If this flops I think I'm done with movies

>The greatest auteur of his generation

holy shit top-250-imdbkid, watch more movies and stop embarrassing yourself

>it's a 'zoomer's first time being aware of a QT film being released in theaters' episode.

Don't worry zoomy, the box office numbers will have zero effect on QT's status in Hollywood or opportunities available to him and capacity to produce films.

He's only making one after this anyway. I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about studios taking a chance on ANYTHING that's not an already established property.

He objectively is. Nobody gives a shit about internet darlings like Lynch. He went to tv and he sucks now. No the return was not a movie. Eat shit hipster.

>Studios taking a chance
>on a director whose only made original movies not based off preexisting IP's for over 25 years

The zoom is real.

what does this have to do with being a zoomer

i seem to recall a few Django movies before his and a few Foxy Brown movies

Because no one who's been alive long enough to see QT's career flourish from the beginning, and also all the careers of indie directors and the indie film industry in general would be so niave and ignorant as to think the way the OP does.

B movies from the 70's that have since been abandoned by the original studios aren't exactly considered solid IP's with a visible public following.

>Opinion
>Objective
Please die

>what is intersubjectivity
retard edgy 21yo

Well I really like the starpower

I wanted to see it but I won't support Lena Dunham.

It's going too. These type of movies don't matter anymore u less it follows the Woke Agenda. This shouldve has been released strictly in art houses instead of major movie theaters

>not being done with movies 20 years ago
>not enjoying nature and working out, bettering yourself
get help bro

Hateful 8 barely broke even.

And nobody who's been paying attention to film for the last couple years thinks the way you do boomer

*spits in your face*

Its going to flop. Audiences these days are generic as fuck, and filmmaking is mostly dead as far as the big screen is concerned.

Plus, most people don't even know what this is about & the trailers do a poor job of giving these audiences a reason to go. And the pedo money has dried up.

name directors with at least 5 consistently great movies in the last 20 years with no duds.

Yep and this has more than twice its budget. If people don't care they wont see it just for Tarantino

I think you mistyped and meant to write that no one in the industry thinks like you, a literal fucking retard.

>the pedo money has dried up.
No, it clearly hasn't.

English motherfucker do you speak it

Pretty much this. Todays movie audience is filled with grown braindead children

Attached: 1559542661217.jpg (1024x960, 115K)

who the fuck cares if it flops. just enjoy it user
i can tell you right now a movie about 1969 is not going to do well at all

That's not very nice.

75% of people are retarded. This is reflected in cinema.

>pedo money
No, it hasn't. It never will. Especially concerning Disney. Tarantino is still trying to matter but he is fighting an uphill battle. There is no art in movie making any more. Disney saw to that

If you enjoy a movie you should care if it makes money, because if it doesn't studios will produce less movies like that in the future.

Leo was always very selective with his roles. Picking movies made by popular technical auteurs. That's why he has remain relevant for so long. Even then, the likelihood of that even lasting is just unrealistic.

Only because they've been conditioned not to. Name one "indie" movie from the last five years that was an actual top hit at the box office.

I agree. At times I don't want to live here anymore. This society is dying.

You sound like your script got rejected.

>technical auteurs.
Well, la-di-fucking-dah

Stay strong, user. Focus on the good things in your life.

normies gonna norm.

Even Redford faded into obscurity. It happens to all actors that try to remain relevant. Leo will be fine sitting on his pile of cash. He won his Oscar, he is rich, made one of the biggest grossing movies of all time. He will be fine

Big actors do not make films good, his best content is behind him and it is not in any shape or fucking form original.

>>>>>>>>reddit

1st of all, it's not a condition that 'good' movies or indie movies are supposed to be box office smashes, this is a condition you're stipulating on the base of your argument.

2nd, I know you're a zoomer because you have no idea how Mirimax was created or how it launched the careers of not only QT but also Vince Vaughn and Jon Favreau, and how the foundation of the studio was based on supporting indie films.

Zoom on, zoomy.

Look around you. Do you think these morons appreciate storytelling anymore? Or which characters represent them best with flashy CGI and explosions?

The few tiny few user anyways. Thanks for the words

Miramax doesn't exist anymore. Can you tell me where the guy that made Miramax is now, old man? And don't tell me he was targeted because he was a predator. Literally every major movie producer is.

We get it gramps you're old, you can stop talking about it. Try not to piss yourself

This user got a point

Attached: 1562393576938.jpg (699x761, 232K)

Chernobyl was good tho. Don't be so fucking bleak and jaded. fuck

yeah! Fuck old people!

Typical zoomer. You do know the Russians refute practically every claim made in the mini-series. Let alone the gender-swapping. Fuck off, pleb. You're out of your league

I fucking hate teenagers. Summerfags gets worse every year

>You do know the Russians refute practically every claim made in the mini-series.
Hope this is trolling

Attached: 1559840134965.jpg (1024x768, 81K)

>Miramax doesn't exist anymore
>the over 30 year history of the studio doesn't matter because my zoomer brain can can't comprehend what happened prior to 2019

They would know since you know it happened in Russia. But keep reading Deadline as your go-to source for facts.

