forums
>b-but there's not an obvious story so that means it doesn't have a meaning
You're an idiot
Loved that movie as a kid
>spiritual experience
no it doesn't, it's about evolution of mankind and the tools mankind has created
rewatch the last 20 minutes of the film
>Art for art’s sake is heretical.
kys
Art's only purpose is beauty.
art's purpose is to create reactions
These movies are all good, but this list is so typical. Why even share your opinion if it's just the safest, most obvious critic-approved choices?