OH NONONONONO

>rottenkike
>tomatonigger
the more you ban me the more racist I become

this, critics and audiences like to be babied thru their movies. easily 9/10 film, one of his best

>one dollar has been deposited into your account

watch it before you call me a shill you braindead npc faggot

i wanted to watch this but i wont because tv likes it

Yea Forums likes everything at the beginning but it will inevitably turn against it after it releases online. Also the film is decent 8/10 and his best film since Jackie Brown.

Adults love it and children hate it.

Tbh Tarantino's films are mostly geared towards 15-20 demographic. This one is a bit more mature that's why it's good.

>manson's
>hollywood
0/10

Guys keep in mind this is his 9TH movie when you're rating

>what if i made a movie where 20% of dialogue is old ads on the radio

tarantino never did a slice of life kind of movie were things happen without connection, it is way more about sucking up the whole vibe of that era.

its is understandable people do not like - specialy when people compare it to pulp fiction, were everything is connected and moves the story foward.

also, the violence against women is a no-no in the current year, even the women in question are cold blooded killers that would kill a pregnant woman and write 'pig' with her blood.

even crazy killers are ladies and deserve a supreme gentleman.

brenton tarrantino > quentin tarantino

Anything Tarantino shits out is going to be received positively by critics and audiences alike. I don't think there has ever been a filmmaker as overrated as Tarantino

this

Kojima

Nolan and Tarantino although i have to say this film is good, he tamed his juvenile tendencies and delivered more mature yet entertaining film.

Absolutely based

>rt average critic rating 7.81/10, average user rating 3.94/5
>meta average critic rating 8.5/10, average user rating 7.9/10
seems a few critics on those extra rags rt pads in lowered the score there. usually it's the opposite

not enough brown cocks 0/10

The fact that he did it with a character who killed his own wife kinda makes it feel like Tarantino was just outright flexing about what he could get away with

Also why the fuck did he racelift one of them to be a chink and then give her the most gruesome death?

Don't you celebrate diversity, user?

I just found it weird that he has his Sonic OC beat up Bruce Lee and then invents a chink in the place of an IRL white woman so his OCs could beat her to a pulp and then roast her with a flamethrower

Does he have something against chinks or something?

>was 9.5
>now 8.8
it's always like this, the early """user""" reviews are rave then slowly real people start shitting on it

Attached: 2019-07-28 13.22.57.png (565x120, 11K)

Anyone who says the last 15 mins of this is the only good part is autistic and ADHD.

Also Tarantino literally taking the piss on those exact people by literally having the show on the television say "Now what you've all been waiting for", cue insanely violent scene.

People claim to hate modern hollywood shit, Tarantino gives us the most anti-modern hollywood movie, people cry that it's boring

KEK

Attached: 1552707208231.jpg (821x797, 183K)

It's just the most tired unfunny and overused shit of a meme it doesn't mean anything it's a topic marker at this point.

I've seen 3 marvel movies in theaters this year, packed theaters, nobody laughed, nobody clapped, hardly any chatter on the way out.

Saw this on friday, theater was half full, many moments of laughter and everyone literally clapped at the end and left talking about how good it was.

Ratings are for the plebbiest of plebs.

Movie was fucking awesome and I think it's my favorite movie he's done... Especially recently. It's cool not to like what's popular.

I unironically agree, Pulp Fiction is still my favorite but this was a better film overall.

Attached: 1552856165918.jpg (900x600, 88K)

The Kill Bill series and Death Proof are memes

>85 Metacritic after 58 reviews
The critics fucking loved it, user. It's one of the best reviewed wide releases of the year so far.

>endless posts on Yea Forums about how critics are shitting on OUATIH because they are all leftist shills
>actually 85 percent of them like the movie

This is Yea Forums. Anything below 97% is bad.

Meanwhile, the retarded audiences loved The Lion King "live-action" remake in RT because modernfags have garbage taste in films. They don't give a fuck on the animals having no emotion becas L0ok@€mGwafix!!!

>Tarantino movie with barely any over the top cartoon violence
>Average movie-goer doesn't like it

What a shock.

babied = plot and payoff

because its all footfags and fanboys praising it. i watched it yesterday. despite great performances it was boring, aimless and self indulgent with the same epin reddit ending as inglorious

things happening without connection is bad filmmaking and universally criticized except when pseudbait directors do it

it only got a 60% recommend from exit surveys on the first weekend in LA. keep in mind the biggest fanboys go opening weekend

so meta!

Attached: d90.png (644x800, 15K)

i don't get it, when did we start treating films with scores of 7 and 8 out of 10 as bad
there's maybe a dozen 10 out of 10 movies in total and a couple of dozen 9 out of 10 movies, but those come very rarely
7 and 8 are supposed to be some very good films, even 6 means that it's okay
god i hate how people are so afraid to state their own opinion on a movie, they complain for seventeen sentences and end the review with "a solid 8" literally wtf, just say that you didn't enjoy it and that it's a 4/10

In today's world the Godfather would be a 4/10 and lambasted for a lack of diversity and stereotyping Italian immigrants

Attached: 1554484533008.jpg (380x349, 62K)

>FFH has a higher RT score
Nice

Attached: Spider-Man-Far-From-Home13.jpg (738x389, 11K)

>i don't get it, when did we start treating films with scores of 7 and 8 out of 10 as bad

When the Yea Forums mentality took over all of Yea Forums.

