What's the point of space movies when realistically we will never make it to other worlds

What's the point of anything really?

Attached: pia17046red-full.jpg (1280x720, 737K)

>planes, therefore all my autistic Sci fi dreams will become reality eventually
Imagine being this stupid

What's the point of you watching porn, if you're never going to have sex?

There are many space films that are limited to our solar system.
There are many space films that deal with the problem of space travel.
You could put space movies into two categories: one that takes faster than light speed travel as a premise and the other that limits space travel to current state of physics.

That's pretty good. It's only been 40 years and it's half way to Alpha century already.

Bzzzzt wrong. Look again. It scales up in multiples of 10. It still has many thousands of years to go.

lol

>when people who try to act smart turn out to be dumb

teleportation is the only feasible means of long distant space travel or any colonization of any kind.

with space travel you have to move things through space. with teleportation that problem is solved.

We could make it to other planets using only the technology we have now. Generation ships could easily take us to habitable planets. It's just people who have the resources and can sell it to the public are busy selling fake futures on mars.

Space is fucking boring, just a couple of rocks floating around and eternal emptiness. No idea why would anyone waste their time wanting to go there.

There are also space movies that are uncertain about the subject, for example Alien. They fly for long time, many month supposedly, as they have to go into stasis. Yet they reach stars hundreds of light years away. So some form of faster than light travel has to exist, but it is never mentioned.

the scale is logarithmic

How do you know it's just that, retard? Have you been there? You could stumble upon other civilization satellites that are undetectable in open space, even fucking spaceships, radio signals, etc.
You could even find holes in the simulation, God, cosmic monsters, you name it.

Life shouldn't be a boring "everything is just what human science tell us lol". Just because some books say space is empty do you think it is? Keep buying jewish "science" retarded NIGGER MOTHERFUCKER

category one:
Aniara
2001
Outland
The Expanse
All the Mars mission flicks
Event Horizon
Wandering Earth

category two:
Dark Star
Star Trek
Star Wars
Dune

For my own curiosity I have expanded the list. Looks quite even:

category one:
Aniara
2001
Outland
The Expanse
All the Mars mission flicks
Event Horizon
Wandering Earth
Interstellar
Serenity
Gravity
Pandorum (?)

category two:
Dark Star
Star Trek
Star Wars
Dune
Fifth Element
Starship Troopers
Superman
Pitch Black
Alien
Predator
Hitchhikers Guide to Galaxy

Yeah but what's the point once we are there?

>we will never
Nearly everyone who ever said this ended up looking like a 'tard

Attached: pleb.png (398x307, 189K)

No, there are things that are simply impossible due to laws of physics

good bait

>impossible
There you go again

>everything is possible
Deluded or retarded?

The survival of the species. To expand the human empire. Exploration of the unknown.

There is absolutely nothing physcally impossible about travelling 4 light years.

Also anyone who claims that all we know now is all there is to know is the fucking retard.

Those guys on other planets won't stay human for very long.

You sound exactly like the people he's talking about.
>lol because I'm not intelligent enough to fathom a way to accomplish interstellar travel then nobody is XD

What a strange question. Those movies, books, video games and others things are all the more important because of that fact. They make us see, imagine, feel and dream things that will never happen in our world.

But yes knowing that we will never be able to discover more than 0.00000000001% of the observable universe no matter how advanced our technology get because everything is moving away from us way faster than we will ever be able to travel wasn't a nice thing to learn for me.

Prove to me is possible I'll wait (:

Teleportation is not feasible in the slightest and never will be. Travelling on a toilet brush is more feasible

Chances are they would be closer to what we are now than the people left on earth.
Not really the point though is it? Continued evolution is expected, the ability to achieve that depends on survival. Exploration, especially flfinding and reaching habitable worlds greatly increases the odds.

It would take millions of years for them to become "not human".

>when realistically we will never make it to other worlds
But we've visited every planet in the solar system

Attached: mfw newton.jpg (232x270, 20K)

I mean technically only objects from our world have, not any intelligent life.

>everything is moving away from us way faster than we will ever be able to travel
Not true. At 1% C we could travel to all kinds of places, and while everything is "moving away" it's nowhere near that speed (though eventually it will be).

Why would you think that?

That's not how evolution works

Warp drives are not impossible according to what we know of physics, NASA is working on figuring out the energy requirements

An orion drive could get to alpha centauri in a human life time.
Light sails assisted with MASERS can get even faster.
Its not a problem of technology, its a problem of money, resources, and a reason.

We still find new things on our own planet, how could you hope to see everything about another planet we haven't visited

>What are wormholes

They would look fucked up pretty quickly yeah, what with their spines/support organs adapting to the different gravity, but to be considered not human they would have to be unable to reproduce with us, and that would take a very, very long time.

We've been to the moon.
We're going back.
Mars Direct should have happened in the 10's.
Elongated Muskrat and Bezos both own private rocket companies with stated long term goals of extra terrestrial human colonization.

