I have to have a gun. It says so in the Constitution

>I have to have a gun. It says so in the Constitution.
>Dad, the 2nd Amendment is just a relic from revolutionary times. It has no meaning today (formerly had).
Was she right?

Attached: 1564663897571.jpg (640x480, 53K)

Here’s what I came up with:
>I have to have a fuck. It says so at Chuck’s.
>Dad, the Fuck and Suck is a relic from the formerly times. It’s Sneed’s today.

Not the best but keep in mind I had to be quick as I need to get to work

no

How about
>It's Sneed's today (formerly yesterday)
?

its all over for sneedshitters

Attached: 1564670471364.jpg (989x1495, 531K)

>I have to have an immigrant. It says so on the Statue of Liberty.
>Dad, the Statue of Liberty is just a relic from Reconstruction. It has no meaning today (formerly had).

Because the Founding Fathers never foresaw the advancement of technology. Nope. The musket is what they believed would be the peak of firearm technology for the rest of time.

based stealth sneed poster

The Snecond Amendment
Formerly First

Isn't the whole idea that you need guns to overthrow your government if they become tyrannical? Which is hilarious because some fat LARPer with his AutoRetard-69 would just immediately get smoked by a drone from outer space if that scenario happened today.

Because the FEEDING fathers never FORESEED ths advancement in TECHUCKLOGY

>But Mr Simpson, can you really put a price on your family's safety
>I wouldn't have thought so... And yet here we are

Don't ruin my happy memories tv, this was just before the side started!

honestly poor people shouldn't be allowed to have guns they are too dumb

regardless of the question of guns, making sacred some laws written 250 years ago is dumb

She was wrong.
The 2nd amedment adresses the right of every American to own a farm with proper pH soil.

Why? They ensure your god-given right to free speech and protection from a tyrannical government. Or would you rather live in a communist dictatorship where your "rights" and granted to you and taken away just as easily?

Most gun violence are committed by spics and niggers. So no. Protecting myself from spics and niggers is more relevant than ever.

Dead meme

Attached: moe.jpg (262x234, 14K)

Attached: 1517395286645.jpg (960x702, 92K)

They describe your natural rights, like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, etc. They're your rights that the government can't take and is supposed to protect. If one isn't sacred, none of them are and you have nothing.

>Formerly alive

Sneed

Lisa sucks the fun out of everything slif she wasn’t in the Simpsons the quality would immediately improve 900%

yet for 100 years slavery coexisted with these same laws, interesting...

>god given right to free speech
>criticise god go to hell
Interesting hypothesis

And slavery was abolished. You're welcome.

The Statue of Liberty one wasn’t even the S word meme you fuck.

Citation needed.

Why is that interesting? Slaves weren't citizens.

Gun ownership is compensation for having a small dick!!!FACT!!!

>honestly niggers and white trash shouldn't be allowed to have guns they are too dumb

FTFY!!!FACT!!!

how about this
>SNEED XD XD SO FUNNAY (FORMERLY MILDLY AMUSING

seriously fuck off sneed faggots

No, it's chronologically snobbery, there's nothing to the argument other than 'new thing better than old thing'

I got a gun for ya right here!
*BANG*

Attached: sneed shot mr burns.png (640x480, 254K)

Yes. The constitution allowed for niggers and spics to ruin this great country, other awful things like the 19th have no place in a civilized nation.

Do laws become less valid as they age?

Vietnam

We'll see how much those drone operators are willing to keep doing their job icing their fellow countrymen when them and their families keep getting murdered to/fro their way to work. Or how well the American public will keep supporting the government when it's leveling city blocks with Hellfires just to kill 2 a few alleged rebels.

t. Chuck

Technically the Constitution had to be amended to let them ruin the country

thank god that's over now and your people and your constitution will wither and die

the puckle gun existed back then

>he insists as the US is 18 years into a war in Afghanistan with no end in sight

>Citation needed.
Citation sneeded.

sure I can imagine a situation where a law is appropriate for one time and situation but not another. I might also argue that the laws were as far from perfect then as they are now.

Woah, you mean choices have consequences?

S

No replace that with freedom of speech and it falls apart.

...

>I'm ignorant of history, so let me make sweeping statements
Brainlet

Attached: 1550201192850.png (726x548, 661K)

Couldn't detect the sarcasm? That's okay, brainlet.

Hearts and minds, wars aren't won with bodycount anymore. See Bundy Ranch for a modern example.

>Because the Founding Fathers never foresaw the advancement of technology. Nope. The quill pen is what they believed would be the peak of writing technology for the rest of time.

>1st amendment is limited to the quill pen and regular talking

Attached: 1553153188311.jpg (652x786, 72K)

Who are you sneeding?

The whole idea is that the founders didn't want the US to have a standing army, so they specifically allow for the creation of well-regulated militias.

Yeah man who needs rights and shit lol, the constitution is just a piece of paper