>makes one good movie
>parlays it into 30 years of shit

he cant keep getting away with it

FFH is dogshit. Spider-Verse is the better movie unironically.

Attached: 1550251532544.jpg (1024x576, 49K)

It isn't but feel free to be wrong.

I don't feel like this is a movie that most Tarantino fans would enjoy. Maybe if their favorite was like Jackie Brown or something, but not people coming from Basterds or something.
I felt that it was self-indulgent for like the first half or so of the movie. I do think some of the non-connected scenes or whatever, if you just mean in terms of plot, managed to serve as an aesthetic or like thematic "eye of the duck" to tie the whole thing into a much stronger latter half.

It was boring as fuck and entirely forgettable. Tarantin-who?

L O L AMERICANA

Shit sucked.

Not really

>le edgy female violence
>Brad Pitt doing it

Might as well call it Fifty Shades of FAGGOT

>tfw your main star can't do a three point turn

Attached: ailephoedeapo.png (809x534, 330K)

It was a 9/10 movie and I'm not one for Tarantulas movies

LOOK AT THIS FAGGOT

dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7293025/Brad-Pitt-miserably-FAILS-make-three-point-turn-unearthed-Time-Hollywood-clip.html

Normie tier trash

>Runs in the family: Nepotism abounds in Tarantino's revisionist fairytale - which also features Andie MacDowell's daughter Margaret Qualley (L), Bruce Willis' daughter Rumer (M), and Kevin Smith's daughter Harley Quinn (R)

>his Sonic OC beat up Bruce Lee and then invents a chink in the place of an IRL white woman so his OCs could beat her to a pulp and then roast her with a flamethrower
Kek well put

>Turn it to the right Brad. All the way right! ALL THE WAY RIGHT BRAD!

what a fucking shitty thread
this board is shit
how many more years do we have to suffer this OH NO NO meme

>and then invents a chink in the place of an IRL white woman
No, that's actually pretty much what she looked like.

Every Tarantino movie is good, even Death Proof

>OH NONONONONO

Attached: mp,550x550,matte,ffffff,t.3u2.jpg (453x533, 48K)

The ending was the worst part of the movie though, completely took me out of a film I was thoroughly enjoying. Same thing happened with hateful eight.

>a movie where nothing happens
Id say it should be lucky for this score

Sounds like chinks are the new nazis

I had a few chuckles here and there, but honestly I was pretty fucking bored. Everything moved at a snail's pace, and desu I couldn't give a shit about any of their problems. The main problem I have I guess is how looong and drawn out all the scenes were, like I get, leo is a great actor, but can he please do something other than cry about how he's all washed up?

Also the action sequence at the end was just okay I guess, it felt like pandering to make for the 2 hours and 30 min we had wasted up to that point.

>literally clapped at the end

Americans

It was good. It hardly even felt like a QT movie until Tex and the girls got to Cielo drive. Pitt was worth the admission alone, I rate it a 5.5/10 which is above average for me.

observer.com/2019/07/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-review-brad-pitt-leonardo-dicaprio-margot-robbie-rex-reed/
>Despite reviews that foam at the mouth about how laugh-out-loud funny it is, I paid real money to see Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood in a real movie theater with a real audience, and I am here to tell you not one person uttered a single chuckle during the film or applauded during the end credits.
>applauded during the end credits

Okay seriously what is it with americans and clapping in theater?

As much as I wanted them to go through with the real murders I found it hard to believe QT was going to end it true to history. I've had an obsession with the Tate--Labianca murders for a long time so it was pretty cool to see the movie stay true to facts until the end.

Are people talking about how he went full retard with the foot fetish stuff? Because he went full retard with the foot fetish stuff.

we're just obnoxious in general

Autsits should not watch actual films. You should honestly stick to capeshit. It was a thoroughly enjoyable flick even if you have the slightest knowledge of the late 60s.

There were some enjoyable parts, but it was pretty bland.

I don't watch capeshit, so piss off with your projecting.

Attached: 1557790253786.jpg (800x600, 117K)

>i had a laugh
>great acting
>enjoyed the ending

What more do you want nigger? adrenaline pumped right into your dick with robots exploding everywhere?

>like I get, leo is a great actor, but
It's like if if you faggots keep saying it it'll become the truth

People only clap on premier nights for marvel and Star Wars movies. Yes I think it’s stupid too. But it’s not like audiences clap after every showing of every movie

How about better dialogue for a start?

Also a light chuckle two or three times for a two hour 45 min long movie isn't good. And to add to your last retarded point, if I wanted mindless violence, I would just go on fucking liveleak, the movie was just so goddamn boring, I really don't understand how you're gonna just sit there and defend it. BOOHOO I'm a washed up actor, BOOHOO everyone thinks I killed my wife and now I can't get a job, BOOHOO I'm Sharon tate, I go everywhere, get into movies for free and be cute.