There are 6 trillion miles in a light-year (approximately), so the distance we need to go is 6 trillion miles / light-year times 4 light-years, or 24 trillion miles. So, this trip would take 1.2 billion hours. There are 24 hours a day and 365.25 days per year, so this time in years is 137 thousand years.

Attached: 1446920710658.jpg (549x549, 62K)

>Wuz

>So, this trip would take 1.2 billion hours
based on?

>so this time in years is 137 thousand years.
In who's frame of reference?

Attached: einstein.jpg (1200x675, 83K)

>just wait till we invent Sci fi shit bro trust me it's possible
Made me laugh

Gen ships

You are talking about random beneficial mutations in an isolated group. See Galapagos islands as an example how fast it can happen.

u die to radiation way before that

The fastest rockets move at about 20,000 mph. Suppose we launch one at 20,000 miles per hour toward Alpha Centauri. How long would it take to get there?

>I know more about space than NASA
Ok bro

>not travelling via wormhole

cmon now

Attached: wormhole.jpg (1280x720, 296K)

Well he's basing it on a ship going 20,000km/h, time dilation wouldn't have much of an effect at such a low speed.

How would having mankind on two different planets work?

Like, if gravity bends time and whatever would that mean that in 10 earth years we’d still be 10 years ahead in technology than 10 years prior but the people on the other planet might have had 200 years to progress

And if signals were ever made strong enough what would happen if you had “fast”communication between them? It hurts my head to think of it

lol you retard

>Keyboard rocket scientists

You're talking about intrasolar rockets

You don't need sci fi shit, bro.
If you can accelerate to relativistic velocities with existent technology.
Average distance between stars in the milky way is 5ly. That's not an unbridgeable gulf, there's just no driving economic or social reasons to sink the resources of the planet into getting to another star when there's still a metric fuckton of resources to exploit right here in the solar system.

Attached: 2001 space odyssey.webm (852x480, 2.26M)

Thinking the math of a rolling egomaniac provides a clear picture of reality is stupid.

it only takes one incel born in the ship to ruin the entire operation and blow up the entire ship

>incel
>generation ship
cmon now

What has nasa achieved in the last 20 years other than announcing water on Mars like 5 times and cry for gibs?

Selling very popular pullovers sweety

Nonsense. It would be similar although much larger to an aircraft carrier. Ideally it would be like multiple cities connected.

Okay, so you're just an argumentative retard.
If you're using an orion drive your weight-to-thrust ratio is fucking huge. You could have lead lined water tanks protecting the entire habitable section of your ship and barely notice the increase in weight.

Space Science is the religion of redditors

Putting men on Mars will be a tragic waste. Be it Muskrat or NASA. Far better goals exist in space for man.

That's like saying trans oceanic travel is impossible because it takes a long time to do in a row boat.

Not to mention we've already had spacecraft go close to 10 times the speed he based his shitty math on. And that spacecraft wasn't even trying to go fast.

We're talking about time dilation brainlet. Me and probably the guy I replied to, based on him using einsteins picture, consider travelling to other stars a viability.

It's moving the ball forward. I agree that trying to get stuck in another gravity well is a mistake, there are things you've got to figure out for a manned trip to mars that will be vital in figuring out how to keep people alive indefinitely in space.
The biggest problem you've actually got now is
>You don't know how people hold up How to make a perpetual life-support system with as few moving parts and fail points as possible.

No it isn't. It's a horribly hostile environment. We could do a manned trip for distance and return to earth without ever setting foot on Mars and learn the things you are talking about. Mars is the pipe dream of morons. We already are on a planet. Leaving and returning we have covered already.

>teleportation is the only feasible means of long distant space travel or any colonization of any kind.

If you want the ability to teleport to a distant spot, you will still have to have a teleportation device brought to that spot.

Life support would be a literal garden in a bottle combined with mechanical methods.
The gravity issue has been addressed. Its space. Orientation and rotation is not an issue.

I know nobody is this stupid. But its a log scale retard.

Attached: 1563320350887.jpg (632x604, 137K)

I agree you're probably going to get the most out of an organic system, but just look at biosphere II. It's not as easy as just putting a bunch of plants in a greenhouse.

Attached: biodome.jpg (426x607, 81K)

why not just teleport a device to the spot you want to teleport to?

just travel really fast bro

it took 200 years for Americans to become "not human"

Singularly it would be a disaster. Instead you would have several filtered fully independent systems. From the aquatics with fish to plants, waste and drinking water. Keeping multiple independent systems ensures that if one were to fail it could be restarted fresh in a short time period. As well as being able to isolate and remove the offending issues or correct the behavior that causes the failure.
It's all really simple in theory at this point.

Redundancy is key.

whats the point of life when you just fucking die at some point

>Event Horizon
wrong category