Why does everyone like this boring snoozefest?

>Tarantino's lost his mojo!
was almost about to make a thread with those exact words earlier

Because plain and simple, it was a comfy 2 hours and 37 minutes. That's all you need to know

Hey, like I said I didn't like it when I first saw it.

It is because they reshot the movie after the plot was leaked.
There was suppose to be a bigger battle and Bruce Lee helps against the fight. Also Charles Manson was suppose to die.

PTA already the cornered the market on the directionless LA-set 3-hour hippie hangout. But since Pynchon can actually write, IV doesn't put you to sleep like OATIH does.

Now I'm comparing inherent vice and OUATIH and they are both kino. OUATIH might be funnier

Is this true? Makes sense. Taranto's biggest weakness (besides the nostalgia porn and mixtape-style soundtracks) is his (usually) awful writing.

Not to sound like a total faggot but the atmosphere of late 60s Hollywood made it great.

I like it, but can someone explain to me whatever deep and complex themes they think it has?
My main problem was that it shouldn’t have this meandering of a structure without having some deep and complex themes and characters, which I didn’t get, but some people have.
I pretty much just saw it as a story of acceptance of inevitabilities in your life, which the film didn’t really communicate in a subtle fashion.
Is that really it?

It's a meme movie, nobody seriously likes it - they just say they do. 2 hours of fucking nothing happening "Man this is kino" bunch of faggots on here

>EVERYTHING MUST BE HAPPY HAPPY FUN TIME WAHOO

Here's your answer OP
tasteless entry level drones

I'm a huge Pynchon and PTA nerd and I liked Once Upon a Time way better than Inherent Vice. And I really liked Inherent Vice.

This is Tarantino's second masterpiece alongside Pulp Fiction.

It's about Hollywood (and America!) in transition; burning out vs. fading away; how hippies are the ideological heirs to Nazis (dubious claim for all of them, but the analogy obviously fits with the Manson family specifically)

No, it's not very deep.

It's partially autobiographical and partially historical. The autobiographical part is played out in Leo and Brad aging out of Hollywood. They're washed up and the younger generation is catching up on their heels. Much like how Tarantino was the bad boy visionary director when he was younger, but now the world, and movies, have changed so much around him. Partly due to his influence.

The historical side is also about American liberation toward the end of the 1960s. Sharon Tate lives free. So do the Manson family. What they do with that freedom is crucial and the alternate history aspect seems to ponder what the world would be like if our vision of the 1960s was informed by the kind of "hippy" attitudes of Sharon Tate and her ilk rather than the menace of the boogey man Manson murders. The world might be a more hopeful place if that dream didn't come to a crashing, violent halt.

It's great because it explicitly states how television and movies are used to induce desired psychological states in the public
The movie is about something very pertinent to our time: Social Engineering and mass psychosis

>Movie titled "Once upon a time"
>Has Sharon Tate living and hippies getting their asses kicked
>Have someone turn down a bj from a cutie minor
>Have BL get btfo
>All things that never happens in Hollywood
>All fairy tales
This is a recurring theme through the movie. Also, QT really relied on the audience knowing about the Manson murders before viewing to move the story along. Otherwise it does seem meandering.

>Weird how no one can actually articulate why it's a new masterpiece
Simple.

Its a ode to the 1960s, ballanced by great performances (Leo, Pitt, Robbie), some amazing scenes (Bruce Lee, the Ranch sequence, the final come to mind) and it is paced like the spaghetti westerns of the era.

you're an ADHD zoomer pleb retard if you think it's boring and your opinion is discarded. fuck off.

I loved it.

Hippy

>Manson murders before viewing to move the story along. Otherwise it does seem meandering.
Yep, if you do not know about it there no tension, while if you do you have constant tension since you know that Tate is going to die horribly in act three then she doesn't

Wow, just like Fight Club and the Matrix!

Taranto is a perpetual adolescent.

not my fault chinks were BTFO, hapa

I sat through Satantango and didn't even get up once to pee. Stand down, sonny.

Why were there no blacks in this movie besides Samuel L Jackson?

Does it name the J?

Sam Jackson wasn't in this movie, was he?

Did I miss him?