Saw Rambo 4 second day and people still clapped

I’m just happy to see that it pissed off the liberal PC fascists. Absolutely amazing movie, Leo and Pitt make a great duo. Did anybody watch the QT film festival on the Sony movie channel before watching this? Actually seeing The Wrecking Crew made the scene with Sharon Tate so much better for me.

my theater was very vocal, though not to an annoying marvel-tier level. I usually don't laugh during movies even when they're funny and I'm enjoying them but there were for sure some laugh out loud moments for me. Some scenes just encapsulate that great buddy buddy feeling and made me laugh along, like rick and cliff watching the fbi show.
It's not quippy 'ummm THAT was awkward' boring setups like most blockbusters that get the whole theater howling. It more makes you feel loose and relaxed since the characters like each other and they exude this infectious feel-good attitude. Good movie.

IT IS NOW 75%!
IT IS NOW 75%!
IT IS NOW 75%!
IT IS NOW 75%!

This movie was comfy as fuck

I can't really describe it but leo just gives off this 'IM ACTING' vibe all the time. I was really feeling it at the start of the movie with the stuttering. As it went on though, I found him much more believable, but maybe that was just me warming to the role? Pitt on the other hand was instantly believable as his character.

I'd have been more satisfied if he just dodged the murders altogether. Revenge porn is kinda cringeworthy, even if it is well executed.

leo's a shit actor, brad is shit too but less shit

how was al

he's only in it for a scene and a half but hes good

Exactly what you'd expect. Like 2 scenes clearly done in 1 day of shooting and it's goofy and broad and the silly outfit does all the acting.

Tbf they're completely different films so that metric isn't really a fair measure when judging them

>invents a chink in the place of an IRL white woman
are you retarded? she was a white chick with long straight black hair. that hairstyle is not exclusive to asians

>most audiences and critics liked it
>”OH NONONONONO”
What even is this retarded fucking board anymore?

Where would you anons rank it in his filmography?

Based retard poster

it was way to much. i mean there were jarring scenes where feet take up a more than a 3rd of the screen

Yeah, Quentin is a faggot.

>Does he have something against chinks or something?
Think about it this way. Tarantino loves old Hollywood. The film is a tribute to that era. In 2019, the Chinese are gaining more and more influence over the film industry, with major movies now catering to Chinese tastes. Not really surprising that Tarantino thinks they should fuck off.

Why did they have Cliff, the ultimate hero and most likable character, be a wife murderer? What did QT mean by this?

I agree. If he wants to be a foot fetishist that's fine but the guy was putting foot fetish shots in non-erotic scenes. The scene where Sharon goes to the movies to watch herself is one of the lynchpins of the entire film and he puts her bare feet up nearly ruining it just so he can jerk off to the B roll.

tfw the finale reveals that Cliff, not Rick is the aging cowboy in the Western novel

Attached: david-brent.jpg (1019x742, 212K)

you people are as bad as the blue cock Watchmen mouth breathers that after 3 hours could only talk about penises

Attached: 1554258089972.gif (320x240, 1.59M)

>liberal PC communism
>is fascist
boomer retard

Attached: 1564122783250.jpg (610x462, 68K)

>it was boring nothing happened why didn't they have a shootout at the manson ranch where Bruce Dern gets his face sliced off

>be a wife murderer
Even the flashback leaves it ambiguous. Like he has a look on his face and has the harpoon, but her chair WAS close to the edge of that boat. I like to think it continues a sort of fiction/reality revisionism thing going on.

Pulp Fiction had no story tho

Boomer references? You sound like a douchebag. You know that, right?

The Ass Shots are amazing in this film.

This movie is a pleb filter.

Anyone who thinks this is a good movie is a memer or retarded

Outside of Cliff's wife he had a slice of perfection I don't remember any. I remember all of the narrow hipless buttlet white hippy girls in cut offs who had zero.

GET IN FAGGOT WE MAKING SOME KINO

Attached: 15639639012632.jpg (2800x1867, 694K)

>Spider-Verse is the better movie unironically.
Speaking of movies where characters don't have any purpose.

It was unreal how distressingly bad this bitch was.

Attached: Lena-Dunham.jpg (931x524, 47K)

Everyone keeps calling the Bruce Lee fight a flashback. It seemed to me to be a day dream? Am I retarded?

She was in the movie for five seconds you just can’t contain your incel rage.

yeah I thought it was a daydream too

It was a flashback but could argue that it wasn't literally true considering it's Cliff's flashback about him beating up a world famous successful kung fu master and then everybody claps

Nah she was bad. I didn't even know tit was he until a later close up. She didn't know what movie she was in, she played it like a campy 60's flower child groovy Halloween costume hippy while every one else around her was playing it straight.

Legit, the Playboy mansion scenes were kino.

After having a day to mull over my thoughts I still can’t decide exactly what I feel about this movie. I enjoyed it well enough, I definitely don’t think it’s trash, but all of the films moving parts never quite coalesced into a great whole for me.

