Basically nothing happens

The most gorgeous looking movie I've seen in a while. That 60s neon was beautiful

It's basically just a late 60s nostalgia trip. So many shots of Brad driving around while 60s music and radio jingles play. It's great for fans of that era.

Stick to capeshit

>>basically nothing happens
And why is that a bad thing?

This movie is easily a Tarantino novel he adapted into film. It's such an Elmore Leonard kind of movie it's intoxicating.

I don't watch capeshit, cope harder fag

It's Jackie Brown style meandering bullshit with an Inglorious Basterds revisionist action ending to make you forget how fucking shit the rest of the movie was!!!FACT!!!

>meandering

Confirmed to have never read a novel!!!!! Think about it, dude. You haven't read a fucking book since elementary school so you think the movie meanders. You're so used to the by the numbers of film making. Sucks for you, doo.

legit feel bad for anyone who's too dumb/ignorant/miserable to enjoy this kino

what does the "nothing happens" meme actually mean?
of course a ton of shit happens, even unusual, crazy shit, what was supposed to happen instead?

Tarantino is a retard who watch David Lynch movies and didn't understand what was going on, he thinks it's just a random day in the life of people and then there's some mindless violence and sex and you got a movie.

they're ADHD zoomers whose movie depth consists of nothing but capeshit, john wick, game of thrones, and whatever garbage on netflix. so this is a shock to their system.

t. brainlet
or
t. never saw the movie

I didn't see this one but that's how all his movies are. he doesn't understand what Lynch does but tried to emulate him.

you're literally the only retard on the planet who's ever been brain damaged enough to say Tarantino tries to be David Lynch

My only complaint is how much feet was in this movie. Not that i dont like feet, but everytime there was one it took me out of the movie because i would think "damn Quentin"

what exactly was good about it?

if they can't quote ostentatious dialogue or talk about how awesome a fight / sex / drug scene was, then "literally nothing happened." it's sad, really

I'm brain damaged because I see things you can't

>t. ADHD addled zoomer

I'm a 30 y/o little boomer and not an american (argie). I had no idea who the fuck was Sharon Tate and no idea about her murder. So to me, the movie also felt like "nothing happened, lol"
However, my mom knew about Tate and the manson family. To her, the movie was really something special.

that's ok. some movies aren't for everyone. some people don't understand this though.

>some bitch died
wow great awesome deep movie if only other people could understand it

1/4

In 1969 Los Angeles, aging actor Rick Dalton, former star of a 1950s Western television series Bounty Law, laments to his best friend and stunt double Cliff Booth that his career is over. Booth, a war veteran who lives in a trailer with his pit bull Brandy, drives Dalton around town and relies on him for work due to rumors that Booth killed his wife. Meanwhile, actress Sharon Tate and her husband Roman Polanski have moved into the house next door to Dalton's. Dalton dreams of befriending the couple In order to restore his status. Later that night Tate and others attend a party at the Playboy Mansion.

Tarantino isn't inspired by David Lynch. I doubt he's even watched a Lynch film in his life.

Nothing against you, but someone like you would write a review and say how bad the movie is without knowing about Manson. Or how boring and annoying it was when they kept mentioning Sergio Corbucci.

2/4

Booth fixes Dalton's TV antenna and reminisces on a sparring match he had on the set of The Green Hornet with Bruce Lee (though it is unclear if the event actually happened). Charles Manson stops by Polanski and Tate's house looking for record producer Terry Melcher, who used to live there, but is turned away by Tate's friend Jay Sebring. Booth later picks up a young hitchhiker in Dalton's car, dropping her off at Spahn Movie Ranch. She tries to persuade him to stay, but Booth is suspicious of the large number of hippies squatting on the property, worrying that owner George Spahn (Booth's former employer) is being taken advantage of. He insists on checking on Spahn despite Lynette Fromme's objections; Spahn dismisses Booth's fears. Returning to his car, Booth discovers that Steve Grogan has slashed his front tire; Booth brutally beats Grogan and forces him to change the tire. One of the women goes to fetch Tex Watson, but Booth is already driving away by the time Watson arrives. Tate goes for a walk and decides to go to the theater to watch herself in The Wrecking Crew.

Ugh you're still here?

3/4

Meanwhile, Dalton lands the role of a villain in a new series called Lancer. He strikes up a conversation with his young co-star Trudi, a method actress. During the scene, he struggles with his lines due to his alcoholism and later has an emotional breakdown in his trailer. He returns and gives a powerful performance that impresses the director and Trudi, bolstering his confidence. After watching Dalton's performance as a guest star on an episode of The F.B.I., casting agent Marvin Schwarzs offers Dalton the opportunity to shoot a Spaghetti Western in Rome. Dalton, who considers Spaghetti Westerns to be the bottom of the entertainment totem pole, reluctantly agrees, bringing Booth with him for the six-month stint in Rome, where Dalton films several movies and gets married.

The whole movie is wrapped In the sequence which starts with the juxtaposition of Margot Robbie (playing Sharon Tate) watching the actual Sharon Tate on screen in the movie theater. The film is basically about subjectivity, objectivity and the oddness of a creation of a fantasy. Cliff Booth lives in reality, he coasts on it, he rides the waves and nothing can topple him over. Cliff is the loyal supporting squire to Rick Dalton, the famous wealthy knight (or prince). Dalton’s subjective reality is breaking in around him from the objective force of the world. Rick sits in his pool and talks to his tape recorder, he talks to a creation of himself. The film is another loose King Arthurian retelling much like Pulp Fiction was, cowboy stories are already repackaged knights and wizards fantasy tales, so this movie has three layers to comb through. Charles Manson’s family is basically just goblins or mountain bandits that want to destroy Tolkienesq society because they are objectively evil. Every ‘wound’ is the force of the objective world intruding onto your subjective physical body, the gratuitous shots of the hippies ‘wounds’ at the end are clear signs that their subjective creations break way to Cliffs objective force because Cliff submits himself to the objective current of the world unwaveringly, allowing him to actually hold real weight and power in the realm where humans subjective realities co-mingle and clash. The film is actually suprisingly optimistic and I would even say a work of genius, it’s his best film since Pulp Fiction.