Because no one wants to see blacks on their screen

I like "boring" and slow movies.
I did not like this movie because it wasn't really anything and feels like Burn After Reading, another much touted movie by acclaimed director(s) with an all-star cast... but ultimately feeling empty, pointless, and missing something essential.
Jackie Gleason references, 60s set pieces, Pan Am jets, etc... all very cool, but it all feels like window dressing for a story that is trying to be clever and dance around the Manson murders and I can actually picture Tarantino getting all excited and cumming over this movie idea and jumping up and down as he vicariously gets revenge on the Manson family in a brutal way, just like he did with the nazis and Hitler in Inglorious Basterds, just like he did with plantation owners in Django, etc etc. Great setting and great atmosphere, some great scenes but ultimately wrecked with Tarantino's hack desires..

Attached: aids.jpg (1280x719, 116K)

accurate assessment

Running low on adderall?

Attached: kek.jpg (680x695, 39K)

I think it’s his best film.

Yeah you did. He was playing poker with an eye patch.

this movie didn't have the n-word :(

>Hollywood in name
>tarantino stated its basically a loveletter to hollywood and the biz
>miraculously gives him his highest grossing opening weekend ever
>despite all of his films getting worse and worse the more he makes
Remember when everyone thought pulp fiction was cool? Now everyone acknowledges how it has basic high school tier fanfic writing.

Wrong. He’s not in it.

Attached: D64A1A95-DC35-4195-BDE7-E9DB7C752365.jpg (640x653, 304K)

This. Its basic concepts you come to realize as a teenager.

I really want to see Tarantino do an adaptation of Lolita

>le three hour masterpiece
yeah fuck right off with that bullshit, movie couldve been a whole lot shorter and had even more of of an impact. it barely had any sort of a plot and the runtime made sure you didnt care about it at all anyway. even the ending wasnt enough to save this shitshow but you can keep thinking youre better than everyone else for thinking its good you fucking brainlet.

Conflict with Endgame and Far From Home shoots.

I am shocked (SHOCKED) the feet kino haven’t been posted yet

Maybe thats why it did so well compared to his other movies. All the other ones had really ugly niggers in it.
This movie had none.
Its honestly a rare occurrence to have a high budget hollywood film NOT have niggers in it.
Thats why the industry is tanking, ugly niggers that white people want to escape from at home, ugly niggers shown to asians who hate them.
Take out niggers and you get a high grossing film, you know, LIKE THE OLD DAYS.

You're lucky it's being shown in Squatamala at all, bean breath.

wrong. he was in at least two shots

There was feet kino?
IIRC QT has horrible taste in feet and hes a shittier footfag.

What? You're making shit up.

you are such a brainlet it's not even funny. the movie was exactly as long as it needed to be. it's called building tension. it's called character development. you low-life swine piece of shit. god i hate people like you. stick to capeshit, faggot.

>and whenever blackie isn’t on-screen, the other characters can ask “where’s blackie?”

if you dislike this, you're

>a capeshit fanatic
>a feminist SJW
>an idiot
>a zoomer who grew up on youtube and netflix

which means this board would be such a better place without you in it. so please just fucking leave. you are cancer.

Left in dead nigger storage.

no i'm not.

during the scene in the bar with leo he is at one of the tables playing cards and wearing an eye patch. There are at least two shots that have him center screen for a second or two, one of him fanning out the cards he is holding.

>wah you dont like my movie so you must like capeshit
listen buddy, just accept that youre a pretentious retard and fuck off

Finally someone who actually fucking gets it.

I just watched it. I've always been quite tepid toward Tarantino, i like and enjoy all of his movies but i never entirely loved any one of them, until Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. To me this is his best, most accomplished and most mature movie, everything is just right, the story, the acting, the pacing, the soundtrack, the cinematography, all the subtle nods and details, that fantastic late 1960s atmosphere that never felt forced or artificial and especially the characters, both real and fictional. Plus, the ending is perfect (i guess that "cathartic" is the right term) and even emotional, knowing what really happened that tragic night. And Margot Robbie/Sharon Tate was absolutely lovely, it was about time to see her as a "real person" and not only as the victim of a horrible murder. Great, great movie, my only problem with it is that it is too short!

you're a double digit IQ idiot who eats up shit like star wars and john wick. accept it, little bitch. you tiny pea-brained bitch.

It has a based marketing team.