I think tarantino quips are actually worse than capeshit quips

people don't actually like hollywood itself
don't wanna watch tarantino's celeb friends chat about stupid shit

yup I'm thinking this movie is getting flushed

Dicraprio's accent is so shit in the bits of trailer I've seen that I may never watch it. I haven't even seen Wolf of Wall Street. His last decent acting bit was Django imo.

>Believing the government

Attached: Screenshot_20190701-232913__01.jpg (1080x1043, 340K)

You trust Russian news outlets/sources to give you the facts on their greatest environmental catastrophe ever?

Attached: 1559643561336.png (785x757, 267K)

So he was cooler when he cast no names and made flicks on a shoestring budget? Is that right user?

Attached: 1563677347255.jpg (585x376, 200K)

I'm only paying to see this and AD Astra in theaters. Gotta support good cinema

>Dicraprio

Attached: andrew-lloyd-webber-123886.jpg (2400x1432, 1.62M)

>AD Astra
it means to the stars

if all the budget goes to getting some boomer celebs to talk then what difference does it make

it's actually worse desu because I'm like oh it's dicaprio again huh

No different than I would trust Hollywood to be accurate in their retelling of 9/11. The fat chick scientist was a dude in real life though. That was more Hollywood pandering.

Fair point

>The fat chick scientist was a dude in real life though
The creator is open about her being a conglomerate character in the podcast. She isn't a "dude", she represents a vast number of male and female scientists.

Buullllshhhittttt
This is HBO we are talking about here. They help lead the woke agenda.

I'll kick your ass irl, dude

>Hollywood movie about Hollywood
>Original idea
Lmao. This shit is stale af

You want to fight me, bitch?

what's the movie about? You seem well informed .

throw down, brah! you ain't got shit!

Added to which it revolves around Mason and Sharon Tate. I don't understand why people find him so fascinating.

I hope it flops. Tarantino deserve only flops.

haha you fucking moron. you clearly know nothing about russian culture if you think that.

What are you 100 pounds soaking wet? Have you ever been in a fight?

he's a great film maker

ikr? what a douche

Tarantino is an overrated hack.

Still, soar over that whole election thing? I get it. It's ok to be wrong and losers

Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill Vol 1 and 2, Jackie Brown
>you must be a JJ fan huh

Attached: 1562221682887.jpg (732x732, 148K)

It succeeded at Cannes Parasite beat its shit out tho, it's a sure bet now, high numbers on rt and mc.

Lmao Quentshit Taranshito stole others ideas for every single one of those movies. NOT ONE ORIGINAL IDEA COMES FROM HIM. Hes a Hack and a fraud and his movies are dishonest.

FLOP
>FLOP
FLOP
>FLOP

what is your opinion on Lanthimos?

No, but I don't trust Hollywood either to deliver accurate propaganda about Russia when we've been in a Cold War with them for over 60 years, and especially with Trump Derangement Syndrome going around.

>You can practically imagine QT telling us, “You think I liked feet before? Every lithe hippie girl from here to San Diego is going to prop up their little piggies on every dashboard and theater seat I throw in the foreground, and they’re gonna be filthy. And you’re going to like it.”

>Tarantino’s foot fetish has gone from somewhat eccentric to straight up weird and if you’re not a foot person, this probably won’t be your movie. Fetishes aside, it’d be somewhat forgivable if there was more to Robbie’s screen time beyond “check out how incredible she looks!”

KINO

Settled then.

>el farto gets to create his obvious ass kiss to hollywood but then end it with the brutal, gruesome violence of the manson murders
Fucking hack

never heard of her

This

Fucking hack who cant help but imitate kubrick at every given opportunity

Hateful 8 was 75% dialogue. I expected Tarantino to do pretty much the same with this. The one thing Tarantino does better than most Hollywood directors these days, is make a kino dialogue-based movie. Look at the beginning of Inglourious Bastards. The milk scene was top tier shit

you start

I'm unlikely to go to the movie theatre because I can have all the movies I want a mere month after they are released for free.

Attached: bread.png (220x220, 1K)

So it's a Tarantino movie without the whole comic cartoon violence?

Because if so yeah then it's gonna flop.

Pretty much. I still want him to make Kill Bill Vol 3. These brain dead idiots will go to see that at least

This movie should have come out 10 years ago. No one cares about the 60s anymore, and this movie just looks too quaint and uneventful in this era of billion dollar capeshits.

>The two biggest actors of their generation
Brad? are you on meds?

Are you retarded?

Looks like someone got LYNCHED

>Dicaprio
>Pitt

when will they fuck off with these meme actors

>reddi newfag

Is this film just Hollywood types congratulating each other on how rich and successful they are?

Cringe

Tarantino is losing popularity because he's starting to lose his juvenile edge that made him popular in the first place.

The reason why his movies got popular wasn't because of the dialogue only, it was because they had this sort of edgy and badass tone with lots of violence. He felt like one of those graphic novel writers who made violent comic books, only he was making movies instead.

