Scenes women will never understand

Scenes women will never understand.

Attached: giphy.gif (245x275, 1.94M)

HOWEVER only a woman could write the plot behind the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1548969682286.jpg (1616x2896, 548K)

women understand every millisecond of harry potter

Girls love Harry Potter, they've seen the entire film series several times. They understand the magic school drama, nothing JK Rowling wrote is going to be deeper than it's face value.

based

Attached: sneed quixote.png (400x302, 36K)

Attached: asfa1.jpg (1000x562, 57K)

Umm, like... just don't do it, honey?

JK Rowling actually said in interviews that she didn't understand why Draco and Snape were popular characters, proving OP right and proving women to be shit at creating meaningful art

Harry Potter is insanely easy to understand, that's why at least 3 or 4 of their movies appear in several women's Top 10 movies.

Attached: 1496594221473.png (257x250, 127K)

>a whiny envious little faggot and literal incel cuck are popular characters
Yea Forums's self-inserts

Seethe more hunny xx

>"I have to say the N word!"

WOMEN BAD
MEN GOOD

Only an effeminate brained 90s born queer would even consume this series in the first place though

I liked Mad Eye Moody because he was the only wizard who didn't seem to be a total faggot. So of course he was an impostor, then he was dead. And Dumbledore turned out to be a lying old queen who used to date Hitler. By the end of the series you're hoping Voldemort wins because everyone else is terrible.

Draco and Snape were popular with girls though

Shut your mouth zoomzoom. Back in the day you couldn't not see Harry Potter. It was part of the culture.

you're trying to hard to fit in, chum. Try something less newfaggy like calling everything you don't like 'reddit'

What's wrong 90s born queers? Did mommy and daddy not give you real literature to read?

Attached: 1384969232721.jpg (737x642, 227K)

They did actually. They gave us Harry Potter :3

while you were reading harry potter, i studied the western canon

>HOWEVER only a woman could write the plot behind the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy farmer and his pals from the feed store as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the backswoods imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make gummy bears unmagical, to make farms seem unplantable.
>Perhaps the die was cast when Groening vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Sneed series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>>a-at least the books were good though
>"No!"
>The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a farmer for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
>I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Groening's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Sneed's feed and seed by the same Stephen Chuck. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are going to Sneed's at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to Stephen Chuck's." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you go to "Sneed's feed and seed" you are, in fact, trained to go to Chuck's suck and fuck.

sorry kiddo, but I started with the greeks

Attached: 2Patrician4u.jpg (2592x1453, 840K)

>all this entry level psuedointellectual toilet paper
fucking kek

DEH!

Attached: 1522060352974.jpg (852x356, 39K)

a daring synthesis
10/10

Why does he look so old?

>not using the Clifford for President image
Step your fucking game up. Checked though.

I do that and I lose the newfags who think its sincere

>actually reading "on sparta"
wasted your time bro

Trying too hard here lad

britbong genes

Why do Yea Forumsfags only read Greek Lit 101 books?

>Everyone taking the bait in this thread

>implying Rowling actually wrote the books

They were film treatments that got turned into books to gauge their popularity, the cunt was just a cover story.

The Greeks started and ended literature. Everything else is just a shallow imitation.

This.

Not gonna lie, it was a total fucking waste of time. There are far better books out there

imagine being this much of a pleb where you think the entire collective lexicon of human literature, started and stopped 3 thousand years ago..

It is a Yea Forums meme, relax.

damn thats embarassing

>3 thousand years ago
It stopped ~7 thousand years ago sonny.

Attached: hermes.jpg (500x709, 152K)