Attached: Pedowood2.jpg (928x523, 99K)

Pleb filter doing its job.

lets not resort to namecalling faggot, understand that I agree with your statement about building tension but my point is that he blew his load too early. by the end I didnt give a shit about anything that was going on. usually every QT film has a moneyshot scene that sells it all but the payoff this time was not worth it.

I like true cinema, not this Tarantino shit - fuck you for thinking you know what good film is.
fucking cringe, please stop posting here Sony employees

In all honesty, i wouldn't mind to see a director's cut with all the missing parts... Where are Tim Roth and James Mardsen?

You're a complete idiot.

brainlets thinking they have a right to post here when reddit exists. KYS.

Attached: feet.jpg (965x1300, 207K)

This. After 9 movies I think Tarantino has finally done it

Those look too decent for Tarantino to want. When he puts Thurman in his movies he found the ugliest toed sasquatch possible. I'm surprised he didn't put Taylor Swift in his latest one, her feet are horrendous.

Margot Robbie puts her feetsies up on the chair in front of her in the movie theater and you can see her bare and dirty soles, and Margaret Qualley presses her feet up against Brad Pitts windshield with her toes bent back a bit

said it better than I could, this is definitely one of his best films'it definitely helps if you're obsessed with 60s hollywood culture but yeah

>implying all Tarantino movies aren't 4 hours long and way to much dialog

haha yeah, i see youre a fellow patrician friend!

Attached: retard.jpg (480x333, 18K)

Here’s a blurry shot of one

Attached: BDCA71F1-C6BF-4D44-B337-CE78C52A399E.png (975x406, 298K)

I can't help but think that Tarantino was somehow making fun of himself, or maybe playing with the audience. The feet shots were too blatantly shameless. Also, the ending, while violent, was quite tame compared to the silly bloodbaths of Basterds and Django.

I thought it was a passionate ode farewell to a bygone era of America and a reminder of how stories can sometimes be written to have a happier ending. I thought it was poignant to have Tate and the victims survive in the film as opposed to their real life fates. I think it was sort of a love letter to the power of storytelling that Quentin was obviously so taken by in his own lifetime, that despite hollywoods checkered history and underbelly, storytelling can still be a form of magic as cheesy as that sounds. The dead can live again. Good can triumph over evil. Etc it's a very romantic vision that I found uplifting and unironically enjoyed having my expectations pleasantly subverted.

too*
but the best movies are all dialogue.

I saw it twice this weekend. One of the best movies ever made. All of Tarantino's films are great, but nothing I would say best film ever made type of stuff. But this film is genuinely one of the best films ever made.

I found that particularly refreshing, didn't you?

yes. no sjw bullshit. just hippies getting what they deserve

Pleb peon filter. No coincidence that only zoomers and feminists are shitting on it. People who don't even know anything about the Tate murders think they're allowed to just have a take on this when it's prerequisite knowledge. And people who don't know shit about the 60s or old Hollywood culture think they're allowed to have a take, too. Certain people shouldn't be allowed to see this is what I'm saying. All movies are not meant for everyone. Go see something that's for everyone like MOST MOVIES EVER MADE YOU BRAIN DEAD IDIOTS.

>being this mad
I barely know shit about the murders but I still got it. Not that hard of a movie to figure out but still great

You're absolutely right on all accounts. And i want to add that, other than restrained, compared to his previous movies, the general atmosphere was deeply melancholic, almost elegiac. And the last 3 minutes were genuinely touching...

My point is that there's a ton of people who know shit all about the murders and they're using their own ignorance to shit on the movie because they purposely don't understand the nuances.

example
>durr why is Charlie only in one scene wtf did it mean

When they don't know the real life fact that Charlie actually did go up to the house and ask if Brian Wilson still lived there.

There's people who don't even know what the hippies did to Tate and so they're mad that Cliff beat up the poor innocent hippies :(

>passionate ode
>poignant
>love letter
>power of storytelling
>duhh only brainlets that don't know about the most famous cult murder or decade ever don't like this movie

this thread is making me depressed... but I may as well face it that /tv is filled with roger ebert-core movie fans. enjoy your hack tarintino turds and I hope the SYMBOLISM and REFERENCES rub the calcified cognitive zone of your otherwise mush brains in a pleasure inducing way

Attached: fisher3.png (424x218, 181K)

You're one of these idiots who's proud of being an idiot. Google some suicide methods and pick your method of choice, retard. It's what you ought to do.