4/4

Upon returning to Los Angeles, Dalton informs Booth he can no longer afford his services, and they agree to go their separate ways. They go out for one last drink and return to Dalton's home, where Booth smokes an acid-laced cigarette and takes Brandy for a walk. Meanwhile, Tex Watson, Susan Atkins, Linda Kasabian, and Patricia Krenwinkel arrive in preparation to murder everyone in Tate's house. Dalton hears the car outside and comes out, ordering them to leave. They initially drive off, but then Atkins hatches a plan to return and kill Dalton. A nervous Kasabian deserts the group as the remaining three proceed with their plan. Upon entering the house, Watson encounters Booth, who recognizes the trio from Spahn Ranch, making them nervous. In the ensuing fight, Booth and Brandy manage to kill Krenwinkel and Watson and severely injure Atkins, who stumbles outside into the pool. This alarms Dalton, who had been floating there listening to music, oblivious to the commotion inside. Dalton climbs out of the pool and retrieves a flamethrower he'd kept from a previous film shoot and burns Atkins to death. Booth is taken to the hospital for his non-fatal injuries, as Dalton strikes up a conversation with Jay Sebring next door, who invites Dalton up to Tate's house for drinks.

Okay, how about a real criticism?
The entire last hour is completely bizzare and out of place. If anyone but Tarantino directed that ending, no one would be okay with that much over the top violence and the revisionist history. But he gets a pass because the violence is just expected at this point and Bastards gives him a precedent to change history (which was a predictable ending). A more restrained Jackie Brown approach would have jived much better, especially since the subject matter of the Manson murders is taken with gravitas (the depition of Sharon Tate et al, not the Mansons themselves reduced to the three stooges).
The film should have been just about Dalton and Cliff and a slice of life in 1960s Hollywood. The oustanding deption of period Los Angeles and those two characters are by far the strongest parts of the movie. Everything related to the Mansons could have been just cut and the film would be much stronger and still even feature length, lol.

>Inglorious Bastards
>Django Unchained
>Once upon a Time
Why do people eat up these movies when its literally just "lets flip the script and glory kill bad people from past injustices"
Like sure its cool and all, but why do people suck his dick over this simple trope? Oh, a jew that kills nazis, oooh a slave that kills slavers, ooh an actor that kills Manson lackeys.

Its enjoyable but not some masterpiece of film

That's because people on this board don't actually care about movies. Editing was great, as was the cinematography. I'm actually really happy it wasn't filled with long ass QT bullshit dialogue. I've seen it twice, it does drag a little the second time around, but everything in there works, and the payoff is worth it. I fucking loved it, don't care if others don't. Best QT movie for me since Basterds

What does it say about me that the only time I felt happy the bad guys were getting killed where when it was the Manson family getting their asses beat to death?

It says you've spent too much time on /pol/

The scene where Bruce Lee and Cliff Booth ‘duel’ is perhaps one of the clearest indications that the film is supposed to be viewed as a King Arthurian legend retelling fantasy, if you couldn’t pick up on that, I’m sorry but you’re just not visually literate.

what happens

>rick dalton is hitting a slump in his career
>goes to Rome and makes spaghetti westerns
>sharon tate spends the whole movie watching a movie
>cliff booth is ricks driver because of too many DUIs plus hes kind of his all round handyman for him
>Charles Manson lackeys goes to kill rick dalton
>cliff and a pit bull beat the everloving fuck out of them
>fin
I just watched it yesterday and thats really all I have off the top of my head
Nothing happens for most of the movie

Besides the two scenes where brad pitt brutalizes people this movie was so fucking terrible

Let me rephrase by saying it’s a satire of the effort of retelling a parody of creating a King Aruthian legend retelling fantasy. Tarantino exhibits some excellent cinematic juxtapositions to show this, it seriously is a work of genius, and I usually hate Quentin’s films.

>haha lets have a stereotypical zany tough little girl character (slice of life amirite?)
B A S E D
A
S
E
D
Waifu posters BTFO

filtered

I knew there was a reason Cliffs dog was a Pitbull

Attached: breedofpeace.png (603x800, 301K)

post the webm

>if you couldn’t pick up on that, I’m sorry but you’re just not visually literate.

Attached: Hmmmm.jpg (330x321, 70K)

>Tarantino isn't inspired by David Lynch. I doubt he's even watched a Lynch film in his life.
Watch Lynch movies from the 80s, Blue Velvet and Wild at Heart. You'll understand what influenced tarantino.

Because Americans have a boner for violence as divine retribution (cowboys vs indians) but they can't indulge in it because the global market and PC culture but deep down they still want their glorified violence for the sake of violence and applying extreme violence against a guy that really, really deserved it mean a divine retribution, not that you're enjoying the act of violence itself, wink wink. I don't think Quentin is doing a social commentary about violence on cereal boxes but it's just that he can't get hard without filming graphic murder scenes

Violence as divine retribution is fine in my book. What I dislike si mindless violence. Tarnatino is into that

If you think ‘nothing happens’ in this movie you cannot ‘read’ or perhaps even watch films in general, and likely you might be be experiencing some sort of cognitive decline. Cinematic image juxtaposition you cannot pick up on, like a five year old confused by an adults conversation because he doesn’t understand all the words

In theory, Tarantino's violence is divine retribution. It's western logic, a bad guy does something bad and he's punished for it. I know you guys don't see slavery or the holocaust as bad things but they are presented as terrible things in the movie context (inb4 /pol/, the holocaust was real in Inglorious Bastard so fuck off).

