Films that look better on the camrip

somehow he became the Mediocre Hulk, he's slightly taller than Thor and as retarded as Mark Ruffalo

What's the source on this rip?

There's no blu-ray version out.
HDTV. Supposedly.

the theater version uses HDR, for that you need to buy the 4k blu ray
blu ray is outdated now retard

it's always the same thing, shills

How come other movies aren't gray, dumbass?

absolutely astounding imagery right here

fuck, this looks like it's from a soap opera

because they downgraded it to make you buy the ultra $40 4k edition
Disney is THE kike company

just bump up the contrast if you think it looks better you blind fuck

Attached: avengers-endgame-behind-the-scenes-image-hulk.jpg (2000x1053, 1.55M)

CamRip is the Snydercut lmao

>lets film this in a giant green screen studio and then just replace the green screen with the most generic generic warehouse possible
a prime example of money laundering

It probably makes it easier to put in the Hulk

I don't understand how these massive blockbusters can't build a few actual sets.

Attached: 1516093905000.jpg (705x527, 247K)

oh excuse me lets just waste our time looking for a huge ass warehouse to rent out that will be twice as expensive and won't look anywhere near as good as what can be designed inside a computer

dumb fuck

They are literally in a warehouse. Literally. They replaced the green screen with the same structure which is behind the green screen

cheaper this way, with the saved money they can spend even more millions on vapid actors and merchandising/marketing

>The highest grossing movie of all time.
Looks Yea Forumstier and absolutely soulless. I loathe marvercucks with a passion.

They have to pump these movies out every year which leads to very little pre-production.
Also “leaks” I guess, that’s my excuse for the Nick Fury greenscreen gun picture.

that's not camrip though.

Based mentally handicapped special ed student with a sign outside his house warning passing traffic of his retardation marvelfan

Sometimes bad image quality actually makes things better, as it hides many of the flaws.

Friday the 13th was kind of spooky when I saw it on a bad VHS tape. Re-watching it on a pristine BluRay makes it apparent how low budget and cheap it was.

Similarly, Jason Takes Manhattan is a shit movie, but the quality of the trailer works for its favor:

youtube.com/watch?v=Ty_e7ZByhe0

>it's meant to look grey and bleak

Oh yeah, just like every MCU movie ever.

>it's meant to look grey and bleak

Attached: 1465386497739.jpg (313x286, 17K)

both look like ass

>terrible audio
>watermark

Wait until the BD release in the next few days.

OP is a legit retard

The film only made $2.8B

Both the IW and the E films barely made $5B. Sets are expensive.

>he doesnt know

>Make Hulk the ugliest shade of green
Thanks Russos

I don't think millions of dollars are worth the boredom of working in a green room day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year

The fact that this had to be pointed out suggests the CGI is good in terms of being lifelike. You should criticize a boring looking set for looking boring, not for looking fake.

CGI sets are more expensive than practical sets. They used because they are faster and offer more flexibility.

the fakeness of Hulk really draws your attention away from everything else

Professor Hulk looks like a beefy version of Idubbbz

Why pay unionized set builders to do it when the cgi monkeys can fake it for a fraction of the price and without worker's rights

You really expect them to build a complex set like this? It's a superhero movie, some things you just can't replicate in real life.

Attached: capeshit.jpg (640x635, 43K)

>Couldn't even use an actual prop gun
>So his finger clips through the CGI trigger guard
Jesus

>soulless

Control your autism.

It's probably because of the possible green screen reflection on the gun

No the trigger guard on the prop is larger, so his realistic interaction with the prop is sabotaged by the smaller CGI replacement, the trigger guard of which would not allow his fingers to be in that position, so they clip through.

There has yet to be a non-fake looking Hulk on screen in any form. Fantasy creatures, whether computer generated or merely a man wearing a rubber suit, regardless of how high quality the practical or digital effect is, tend to look unreal by the fact that a real life counterpart does not exist.

I would even argue Hulk in that shot blends in relatively well due to him looking as drab as every other character and the composition of the shot himself. In the Patterson film, Bigfoot looks real not because of the quality of the suit but because of the fact he is in the distance of a shaky 16mm film shot on a low quality film camera. He is hidden more by the poor filmmaking rather than the props or costume.

In the comics there are like 20 hulks depending on Bruce's emotions and he is a mental headcase.

there's usually logistical reasons for stuff like this that sounds really stupid in retrospect but was probably necessary for a convoluted reason. No sane person sits there and says
>lets just not build a set wouldnt that be awesome
in the director's commentaries they try to build as much practical as possible.

Holy shit that looks even worse than the camrip I saw
people unironically shill this garbage just for the number of tickets it sells alone.

Attached: 1407289231998.png (364x322, 14K)

>for no reason
I can think of so many

>Highest grossing film of all time
>#20 on IMDb Top 250
>94% / 91% on Rotten Tomatoes

A fucking disgrace

He finally made it 60 days of nofap

The fourth thing you linked is from Spider Man FFH

>they didn't bother to build a fucking hotel room
fuck marvel

Only one around here who needs a "trigger guard" is you, faggot /pol/ incel cuck

Is there a good torrent out that doesnt have any watermark?