With this movie he's trying to do something different and more adult; but this means he's losing touch with the younger audience. He's making "old man movies" now.

Attached: 1430464415087.jpg (395x734, 65K)

because it was shit

I didn't understand the point of this movie. Felt like a bunch of random ideas and scenes cobbled together.

Wasn't that because it came out right before The Force Awakens?

Django Unchained only shares a name with the other Django. They have nothing in common.

Jackie Brown is an Elmore Leonard novel, but it's not a retread.

Tarantino movies were graphic and violent, but they had a point. Gangster movies at the time were far too quick and clinical and convenient when it came to violence. Guy gets shot, guy goes down clutching wound that conceals most of the blood, we never see him again. Tarantino's inspiration was: If these gangsters existed in real life, the fallout from these kind of shootouts would be horrific. You would have guys half dead and half alive with body parts hanging off them dragging themselves into cars and then screaming for the next two days while their inept friends try to find them a doctor. So, I'm going to show it.

This offbeat style was what made his films so original. Take Pulp Fiction. Most gangster movies would show a character like Marcellus Wallace summoning two hitmen to his office and saying "Bring me back my briefcase and kill the punks who stole it." Then, we would cut to a shootout / car chase / action beat. Tarantino thought: Well, if these guys really existed, there would have to have been like a twenty minute car ride where the hitmen were on route to whack their targets. What kinds of things would they talk about? How would they select their weapons and talk about how specifically they were going to kill who? I'm going to show this.

The offbeat style continues to be influential to this day. To single a show out, look at Breaking Bad. The reason the show was so original and relatable was that it showed the minutiae, the nitty gritty, of running a meth empire. Things like going down Home Depot for a plastic barrel to acid melt a corpse in, having to check the label to see if is made of the right kind of PFTE, and check if you can actually get a body into it and close the lid.

Attached: 1556729924338.jpg (960x960, 86K)

I hope it does. Tarantino's dialogue is retarded if you aren't a teenager and he's a hack that can only mash together ideas from different movies he's recently seen.

It's what target demographic audiences have been trained to gobble up, because Disney, 3D cartoons and capeshit is almost the only thing in supply, with an army of marketing teams and youtube influencers grooming them for years in the name of merc. Don't worry though, this is temporary. Just as with any fad, it's going to come to an end, and we'll see a return of "normal" movies in theaters until the next fad gains ground.

>popularity
Who fucking cares.
Pulp Fiction posers and Jackie Brown contrarians can go eat a railroad spike, both Inglourious Basterds and The Hateful Eight are his best works to date, so there's been no decline as far as I'm concerned, though Django is definitely his worst.

>Literally every major movie producer is.
prove it

Love his new work but the phrase "pulp fiction contrarians"? Pulp Fiction is so beloved that it's critical reputation suffers. It's arguably his best but is objectively his biggest and most important film. When it stops being a rite of passage for adolescent boys it will start being rehabilitated as an unbelievable masterpiece.

It's gonna bomb hard.

Scorsese and Tarantino are capeshit now.

Attached: ryMRsfK.png (601x737, 336K)

All modern Hollywood movies deserve to flop.

>Who fucking cares.

People who want to keep making movies?

They cost money.

>both Inglourious Basterds and The Hateful Eight are his best works to date
i agree about hateful but inglorious is nothing special

Anyone else cant open images?

>moving the goal posts this much
classic blue check nigger

Check again. Inglorious Bastards is incredible.

> anyone but burgers care about this shit
Wew

Why? Who cares if a movie does or doesn't make money? Unless you have financial ties to it, it really doesn't affect you. Just watch the dumb movie and enjoy it.

No, the Jackie Brown people tend to be the contrarians (though It is one of his best). I say Pulp Fiction posers because majority of people dismiss his later work based solely on Pulp's right time at the right place in history. It's akin to the Batman 89 people refusing to judge The Dark Knight on its own merits because Prince had a song and because Jack Nicholson "was the bomb".
Though I won't dispute its importance and influence in the 90s, Pulp Fiction isn't his best work and is arguably no longer a benchmark for adolescent boys, hasn't been really since the death of the video rental shop.

was for me thought I was banned again I just browsed some other boards for a minute or two and its working again try Yea Forums first

I can't. I figured the thread had been deleted but it's still active. Some Yea Forums issue.

Coen brothers are better anyway.

I like Jackie Brown a lot and it is his least-discussed picture but yes.

I think Reservoir Dogs and Kill Bill are his weakest outings, but they're both very inspired. I'm 24 now so it's possible that today's kiddos are not watching Pulp.

>A take that directed at the Jewish revenge porn that has permeated Hollywood since WW2 that won't let the ghosts of German privates sleep ever, shouted in broad daylight without consequence
>nothing special

It's one of the ballsiest and cutting satires since Starship Troopers, though I suppose it flew over most people's heads.

There is not a trope I hate more than "meta hollywood" or "meta acting". Hate that shit. Fucking famous people masturbating each other because it's so hard being a millionaire actor.

>not capeshit
Of course it will flop

movies can go wrong in a billion ways, just because you have these precpnditions, it means jack shit for the movies quality