Burgers are still puritans at their core

Wrong. Try again!
I wrote and you come off as retardetly arrogant. Theres interesting subtext in the movie sure, but my problems are with the script

Is it the new Inherent Vice? Pic unrelated

Attached: 1553737211407.gif (400x224, 3.14M)

I'm no burger and I didn't watchin inglorious jews. But I have seen Pulp Fiction and it's full of mindless violence. I've watched The Hateful Eight , same thing. The whole movie shows that woman treated like shit because she is supposed to be a criminal yet we never know what she actually did and it seemed like just an excuse to torture throughout the film. Very strange. That didn't feel like retribution at all because we didn't see her do anything wrong

The third time you see it, is the best.

Attached: PicsArt_03-18-12.33.17.jpg (1516x1080, 198K)

The sheer amount of asshurt this is creating helped me decide to go see this.

It’s not about subtext and the film is nowhere close to being a ‘slice of life’. Tarantino completely rejects realism in the film and completely rejects a realistic approach. If anything he is directly trying to create a hyper-real (“symbolic”) psudo-fantasy (rescinded by the ironic and parodical elements) super-structure. You’re concerned about the ‘script’ which is irrelevant when you’re dealing with a King Arthurian fantasy tale, and of course every fantasy is always symbolic, which is what the film is truly trying to commentate about, the existence of fantasy in general

this is a terrible take

>It's a metaphor that you don't understand, get it?

>muh story
>muh plot

biggest plebs

Holy shit. I didn't think about it, but your post makes so much sense! What a great observation, user. Unironically

I actually walked out. And I love tarentino. I just got bored of DiCapprio crying in every scene. And I didn’t care if Brad Pitt killed his wife or not.

What do you think is ‘realistic’ about this film? If it’s main aim is being a ‘slice of life’ it would be a necessity for it to be realistic. Well, why isn’t it realistic? It’s not directly metaphorical or symbolic in the sense of solving a puzzle or clue, it’s a direct cinematic image juxtaposition, the comparison between images that a person should be able to easily see at once. Sadly most people can’t because they haven’t developed their senses, or they watch films with the artistic aims of the written word in mind, instead of being aware of cinemas own unique abilities.

What is worse? Contrarians or dumbasses who think a movie has substance when there is nothing there

By far his best movie, the most mature, accomplished and complex. Only attention span deficient brainlets can think "nothing happens".

>muh characters
>muh dialouge
>muh pacing
>muh story
>muh plot
>muh cinematography
>muh ost
>muh themes
>muh acting
>muh editing
>muh directing
>muh sound design

Look I can do that too you fucking moron

>tough little girl character
>feet
>cheeky nods to pedophilia without actually addressing the topic
>forced fight scenes
>the most gratuitous and tasteless violent scene he's ever produced (save the flamethrower, that was actually pretty good)
>mature and complex

wow you sure BTFOd me

Great subjective opinions, faggot

Is there any explanation why the 8 yo girl was a beter conversationalist than 95% of grown adults? It reminded me of older films where kids speak like little adults.
Real 8 year olds can barley stay on a topic for more than a minute or two

You're too cumbrained to understand this movie.

> It reminded me of older films where kids speak like little adults.
That was the point user

Same as pulp fiction.

Just because you learned what a slice of life film is in the last year, that doesn't justify a boring, meaningless piece of shit.

just finished watching. it was terrible. thank god i didn't spend any money on this

(And that may be a good thing)

Zoomers get bored if there isn’t a line of dialogue spoken for more than 30 seconds. It explains why movies recently fill every available moment with talking.

It takes me out of the movie also. And it was CONSTANTLY in this movie.

You were doing fine until the "sadly" part, it undermines anything you said and will say after as you then imply superiority which is very unlikely.

Attached: deal.gif (307x233, 3.34M)

Sorry you didn’t get an Ang Lee jerking off in your face for 2 hours.

>edit scene together
>put 60s song over it
WOW GENIUS EDITING SKILLS

Well then wouldn't it be more fitting to have Cliff beat up the Mansons with old timey WHAP sound effects and old school stunt falls? Where does the line between nostalgic references and Tarantino's own pornographic style end?
Hateful Eight suffered from the same problem with its unneccessary over the top violence. It's like his direction sometimes has two modes.

No, to me the movie was really good, but there's a difference between a person who knows who Sharon Tale was and a person who doesn't know about her history (and lived in that time). You approach the movie differently.I enjoyed the movie but my mother enjoyed it a lot more

889955

Attached: 1541800216742.jpg (656x466, 99K)

>Brad Pitt puts a beer can in his holster
>entire theater erupts in laughter
this is the type of people this movie was made for.

i watched the camrip and the american audience all clap
why do they do this?

The theater I go to is mostly black people and they don't clap. All American too, must be a demographic thing.

Yeah and it was great. Would see it again

did you get your free BTC?

this. I love the setting and time. it was bliss just getting wrapped up in the world.

no. it's a trendy character archetype that's supposed to be funny. It's a cheap gag.

>subjective opinions
1) are you dumb
2) the only subjective thing was the gratuitousness of the last fight scene
3) your post was more subjective
4) are you dumb

skinny effeminate liberal men love projecting their repressed masculinity onto Brad Pitt. QT knows this and feeds into it, so bravo to him I guess

In that its an effective pleb filter and normie deterrent? Yes.

no one will ever answer you. The only positive thing I've ever seen anyone say about it is that it was comfy. Everything else is just people insulting people who didn't like it.
It's a surefire sign of shit taste

I liked that one scene where Sharon Tate is watching her own movie. She was really cute.

They didn't even do justice to Sharon Tate or Sergio. Sergio's dialogue was whatever and Tate just ditzzed around for 25 minutes, and of course QT had to throw in her feet. You don't get points for just including a character - how you portray them is more important.

but Zoomers love Drive

>>I play Miss Carlson. The klutz.

Attached: 78bbb5ff526de742f5546e8165b941f6.jpg (500x660, 41K)

Attached: 1552331537543.gif (350x263, 1.48M)

It’s not a cheap gag. If you don’t understand her purpose in the movie then don’t even bother discussing it

it means you've achieved enlightenment

Man is famous for a quote about Lynch after Fire Walk With Me where he basically ragequits him and claims that he has "gone too far up his own ass"

When will double breasted overcoats make a comeback? They unironically only look good on old people and if you’re a young male wearing one you look like a tryhard

Cliff's character made me wonder if Brad ever fantasizes about murdering Angelina.