For sure, the atmosphere was his most fully realized imo. No longer was it a pastiche, it felt meticulous and thoughtful in its recreation of an era moreso than any other of his films. If I was trying to explain through metaphor I'd say his other movies are a buffet of good tasting but ultimately unhealthy food, this one was a simple, timeless, delicious burger with nothing but the essentials and salt and pepper. Less is often more and he truly nailed it.

Onions

Attached: 274A6248-56AF-48CF-94CF-6E31D3E6298E.jpg (640x410, 103K)

Was Manson unironically /ourguy/ in predicting the race war back then, right after the immigration bill that fucked us backwards was passed by the Kennedy's / Johnson

TING TING TING
AHEM... I HAVE AN ANNOUNCEMENT TO MAKE
FUCK WAHMEN
FUCK JANNIES
AND FUCK PEDO KIKES
nationalreview.com/2019/07/tarantinos-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-is-his-best-film/

Attached: armond.jpg (300x279, 22K)

>88
>White
Confirmed.

I’m both of the last two but so still liked it

Remember when Tarantino had to offer more than childish revisionism?

>hundreds of other artists: create works which dissect, challenge or recontextualize the Manson cult and Tate murders
>Tarantino: loL wHaT iF sHaRoN dOnT DiE

Sometime between Kill Bill and Inglorious Basterds he just crawled into his own ass and never came out of it again. What a shame.

If you're a fucking schizo then yeah he's /yourguy/ user.

Attached: 1564248691487.png (882x624, 39K)

SABO x Tarantino

Agreed.

I am a complete Tarantino stan and split my dick over his entire filmography, but this film was so boring and the payoff was absolutely nothing. No tension through dialogue, no vignette scenes, it is the least Tarantino Tarantino film, and I found it incredibly unsatisfying.

Manson, Tate, Dalton... everything was just incidental and didn't weave together in any cohesive or satisfying way. I thought DiCaprio had his moments, and the symbolism of the very ending was kind of good, but not worth trudging through 2 hours of INCREDIBLY slow burn.

I thought maybe I didn't get it because I wasn't alive during the late 60s, but my mother, who was 20 during the period, also agreed that the film was a huge disappointment.

Attached: 1548412544313.jpg (1730x2000, 3M)

If so then that was the best thing that could have happened
Subverting the Tate murder entirely and having it focus on 5 people and a dog instead of some massive shootout was undoubtedly a wise move, it elevated the entire movie and stopped it from being nothing but 2 and a half hours of nostalgia wank

Why does this read like a trump tweet?

nice to see someone around here who isnt retarded

The only thing I felt I picked up on was the fantasy of saving Tate in the end was basically allowing the innocence and beauty of that era of Hollywood to be preserved. The title of the film seems to reflect on this IMO.

My mother said that the Manson murders was the first absolutely random and absolutely brutal thing that she could remember, and would go on to consistently define the 70s,80s, and 90s.

I didn't like the movie BTW, that was all I could hook into.

same iq levels

Anyone know the name of the song that was playing when the Manson family pulled up into the neighborhood and rick gets pissed?

It's wistful, optimistic, and idealized. It's called "Once upon a time in Hollywood" for fucks sake. It's explicitly portrayed as a feel-good fairy tale where the guys aging out of the industry get a second chance, the crazy hippies get their just desserts, and Tate's group are spared from an absolutely abhorrent fate.

In the modern movie landscape it's a breath of fresh air, and it feels like an especially genuine effort from Tarantino.

x gon give it to ya

to see liberal hippies/ women get murdered

Saw it last night with a group last night. My old man wanted to see it and I kind of wanted to rewatch it to catch the Easter eggs so I went again today.

It’s a little long and there’s not a lot of action but it’s not boring by any means. The pacing feels better when you know the timeline. I took a bathroom break during Ricks conversation with the little girl and it didn’t feel any longer than it had to be.

It was youtube.com/watch?v=dGFkPciV-DU

Rick is listening to youtube.com/watch?v=wtJ1Gnh9wPU

they were also serving a mixed drink called Hollywood hotshot

Good post. Will get ignored by zoomer that think they know it all. But we all have to go through that stage.