It has individually good parts but when looked at as a whole 2h46m film it falls flat. The best example is the ending, it's an incredibly enjoyable, well done scene; but it feels so jarring and out of place for what the rest of the movie is. We get hints of it with Cliff beating the hippy, and the implication that he killed his wife, but nothing on the level of a dog ripping someone's nuts off and a girl being burned alive. Depending on what you value in film that may not bother you and you might consider this film good. I personally found it really uninteresting, save for a few moments, and I would probably say it's his worst film; but then again I haven't seen Death Proof.

>Jackie Brown
>Pulp Fiction
>The Hateful Eight
>Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
>Reservoir Dogs
>Kill Bill
>Inglourious Basterds
>Django Unchained
>Death Proof

its a daydream, it starts with leo getting him the job he was just turned down for

It's a memory but he's bullshitting himself about the reason he was fired.

It was a daydream, dude. That's why he dented the car like he was a fuckin superhero.

...

It is a daydream if he would have pressed Leo to talk to the boss about getting him a job. It starts out mentioning that there was already someone else pegged for it, which we learned in the previous scene. Meaning that it is occurring in the present.

>advertising masquerading as news

you are the cancer

As I've said in other threads, any Tarantino list is correct as long as Django and Death Proof are at the bottom. Good job.

He really could have made it on the 3 point but it looked like he was just being careful with the nice car and didnt cut the turn close

It has good ratings, am I missing something?

Django's at the top, Death proof and H8tful eight at the bottom

What the fucking fuck

Hateful is his best work pleb

>Django's at the top

not with that editing

>This is Yea Forums. Everything is bad. And if someone says otherwise they're a shill
there you go

Brainlet here, explain how the editing of DU is bad

It's almost like your perception of what people care about is off

Yea Forums has told me that audience scores are always authentic and true while critic scores are agenda driven garbage. I'm going to assume that the inflated critic score is from the good will let over from qt making films about black men murdering and facefucking White nen.

It’s pretty obvious you have to be moderately intelligent to enjoy and understand Tarantino movies, anyone who didn’t like it or couldn’t understand it is plain stupid, like IQ stupid.

I mean, it had cool scenes but half the film was a discombobulated mess. Even for Tarantino.

>this cope
Most marvel capeshit gets better scores than that lmao the absolute state of tarancuckinos

Let's be honest, the third act was garbage other than the murder scene. We had that terrible and sloppy narration of the Italian film story. Not to mention, what was the point of the Roman Polanski household story? Just so that he could finally meet his neighbors after slaughtering hippies? Sure there were some great moments, but without Brad Pitt this film would have been really bad. I'm a big Tarantino fan and not really surprised or disappointed. It's very Tarantino, but c'mon, most his films have had a bit better of a structure in the past.

Just like Vertigo like a full hour of this movie is one character driving a car around the city while the soundtrack blasts and just like Vertigo it's fucking awesome

Tarantino has evolved since the days of the great Reservoir Dogs. He now uses violence not only as a visual flourish, but as a structural device AND as a critique of his usual audience and their blood-thirsty expectatives on what makes a Tarantino kino (OUATIH is like a twin of IB in that regard)

It's not his best movie imho, but it's his most comfy, nerdy (much more than Kill Bill) and vital movie (Jackie Brown aside) and, right now, I consider it his most fun and free creative effort. It gets extra points because I like the sixties enviroment a lot and the almost plotless meandering suspense, full of tangents and funny visual cues. The ost is his best one and I love the buddy chemistry between Di Caprio and Pitt even if I don't consider them good actors. Pitt in particular gives here his most likeable (and ambiguous) role ever. Man, I love this movie.

Attached: 1564303765937.jpg (1924x1280, 800K)

>Hollywood hates treatment of women
>QT has treated women in his life like shit
>the amount of violence towards woman at the end is graphic
>Hollywood left still walk out saying it's the best film of his and of the year

It's like they constantly bring this shit upon themselves always.

Speed Racer got a major role too

...

>its supposed to be bad

#1 honestly

Learn to post, spacing redditor.

>real score is 77%
>barely a passing grade in MUTTMERICA

Attached: 1560626820692.jpg (632x505, 46K)

"This is boring, wheres the superheroes?"
"Ayyy mane dis moovie racis, no black brothas or sistas!"
"Ewww stacy look at those grandpas"

I actually love how many red herrings there turn out to be throughout the movie. I kept expecting Leo to be diagnosed with lung cancer or something with how he kept hacking, and there are multiple times where Brad has foreshadowing that turns out to be not what you expect, like him mentioning he hasn't been in trouble with the law and the Manson hiker won't be the person to do it, the acid cigarette, insisting he check on the old dude, etc. I kept expecting him to die multiple times and it never happened.

I like how the unconfirmed story about murdering his wife gives him this uneasy quality that you feel might boil over into him being some kind of psycho but it never does.

fpbp

The slow burn tension is so unbelievable great. Pitt being a "toxic masculinity" totem, walking around the Spahn Movie Ranch is one of the best scenes of the year. So refreshing to watch a total Chad doing his thing in the pussified movies landscape nowadays.