At least with Basterds and Django the stakes were higher. Once upon a time featured his autistic revisionist history shit but it felt so insignificant to anyone who didn't want to suck Hollywood elite cock

what? no they don't. zoomzooms watch 'Drive' thinking it's going to be some neon lights action flick synthwave bullshit and then go online to call it boring when they're disappointed.

Fuck is there seriously a little kid in this movie? Are we talking War of the Worlds or Logan? I might avoid it now.

It's top tier Tarankino. Up there with Jackie Brown and Pulp Fiction. It's so far above most of his recent outings like Death Proof, Basterds, and Django.

It's the most un-Tarantino movie which is probably why it's so good. It's his most fully realized film. I went in with tepid expectations at best and was pleasantly surprised.

Hopefully soon.

Attached: 5defbab716d71f5d34f0e8f41369c6fd.jpg (1240x1836, 268K)

she's in one scene and it's good

It’s not a ‘little kid’, it’s a young Jody Foster and there’s almost some weird pedophilic undertones between her and Leo’s character

Movies aren’t books and entertainment would die if they were structured the same way.

Oh okay that’s not too bad then. Thx for reply.

>muh lynch
>muh arthouse
>muh 3x3 visual showcase

Not even quips or punching.

The editing at the beginning was awful. Got better after they got through the intro cutaways

I agree, but I didn’t remember until you mentioned it

You sound like you have no friends

>almost
If you couldn't tell this is Tarantinos most self indulgent movie yet. He laid out in plain few what his fetishes are.
Feet, children, dirty smelly hippy girls, and domestic violence.

see

You sound like you have no sex

Could've been about 20 minutes shorter but still very much enjoyed it and I think it might be his best, but I'll have to give it time due to recency bias.

I liked the way it looked, first and foremost. The sets, the clothes, the lighting, the locations.

I actually liked the way it was paced. Only in a few parts did it 'drag' for me.

I loved the chemistry between Cliff and Rick and in general their whole buddy friendship. I could watch a series of movies about them and their adventures.

And following that, I loved Leo and Brad. And just about every other actor. I know people don't like how Robbie has far less lines than expected, but I dug it. She really sold Sharon Tate being a likable, innocent person without saying much. In an alternate version of this movie where she really does get killed like IRL, then it would be pretty devastating because Robbie and QT did such a good job making her lovable. IMO.

I loved the minor characters. Bruce Dern, Olyphant, the little girl, even the guy who played Bruce Lee. And as well, I loved that they portrayed Bruce Lee as he really was. People are upset about that but stay mad I guess. I liked that he was just an arrogant jerk off. That scene in general ruled.

I really dig the whole late 60s odyssey vibe it has going on. Some parts of it have this, I don't know how to put it, like an understated dream-like quality?

And of course, the must discussed ending. This was the most satisfying over-the-top Tarantino violence he's ever done imo. It was brutal and fun. As someone who generally dislikes hippies, I especially enjoyed it. Cliff and Rick's triumph was just very satisfying. And especially for Rick. QT actually had me have empathy for this kinda douchey, kinda jerkoff-ish, fading actor and his mid-life crisis. It's a poignant scene when Rick finally gets that kudos and acceptance he's been yearning for.

I could go on but I'm running out of characters so

Don't be a contrarian, even Armond White says it's Tarantino's best film yet.

oh?
Now you can explain why you don't like it. Which I'm sure you'll do. You definitely saw the movie and you definitely won't reply with some lazy snark and memes, right?

All you did was miss his point.

I hope this attempt at hippy revisionism sticks to make sure that people end the weird hippy romanticism for good.

I'll take that over the nigger Django genre garbage he's been doing lately any day.

Same. Most hippies in reality were just degenerate scumbags, worthless layabouts, or opportunists. Hypocrites hiding under the whole peace and love banner. A lot in common with the antifa of today, honestly.

Rick dies in the pool when his radio falls in. Everything after that is his near-death experience fantasy. Jay opening the gate to the Tate/Polanski house represents his going to heaven.

It's his least-pozzed movie in many years, maybe since Pulp Fiction? Very low on diversity bullshit. Only a few "PoC" in the background as extras. No gay bullshit. No yas kween bullshit.

I guess his whole "champion of slavery" phase was a mid life crisis that he finally got over.

Is also his funniest since Pulp Fiction

They didn't find the Infinity Stones!!!

Reservoir Dogs > Pulp Fiction > Kill Bill > Inglorious Basterds > Once Upon a Time in Hollywood > Jackie Brown > Hateful Eight > Django Unchained > Deathproof

Prove me wrong

Better than blatant BBC cuckoldry.

>watch the HD cam rip
>everyone laughs during bruce lee's noises

no wonder his daughter is pissed

>i didn't understand the film: the post
I am enraged my children have to share the world with vermin like you. Granted, the only role you'll ever play in their lives is parking their cars or pressing their dry-cleaning, but still.

Attached: 1537701045832.jpg (353x400, 20K)

whoa I just realized theres no black people in this movie and no samuel jackson

BASED QUENTIN

Or read DFW's essay on Lynch.

Could have been a really good short movie, maybe 35-45 mins long? If you cut all the scenes of Brad Pitt driving and Margot Robbie dancing by herself, that is probably the amount you're left with. I watched it on spankbang on 2x speed and it was still too long.

That wasn't the US. It was Canada.

Pulp Fiction > OUATIH > Jackie Brown > Reservoir Dogs > Hateful Eight > Kill Bill > Django > Death Proof > Basterds

IMO. Kind of unfair because OUATIH is so recent. Might feel differently about this a year from now. I watched Basterds for the first time since it came out recently and it fell off for me. Used to think it was great now I think it's just ok.

