QOTD:
> What's the ideal length of a film?
Remember the following:
>NO BULLYING
>POST YOUR DAMN PROFILE
>patricians occasionally read these generals and have posted here before.
>patricians may pretend to be normal users asking for your top kinos and when you post them, they ban you for being an embryo
Other urls found in this thread:
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
boxd.it
letterboxd.com
news.letterboxd.com
strawpoll.me
youtube.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
youtube.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
twitter.com
3h 10m
I say no more than 20 minutes. Sometimes I fastforward if movie is too long
Or take lots of breaks when I watch
1 h 50 min
based
> > What's the ideal length of a film?
90-110 minutes, generally. With longer than that I'm always wondering why am I watching it instead of spending time with book. Film is 'lmao just turn off your brain' medium for me, last resort to pass time.
the real smooth here
follow me at letterboxd.com/smoothhands
tonight im watching avengers
POGCHAMP
POKIHYPE
>QOTD:
>> What's the ideal length of a film?
Either 90 minutes or below.
Or, over 3 hours.
Anything in between you're just wasting your time.
>What's the ideal length of a film?
However long it takes to tell the story it needs to tell.
letterboxd.com
-No profile pic b/c I'm not tying this shit to any form of social media, especially ones I don't have.
-Favorite movies are the definitive 10/10s. Only picked those two because I can't decide what else to put up there that would misrepresent me. These two movies are at the opposite ends of my taste in film, really.
-Liked movies are any one that I can just watch on repeat with no change in my level of enjoyment, with a couple exceptions for movies that are a 9 or higher.
-I log, I don't star. And only movies I've watched/rewatched after joining the site.
-The two lists I made, the 4 lists I liked, and the 1 review I liked are for clerical purposes.
-My watch history is not full, owing to a faulty memory. The Mask is my most recently added because I thought I'd already put it on there when I logged every movie I owned, but apparently I've misplaced my copy sometime in the past year when I moved.
>that would misrepresent me *by way of omission
Fuck.
Why do you watch so much garbage?
Hello. Why is letterboxd the superior option against imdb?
how do i know if its garbage unless i watch it
WEEKEND AT BERNIES!? CAMAN!
Trannies and Marxists.
Holy shit I'm not reading all that who fucking cares, I just want does your favourite films and how you rated my favourite films, shut up you fucking narcissist
Who is the plebbiest user in here besides trolls? I think I am. Least pleb would have to be S.
3 hours if it's a complex film. 90 minutes if it's a more straightforward one. If you've seen films like Cat People or I Walked With a Zombie, you see how you don't really need that much time if you have a very clear idea of what you're trying to do.
why does this film make trannies seethe ? why is there is an irrational amount of loathing in the popular reviews ?
13 minutes and 37 seconds
web design
sorting/filtering capabilities and UI. only downside is letterboxd doesn't have tv
>POST YOUR DAMN PROFILE
Can we post someone else's profile? XD
letterboxd.com
Follow the swain.
followed ;)
your mum
Griffithfag, griffithfag, lama sabachthani?
He fears the sneedposters.
Whoa, gigapatrician faves
boxd.it
I shuffle around my favorites a lot.
do you think this is a fun fact?
Back at it again
>Firstly: dangerous fascist and white supremacist ideologies can go to hell. We remove such content from our service regularly. We want to catch it all. We’ve changed our community policy as of today to reflect this, adding in an explicit line rejecting content that “expressly praises, supports, promotes or represents white nationalist ideology”.
Bye-bye facists!
Bunch of morons. I wonder whether they will remove those anti male and anti white posts that are all over their website.
Depends, but between 100-130 minutes I find to be the sweet spot. I forgot who said it, but somebody once said that no film needs to be longer than 2001, & I mostly agree with that.
what was the original review?
It was SilentDawn's review of INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS. This was all over twitter a couple days ago and was in the OP of this thread, too. Where were you?
do you know where to get a decent copy of stinsen brinner with english subtitles?
no, sorry
how did you watch it then?
Holy BASED!
I downloaded a shabby copy without subtitles
do you speak swedish?
yes
ahh i see, makes sense now. i might still watch it see what i can get out of it
2 hours and 5 minutes max
*posts five star reviews review of Triumph of the Will and Mel Gibson's filmography*
I'm thinking of subjecting myself to one of those avengers movies to experience what terrible plebeian cinema is truly like, what am I in for?