Cliff Booth has got to be one of my favourite characters in recent memory. Brad Pitt nailed it

Everyone keeps talking about Brad in this movie but I actually found Leo's character more interesting. I really enjoyed watching him try to rebuild his acting career.

Leo's role is harder than Pitt's. He's fucking great in this thing. Rick's vulnerability is expertly crafted and he's funny as hell.

Peepee Poopoo

>mfw laughing my ass off at the finale while so many boomers and elderly were gasping

Attached: gflaugh.jpg (1600x1150, 200K)

idk the only scene I enjoyed him do was the trilor meltdown. his "redemption" scene with the little girl didn't impress me

Do you think Leo ever once questioned why a guy 7 years older than him is playing the hotshot young upstart replacing him? Nah don't think about it, drink another beer and have another vape.

Attached: Olychad.jpg (682x1024, 34K)

Holy shit, he's 51?? Dude doesn't age.

Ke kind of did snap at the end but in the best way

Highest weekend ever for a Tarantino movie.

Wow 38 whole dollars?

I actually enjoyed the contrast. Aside from the hippie beating that was the first truly violent scene in the film. Had there been something sooner the end wouldn’t have hit quite as hard as it did

agreed desu. I really enjoyed the movie, it was refreshing and different than the usual hollywood recycled crap i've been watching in theaters the last few years. brad pitt was excellent

>box office = good votes

Attached: 1299827572337.jpg (4688x4688, 716K)

Ending is so lame compared to what was rumored: That Leo, Pitt & Bruce Lee go to the Spahn ranch and beat the crap out of the Manson family, with Leo torching Charles Manson with the flamethrower. Instead, we get Pitt on acid killing two Manson members and Leo torching a third one.

Let's pause to say goodbye to the Tarantino that gave us Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill & Reservoir Dogs.

There shouldn't have been any wacky violence at all in the ending, the rumored one actually sounds worse. This was actually pretty serious/down to earth compared to most of his other works, and the ending really killed it for me when I was honestly really enjoying what it was doing. Same thing with The Hateful Eight, after Kurt dies everyone just starts shooting eachother. He doesn't know how to write third acts.

JAMES REMAR WAS IN THIS?

How did I miss him or his voice? Who was he?

73%!!!
73%!!!
73%!!!
73%!!!
73%!!!

Attached: 1562950162937.gif (200x150, 2.23M)

the ending was a flawlessly executed climax

>the ending was a flawlessly executed climax

Attached: neckbeard.webm (640x360, 1.78M)

Even though they were basically co leads, Leo's role was written like a leading man while brad could play his like a character actor. That's where both of them shine and it worked perfectly, I hope they do more movies together like they're saying

This was definitely one of Leo's best performances, he played 3 characters well. The stuttering real rick dalton, the phoning it in actor, and the try hard actor. Very well done

He's making fun of himself. It was over-indulgent on purpose.

Pretty much this. Guaranteed disappointment. Blade Runner was so fucking bad

Do you hate slow movies or something?

>even Death Proof
No user. No

I loved the vibe of this film. Hang out movie. Didnt need all the a to b to c plot.

Plus..loved that ending

You have to be able to enjoy b-movies to like Death Proof. Fortunately for me, I adore cheaply made shit. It's fun.

Not great but at the end of the day it’s better than Inherent Vice

Just shitty ones. I remember that other movie Villanovagoge or whatever the fuck his name is did. The one with Jake Gyllenhal. That fucking movie sucked too (another Yea Forums recommendation)

I do. I love the original Evil Dead. Death Proof was something that should have been aborted. Good God, I haven't cringed that hard in a long time. The man fucking sucks at making movies and Jackie Browne is a fluke

>About to dunk in and say >>not posting the Metascore
>See this
>WTF

Attached: Screenshot_20190728-141943.png (720x1280, 272K)

>Inherent Vice
Talk about a fucking disappointment. I was looking forward to that movie hardcore. God damnit I still remember when that dumb bitch started narrating I almost turned it off right there. Belladonna in the movie? That ugly spotted bitch (PTA's wife) getting a role? Every actor was trash and every scene horribly directed. What a weird, disjointed piece of shit

>Calls 2049 boring
>Likes Jackie Brown

>not liking Jackie Brown
>liking BR 2049
I've come to accept that Gosling can't act. Can you?

Attached: 1562904686771.gif (200x160, 2.41M)

>Reaching this hard over movie magic logic

>MY opinions are BETTER than YOUR opinions

christ

It was a flashback to the last time Cliff worked with Stuntman Mike, on The Green Hornet. Bruce Lee was the little chink on that show, you fucking brainlet.

In this case, yes.

Alcohol

Amazing how good your movie can be when they delete all the bad reviews for you.

Nice, I was missing this meme. Also based Necro Critic goon

>Gosling can't act
>The boring replicant character couldn't possibly be assisted by having a boring actor
>>Focusing on anything but the cinematography, shot comp, direction, story, etc.