Nah there were black people dancing at the mansion

I didnt even notice them so its still an improvement for quentin.

Im sick of samuel jackson

Unironically kill yourself, sperg

I mean I think there were black people dancing at the mansion

Bravo you summarized these pseudo intellectual faggots on this shitholes well
>ITS BORING BECAUSE ITS SAMRT, JUST LIKE ME

Jackie Brown is his best fucking film (haven't seen OUATIH yet tho')

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PEOPLE CANNOT HAVE DIFFERENT TASTE THAN ME I AM GOD IF SOMEONE SAYS THEY LIKE SOMETHING I DONT THEY MUST BE LYING

Attached: 1552005257381.jpg (988x1059, 148K)

>being proud of having a double digit IQ

Django is the worst by far. All of the rest are at least decent. Django is just garbage.

Isnt it your bedtime?

my daddy never showed up, men are lame, nihilism waaaahhh. Nothing genius here chum, just a sad man in between feet to suck.

No one ever saved me and talking about it is futile even making this is silly, and no one will get it. Waaahhh

the hippes are a failed promise. He bites them.

Anger and the disappointment of birthing ideas and people is like an important thing to talk about bro.

Q has no dad bro. This whole board is about anger.

This is an optimistic film.

The entire Manson family is btfo at the end you zoomer. I'm sorry there weren't enough explosions for you to keep interested. Don't worry, there is a new F&F spin-off coming out soon!

I think it's one of the weaker ones, the candy land scenes redeem it though imo. Hateful 8 and Reservoir Dogs are the only ones I wouldn't mind not watching again.

well yeah he gets an invite up. Q is a rich director and sucks toes bro.

I was planning to, but now I will have to postpone because I don't want people to think that I did it because QT's 9th movie™ was too boring.

Don't you have a second shift, wagie?

No they arent you fucking retard.
Literally only 3 lackeys die.
Not even charles manson or the 20 other family members at the ranch

who's excited for the next movie?

Attached: tarantino new film.png (1090x678, 1.11M)

Autistic zoomers with ADHD hate it. It's just science; it's the ultimate pleb filter.

Contrarians I.E. zoomers

Imagine being such a boring generation that the only way you can think of having an interesting personality is by being contrarian to everything. It's truly autistic and pathetic.

>save the flamethrower, that was pretty good
You've literally been filtered™, holy shit.

QT is taking the piss so fucking hard, he has a television say "Now what you've all been waiting for" followed by one of the most violent scenes he's ever made. If you can't even realize that, you're braindead and filtered™.

Attached: kek.jpg (680x695, 39K)

I actually like that they didnt kill the old ranch man and she actually did fuck his brains out earlier

>a slice of life movie

Attached: 1554759710275.png (894x773, 48K)

>b..but it was boring on purpose! It was all a ruse to filter the plebs!

Based

>haha lets watch margot robbie do literally nothing for 25 minutes
id pay good money for this

Was it kino?

Attached: cera-una-volta-a-hollywood-foto-locandine-del-film-di-quentin-tarantino-1-3.jpg (620x921, 144K)

I think you may be retarded

Lmfao tarantinocels have been in full damage control mode this movie is ass

Spahn was a real guy and he was actually blind and the Manson girls really did have sex with him in exchange for letting them live there.

I didn't think it was boring. Legs cramped though. Huge footspace problem in regal theaters. Should have standing/stretches sections in the back.

Explain why it's ass. (you won't)

As much as I enjoy Marvel movies I fear it is creating a generation of idiots who don’t realize film can also be there to make you feel something.

>I loved that they portrayed Bruce Lee as he really was
It did the exact opposite, retard

Aside from how they portrayed Bruce Lee as an arrogant asshole, I thought the movie was great. Bruce was anything BUT a blowhard, so I don't understand why they chose to portray him as one.

Attached: bruce-lee-1.jpg (618x410, 41K)

I’m not a fan of Tarantino for the most part .. but this movie was fantastic ..captured the feel of the 60s .. and great performances by Pitt and di Caprio ..most important for me though is that it’s easily the most comfy feeling movie I’ve watched in years .. optimistic ..funny and a happy ending ...

>loved that they portrayed Bruce Lee as he really was. People are upset about that but stay mad I guess. I liked that he was just an arrogant jerk off. That scene in general ruled.

Nigga, Bruce Lee was the complete opposite to how he was portrayed in this movie.
variety.com/2019/film/features/bruce-lee-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-dan-inosanto-1203287237/

>muh homage to Hollywood

Inherent Vice was better

Feelings are for women and cucks obviously. Real men only care about action, lensflare and muder, I mean facts.

The depiction of Bruce lee was hilarious .. the guy was a stunt man with pretentious of being a guru..
“I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times.”
What kind of person talks like this ?
His quotes are mostly incredibly cringeworthy

To give us a glimpse at how tough Cliff was and that’s all.

Only Japan can make sol movies. This is meandering garbage

Kind of a cheap way to do it if you ask me.

Where do you think you are right now?

>Bruce Lee on the set of The Green Hornet
>looks like Bruce Lee from Enter the Dragon
Tarantino is a fucking hack

I laughed out loud when it paused at the stunt and the text pointed at "Cliff".

lucky bastard

Bruce Lee was a fraud and couldn't actually fight, rube.

He managed to make one of the most interesting events in Hollywood history boring

This. Disney and Netflix are consuming the industry. This is one of the last big-budget major 'film' films that are going to be released, especially one that doesn't push some sort of pozzed agenda. A whole generation of movie goers are going to have Disney expectations for every movie made. Sad.

DUDE I GET IT BECAUSE IT PANDERS TO MY BOOMER DAD, I AM ALSO AN ADULT GUYS BY WATCHING 3 HOURS OF "slice of life (lookitup)" HOLY SHIT I FUCKING LOVE NIGBULLS NOW FUCK YES SHARON TATE KEEP DOING NOTHING WOW BRAD PITT IS JUST LIKE ME WTF THAT VIOLENCE AT THE END WAS THE CHERRY ON TOP

Attached: 1564608304971.png (454x520, 11K)

Wrong. You've been misled. You think pro wrestling is real too?