I don't know if I should see this movie with a normie pleb friend of mine or just go myself.

Great film but I noticed at the hour mark Tarantino drops the ball for 10 minutes. And it was that moment him and the girl talk

>The pacing feels better when you know the timeline.
That was my experience too. When I watched it the second time, the whole first half of the movie seemed to go at a much better pace. I guess it's because I knew it was actually going somewhere?

God Michelle Phillips was hot.

Thanks friend c:

>Dalton listening to a song that glorifies the exploits a German war hero briefly before incinerating a hippie
hmm

How have so many people seen it if it’s not out until the 15th?

youtube.com/watch?v=t3bjMtqpGBw

Now I want to watch it a 2nd time.

I suspect that when I rewatch it will feel faster since I know it barring to the end. It is paced like a 1960s film for a good bit.

Its not a bad thing.

youtube.com/watch?v=A8QszMa58XA

the version from the movie

The only people who didn’t like this movie go to Coachella

this is probably the first time White got it wrong. He needed to skewer this. one of his weaker reviews

hangout movies are always better better on second viewing.
Jackie Brown, Death Proof and even Hateful Eight are all hangout movies too

Second half was kino af. First half was just people driving around in 60s cars listening to music.

>brad and leo
i can envision perfectly in my mind's eye how much negative chemistry these two guys must have on screen. like magnets forcing eachother away.

thank you.

It worked brilliantly

Did the Manson cultists legit want to kill celebrities for promoting violence through the media, or was Tarantino using them as surrogates for the people who claim that fictionalized violence leads to actual violence?

Anyone else feel like this story line/premise would have been better handled by the Coens?

THAT IS NOT HOW MAGNETS WORK

Brainlet here, can someone explain what Brad's character got out of the relationship/friendship. I get Leo side of it but Brad seemed like he was just along for the ride.

they actually worked great together as a pair and were probably the best part of the movie outside of the final manson group sequence. worst part of the movie was with sharon tate and not because of robbie, but because she does nothing of important besides you as an audience member knowing she was killed and waiting for it to happen which never does

The latter. The Manson cultists wanted to kill celebrities and pin it on black people to start a national race war they called "Helter Skelter."

He was a simple guy who genuinely liked Dalton and didn't want too much from life. He was happy just to exist and keep out of prison, and he liked feeling needed.

Attached: fuckingmagnets.jpg (800x450, 44K)

A paying gig and a buddy

Dude was out of a job and Leo was paying him as basically an errand boy and they were bros. You know he was being paid because towards the end when they got back from Italy, Leo was saying how he couldn't afford Brad anymore and was going to sell the house.

He actually doesn't really like it, he's just impressed that Tarantino finally made a movie that wasn't complete garbage (according to him).
Armond has a long-running hate boner for QT.

That and everybody else thought he was a creep because he allegedly killed his wife.

That was what Susan Atkins claimed on the stand during her trial. She kind of knew she was full of shit though. Most of the Manson girls were in it for the thrill and fried out of their minds on acid.

He fought to get him work after he was blackballed for killing his wife

Rick wanted to be wanted, Cliff wanted to be needed

the chad president jfk had his head blown and it wad sharon tate murder that took away america innocence?

cmon now...

Attached: 1564107388594.jpg (720x946, 32K)

This. Tate was *after* JFK, RFK, MLK, My Lai, the 60s race riots...

>He watched this movie with his mom
Did she wipe the shit from your ass after the movie incel?

Attached: aD6KW7Pe.jpg (600x400, 56K)

10/10 movie

Attached: D9DC12E7-8C99-44F3-93F9-16B29C7C4D58.jpg (750x384, 40K)

well the story is focused on Hollywood so it does kinda make sense

It's incredible and you're missing out because you're "too cool"

Armond White explained why he liked it. I think he liked how masculine Rick and Cliff are and how Tarantino btfo those women despite the metoo shit, and also for not glamorizing the liberal hippies.

I was surprised he liked it. He fucking hates Tarantino. He still called the film juvenile, though

Hollywood was a fantasy land that was sheltered from all that violence, but ended with the Tate murder

did anyone else notice rick said he was one pool party away from getting to work with polanski, then ended up meeting him after barbecuing a bitch in his pool?