You just sound like someone who sucks character interaction dick too hard

Did you even see The Place Beyond the Pines? Fucking God awful and I started realizing then that the fucker can't act. Drive was a happy accident. But that is literally his only good role, because of how little he speaks or tries to emote. In BR2049 it was obvious he was supposed to be robotic but somehow he couldn't even do that right

The Nice Guys is the best neo-noir movie since LA Confidential

Oh come on, you know that's not true. Don't even compare it to LA Confidential

I know Russell Crowe was better in The Nice Guys, and Ryan Gosling was a better lead than Guy Pearce.

>Ryan Gosling was a better lead than Guy Pearce
Now I know you're full of shit

You are a bitch. Cool blog right there though.

Did I ask for you opinion, numbnuts?

I cared about him more. That may be personal bias because I like the likable fuckup type character more than the overachieving golden boy trying to live up to some memory or ideal. Guy is a fantastic actor, and I love LA Confidential, but The Nice Guys has more charm.

In all honesty I can't tell you what my opinion of The Nice Guys is, as I've yet to see it. I'm bad about actually watching movies these days. I'll give it a shot. But I've become disappointed by the Gos, as Refn's second movie with him was a letdown as well.

Keep bitching as the little miserable whore you are. It´s cool with me, anuslicker.

It's Shane Black's best movie.

Keep having nothing to say. I'd probably feel something if you actually put in any effort

>already made $40M this weekend

That "insider" LARPer faggot should commit suicide now.

nooo this cant be happening. why is russia doing this?

>Dead Heat
>Lethal Weapons
Well now I'll definitely give it a watch

Attached: 1426954852722.jpg (470x317, 17K)

It's not LARPing if it's on the internet; it's just a regular RP. LA means live action, like McLovin and Dr Ken in Role Models.

It's just plain fun from start to finish.

Yea Forums was wrong again. It opened second behind The Lion King and is the highest opening weekend gross of Tarantula's career. It won't flop.

What?

Fuck wh*toids. Nobody wants to watch a movie about a bunch of crackers talking about nothing.

>That fucking movie sucked too (another Yea Forums recommendation)

Because any garbage from the holy redditory academy of imdbcore directors will be praised. Lynch, villanuevue, tarantino, anyder, nolan could release an iphone video of a dog eating its shit and people will come say it is "a critique of the audience" or a "deconstruction of the modern blockbuster"

Attached: 1445107232362.jpg (480x416, 29K)

Russell Crowe was the original Cliff Booth, an Avatar of violence, he defined LA Confidential

Leo was actually good in this movie, way more believable acting than his usual reeeeeeee yelling.

>Sony bombs yet again
Literally all they have is Marvel. I hope Morbius bombs next year

LA Con is a neo-noir. The Nice Guys is a hangout movie. There is an essential generic difference between the two and comparing those characters is really dumb

But I like you, don't you see? I always appreciate the input from a soulless stupid cocksucker like you. And one who doesn't like PTA best movie? that's the icing on the cake. Keep it going, don't hesitate in your whoring career. Your future in public bathrooms is bright as an Ethiopian sunrise.

Dubs and I get a hot girlfriend.

>Robert Arnett stated, "Neo-noir has become so amorphous as a genre/movement, any film featuring a detective or crime qualifies."[6] Screenwriter and director Larry Gross, identifies Alphaville, alongside John Boorman’s Point Blank (1967) and Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973), based on Raymond Chandler's 1953 novel, as neo-noir films. Gross believes that they deviate from classic noir in having more of a sociological than a psychological focus.[7] Neo noir features characters who commit violent crimes, but without the motivations and narrative patterns found in film noir.[3]

movie was great
it says a lot about how media was (and is) used as a tool of social engineering to induce specific psycholigcal states in the public.
It's not all "just nostalgia" although that's a part of it. Screens showing constant violence are everywhere, and most of the violence involves both men and women
Still don't understand it completely but it's not just a nostalgia-wank

Attached: Pantages-shot-by-Bill-Counter.jpg (1500x844, 219K)

Thats so epic of you

You don't think that part of what Tarantino was saying by violently killing the Tate-Labianca murderers after they specifically talk about violent movies making them want to murder is that movies don't cause violence - deranged people do, and that violent movies are actually a good thing for society?

I still think the comparison is hot retardation

"hangout movie" is nebulous and can be a part of any other genre. Dazed and Confused and The Big Lebowski are both hangout movies, but the former is a drama and the latter is NEO NOIR, JUST LIKE THE NICE GUYS.

maybe
But I saw the car conversation among the murderers was an allusion to MKUltra: the use of LSD and other programming (tv) to induce violent psychosis.
I need to think about it more, but what the killers said was not wrong on the face of it. Americans then WERE being programmed to be accustomed to violence via violent television. The allusions to Vietnam support this.
need to think more

t.low t zoomer

Still haven't addressed how the comparison does not work. Also The Big Lebowski is such a poor example to bring up because it supports my argument. Lebowski is closer to Gosling than Pearce, demonstrating that the takeaways from both films are those of HANGOUT MOVIES

Don't listen to that user, The Nice Guys is shit

Just saw it, it's odd that the ratings are so high, on one hand I can understand with the excellent acting, scene composition, and camera work, but the movie suffers from some of the worst pacing of any movie I have ever seen. Once upon a time in hollywood just plods along so slowly without giving any scene more weight than another, the movie just keeps going, the first two hours could honestly been consolidated to 45 minutes or less. I really think that most people who are rating this movie so highly are doing so in respect to the excellent craftsman ship that went into this movie, and not because it was fundamentally a good story or well put together. It really feels like this is a directors cut on top of another directors cut of a movie, I have never watched a movie where so little happened in so much time, just for reference the movie is as long as a LOTR directors cut and has less plot progression than 30 minutes of one of those movies on top of that most of the progression in Once upon a time happens in narrated fastforward scenes.