Why are you so upset and bothered that people like a movie?

FUCKING HELL WHERE ARE THE EXPLOSIONS AND LOUD NOISES CAN'T ANYONE EVEN FLY IN THIS MOVIE HEY JEFF IS TWEETING AT ME LOL I WISH I WERE AT HOME WATCHING ANNABELLE NOW THAT IS SOME SICK KINO BRUH REMEMBER THAT TIME THERE WAS A LOUD CRASH AND A SKELETON POP OUT JESUS CHRIST THAT'S SCARY I HAD NO IDEA IT WAS COMING BECAUSE I WAS ON MY PHONE

Attached: 1564345684846.png (1268x670, 84K)

What he actually did was manage to not glorify real life murderers for once by showing their biggest achievement.

Imagine being the person that typed this out

Am I the only one that thought Leo had some really funny moments? I thought he was great.

I agree that nothing much happens of interest in the film. With that said, I did enjoy it for the atmosphere and feeling.

The only complaint I have (and I know I am not alone in this) is that the Bruce Lee scene took me out of the movie. Everything up to and after it was believable and kept me immersed, but that scene had me doing a double take.

Even though it sounded like Bruce Lee, it didn't act or behave like Bruce Lee as I had seen him in documentaries or described by people who knew him.

Also, the notion that a stuntman with no combat training would be able to take on Bruce Lee in real life was utterly ridiculous.

>Yea Forums gobbles up mediocre scifi crap like Alita
>hates Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
What the fuck is up with this board's taste

Attached: Aunt-Linda-SNL-cringe-worthy-career-mistakes.jpg (300x400, 26K)

>night of two guys one cup

tarantino is a talentless hack, what's new ?

This is the best Tarantino movie. I cant stop thinking about it, it's the ultimate feel good summer movie.

Is this your first day?

>make shitty movie about nothing
>include controversial scene with icon Bruce Lee to generate buzz and interest to sell your shitty movie

Attached: 1564370901879.gif (331x197, 1.91M)

HOLY SHIT BRAHS ITS A SELF REFLECTIVE SLICE OF HOLLYWOOD IN 1969 BUT DUDE, DUDE! IT ALSO FEATURES THE MANSON CULT, BUT THEY GET VIOLENTLY BTFO'D AT THE END! HOLY FUCK I LITERALLY JUMPED UP AND CHEERED WHEN LEO PULLED OUT THE FLAMETHROWER TARAN-FUCKING-KINO IS BACK BUT THEN AGAIN HE NEVER REALLY LEFT US

Attached: 1564174370449.jpg (232x217, 7K)

I actually only watched the movie because of bruce lee, and unfortunately it was underwhelming.

I needed at least 10 more minutes

this board boggles my mind because of how inconsistent everyone's views are. You complain about this shit yet someone like Lynch can include a long take of someone sweeping a floor and you'll all call it kino. wtf

Fuck you, compared to that borefest which was " Inglorious Bastards " this film was a masterpiece.

>why isn't Yea Forums one person?

How many hypotheses did you reject today, Yea Forums?

Attached: tarantino.png (348x310, 182K)

>watched Basterds for the first time since it came out recently and it fell off for me.
You're not alone. Attempted to give it a second watch recently, good lord were those 2 of the most boring hours I've seen. That pretentious jew bitch didnt feel like a victim at all, youd think someone who's hiding from nazis would be more humble but she was the complete opposite, she had this "my farts dont smell" look throughout every scene she encountered members of the reich. Hell, h8ful eight was more entertaining and believable than that crap. I'd rather watch Death Proof with it's atrocious and pointless dialogue twice in one day than watch Tarantinos self version of world war 2 again. At least stuntman Mike was amusing.

>I didn't watch the movie and don't know who the most important members of the Manson family were
OK, zoomer. You sound upset.

How old are you?

>imagine being /pol/ with an unhealthy dose of face blindness and anti-Semitism to the point where you can't register the difference between rage and "smugness"

Yeah. The first half seemed to meander aimlessly for a while but the second half is as good as anything Tarantino's done.

>charles manson wasnt the most important

LOL

I said some of the most, the main figureheads of the family were brutally killed at the end.

A ton of shit happens towards the end, but a majority of the movie doesn't have direction. Rick's story is basic but is frequently interrupted by Cliff's non-story that is occasionally interrupted by the even-more-pointless Margot scenes. Only about midway does Cliff's story start mattering and Margot's never matters. She's just there for foot shots.

>b-but the murders!

You shouldn't need meta knowledge to support your plot. Margot's scenes add nothing at all.

Yeah you also said the entire family was brutally killed at the end of the movie just 4 posts ago.

Because this is an alternate universe of our own. Remember that this clearly takes place within the Tarantinoverse, which is solidified by Sharon Tate still living. So Bruce Lee being a slightly different version of himself isn't too far of a stretch.
Hell, in this universe Hitler was killed by an American hit squad before the end of the war.

>if you dislike this movie you must be /pol/
rent free

Would you have taken good care of her, Yea Forums?

Attached: image_url=https___peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com_2019_07_julia.jpg (683x1025, 90K)

Of course pumpkin puss. Just wondering does anyone have any idea if her character is actually based off of anybody?

It’s Jody Foster. You see her name on the back of the chair she’s sitting on but only briefly

So did he "like" the 60s or what?

Wow this is an excellent take, you might be the only one in this thread that truly understands the film. I remember thinking while watching it that it was clearly an Arthurian mytho-poetic legend, can’t believe more people aren’t picking up on that

The more I think about this movie the more I feel like the meta knowledge was absolutely essential to appreciating the plot.