This is his best film yet. Just got back. Was ready for dissapointment, left with kino. After the last 2 films were duds for me after inglorious basterds I'm glad he still got it.

Based Tarankino, cant wait for the bluray rip

Polanski wasn’t even there. He was filming a movie in Europe.

>and the symbolism of the very ending was kind of good

Heard multiple brainlets say this, explain in full detail the symbolism of the ending without adding your own fucking head-canon.

Attached: 81Cgym5jGkL._UX679_.jpg (679x662, 38K)

BIG GUY DUBS

in real life maybe, but sharon tate also died in real life at that point, he was probably still there narrative wise, and if not he surely met dalton after he was introduced to sharon and the other guy

I'll never know. I walked out after about an hour. Boring!

It was mentioned in the movie too though. Pretty sure he was still in Europe.

They were extremely painful.

the narration stated that Polanski was in Europe and that's partly why the other people were staying at the house

Was your mom hot

He hates Tarantino but I can see why he liked it.

>Btfo women despite metoo movement
>btfo liberal hippies
>Leo and Brad are pretty masculine
>Good message about friendship and brotherhood ("He was more than a brother, but less than a wife")

But remember he still called this movie juvenile and gave Tarantino a bunch of backhanded compliments.

so what shitty small town newspaper did you get this gay review from?

He gave Tarantino a bunch of backhanded compliments in the review but he still gave it a fresh rating on RT

newspapers don't exist anymore.

he doesn't have a "hate boner" for tarantino, he just recognizes shit when he sees it

it shouldve been polanski behind the gate though, he rewrote history already so why not go the full way to make it more 'magic' that he finally gets to meet him

Does Julia Butters have a lot of screentime in this? and does she have any sexy scenes?

Attached: julia-butters-hugs-leo-ouatih-premiere-02.jpg (1047x1222, 301K)

>Pepe!

But he gave this film a positive review

>No vignette scenes
Guess you went to the bathroom during the scuba diving & Bruce Lee scenes. You could almost get away with calling Sharon’s scenes vignettes as well but that’s pushing it

>it's called character development.
Stop using this word wrong there's literally no character development in this entire movie it has tons of characterization but no character development learn the difference

Attached: 8d6.jpg (645x729, 81K)

Yeah, she's not even close to 21, pedo.

You mean Boomers? Yeah, they love a stroll down memory lane. It even comes with a nice happy ending.

Stick with your mcu flicks, little zoomie

You didn't answer my question and she's just 9 years away from turning 21. That's pretty much an eyeblink.

Attached: 144645_0345_FULL.jpg (2249x3000, 1.17M)

No, she's 10. On her Twitter it says she was born in 2009

Sorry. That doesn't make it great. As stated, other movies have made these observations while being much more entertaining. Maybe if half the bullshit driving scenes were removed, it could have been more impactful and jumped the rated from a 6 to an 8. This is a trend with his movies now. They are a bloated mess of masturbation.

Attached: Cable-Guy-Banner[1].jpg (711x400, 54K)

Then that's even better, I get to enjoy her for 2 more years than I thought. You still haven't answered my question.

Attached: 56184630_2173100619443835_912340024197385810_n.jpg (828x1472, 138K)

she steals a few scenes.

I'm a Gen X'er. I have to deal with the retarded shit from both ends.

It’s literally what ended the Summer of Love and killed the Give Peace a Chance/Male Love Not War movement.

Up until that point everyone kind of had a soft spot for the idea that even if it felt kind of silly maybe we could all just smile on your brother get together and try to love one another and everything might just be all right. If not for us, then maybe our kids who could have a better day than we had.

Then this freaky fucker came along and killed this beautiful girl and her baby still in her womb, cut it out and defiled the body and smeared their blood on themselves and the walls screaming they were the devil and here to do the devil’s business. In one of the richest, safest neighborhoods in the country - proving that even if you achieved the American dream you still weren’t safe from the evils of the world.

And if that wasn’t bad enough, eventually they found out not only did they do nothing to deserve such a brutal end to their short lives, but that the person he was trying to kill was being targeted simply for trying to be a nice guy and invite a complete nobody to be his friend and try to help him make something of himself.

And the more you looked at this guy the more crazy you realized he was:

> “Listen to all these songs about love and peace. They’re really saying fuck the niggers and the kikes! Kill babies lol.”