Attached: 1514085801698.jpg (1692x1252, 111K)

I agree with this. The best scenes were those in black and white.

Ironic that you say we're reveling in everything but one aspect which supposedly tarnishes the film to a great degree and you're posting BR2049 memes. But to address your point, I thought the pacing and story were appropriate to a hangout movie and felt right and satisfying to me, so I'm not overlooking anything, for me personally. It was an 8/10

>Had there been something sooner the end wouldn’t have hit quite as hard as it did
Agreed. There's rising tension throughout, but it doesn't boil over into violence until the very end. It's a similar sort of effect and payoff as Bone Tomahawk.

The first to hours are the best part of the movie, it shits the bed once the manson murder shit happens.

But Bone Tomahawks ending still fit the overall tone of the rest of the film

Thirding that

>it shits the bed once the manson murder shit happens.
that's like the last 15 minutes of the movie and the climax . . .

Yeah, and it's the worst part of the film. A bad ending can ruin an otherwise good film.

The Big Lebowski is a neo-noir hangout movie. There are hangout horror movies, hangout sports movies, etc.

I liked the build up, and that it sets up earlier that brad pitts character is capable of such violence, but the movie took too much time to do that. It would be fine if this was a directors cut with stretched out scenes that lounged about a bit more, but it's not and the movie suffers for it.

which is better boomerwood kino, this or Hail Caesar?

The ending is divisive. You have to remember that Tarantino is an iconoclast when it comes to film conventions. A tonally inconsistent ending can either shock and delight or shock and displease, depending on which side of the coin you wagered. But don't go into a QT film expecting a traditional movie. There seem to be as many people praising the ending as the best part as there are those saying it ruined it.

>Hollywood loves a film about Hollywood

yep, cant say i saw that one coming

Attached: 1550342924355.jpg (948x1188, 401K)

You're still avoiding the main thrust of what I'm saying here. Good day.

Cope

You know, for a weird reason his movies are never released in cinemas in my country

Should be fall lower
this man killed cinema as an art form with pulp fiction

No, Joss Whedon killed cinema as an art form with The Avengers

>BR2049 memes
there is actually plot in blade runner, Once upon a time's plot is like this
>plot................plot.plot........................................plotplotplot................................plot...END

Attached: disapointment.gif (398x504, 1.99M)

Yeah, and that's what he intended to do. Cope harder.

Blade Runner suffered from an uncharismatic lead and mudlike pacing and despite that critics liked it too. You're being hypocritical.

hail ceasar is a much better made movie

this is the stupidest fucking post on the internet, lol

>uncharismatic lead
he's supposed to be a robot
>mudlike pacing
not really, it was atmospheric, but the story progressed fairly consistently.

First time I saw it (on a date with a girl) I wasn't a huge fan.

Second time I saw it (at the behest of a friend) it was a fucking masterpiece.

How does this work?

With Pulp Fiction, the America viewing public finally acknowledged all the films they once saw as a "guilty pleasures" as legitimate art. All of a sudden Texas Chainsaw Massacre was inducted into New York's Museum of Modern Art. Slasher films were revived and shared movie theaters with "high art". Now people had an excuse to say all the crappy movies they had seen were important. All of a sudden academic papers were being written on the virtues of Ernest films. Quality of writing dipped, because people were more concerned with "impressions to ideas" or used it as an excuse not to actually learn anything so they could justify sitting alone masturbating to porn, rather than reading book. It was another excuse for our generation to feel entitled to their tastes, and consequently defend them inarticulately.

People are nostalgic for the days of Pulp Fiction, when indie film making "actually meant something." This was when not every indie film starred Michael Cera or was directed by Wes Anderson. This was when indie films were "cool and unpredictable."

I believe Pulp Fiction does not mean anything, its a void that convinced the film viewing public of its importance and quality with xenophobia disguised as irony and substance veiled by coolness.

This film is not unique, it is empty. It is a number situations rather than subjects, and it made this generation dumber.

Well at least its better than Four Weddings and a Funeral. (or is it? They were both nominated, I guess they should both be classics.)

Fuck, that'd be a great double feature with this.

Yes, because that is your perspective of the film. I think it's needlessly petty to try and disqualify positive reviews of a movie. Why would you ever care *why* people like or dislike things? You either like it or dislike it yourself. Don't let other people's views scare you so much. You just looking like a sad little copecel.