It's pretty unfortunate that I went into it with absolutely no idea what it was about. I started to pick up on what was going on once they portrayed Sharon Tate as being pregnant, though. Even then, the way things played out left me feeling pretty cheated and baffled. Don't get me wrong; watching those hippies get fucking rekt was unbelievably satisfying. But the fact that it played out so obviously and simplistically was the last nail in OUTIH's coffin.

At least Cliff was super based. He was sort of like a jollier Brock Samson.

Attached: 1_TkTsO0lA6WhCZZVJmpUF7A-1210x642.png (1210x642, 624K)

Killing the Manson fucks was nice addition

This.

Are any of those fuckers still alive? If so I hope they get to see this scene before they croak.

>mfw I couldn't make out the cursive on the back of the chairs

Attached: download.jpg (250x202, 7K)

Tex Watson still is.

Her character's name is Trudi Fraser, but it's supposed to be Jodie Foster.

Lol Zoomers aren't taking Tarantino well. Go suck on your Marvel tits.

If they had cut 40 min from this movie it would be Tarantino's best.

ok Andy Warhol

Attached: costanza.jpg (600x600, 35K)

This, desu. The movie was really poorly paced and that detracted far too much from it.

>Nobody will ever mention how fucking GOOD the god damn editing was.
le LETS KILL THE BAD GUYS LMAO! ending?
that's your idea of good you fucking retard?

>LE NAZIS BAD KILL ALL NAZIS
>LE MANSONITES BAD KILL ALL MANSONITES

Half the film is 60s commercials and vapid pop culture callbacks. Shut the fuck up

I felt the complete opposite, I could have watched another 20 minutes and still loved it. I didn't feel the length at all, the pacing was really great.
>Le Nazis and masonites dindo nuffin
Fuck off.

One of his best. One of the best big pleb filters I've seen in a while if threads like this and the liberal reaction is anything to go by.

Jackie Brown/Inglourious Basterds is unironically how I describe this movie. And its kino

The first half was a major slog, it really picked up once Rick started owning his villain character.

Cinematic image juxtapositions you cannot pick up on, like a 5 year old confused by an adults conversation because he can’t understand all the words. Just face it, you’re not visually literate and you cannot ‘read’ films

The scene where the hippie girls flip off Cliff and yell at him walking off the ranch before he BTFOs that guy who popped his tire was pure kino. I also like how the nazi flamethrower scene in the beginning was so campy and over the top, seeming like just a charming humorous cutaway, but the flamethrower was brought back at the end, the only other part of the movie so bombastic, hitting much harder as the chaos was actually happening between the characters. It perfectly foreshadowed the drastic change of tone in the final scene. Other than that the movie was okay I guess.

(You)

i am truly enjoying how hard this movie is making people seethe in both sides of the spectrum. these threads are hilariously entertaining anons, keep it up

alotta shit happened:

>stoopid braindead goyim paid $17.50 to watch nothing happen for 2 hours 40 mins
>the only "payoff" is 5 minutes of tarantino cartoonish violence at the end
>you got to watch two millionaires pretend to be down-on-their luck
>you got to watch a slutty australian woman saunter around but you don't get to see her naked again
>you will never be brad pitt or leo
>you will never fuck a hot blonde like margot

they are just fucking with you at this point. next time stay home and watch free tube sites if you want to see hot girls. or go pay a whore and get laid in real life. there's absolutely no substance in movies anymore. kino is going extinct. you can still find it but it's rare.

Attached: 1558412526262.png (600x580, 360K)

thank you for your shekels

Film is the medium of the comparing of images to encapsulate an inner exoteric effort intuition of the truth. You most likely have poor pattern recognition abilities. You have trouble watching a succession of images and linking them together (‘reading’ ‘between the lines’)

Mfw this movie kills the zoomer

((((((((You))))))))

YOu

Attached: daviewants2.jpg (300x381, 17K)

The payoff is the cinematic image juxtapositions that show an intrinsic exoteric effort to encapsulate the whole of the ultra-subjective Truth (upper case T). You have low IQ and poor pattern recognition abilities, which is also why you’re poor and angry, like a dumb angry monkey.

>Confirmed to have never read a novel!!!!! Think about it, dude. You haven't read a fucking book since elementary school so you think the movie meanders. You're so used to the by the numbers of film making. Sucks for you, doo.

Novels aren't the same as movies shithead but both need to have a sense of pacing or they look the audience. This movie was about Tarantula wallowing in 60's cinema nostalgia and he had NOTHING to say!!!FACT!!!

>Ugh you're still here?

Fuck off back to Trouble City with the rest of the pedos!!!FACT!!!

>they look the audience.

they LOSE the audience!!!FACT!!!

>pacing was really great

I have a hard time accepting that you actually believe this.

Christ, this fag again
Are you actually austistic?
>MUH VISUAL JUXTAPOSITION
I guarentee you there are more, concrete reasons why people don't like this film other than simply not understsnding subtext and allegory, or whatever king arthur bullshit you think is going on

Attached: 1529305427756.jpg (1920x1080, 641K)

wasn't that in Cliff's imagination as to what would happen if he actually did work on a set Rick worked on? He made Bruce seem so egotistical but still kicked is ass super easily somehow because it was how Cliff saw them.

It was racist and misogynistic.

globalgrind.cassiuslife.com/4344802/quentin-tarantino-racist-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood/

Wow another one that reveals his visual illiteracy, it’s so obvious, it’s so simple, am I really this much of a genius? I just can’t undestand how people are so bad at reading
It’s not about subtext or allegory because a juxtaposition (comparison between images) isn’t ‘hidden’. You people literally just cannot read, it’s called ‘Once upon a time’ for a reason, because it is a satire of the effort of creating an Arthurian legend re-telling, it’s a commentary on the nature and creation of fantasy itself. This isn’t subtext or allegory because it is not hidden, it’s the main artistic effort.

ahahaha
T A R A N T I N O R N A D O E D

what you actually wanted something other than dirty feet on the screen for the first 2 HOURS of the movie? hehe fucking pleb

>The payoff is the cinematic image juxtapositions that show an intrinsic exoteric effort to encapsulate the whole of the ultra-subjective Truth (upper case T). You have low IQ and poor pattern recognition abilities, which is also why you’re poor and angry, like a dumb angry monkey.