Made everyone realize there’ll always be garbage out there and you can’t just fix it all with kindness. The sad part is if it wasn’t him it would have been someone else.

He's been bringing up Pulp Fiction in his reviews as one of the worst movies ever made for decades. "Hate boner" is accurate.

the world existed a long time before america in the 60s, newfag. people have always known it's shit

thnks, I just wanted to know that she wasn't only getting 30 seconds of screeentime or something like that.

Attached: Dq31iV7U8AATR3v.jpg (1200x1200, 583K)

lol

>and killed the Give Peace a Chance/Male Love Not War movement
I thought that was Kent State lol

she in two scenes, about 10 mins all together, but they are good scenes.

>Must have flown over my head.
Sounds like you answered your own question.

>10 mins
that's actually better than I expected
I'll definitely be watching this

Attached: DynQUxxUwAcOUPv.jpg (640x640, 47K)

Because they thought it was an example of the big dummy politicians not giving peace a chance. Though it did fuck with America when it happened.

This was different not only because it was in Hollywood so the media epicenter of America overly publicized it (think the Michael Jackson trials level of coverage) because hey were freaking out that it happened in their own backyard (literally) but also because it was two completely innocent lives.

A beautiful young white girl will always get more attention and clutch at the hearts of the public more than any man, even the president. Add in the fact that she was soon to be a mother and that her unborn child died as well and you’ve got a Molotov cocktail of mass hysteria

>people born in 2009 are 10
Ahhhhhhh

My favorite part is at the beginning when Leo tries to cry on Brad’s shoulder and he’s like “WHAT THE FUCK!?”

And Leo’s like: “Shit, that was gay as hell. I’m sorry man, my life’s just over.”

And Brad fires back with: “Come on man, don’t cry in front of these fucking Mexicans.”

>snoozefest
You've been filtered, pleb.

>don’t cry in front of these fucking Mexicans.”
This shit was hilarious but the way you explained it ruins a joke

Yeah, but he becomes friends with Sharon and her possee because she invites him up for drinks, so when Roman gets back she’ll be all like: “Honey, that poor, amazingly talented actor who lives next door was almost Murfreesboro by dirty, dirty hippies so we’re going to be friends with him and his wife now.”

And he’ll be all like: “Ok. Talented actor, huh? Wonder if he’s ever want to be in one of my films? Bet he could give a haunting performance after all that.”

What was the point of the Steve McQueen sequence?

Lol did you see the movie alone. I think I might have you seen bud.

Because it shows that Rick was once big enough to almost star in The Great Escape and put emphasis on how washed up he is now.

Because they're plebs
the biggest numale site after rt loves it which truly does tell you type of pleb that think it's "good"

Attached: plebs.png (980x382, 299K)

>Murfreesboro
What?
Also yeah, I agree that the implication was that Rick would land a role in a Polanski film. I just remembered too that the director of "Lancer" told Rick to strike a "Scary Macbeth" pose or something like that. Polanski released "Macbeth" in 1971, so Rick probably gets the titular role over Jon Finch.

There’s a scene where she comes off really precocious and comforts DiCaprio while he cries by patting his inner thy and speaking soothingly to him, then goes domme-loli when he tries to call her “Lil’ Pumpkin” by leaning in and saying “I’m going to let that slide because you’re having a hard time right now, but I don’t appreciate little nicknames. We can have a discussion about that later.”

Then there’s a scene where DiCaprio and her are filming a tv show together and he’s holding her hostage and has her sitting on her lap while he reads her a story and is whispering in her ear before he starts threatening to shoot her and tosses her around.

Those are about he only scenes.

I need to read up on Spaghetti Westerns. I recognized a few names that were dropped but a lot went over my head. That goes for the whole film, really. Things like FBI and Green Hornet are obvious, but I know I missed a metric shit ton of tv and cinema nods.

....except for America in the 60’s, then this happened. Brainlet

No, the examples involving institutionalized/political party violence (Kent State, JFK, etc) allowed for mental gymnastics that it was just the government’s fault and they could fix it.

Heater Skelter proved that people can just be shit

this:
but its also a reference to the fact that McQueen was supposed to be at the Polanski house the night of the murders, as he was part of that social circle

How would you explain it?

