Supposedly the greatest writer of all time

>zero good movies

WRONG

Attached: 41ySjXPCnbL.jpg (346x500, 32K)

>not the superior 60s movie, with an appearance of big tits

youtube.com/watch?v=bhbGq3fxm4s

SHUT THE FUCK UP NERD

Attached: 10132675721.jpg (400x353, 39K)

writing alone doesn't make a good movie.

but i thought romeo + julie with leo was good. real cool cinematography, especially that part with the fireworks and leo is hanging out with the black crossdresser

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-26 Unconventional Director Sets Shakespeare Play In Time, Place Shakespeare Inten (796x858, 297K)

Am I autistic? I thought OP was joking that shakespeare never wrote any movies

like the cat said to alice, you must be, otherwise you wouldn't be here

youtube.com/watch?v=SCVc5TaPpe8

There are so many good Shakespeare adaptions: he's just not attributed

The Lion King

>Shakespeare wrote 40 plays, about 25 of which are masterpieces still debated and preformed 400 years later, despite having no formal education
how'd he do it bruhs

>thinking baz lurman is a good director

Attached: 1563647495466.png (886x898, 719K)

Ran and Throne of Blood were kino.

nah he sucks, but that movie was kino. movies are judged individually, not by lot.

much ado about nothing starring keanu reeves as john the bastard.

You might try Chimes at Midnight, Welles's Othello, Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet (not great, but fun), Richard III, Polanski's Macbeth.