Attached: received_2238655433112773.jpg (1024x1024, 157K)

Why do you go out of your way to look for things that upset you, or even worse why do you use sites that would post that drivel?

>"lets flip the script and glory kill bad people from past injustices"
killing hitler is the least memorable scene in IB

Just like Deathproof.

Adult children, I swear. If the director isn't sucking off PoC characters and shoving them in your face for the mere fact of existing, it's racist.

>nazis bad
Based retard. The Nazis were portrayed as well-spoken, well-dressed, intelligent, and honorable ("for bravery") while the Americans were portrayed as crude and violent. I'm not saying it was pro-Nazi /pol/: The Movie, but if the message you received from that movie was "lol fuck nazis" you might want to double check yourself for signs of brain activity.

>loose King Arthurian retelling
what the hell is King Arthurian retelling? asking for a fren

Attached: kot35.jpg (1024x733, 81K)

>though it is unclear if the event actually happened

>replying with a meme

Attached: 9B356931-05FF-4307-B2A0-7B9B992B4789.png (300x225, 80K)

Where did Tarantino get this idea that the only parts of his movies people liked were the parts about nothing? The entire movie can't be scenes like Mr. Pink tipping or quarter pounder with cheese in France.

You sounds upset that people like what you doing like. Which is fine but kind of being a dick about it.

You are the meme

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 95K)

>I liked the way it looked, first and foremost. The sets, the clothes, the lighting, the locations.

wow what a great start to a review

>I actually liked the way it was paced. Only in a few parts did it 'drag' for me.

I actually enjoyed sleeping for the first hour

>And following that, I loved Leo and Brad. And just about every other actor

famous actor good, so movie good

Notice nothing about scenes, dialogue, or plot because even shills cant think of something positive to write about this dumpster fire of a movie

>Tex Watson still is.
So is Patricia Krenwinkle (the girl who stabbed Brad Pitt in the leg) and Linda Kasabian (the girl who took the car and left). In fact, all the main Mansonites are still around except for Susan Atkins and Manson himself.

The tale is Arthurian in essence. Pulp Fiction is a well known re-telling of the legend of King Arthur

the parts with Pacino were REALLY boring

Audibly groaned in the theatre when the manson whore put her dirty-ass feet on the windshield. My girlfriend does the same thing while reclining 180º in the seat. Like, you can be a LITTLE uncomfortable, sometimes.

Brad Pitt eating kraft dinner

That's so dangerous. If you get in an accident with your feet on the dash it can really fuck you up. I never let anyone in my car do this for that reason.

Tarantino didn't know how to use him

Worst part of the movie for me, I only think of his donut commercial when I see him now

Remember when Pitt pulls the sword out of Leo's asshole? When nobody else could?

>made just FOR YOU

Anyone kinda felt sad at the ending with Sharon Tate knowing what actually happened to her

Attached: E3A33571-AEF8-44C2-9EE8-AF796F3827A9.jpg (540x696, 83K)

Dunkacino

Just got out of the theatre, I fucking loved it. The part where brad Pitt kills everyone has the whole theatre literally yelling, never had that happen during any movie before, it was a blast.

No.

it means 40 good boy points have been deposited into your tendie account

Visually illiterate

Dunkakino

More like Brad's Pitt

THIS GUY GETS IT

How so?

Came off as forced and dishonest. Almost as if done to please whoever gave the funds to produce it along with tates living sister

KyoAni died in order to make Slice of Life kino, pleb.

Besides marvel, the last time that happened was when Django murders everyone at the end of Django Unchained.

>S-SHUT UP ITS A BRILLIANT MASTERPIECE SLICE OF LIFE FILM WHERE WE GET TO HANG OUT IN THE BACK SEAT AS TWO LE-GEN-DAIRY ACTORS LEO AND PITT DRIVE AROUND AND DO COOL STUFF!!!!11!!! TARANTINO KINO BABY HE'S SUCCESSFUL AND RICH, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE???

Attached: 1552149341911.gif (452x371, 59K)

Margot Robbie’s Sharon Tate is supposed to be a plastic reconstruction, did you miss the excessive use of the Dutch angle?

I liked the atmosphere a lot, but I did feel like it really lacked a central storyline. It had elements of plot, but not much meat on it beyond
>I'm sad, because I will never be a real actor :(
Also every scene with name tags on the characters and narration really took me out the movie, there weren't that many, but it squandered something that was otherwise really well edited and cool. Would it have been so hard to just portray the passage of time in Italy through a montage for example? The time skip and the ending also felt like bullshit to me, since the Manson stuff felt like a sideplot at best and the sudden extreme violence at the end felt really dumb after an otherwise very realistic movie. It might have hit home more if Sharon was still murdered and the ending was Rick and Cliff hearing about the murders in the morning, feeling bad about it and going their separate ways. Also the scene where Bruce Lee got thrown into a car is the best part of the movie, people who think he was a serious fighter are retarded.

Visually illiterate

Leo was really good and he was funny in a way that he never has been before.

He was comedic in wolf of wall street

>It might have hit home more if Sharon was still murdered and the ending was Rick and Cliff hearing about the murders in the morning, feeling bad about it and going their separate ways.

This would of worked

>if Sharon was still murdered

'Protip: they were

Tarantino is entry level shit, and the RLM video was the perfect example of why people think hes so great when Mike said he was good cause he isn't making capeshit.
People who like Tarantino are like people who liked GoT, justifying it by saying "well it's not The Real Housewives of New York so it's good and deep and kino!" Tarantino is stylish for the sake of being stylish, with no substance.

Visually illiterate

I wish Yea Forums wasn't pissed off about every single new movie that ever comes out. Every single thread about every single film turns into a pissing contest to see who can hate the most movies for the most pretentious reasons

Attached: LooksBack.jpg (2208x1242, 702K)