I meant murdered

Ah! I knew I forgot a vignette sequence. I guess all the cuts to Rick’s work count as well.

You weren't born until 30 years after the 60s, all you know about them is second hand at the very best.

Even if you were born in the 60s it's still second hand unless you were actual THERE, boomer.

I was an infant when the berlin wall came down, but I existed, newfag.

i've read a lot about the manson family for years
i knew she was supposed to die, but this movie still feels as though it was deliberately boring and pointless. yeah we get to see how it could have been different, but with such an interesting idea tarantino still made it boring - and the ending didnt make up for it imo
even knowing the manson family hippies were the scum of the earth, with how little they were developed, at then end i was still left with "why did they go to all this trouble to maul these clumsy retarded teenagers?" i frankly dont give a shit about tate (in the movie) and dont really feel compelled to care for leo or pitt's characters either.
i've never been a fan of tarantino's work, but this story actually grabbed my attention, and he just proved again why i don't bother to pay for his movies. wish i could get the 2 hours back i wasted streaming this

Exactly what I was thinking

>feels like Burn After Reading
Uh oh

To each his own. I liked it.

4thpbp
Except 7.5/10

The Italian directors the narrator listed were made up.

(Was Kurt Russell the narrator?)

i need a bluray rip NOW!!

Also to explain the menage a trois situation going on with Tate, Polanski and the other guy

It sounded like Kurt Russel to me too. I thought it was intentional as well to give Rick's character an eye patch in that WW2 movie.

Well she could be 9, dumb fuck. Her birthday could be in November but she confirmed on her Twitter she is 10. So yes, I was correcting the retard who thought she was 12

I had a semi in the theater when booth was picking up and talking to the hippie chick. Just her body language was cute bros.

>Certified Fresh
>By both Fans and Critics

Yeah OP, you're the sane one. The entire world is crazy.

right? marvel capeshit is great too!

Another easter egg you might have missed: the book Sharon Tate got for Polanski (she actually gave it to him IRL, and it was the last time they saw each other before she was murdered) was later adapted into a film by Polanski 10 years later.

Attached: 3767EF84-BE8A-4EAD-986F-99AE0535E66F.jpg (1288x1600, 225K)

I recognized Antonio Margheriti and Sergio Corbucci who are both real. The latter directed directed "Django".

Dunno what your point is, but yes, it is.

Ooh good catch, user!

cringe

are there any references to roman polanski drugging and buttfucking a 13 year old girl?

History is changed so that doesn't happen.

you know, if tate wasnt murdered maybe he would turn out a decent man having a loving family would keep him away from fucking young girls

Nobody ever talks about how Jack Nicholson was also there.

Remember folks, all celebrities are scum.

I've heard there's a post credits scene?
I had to leave and missed it. Can someone fill me in?

Attached: 1503486687968.png (571x540, 489K)

It happens right after the credits start to roll and it's Rick Dalton doing an ad for Red Apple cigarettes

>it's Rick Dalton doing an ad for Red Apple cigarettes
Shit I don't know how I missed it. Thanks user. Guess I'll see it when it comes out on dvd.

>Hippies are the ideological heirs to Nazis
This is the stupidest fucking thing I've ever read.

People are jerking off to this flick when it's literally 3/10 at best. Doubt I would ever sit through it again and I love rewatching good movies.

You're right user. The people praising this movie are hopeless, but what can you do? If they're satisfied with a navel-gazing wank fest by an over-the-hill boomer then more power to them I guess. This movie says nothing and it means nothing. It is a monument to QT's bloated ego, and to the sad sacks who worship Hollywood because it has given meaning to their empty lives.

yes

Ah, so this is why Yea Forums is falling over itself to gargle QT's cum. The biggest joke in movie criticism has christened this turd a masterpiece.

Fetishes aside, the scenes with Sharon were pretty subtle and fucking sad. Leave it to Tarantino to make me feel depressed over some celebrity that died several decades ago.

They're sheep user. Most of these people fashion their opinion via a Rotten Tomatoes score. The worst of them are devotees of Armond White.

it was a scary Hamlet pose

kinda like christopher walken being on the boat that natalie wood "fell off of" and drowned

>it's literally 3/10 at best.
>They're sheep user.

>hating good things other like makes me cool.

Attached: You and Your Mom.gif (330x204, 2M)

>heater skeeter