Your mom's dick.
you'd know
I thought he was smart but then I read some more of his reviews and I’m convinced he doesn’t understand Griffith at all. He calls Griffith a ‘pragmatist’, Griffith wasn’t a pragmatist he was a vaudeville fruitcake. Another review he calls Christianity a ‘scam’, what a joke that is, how can you be such a fan of Griffith but have nothing but contempt for the ideals that solely infuse Griffith’s pictures with its warmth and clarity? Griffithfag can only review pictures based on some sort of meta-narrative rivalry chip on his shoulder he has with contemporary cinephiles, he can’t conceive of an original thought, only reactions to a made up meta-narrative. It’s mentally ill. I come in with my Birth of a Nation examination and I flip the whole table over, no one brought it back to Star Wars and the contemporary meta-narrative of historical movements throughout time. Pragmatists be damned
love those paintings
Garish
who's the wagner of focus pulling?????????????
...
youtube.com
How do you think it stacks up to the Sandler version?
agree.
if you make and release a movie that’s like 2 hours or so then bro... your a punk ass buster
do you think is a fun fact?
Is there any way to replace the Recent Activities bar with Recent Likes in your profile?
It used to show the latter until a few weeks ago but it changed for some reason.
I think he's a hack but not a fraud
tl;dr
>that hashtag bottom right
Didn't know Italians were so cucked
But those 2 movies you liked are that long...
why are you talking street
I reject your hypotheses.
Of *any* film? This is a filmlet question, do you even view?
Most recent faves.
you can log the animated cum town youtube videos on letterboxd
the stand miniseries was better than the book
>Who’s ready for this to inexplicably become the highest rated film on LB? I know I’m not!
Only fans watch concert films. Hows that for an explication.
letterboxd.com
Do you guys like me
What does this mean?
Not enough films and simple reviews
wait and you'll find out, patiencelet
letterboxd.com
I review in German, so sorry.
very strange
very strange, also
I thought no one read reviews anyway
do you like found poetry?
youtube.com
I do
follow the vulva
DAMMMMMNNN
machill54 look like that?!?
Why do feminists call Jews "goblins"? I get hating him for the whole rape thing, but making fun of him for being Jewish is just in poor taste
>using “kino” in your reviews
Gonna be a “yikes” from me
its pronounced кинo
What, that was not a review that was just a clarification. Seriously, how the fuck do I delete ratings? There's a bunch of movies it just randomly registers as rated 5 stars despite me never ever logging them or visiting ther page or anything. I can't remember how I deleted some.
Wait, maybe it's some higher being telling me to watch these? Maybe they're kino that will guide me in my life... Hmm.
>how you rated my favourite films
I don't rate movies number-wise. I never saw the point of it.
In my opinion, the only viable method of ranking a movie is just that: literal ranking.
Dark City>True Stories>>>>>>>The Vast Majority of the Movies I've Watched>>>>> Literal Shit>Pauly Shore is Dead>13 Moons>The Breakfast Club
Fuck off if I say it's kino then it's kino.
Iam more partial to Κίνο myself
This post is smooth-approved
letterboxd.com
letterboxd.com
Say something nice.
Trips!
the Liberal selfhate is cringe.
letterboxd.com
i just want friends and recommendations :(
>power level showing site
Bitch i worked at blockbuster for 10 years. There isn't a server big enough to list all the movies i have seen.
>Female misogynist.
It literally isn't selfhate in any way; the hate is directed towards racists.
Convenient how that paper blocks the adam's apple he has.
Why would I go to Tumblr when I hate women?
Aw yeah. Going to ruin it by watching all the Jurassic Parks later.
>Why would I go to Tumblr when I hate women?
cringe
WARNING:
there is a smooth(im)poster ITT RN
I'm the real smoothhands. I guess I will have a trip to use in emergency from now on.
THIS IS NOT THE REAL SMOOTHHANDS IGNORE HIM
>The same small team that built the service also looks after the servers, does the PR
Who thought that was a good idea?
So much garbage.
think
They don't have any money, dude. Go Pro if you want to help them out.
Very good
Oh man I regret starting this, poor smoothhands... Who is even the real one anymore, how can I tell
pomo
smooth(im)posters
J'ACCUSE
?
Tl;dr Griffithfag actually plagiarized Roger Ebert in his latest review of BOAN
One of the better sports actualities I’ve seen, but still not spectacular.
what's nigmar
who cares, he's dead
The scholarly consensus is that it was the opposite.
Can't wait to revist the classics as SHINE A LIGHT and THE 50 YEAR ARGUMENT.
Some Charles Bronsan films are underrated, some other less so...
Also I like tough old men characters.
letterboxd.com
Galaxy brian.
*jacob