My point still stands. MCU movies never deserve the recognition and praise they recieve. Endgame being before Once Upon A Time In The West, Casablanca, Alien and 2001: A Space Odyssey on the Top 250 is absolutely ridiculous. "Nerd culture" was a mistake. A MISTAKE.

>I don't understand how these massive blockbusters can't build a few actual sets.
Its not money, its time.
It takes weeks or months to build or reorganize a big warehouse, meanwhile the cgi guys often get 2 weeks or less to do the shoot.
Price isnt really the problem anymore as studios spend upwards to 100mln$ for the cgi, for that money you can buy out and renovate, destroy anything.
But with how those movies are made in 2 years or less there just isnt time to even look for a property yet alone to finalize a sale, and find the contractor to do it.

God I hate CGI.

No one is making such claims. Imagine treating box office and IMDb scores as anything remotely meaningful.

They are CGI because the design wasn't final at the time of shooting, so there's one reason

What bothers me the most about CGI is the fast transition, like when the helmets appear and disappear. Why so quickly?

oh yeah, I forgot the toy companies have final approval

Kevin Feige hates blacks

Disney is the toy company.

That's not a reason, that's a cheap excuse. Having a budget of $356m and not even bother to rent a location or make actual costumes is lame. The way these superhero movies are produced is nothing but soulless. I can't understand why so many people are attached to this crap.

Look at the first Star Wars movie. Production was hell on earth but mostly everything was made with practical effects and it was worth it in the end. The struggle paid off.

kek marvel fags call that symbolism, jesus you guys will shit on snyder for actual meaningful symbolism, and you guys defend actual shit.
lol

Attached: Gaye.jpg (480x360, 26K)

you sure got him, frick the h8ers us 12 year olds need to stick together when it comes to our standalone brand of capeshit

wait. wait. hol'up. he actually acts as the hulk to? for what fucking reason?

Once Upon A Time In Hollywood

>it's meant to look grey and bleak
The entire MCU has desaturated colors.

It's a HDR camrip

You clearly haven't spoken to anyone about marvel irl. Just go to Twitter or Youtube comment sections to get an idea of how general audiences feel

money laundering 101
marvelcucks can't be serious when they think this is the best ever. seriously, this made billions. WHAT THE FUCK.

Hey come on, don't call him that. That's an insult to special ed students

Absolutely based my Marvel worshiping buddy

Attached: 0A745FFA-A015-4BE1-8E9A-F8BE9C2B8439.jpg (1280x512, 104K)

>Cool continuity throughout the saga
>Iconic marquee characters that are colorful and fun
>Super powers
>The only fun entertainment worth spending 11+ bucks more to see

What you should asking is not why people see this shit but why Hollygay can’t make new cool shit to dethrone capeshit. Or I don’t know stop being a lazy cum sucking faggot and make some shit.

Attached: 0C534757-B2A1-4FE4-942F-3551970E8E8D.jpg (747x298, 52K)

no open matte for this one?
remember they bragging about it being shot in imax format

Give them credit, the CGI artists do a great job making the environment look real

Was
>stupid fucking marvel with their colors and bright lights.

Now
>stupid fucking marvel and their lack of colors and lights!

you are the issue.

throwing millions of dollars into CGI the creators imagination is the only limitation to bring those astonishing, truly magical visuals into the screen

Only dumb people ever said Marvel had color

>I don't understand how these massive blockbusters can't build a few actual sets
A lot of them do

Attached: tri-12139r.jpg (1200x800, 303K)

>>The highest grossing movie of all time.
Adjust for inflation. Otherwise the highest grossing movie of all time is that one copy of pirates of the Caribbean that sold in Zimbabwe for 500 quadrillion dollars.

Attached: 2176130_The_Reserve_Bank_of_Zimbabwe_introduces_10_20_50_and_100_trillion_Zimbabwe_dollar_notesepa01 (480x300, 52K)

Why waste time building sets when the shitters that watch these movies will watch them anyway.

plz respond

I'm actually glad to know I'm not crazy for thinking some movies actually looked better via camrip

Attached: 1563771274671.gif (220x232, 518K)

Post correct rip or gtfo

impressive

Dude, watch your sôj intake. It might kill you one day.

>actual meaningful symbolism
you mean "HURRR SUPERMAN IS JEBUS"?

>actual meaningful symbolism
ah yes the generic "main character is an allegory for Jesus!" it is every 13 year old's first theory about everything.

Yeah, along with length and pacing issues, the visual pallet of the climactic battle is one of Endgame's main flaws.
Infinity War had large-scale battles that were also visually appealing, Endgame should have done the same.

Sort of get what they were going for, a sunrise aesthetic, but it's still mostly gray with a "sun jizzed on everything" effect that looks like something out of the Hobbit movies