>leaving the argument because he's wrong
>while still posturing that he's right
Kek nice work

>Pulp Fiction is not unique

I retroactively discarded your entire post as laughable after reading that. You mischaracterize how PF changed film. It was due to its untraditional structure and editing that it changed things.

Its not the type of film to see on a date

Your mind probably was on impressing her and my guess is she was a bit dull

Neo noir movies can be hangout movies.

My point to that poster was that Pearce and Gosling should not be compared, even if you can incidentally call TNG a neo-noir. Pearce is a noir detective and Gosling is essentially a goofball. Closer to Big L.

>that is your perspective of the film
no, the movie has objectively consistent pacing, it's a long movie yes, and the lead actor is what he is supposed to be, not liking the content is one thing, not liking the pacing is another. I liked what was in once upon a time, it was just assemble poorly, there are long stretches of nothing happening, scenes that meander about to the detriment of the movie as a whole, like I said it is as if this is some sort of super directors cut where everything is left in and nothing is cut, but it isn't theatrical, which is ironic for Tarantino since he is all about the movie going experience.

Attached: villeneuve.jpg (570x793, 167K)

>some of the worst pacing of any movie
jesus christ, watch more movies

I hated Kill Bill vol 2, Death Proof, IB, Django, and Hateful Eight...

but I loved this one... what gives? Yeah theres no story, but I was never not interested or bored during the entire 3 hour run, its very much a 60's set piece and character piece, I was expecting to hate it because I thought it'd be non-stop dialog, but Tarantino finally figured out how to not have his characters constantly yapping pointless bullshit. I dug it, anons.

What moron made this poster? Do they know what a trilogy is? Villeneueve-is-pure-kino fags are the most insufferable idiots on this board

I gathered.

There was some fooling around though so it's a win for me I guess. Neither of us really want a relationship at this point, me because I know it'll probably end badly, and her because she just got out of one and needs some time to heal. She seems to like me though, and she seems to like making out on my buddy's couch when no one's watching, so fuck it. Que Sera, Sera.

Not to mention the font choice is fucking disgusting.

You got a good head on your shoulders, user, you'll make it something she'll look back fondly on, I'm sure. Best of luck.

>It shits the bed when the thing that is teased for the entire movie happens at the end
You are a literary fool and too stupid for film.

for a real movie made by professionals of this caliber, and not some shit ass student film

Another Tarantino flick where everyone projects 'I AM ACTING!!' And nothing happens for 2+ hours of the movie.

4/10 just for the visuals otherwise it would be a 1/10 from me.

Take a look at any Jim Jarmusch movie

If it played out differently, in a more serious way, I would have liked it. Brad Pitt tripping on acid and beating up the Manson Family with his dog ruined the entire tone.

>of this caliber
like I said

It's definitely decent but it's too loose with the plot to be really great. I can see how Cliff fighting Bruce Lee (hate how they made Bruce a bitch), him investigating the cult ranch, Rick having multiple long take acting scenes and Sharon Tate living it up all connect together, but they're still too meandering.

damn she's CUTE. what's her name?

>If it played out completely unlike how a hangout movie would play out by becoming grim in the final 15 minutes I would've liked it more, by the way did I mention this was the worst Chinatown-esque movie I've ever seen? Gods, my dudes, it was almost like it was a comedy

T brainlet

God bless. It was tearing me up a little when I asked "So, what is this?" and after we talked about it I was happy with the answer for the most part. A little disappointed that she probably won't take my virginity but hey I fingered her so I can't complain.

It didn't exactly feel like a comedy until that point, there were a few moments like Pitt fighting Bruce Lee and Leo freaking out in the trailer, but besides that it felt fairly serious.

Your posts are comedy

it's like a worse pulp fiction

wrong. the car is dented IRL later when we see her driving.

pay attention plebs

You mean like rick and morty smart?

Attached: 1559242589308.jpg (604x603, 106K)

If you mean you have to consume on a level even a furlong below the surface appearance of a work then yes, it's "Rick and Morty" smart

>Hollywood loves a film about Hollywood
It's the most self-indulgent kind of narcissism.

Hollywood is not an individual, you laughable twat.

>also, the violence against women is a no-no in the current year

Actually, it (violence against women) is far more acceptable today than in the era that was depicted in the movie.

This is some 6/10 bait, disregard

>Hollywood is not an individual

Hollywood is a hive-mind.

>if there is a reference to something I'm not familiar with I don't care about it

you really are a faggot

I think the pacing is also a callback to Once Upon a Time in the West which was a fairly slow paced movie

Yep, she stuck out like a sore thumb.

Bros the underage hippy Cliff flirted with was so ugly but so sexy. I don't even get it.

I think that the film requires you to know the basics of hte manson murders to get the film.

She played it like that because she, like the other completely fictional characters, was a good guy. She was too young to believe anything other than free love and fuck the police. She wasn't on the Mansonite's level. She's just a horny drifter.

Must of drunk the water of life on the set of hitman, him and Ogla Kurylenko do not age.

>its supposed to be bad

Pacing matches the Good , the Bad, and the Ugly (which is a buddy film) almost to a T.