Discuss

discuss

Attached: ebert.jpg (2453x1380, 569K)

>trashed john carpenter kino
the man is a fucking idiot.

Attached: boomer jr.gif (229x332, 1.73M)

Spy kids is kino.

also don't forget this one

Attached: file.png (1183x947, 978K)

Signs is great.

He also gave 2012 3.5/4

was he a closet misogynist?

Isn’t he dead? Why do you care what a dead man thinks about flicks?

It's perfectly fine to disagree with his ratings, but did you even bother reading the reviews attached to those ratings? Zoomers are so fucking cancerous it's past being funny at this point.

Name a more based filmmaker

Attached: 82364823684732647234723.jpg (850x400, 76K)

most of the films on the left are old films pre-2000s and most of the films on the right are post-2000s. I feel sorry you having to label everything either zoomer or boomer

gallo is based but didn't ebert give both of his films 3/4 ?

Abatap is great though, and polar express and spy kids are pure comf for what they are

>god gave him a permanent soi boy face
heh

Attached: 7236482736482376472346.webm (720x360, 1.47M)

Based Snyder

that looks extremely painful

That's fucking awful. Just kill me at that point.

>Watchmen 4/4
Fucking based unironically

I thought TWBB was much better than No Country... what did he mean by this?

Attached: twbb.png (1730x365, 127K)

for you

that just makes him redpilled

Roger Ebert was a journalist, not a critic, he never studied film, he just got lucky with a film collum when he was 20. He was a consumer guide for normies. If a movie was uncomfortable, he'd downvote it. If he thought kids would like kids movies, he'd give them a 4.